Back to Events

OTR — Olympic Trap

Olympic Trap at National Clay Shooting Centre

National Clay Shooting Centre

Saturday, 03 May 2025 · CPSA Results →

Weather loading...

Event Rating

Latest Visitor Reviews

No written reviews yet.

Entries

79.3%

Field Average

96.8%

Highest Score

52.0%

Lowest Score

Top 3 Overall

🥈

Matthew Coward-Holley

119/125

95.20%

🥇

Nathan Hales

121/125

96.80%

🥉

James Dedman

117/125

93.60%

Event Difficulty

79.3% This Event

vs. National Clay Shooting Centre historical average (Olympic Trap)

↑ +5.4% easier than usual

Ground avg: 73.9%

Class Winners

A 11 entered

121/125 — 96.80%

Nathan Hales

2: Matthew Coward-Holley — 95.20%

B 17 entered

108/125 — 86.40%

Tim Smith

2=: Harry Poolman — 84.80%

C 12 entered

110/125 — 88.00%

Rhys Dixon

2: Liam Crabb — 83.20%

D 7 entered

98/125 — 78.40%

Karl Weaver

2: Abbie Coutanche — 76.00%

Other 1 entered

105/125 — 84.00%

Mackenzie Vandertuin

Field Shape

79.3%

Field avg

Olympic Trap at National Clay Shooting Centre had a 44.8 point scoring spread across 48 entries.

Spread 44.8 pts

Front 96.8%

Largest class B

A compact read of how the field performed: average, spread and where most shooters sat.

Score Distribution

90–100%

5 10.4%

80–89%

21 43.8%

70–79%

14 29.2%

60–69%

5 10.4%

50–59%

3 6.2%

<50%

0 0.0%

Field Achievement

% of competitors reaching each score threshold

90%+

10.4%

5 / 48

80%+

54.2%

26 / 48

70%+

83.3%

40 / 48

60%+

93.8%

45 / 48

50%+

100.0%

48 / 48

Unlock the full event analysis

Register free for historical ground trends, class averages and spread, score charts, class composition and a detailed classification breakdown.

Historical Trends at National Clay Shooting Centre

Olympic Trap performance across events held at this ground.

Last 12 months

Overall Average Trend

Classification Trend Comparison

Classification Deep Dive

4 active classifications

—

Member insight

Typical —

Best —

Lowest —

Middle 50% score range

vs Ground Avg (12m)—

—

Member insight

Typical —

Best —

Lowest —

Middle 50% score range

vs Ground Avg (12m)—

—

Member insight

Typical —

Best —

Lowest —

Middle 50% score range

vs Ground Avg (12m)—

—

Member insight

Typical —

Best —

Lowest —

Middle 50% score range

vs Ground Avg (12m)—

Event Performance Analysis

Registered insight

Average by Class

Class averages make it easier to see where the event played hardest across the field.

Field Spread by Class

68.8-96.8%

73.3-86.7%

61.6-88.0%

52.0-78.4%

Other

84.0-84.0%

Boxes show the middle 50% of each class. Orange line is the median.

Top 10 Score Lollipop

A quick visual read of how far the front of the field separated itself.

Score Histogram

High gun: 96.8%. The high-gun band is outlined.

Class Breakdown

Rotate your device to see High/Low scores and the class winner

Class	Count	Average	High	Low	Winner
A	11	87.7%	96.8%	68.8%	Nathan Hales
B	17	81.0%	86.7%	73.3%	Tim Smith
C	12	77.0%	88.0%	61.6%	Rhys Dixon
D	7	65.3%	78.4%	52.0%	Karl Weaver
Other	1	84.0%	84.0%	84.0%	Mackenzie Vandertuin

Class Composition

11 22.9%

17 35.4%

12 25.0%

7 14.6%

Other

1 2.1%

Largest class: B — 17 competitors (35.4%)

Full Results — 48 entries

🔒 The Class Rank and vs Class Avg columns are hidden — register free to unlock both insights.

