Back to Events

CSP — Compak Sporting

Compak Sporting at Eaton Hall Shooting Ground

Eaton Hall Shooting Ground

Friday, 30 January 2026 · CPSA Results →

Weather loading...

Event Rating

Latest Visitor Reviews

No written reviews yet.

Entries

86.8%

Field Average

98.0%

Highest Score

53.0%

Lowest Score

Top 3 Overall

🥈 =2

Samuel Ward

Stuart Lodge

97/100

97.00%

🥇

Chris Childerhouse

98/100

98.00%

Event Difficulty

86.8% This Event

vs. Eaton Hall Shooting Ground historical average (Compak Sporting)

↑ +0.6% easier than usual

Ground avg: 86.2%

Class Winners

A 13 entered

98/100 — 98.00%

Chris Childerhouse

2=: Samuel Ward — 97.00%

B 12 entered

96/100 — 96.00%

Maxwell Drelincourt

2: Martin Walmsley — 95.00%

C 15 entered

95/100 — 95.00%

Finley Jacques

2: Tom Clifford — 92.00%

D 12 entered

87/100 — 87.00%

Jonathan Dennis

2: David Smith — 85.00%

Other 3 entered

95/100 — 95.00%

Archie Gale(tied) Mike Cashmore(tied)

3: Nigel Lane — 92.00%

Field Shape

86.8%

Field avg

Compak Sporting at Eaton Hall Shooting Ground had a 45.0 point scoring spread across 55 entries.

Spread 45.0 pts

Front 98.0%

Largest class C

A compact read of how the field performed: average, spread and where most shooters sat.

Score Distribution

90–100%

29 52.7%

80–89%

14 25.5%

70–79%

10 18.2%

60–69%

1 1.8%

50–59%

1 1.8%

<50%

0 0.0%

Field Achievement

% of competitors reaching each score threshold

90%+

52.7%

29 / 55

80%+

78.2%

43 / 55

70%+

96.4%

53 / 55

60%+

98.2%

54 / 55

50%+

100.0%

55 / 55

Unlock the full event analysis

Register free for historical ground trends, class averages and spread, score charts, class composition and a detailed classification breakdown.

Historical Trends at Eaton Hall Shooting Ground

Compak Sporting performance across events held at this ground.

Last 12 months

Overall Average Trend

Classification Trend Comparison

Classification Deep Dive

4 active classifications

—

Member insight

Typical —

Best —

Lowest —

Middle 50% score range

vs Ground Avg (12m)—

—

Member insight

Typical —

Best —

Lowest —

Middle 50% score range

vs Ground Avg (12m)—

—

Member insight

Typical —

Best —

Lowest —

Middle 50% score range

vs Ground Avg (12m)—

—

Member insight

Typical —

Best —

Lowest —

Middle 50% score range

vs Ground Avg (12m)—

Event Performance Analysis

Registered insight

Average by Class

Class averages make it easier to see where the event played hardest across the field.

Field Spread by Class

84.0-98.0%

86.0-96.0%

76.0-95.0%

53.0-87.0%

Other

92.0-95.0%

Boxes show the middle 50% of each class. Orange line is the median.

Top 10 Score Lollipop

A quick visual read of how far the front of the field separated itself.

Score Histogram

High gun: 98.0%. The high-gun band is outlined.

Class Breakdown

Rotate your device to see High/Low scores and the class winner

Class	Count	Average	High	Low	Winner
A	13	93.8%	98.0%	84.0%	Chris Childerhouse
B	12	91.2%	96.0%	86.0%	Maxwell Drelincourt
C	15	84.4%	95.0%	76.0%	Finley Jacques
D	12	76.2%	87.0%	53.0%	Jonathan Dennis
Other	3	94.0%	95.0%	92.0%	Archie Gale

Class Composition

13 23.6%

12 21.8%

15 27.3%

12 21.8%

Other

3 5.5%

Largest class: C — 15 competitors (27.3%)

Full Results — 55 entries

🔒 The Class Rank and vs Class Avg columns are hidden — register free to unlock both insights.

