Back to Events
CSP — Compak Sporting

Compak Sporting at High Lodge Leisure Ltd

High Lodge Leisure Ltd
Saturday, 08 November 2025  ·  CPSA Results →
Weather loading...
Event Rating
Rate
Select a star to rate or review this event
Latest Visitor Reviews
No written reviews yet.
61
Entries
80.6%
Field Average
97.0%
Highest Score
37.0%
Lowest Score
Top 3 Overall
🥈
Stuart Lodge
A
95/100
95.00%
🥇
Jordan Sayer
B
97/100
97.00%
🥉 =3
Matt Watling
B
Philip Thorrold
B
94/100
94.00%
Event Difficulty
80.6% This Event
vs. High Lodge Leisure Ltd historical average (Compak Sporting)
↓ -0.6% harder than usual
Ground avg: 81.2%
Class Winners
A 4 entered
95/100 — 95.00%
Stuart Lodge
2: Mark Bowes — 93.00%
B 20 entered
97/100 — 97.00%
Jordan Sayer
2=: Matt Watling — 94.00%
C 15 entered
90/100 — 90.00%
Christopher Willis
2=: Brian Jackson — 88.00%
D 20 entered
85/100 — 85.00%
Andrew Stackwood
2: Thomas Massey — 84.00%
Other 2 entered
86/100 — 86.00%
Bradley Jarvis
2: Jack Anderson — 81.00%
Field Shape
80.6%
Field avg
Compak Sporting at High Lodge Leisure Ltd had a 60.0 point scoring spread across 61 entries.
Spread 60.0 pts
Front 97.0%
Largest class B
A compact read of how the field performed: average, spread and where most shooters sat.
Score Distribution
90–100%
10 16.4%
80–89%
29 47.5%
70–79%
12 19.7%
60–69%
9 14.8%
50–59%
0 0.0%
<50%
1 1.6%
Field Achievement
% of competitors reaching each score threshold
90%+
16.4%
10 / 61
80%+
63.9%
39 / 61
70%+
83.6%
51 / 61
60%+
98.4%
60 / 61
50%+
98.4%
60 / 61

Unlock the full event analysis

Register free for historical ground trends, class averages and spread, score charts, class composition and a detailed classification breakdown.