Class A

Score 121/125

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class A

Score 119/125

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class A

Score 117/125

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class A

Score 116/125

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class A

Score 114/125

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class A

Score 112/125

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class A

Score 110/125

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class C

Score 110/125

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 108/125

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class A

Score 107/125

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 106/125

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 106/125

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class Unknown

Score 105/125

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class A

Score 105/125

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class C

Score 104/125

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 102/125

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 102/125

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class C

Score 101/125

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class C

Score 101/125

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 101/125

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 100/125

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class C

Score 100/125

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 100/125

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 99/125

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class A

Score 99/125

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 99/125

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class C

Score 99/125

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class D

Score 98/125

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 97/125

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 97/125

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class C

Score 96/125

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class D

Score 95/125

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class C

Score 95/125

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 94/125

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class C

Score 94/125

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class C

Score 93/125

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class A

Score 86/125

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class C

Score 85/125

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class D

Score 85/125

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class D

Score 84/125

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class C

Score 77/125

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class D

Score 74/125

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class D

Score 70/125

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class D

Score 65/125

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 65/75

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 65/75

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 55/75

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 41/50

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

#	Name	Class	Score	Score %	Class Rank 🔒	vs Class Avg
1	Nathan Hales	A	121/125	96.80%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
2	Matthew Coward-Holley	A	119/125	95.20%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
3	James Dedman	A	117/125	93.60%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
4	Steve Scott	A	116/125	92.80%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
5	Thomas Betts	A	114/125	91.20%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
6	Michael Wixey	A	112/125	89.60%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
7=	Lucas Hyde	A	110/125	88.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
7=	Rhys Dixon	C	110/125	88.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
9	Tim Smith	B	108/125	86.40%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
10	Argun Ismet	A	107/125	85.60%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
11=	Harry Poolman	B	106/125	84.80%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
11=	Leah Southall	B	106/125	84.80%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
13=	Mackenzie Vandertuin	Unknown	105/125	84.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
13=	Mark Shaw	A	105/125	84.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
15	Liam Crabb	C	104/125	83.20%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
16=	David Allwood	B	102/125	81.60%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
16=	Paul Jenkins	B	102/125	81.60%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
18=	Francesca Chau	C	101/125	80.80%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
18=	Graham Carter	C	101/125	80.80%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
18=	Ian Mulliner	B	101/125	80.80%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
21=	Charlie Morris	B	100/125	80.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
21=	Elise Dixon	C	100/125	80.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
21=	Joe Turner	B	100/125	80.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
24=	Benjamin Killian	B	99/125	79.20%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
24=	Christopher Dean	A	99/125	79.20%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
24=	Joseph Robbins	B	99/125	79.20%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
24=	Oliver Austin	C	99/125	79.20%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
28	Karl Weaver	D	98/125	78.40%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
29=	Howard Beaumont	B	97/125	77.60%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
29=	Maciej Bilkiewicz	B	97/125	77.60%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
31	Jim Kyriakou	C	96/125	76.80%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
32=	Abbie Coutanche	D	95/125	76.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
32=	Cemal Seziner	C	95/125	76.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
34=	John Lucy	B	94/125	75.20%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
34=	Michael Cooper	C	94/125	75.20%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
36	Paul Culverwell	C	93/125	74.40%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
37	Abbey Ling	A	86/125	68.80%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
38=	Andy Savva	C	85/125	68.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
38=	Anne Phillips	D	85/125	68.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
40	Richard Smith	D	84/125	67.20%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
41	Senol Tas	C	77/125	61.60%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
42	Julian Owens	D	74/125	59.20%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
43	Peter Lunn	D	70/125	56.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
44=	Anastasia Mascali	D	65/125	52.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
44=	Bayram Baysal	B	65/75	86.67%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
44=	Finley Bowles	B	65/75	86.67%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
47	Tegan Hart	B	55/75	73.33%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
48	Hollie Lumsden	B	41/50	82.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%

Other OTR Events at National Clay Shooting Centre

⚙ Performance Stats DRAG TO MOVE

0.053s ● FAST

DB 65% · Py 24% · Render 12%

12 queries · avg 2.8ms · max 22.5ms

Render Breakdown

DB Logic (Pre-Render) 0.0341s

Python Logic (Pre-Render) 0.0123s

Full Page Render 0.0060s

QUERY TABLES ▾

⚠ event_review 4× 0.004s

shoot_event 2× 0.024s

shoot_score 2× 0.003s

site_configuration 2× 0.002s

ground 1× 0.001s

admin_menu_item 1× 0.001s

⚠ = queried 3+ times (cache candidate)

SQL QUERIES (12) — click to expand

#1 [04:25:36.018] 1.8ms

shoot_event

SELECT shoot_event.id AS shoot_event_id, shoot_event.cpsa_fixture_id AS shoot_event_cpsa_fixture_id, shoot_event.name AS shoot_event_name, shoot_event.date AS shoot_event_date, shoot_event.discipline AS shoot_event_discipline, shoot_event.ground AS shoot_event_ground, shoot_event.url AS shoot_event_…