Class A

Score 98/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class A

Score 97/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class A

Score 97/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 96/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class A

Score 96/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class A

Score 96/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class Unknown

Score 95/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class A

Score 95/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class C

Score 95/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 95/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class A

Score 95/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class Unknown

Score 95/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class A

Score 95/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 94/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 94/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 93/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 93/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class Unknown

Score 92/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class A

Score 92/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class C

Score 92/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class A

Score 92/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class A

Score 91/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 91/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class A

Score 91/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class C

Score 90/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 90/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class C

Score 90/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class C

Score 90/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class C

Score 90/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 88/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 87/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class D

Score 87/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 87/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 86/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class D

Score 85/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class A

Score 84/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class C

Score 84/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class C

Score 84/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class D

Score 83/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class D

Score 83/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class C

Score 82/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class C

Score 81/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class C

Score 80/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class D

Score 79/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class D

Score 79/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class D

Score 78/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class C

Score 78/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class C

Score 77/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class D

Score 77/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class C

Score 77/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class C

Score 76/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class D

Score 74/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class D

Score 74/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class D

Score 62/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class D

Score 53/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

#	Name	Class	Score	Score %	Class Rank 🔒	vs Class Avg
1	Chris Childerhouse	A	98/100	98.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
2=	Samuel Ward	A	97/100	97.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
2=	Stuart Lodge	A	97/100	97.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
4=	Maxwell Drelincourt	B	96/100	96.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
4=	Paul Foster	A	96/100	96.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
4=	Timothy Simmons	A	96/100	96.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
7=	Archie Gale	Unknown	95/100	95.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
7=	Damian King	A	95/100	95.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
7=	Finley Jacques	C	95/100	95.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
7=	Martin Walmsley	B	95/100	95.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
7=	Matthew Armett	A	95/100	95.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
7=	Mike Cashmore	Unknown	95/100	95.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
7=	Ross Holmes	A	95/100	95.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
14=	Phil Rowbottom	B	94/100	94.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
14=	Troy Thornell	B	94/100	94.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
16=	Neil Hastilow	B	93/100	93.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
16=	Toni Dixon	B	93/100	93.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
18=	Nigel Lane	Unknown	92/100	92.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
18=	Stewart Owen	A	92/100	92.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
18=	Tom Clifford	C	92/100	92.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
18=	Tom Miller	A	92/100	92.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
22=	David Kempley	A	91/100	91.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
22=	Guy Robinson	B	91/100	91.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
22=	Mark Byng	A	91/100	91.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
25=	Andrew Heron	C	90/100	90.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
25=	Guy Watson	B	90/100	90.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
25=	Peter Cantrill	C	90/100	90.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
25=	Roger Grimshaw	C	90/100	90.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
25=	Sam Hargreaves	C	90/100	90.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
30	Andrew Jones	B	88/100	88.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
31=	Emma Lowrison	B	87/100	87.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
31=	Jonathan Dennis	D	87/100	87.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
31=	Rachel Carrie	B	87/100	87.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
34	Paul Cockle	B	86/100	86.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
35	David Smith	D	85/100	85.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
36=	Anthony Dean	A	84/100	84.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
36=	Kyle Garner	C	84/100	84.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
36=	Mark Colclough	C	84/100	84.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
39=	Dale Cross	D	83/100	83.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
39=	Mark Dale	D	83/100	83.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
41	Zac Jacques	C	82/100	82.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
42	Keith Roe	C	81/100	81.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
43	Brian Eccles	C	80/100	80.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
44=	Andrew Hales	D	79/100	79.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
44=	John Rogers	D	79/100	79.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
46=	Derek Matthews	D	78/100	78.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
46=	Nick Woodward	C	78/100	78.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
48=	Bill Bristow	C	77/100	77.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
48=	Paul Hodson	D	77/100	77.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
48=	Robert Scurr	C	77/100	77.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
51	William Pennington	C	76/100	76.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
52=	Kevin Miller	D	74/100	74.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
52=	Paul Sanders	D	74/100	74.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
54	Brian Prescott	D	62/100	62.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
55	Jason Hallam	D	53/100	53.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%

Other CSP Events at Eaton Hall Shooting Ground

⚙ Performance Stats DRAG TO MOVE

0.031s ● FAST

DB 42% · Py 38% · Render 20%

12 queries · avg 1.1ms · max 1.8ms

Render Breakdown

DB Logic (Pre-Render) 0.0132s

Python Logic (Pre-Render) 0.0117s

Full Page Render 0.0064s

QUERY TABLES ▾

⚠ event_review 4× 0.004s

shoot_event 2× 0.003s

shoot_score 2× 0.003s

site_configuration 2× 0.002s

ground 1× 0.001s

admin_menu_item 1× 0.001s

⚠ = queried 3+ times (cache candidate)