Register free Log in
Full Results — 61 entries
🔒 The Class Rank and vs Class Avg columns are hidden — register free to unlock both insights.
Class B
Score 97/100
vs Class Avg +0.0%
Profile Open →
Class A
Score 95/100
vs Class Avg +0.0%
Profile Open →
Class B
Score 94/100
vs Class Avg +0.0%
Profile Open →
Class B
Score 94/100
vs Class Avg +0.0%
Profile Open →
Class A
Score 93/100
vs Class Avg +0.0%
Profile Open →
Class A
Score 92/100
vs Class Avg +0.0%
Profile Open →
Class B
Score 92/100
vs Class Avg +0.0%
Profile Open →
Class B
Score 92/100
vs Class Avg +0.0%
Profile Open →
Class C
Score 90/100
vs Class Avg +0.0%
Profile Open →
Class B
Score 90/100
vs Class Avg +0.0%
Profile Open →
Class C
Score 88/100
vs Class Avg +0.0%
Profile Open →
Class C
Score 88/100
vs Class Avg +0.0%
Profile Open →
Class C
Score 88/100
vs Class Avg +0.0%
Profile Open →
Class B
Score 87/100
vs Class Avg +0.0%
Profile Open →
Class A
Score 87/100
vs Class Avg +0.0%
Profile Open →
Class C
Score 86/100
vs Class Avg +0.0%
Profile Open →
Class Unknown
Score 86/100
vs Class Avg +0.0%
Profile Open →
Class B
Score 86/100
vs Class Avg +0.0%
Profile Open →
Class B
Score 86/100
vs Class Avg +0.0%
Profile Open →
Class C
Score 86/100
vs Class Avg +0.0%
Profile Open →
Class B
Score 86/100
vs Class Avg +0.0%
Profile Open →
Class B
Score 86/100
vs Class Avg +0.0%
Profile Open →
Class D
Score 85/100
vs Class Avg +0.0%
Profile Open →
Class B
Score 85/100
vs Class Avg +0.0%
Profile Open →
Class B
Score 85/100
vs Class Avg +0.0%
Profile Open →
Class C
Score 84/100
vs Class Avg +0.0%
Profile Open →
Class B
Score 84/100
vs Class Avg +0.0%
Profile Open →
Class B
Score 84/100
vs Class Avg +0.0%
Profile Open →
Class C
Score 84/100
vs Class Avg +0.0%
Profile Open →
Class D
Score 84/100
vs Class Avg +0.0%
Profile Open →
Class C
Score 83/100
vs Class Avg +0.0%
Profile Open →
Class B
Score 83/100
vs Class Avg +0.0%
Profile Open →
Class B
Score 83/100
vs Class Avg +0.0%
Profile Open →
Class B
Score 82/100
vs Class Avg +0.0%
Profile Open →
Class Unknown
Score 81/100
vs Class Avg +0.0%
Profile Open →
Class B
Score 81/100
vs Class Avg +0.0%
Profile Open →
Class C
Score 81/100
vs Class Avg +0.0%
Profile Open →
Class C
Score 80/100
vs Class Avg +0.0%
Profile Open →
Class D
Score 80/100
vs Class Avg +0.0%
Profile Open →
Class C
Score 79/100
vs Class Avg +0.0%
Profile Open →
Class B
Score 78/100
vs Class Avg +0.0%
Profile Open →
Class C
Score 77/100
vs Class Avg +0.0%
Profile Open →
Class D
Score 77/100
vs Class Avg +0.0%
Profile Open →
Class D
Score 77/100
vs Class Avg +0.0%
Profile Open →
Class D
Score 77/100
vs Class Avg +0.0%
Profile Open →
Class D
Score 76/100
vs Class Avg +0.0%
Profile Open →
Class D
Score 76/100
vs Class Avg +0.0%
Profile Open →
Class D
Score 76/100
vs Class Avg +0.0%
Profile Open →
Class C
Score 75/100
vs Class Avg +0.0%
Profile Open →
Class D
Score 73/100
vs Class Avg +0.0%
Profile Open →
Class D
Score 71/100
vs Class Avg +0.0%
Profile Open →
Class D
Score 69/100
vs Class Avg +0.0%
Profile Open →
Class C
Score 67/100
vs Class Avg +0.0%
Profile Open →
Class D
Score 67/100
vs Class Avg +0.0%
Profile Open →
Class D
Score 67/100
vs Class Avg +0.0%
Profile Open →
Class D
Score 66/100