#2 [04:25:36.020] 1.4ms

shoot_score

SELECT shoot_score.id AS shoot_score_id, shoot_score.targets AS shoot_score_targets, shoot_score.hits AS shoot_score_hits, shoot_score.points AS shoot_score_points, shoot_score.percentage AS shoot_score_percentage, shoot_score.shooter_id AS shoot_score_shooter_id, shoot_score.event_id AS shoot_score…

#3 [04:25:36.024] 1.3ms

shoot_score

SELECT avg(shoot_score.percentage) AS avg_1 
FROM shoot_score JOIN shoot_event ON shoot_score.event_id = shoot_event.id 
WHERE shoot_event.ground = %(ground_1)s AND shoot_event.discipline = %(discipline_1)s AND shoot_event.is_scraped = true AND shoot_event.admin_hidden != true AND shoot_event.id != …

#4 [04:25:36.047] 22.5ms

shoot_event

SELECT shoot_event.id AS shoot_event_id, shoot_event.cpsa_fixture_id AS shoot_event_cpsa_fixture_id, shoot_event.name AS shoot_event_name, shoot_event.date AS shoot_event_date, shoot_event.discipline AS shoot_event_discipline, shoot_event.ground AS shoot_event_ground, shoot_event.url AS shoot_event_…

#5 [04:25:36.050] 1.1ms

event_review

SELECT avg(event_review.rating) AS avg_1, count(event_review.id) AS count_1 
FROM event_review 
WHERE event_review.event_id = %(event_id_1)s

#6 [04:25:36.052] 0.9ms

event_review

SELECT count(*) AS count_1 
FROM (SELECT event_review.id AS event_review_id, event_review.event_id AS event_review_event_id, event_review.rating AS event_review_rating, event_review.review_text AS event_review_review_text, event_review.reviewer_name AS event_review_reviewer_name, event_review.review…

#7 [04:25:36.053] 0.9ms

event_review

SELECT event_review.id AS event_review_id, event_review.event_id AS event_review_event_id, event_review.rating AS event_review_rating, event_review.review_text AS event_review_review_text, event_review.reviewer_name AS event_review_reviewer_name, event_review.reviewer_hash AS event_review_reviewer_h…

#8 [04:25:36.055] 1.0ms

event_review

SELECT event_review.id AS event_review_id, event_review.event_id AS event_review_event_id, event_review.rating AS event_review_rating, event_review.review_text AS event_review_review_text, event_review.reviewer_name AS event_review_reviewer_name, event_review.reviewer_hash AS event_review_reviewer_h…

#9 [04:25:36.056] 0.9ms

ground

SELECT ground.id AS ground_id, ground.name AS ground_name, ground.url AS ground_url, ground.postcode AS ground_postcode, ground.what3words AS ground_what3words, ground.email AS ground_email, ground.website AS ground_website, ground.num_events_cpsa AS ground_num_events_cpsa, ground.num_events_cpsa_la…

#10 [04:25:36.057] 0.8ms

site_configuration

SELECT site_configuration.id AS site_configuration_id, site_configuration.key AS site_configuration_key, site_configuration.value AS site_configuration_value 
FROM site_configuration 
WHERE site_configuration.key LIKE %(key_1)s OR site_configuration.key LIKE %(key_2)s

#11 [04:25:36.059] 0.8ms

site_configuration

SELECT site_configuration.id AS site_configuration_id, site_configuration.key AS site_configuration_key, site_configuration.value AS site_configuration_value 
FROM site_configuration 
WHERE site_configuration.key IN (%(key_1_1)s, %(key_1_2)s, %(key_1_3)s, %(key_1_4)s)

#12 [04:25:36.060] 0.8ms

admin_menu_item

SELECT DISTINCT admin_menu_item.active_tab AS admin_menu_item_active_tab 
FROM admin_menu_item

LIVE REQUESTS (0) — click to expand

Olympic Trap at National Clay Shooting Centre

Unlock the full event analysis

Historical Trends at National Clay Shooting Centre

Classification Deep Dive

Event Performance Analysis

Analyzing Data...

Refresh Complete

Already Up to Date?

Analyzing Data...

Refresh Complete

Already Up to Date?