SQL QUERIES (12) — click to expand

#1 [00:03:57.749] 1.8ms

shoot_event

SELECT shoot_event.id AS shoot_event_id, shoot_event.cpsa_fixture_id AS shoot_event_cpsa_fixture_id, shoot_event.name AS shoot_event_name, shoot_event.date AS shoot_event_date, shoot_event.discipline AS shoot_event_discipline, shoot_event.ground AS shoot_event_ground, shoot_event.url AS shoot_event_…

#2 [00:03:57.751] 1.5ms

shoot_score

SELECT shoot_score.id AS shoot_score_id, shoot_score.targets AS shoot_score_targets, shoot_score.hits AS shoot_score_hits, shoot_score.points AS shoot_score_points, shoot_score.percentage AS shoot_score_percentage, shoot_score.shooter_id AS shoot_score_shooter_id, shoot_score.event_id AS shoot_score…

#3 [00:03:57.755] 1.6ms

shoot_score

SELECT avg(shoot_score.percentage) AS avg_1 
FROM shoot_score JOIN shoot_event ON shoot_score.event_id = shoot_event.id 
WHERE shoot_event.ground = %(ground_1)s AND shoot_event.discipline = %(discipline_1)s AND shoot_event.is_scraped = true AND shoot_event.admin_hidden != true AND shoot_event.id != …

#4 [00:03:57.757] 1.1ms

shoot_event

SELECT shoot_event.id AS shoot_event_id, shoot_event.cpsa_fixture_id AS shoot_event_cpsa_fixture_id, shoot_event.name AS shoot_event_name, shoot_event.date AS shoot_event_date, shoot_event.discipline AS shoot_event_discipline, shoot_event.ground AS shoot_event_ground, shoot_event.url AS shoot_event_…

#5 [00:03:57.759] 1.0ms

event_review

SELECT avg(event_review.rating) AS avg_1, count(event_review.id) AS count_1 
FROM event_review 
WHERE event_review.event_id = %(event_id_1)s

#6 [00:03:57.760] 0.9ms

event_review

SELECT count(*) AS count_1 
FROM (SELECT event_review.id AS event_review_id, event_review.event_id AS event_review_event_id, event_review.rating AS event_review_rating, event_review.review_text AS event_review_review_text, event_review.reviewer_name AS event_review_reviewer_name, event_review.review…

#7 [00:03:57.762] 0.9ms

event_review

SELECT event_review.id AS event_review_id, event_review.event_id AS event_review_event_id, event_review.rating AS event_review_rating, event_review.review_text AS event_review_review_text, event_review.reviewer_name AS event_review_reviewer_name, event_review.reviewer_hash AS event_review_reviewer_h…

#8 [00:03:57.763] 0.9ms

event_review

SELECT event_review.id AS event_review_id, event_review.event_id AS event_review_event_id, event_review.rating AS event_review_rating, event_review.review_text AS event_review_review_text, event_review.reviewer_name AS event_review_reviewer_name, event_review.reviewer_hash AS event_review_reviewer_h…

#9 [00:03:57.765] 0.9ms

ground

SELECT ground.id AS ground_id, ground.name AS ground_name, ground.url AS ground_url, ground.postcode AS ground_postcode, ground.what3words AS ground_what3words, ground.email AS ground_email, ground.website AS ground_website, ground.num_events_cpsa AS ground_num_events_cpsa, ground.num_events_cpsa_la…

#10 [00:03:57.766] 0.9ms

site_configuration

SELECT site_configuration.id AS site_configuration_id, site_configuration.key AS site_configuration_key, site_configuration.value AS site_configuration_value 
FROM site_configuration 
WHERE site_configuration.key LIKE %(key_1)s OR site_configuration.key LIKE %(key_2)s

#11 [00:03:57.768] 0.9ms

site_configuration

SELECT site_configuration.id AS site_configuration_id, site_configuration.key AS site_configuration_key, site_configuration.value AS site_configuration_value 
FROM site_configuration 
WHERE site_configuration.key IN (%(key_1_1)s, %(key_1_2)s, %(key_1_3)s, %(key_1_4)s)

#12 [00:03:57.769] 0.9ms

admin_menu_item

SELECT DISTINCT admin_menu_item.active_tab AS admin_menu_item_active_tab 
FROM admin_menu_item

LIVE REQUESTS (0) — click to expand

Compak Sporting at Eaton Hall Shooting Ground

Unlock the full event analysis

Historical Trends at Eaton Hall Shooting Ground

Classification Deep Dive

Event Performance Analysis

Analyzing Data...

Refresh Complete

Already Up to Date?

Analyzing Data...

Refresh Complete

Already Up to Date?