vs Class Avg +0.0%
Profile Open →
Class D
Score 65/100
vs Class Avg +0.0%
Profile Open →
Class D
Score 64/100
vs Class Avg +0.0%
Profile Open →
Class D
Score 63/100
vs Class Avg +0.0%
Profile Open →
Class D
Score 61/100
vs Class Avg +0.0%
Profile Open →
Class D
Score 37/100
vs Class Avg +0.0%
Profile Open →
# Name Class Score Score % Class Rank 🔒 vs Class Avg
1 Jordan Sayer B 97/100 97.00% 🔒 1 🔒 +0.0%
2 Stuart Lodge A 95/100 95.00% 🔒 1 🔒 +0.0%
3= Matt Watling B 94/100 94.00% 🔒 1 🔒 +0.0%
3= Philip Thorrold B 94/100 94.00% 🔒 1 🔒 +0.0%
5 Mark Bowes A 93/100 93.00% 🔒 1 🔒 +0.0%
6= Andrew Jude A 92/100 92.00% 🔒 1 🔒 +0.0%
6= Clive Scase B 92/100 92.00% 🔒 1 🔒 +0.0%
6= Peter Mayhew B 92/100 92.00% 🔒 1 🔒 +0.0%
9= Christopher Willis C 90/100 90.00% 🔒 1 🔒 +0.0%
9= Darren Neale B 90/100 90.00% 🔒 1 🔒 +0.0%
11= Brian Jackson C 88/100 88.00% 🔒 1 🔒 +0.0%
11= Daniel Meggison C 88/100 88.00% 🔒 1 🔒 +0.0%
11= Eric Chapman C 88/100 88.00% 🔒 1 🔒 +0.0%
14= Tim Sayer B 87/100 87.00% 🔒 1 🔒 +0.0%
14= William Page A 87/100 87.00% 🔒 1 🔒 +0.0%
16= Bradley Jarvis C 86/100 86.00% 🔒 1 🔒 +0.0%
16= Bradley Jarvis Unknown 86/100 86.00% 🔒 1 🔒 +0.0%
16= Dan Frost B 86/100 86.00% 🔒 1 🔒 +0.0%
16= Ian Schwier B 86/100 86.00% 🔒 1 🔒 +0.0%
16= Jamie Ponder C 86/100 86.00% 🔒 1 🔒 +0.0%
16= Jonathan Buckenham B 86/100 86.00% 🔒 1 🔒 +0.0%
16= Wayne Parker B 86/100 86.00% 🔒 1 🔒 +0.0%
23= Andrew Stackwood D 85/100 85.00% 🔒 1 🔒 +0.0%
23= Clint Brumbley B 85/100 85.00% 🔒 1 🔒 +0.0%
23= Pauline Chapman B 85/100 85.00% 🔒 1 🔒 +0.0%
26= Alex Higgs C 84/100 84.00% 🔒 1 🔒 +0.0%
26= Dean Porter B 84/100 84.00% 🔒 1 🔒 +0.0%
26= Michael Payne B 84/100 84.00% 🔒 1 🔒 +0.0%
26= Paul Owen C 84/100 84.00% 🔒 1 🔒 +0.0%
26= Thomas Massey D 84/100 84.00% 🔒 1 🔒 +0.0%
31= Colin Fowler C 83/100 83.00% 🔒 1 🔒 +0.0%
31= David Pointer B 83/100 83.00% 🔒 1 🔒 +0.0%
31= Sean Crutchfield B 83/100 83.00% 🔒 1 🔒 +0.0%
34 Robert Humphreys B 82/100 82.00% 🔒 1 🔒 +0.0%
35= Jack Anderson Unknown 81/100 81.00% 🔒 1 🔒 +0.0%
35= James Abbott B 81/100 81.00% 🔒 1 🔒 +0.0%
35= James Hubert C 81/100 81.00% 🔒 1 🔒 +0.0%
38= Michael Murphy C 80/100 80.00% 🔒 1 🔒 +0.0%
38= Mitchell Lee D 80/100 80.00% 🔒 1 🔒 +0.0%
40 Peter Smith C 79/100 79.00% 🔒 1 🔒 +0.0%
41 Alan Coy B 78/100 78.00% 🔒 1 🔒 +0.0%
42= Chris Colby C 77/100 77.00% 🔒 1 🔒 +0.0%
42= Chris Troughton D 77/100 77.00% 🔒 1 🔒 +0.0%
42= Ricardo Sloley D 77/100 77.00% 🔒 1 🔒 +0.0%
42= Simon Owen D 77/100 77.00% 🔒 1 🔒 +0.0%
46= Dale Mills D 76/100 76.00% 🔒 1 🔒 +0.0%
46= David French D 76/100 76.00% 🔒 1 🔒 +0.0%
46= Mark Bush D 76/100 76.00% 🔒 1 🔒 +0.0%
49 John Mitchell C 75/100 75.00% 🔒 1 🔒 +0.0%
50 Tina Henshaw D 73/100 73.00% 🔒 1 🔒 +0.0%
51 David Newland D 71/100 71.00% 🔒 1 🔒 +0.0%
52 Frank Birch D 69/100 69.00% 🔒 1 🔒 +0.0%
53= John Sparrow C 67/100 67.00% 🔒 1 🔒 +0.0%
53= Paul Godbold D 67/100 67.00% 🔒 1 🔒 +0.0%
53= Peter Humphreys D 67/100 67.00% 🔒 1 🔒 +0.0%
56 Ben Cleveland D 66/100 66.00% 🔒 1 🔒 +0.0%
57 Clayton Buckenham D 65/100 65.00% 🔒 1 🔒 +0.0%
58 Ian Scott D 64/100 64.00% 🔒 1 🔒 +0.0%
59 Darren Wiles D 63/100 63.00% 🔒 1 🔒 +0.0%
60 Josef Large D 61/100 61.00% 🔒 1 🔒 +0.0%
61 Peter Brueggemann D 37/100 37.00% 🔒 1 🔒 +0.0%
Other CSP Events at High Lodge Leisure Ltd
VER: v0.7
BUILD:
DEPLOYED: 29 Aug 2026 15:58:46