Back to Events

DTL — Down The Line

Down The Line at North Of England C.T.C

North Of England C.T.C

Sunday, 27 April 2025 · CPSA Results →

Weather loading...

Event Rating

Latest Visitor Reviews

No written reviews yet.

Entries

94.9%

Field Average

100.0%

Highest Score

74.7%

Lowest Score

Top 3 Overall

🥈 =2

Ian Douglas

Tom Robinson

299/300

99.67%

🥇

Curtis Woolley

300/300

100.00%

Event Difficulty

94.9% This Event

vs. North Of England C.T.C historical average (Down The Line)

↑ +1.4% easier than usual

Ground avg: 93.5%

Class Winners

AA 20 entered

300/300 — 100.00%

Curtis Woolley

2=: Ian Douglas — 99.67%

A 22 entered

296/300 — 98.67%

Keith Blaney

2=: Charlotte Kitchen — 98.33%

B 13 entered

290/300 — 96.67%

Rene Aas

2: James Ramsey — 96.33%

C 8 entered

291/300 — 97.00%

Colin Winterburn

2: Richard Northey — 93.00%

Field Shape

94.9%

Field avg

Down The Line at North Of England C.T.C had a 25.3 point scoring spread across 63 entries.

Spread 25.3 pts

Front 100.0%

Largest class A

A compact read of how the field performed: average, spread and where most shooters sat.

Score Distribution

90–100%

55 87.3%

80–89%

7 11.1%

70–79%

1 1.6%

60–69%

0 0.0%

50–59%

0 0.0%

<50%

0 0.0%

Field Achievement

% of competitors reaching each score threshold

90%+

87.3%

55 / 63

80%+

98.4%

62 / 63

70%+

100.0%

63 / 63

60%+

100.0%

63 / 63

50%+

100.0%

63 / 63

Unlock the full event analysis

Register free for historical ground trends, class averages and spread, score charts, class composition and a detailed classification breakdown.

Historical Trends at North Of England C.T.C

Down The Line performance across events held at this ground.

Last 12 months

Overall Average Trend

Classification Trend Comparison

Classification Deep Dive

4 active classifications

—

Member insight

Typical —

Best —

Lowest —

Middle 50% score range

vs Ground Avg (12m)—

—

Member insight

Typical —

Best —

Lowest —

Middle 50% score range

vs Ground Avg (12m)—

—

Member insight

Typical —

Best —

Lowest —

Middle 50% score range

vs Ground Avg (12m)—

—

Member insight

Typical —

Best —

Lowest —

Middle 50% score range

vs Ground Avg (12m)—

Event Performance Analysis

Registered insight

Average by Class

Class averages make it easier to see where the event played hardest across the field.

Field Spread by Class

94.3-100.0%

74.7-98.7%

83.0-96.7%

87.3-97.0%

Boxes show the middle 50% of each class. Orange line is the median.

Top 10 Score Lollipop

A quick visual read of how far the front of the field separated itself.

Score Histogram

High gun: 100.0%. The high-gun band is outlined.

Class Breakdown

Rotate your device to see High/Low scores and the class winner

Class	Count	Average	High	Low	Winner
AA	20	98.0%	100.0%	94.3%	Curtis Woolley
A	22	94.6%	98.7%	74.7%	Keith Blaney
B	13	93.5%	96.7%	83.0%	Rene Aas
C	8	90.2%	97.0%	87.3%	Colin Winterburn

Class Composition

20 31.7%

22 34.9%

13 20.6%

8 12.7%

Largest class: A — 22 competitors (34.9%)

Full Results — 63 entries

🔒 The Class Rank and vs Class Avg columns are hidden — register free to unlock both insights.

Class AA

Score 300/300

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class AA

Score 299/300

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class AA

Score 299/300

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class AA

Score 298/300

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class AA

Score 297/300

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class AA

Score 297/300

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class AA

Score 297/300

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class A

Score 296/300

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class A

Score 295/300

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class A

Score 295/300

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class A

Score 295/300

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class AA

Score 295/300

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class AA

Score 295/300

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class A

Score 294/300

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class AA

Score 294/300

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class A

Score 293/300

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class AA

Score 293/300

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class AA

Score 293/300

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class AA

Score 293/300

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class AA

Score 292/300

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class AA

Score 292/300

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class AA

Score 292/300

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class C

Score 291/300

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class A

Score 291/300

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class A

Score 290/300

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class AA

Score 290/300

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class AA

Score 290/300

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class A

Score 290/300

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 290/300

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class AA

Score 289/300

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class A

Score 289/300

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 289/300

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class A

Score 287/300

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 287/300

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class A

Score 287/300

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 286/300

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class A

Score 285/300

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class A

Score 285/300

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 285/300

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 284/300

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class A

Score 284/300

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class AA

Score 283/300

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class A

Score 283/300

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 282/300

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 280/300

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 280/300

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class A

Score 280/300

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 279/300

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class C

Score 279/300

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class A

Score 278/300

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 278/300

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 278/300

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class A

Score 275/300

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class A

Score 274/300

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class A

Score 273/300

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class C

Score 269/300

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class C

Score 268/300

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class C

Score 268/300

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class C

Score 264/300

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class C

Score 263/300

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class C

Score 262/300

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class A

Score 224/300

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 83/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

#	Name	Class	Score	Score %	Class Rank 🔒	vs Class Avg
1	Curtis Woolley	AA	300/300	100.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
2=	Ian Douglas	AA	299/300	99.67%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
2=	Tom Robinson	AA	299/300	99.67%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
4	Sam Winterburn	AA	298/300	99.33%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
5=	Michael Turner	AA	297/300	99.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
5=	Paul Chaplow	AA	297/300	99.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
5=	Stephen Petch	AA	297/300	99.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
8	Keith Blaney	A	296/300	98.67%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
9=	Charlotte Kitchen	A	295/300	98.33%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
9=	James Gott	A	295/300	98.33%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
9=	Mike Hartley	A	295/300	98.33%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
9=	Nigel Chapman	AA	295/300	98.33%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
9=	Stephen Eley	AA	295/300	98.33%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
14=	John Laverick	A	294/300	98.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
14=	Paul Turner	AA	294/300	98.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
16=	Adrian Wragg	A	293/300	97.67%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
16=	Ian Biggins	AA	293/300	97.67%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
16=	Richard Ryan	AA	293/300	97.67%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
16=	Stephen Fiddler	AA	293/300	97.67%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
20=	Cory Doble	AA	292/300	97.33%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
20=	John Beveridge	AA	292/300	97.33%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
20=	Lewis Holden	AA	292/300	97.33%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
23=	Colin Winterburn	C	291/300	97.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
23=	Thomas Shaw	A	291/300	97.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
25=	Andrew Laverack	A	290/300	96.67%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
25=	David Priestman	AA	290/300	96.67%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
25=	David Whitehead	AA	290/300	96.67%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
25=	Mark Shaw	A	290/300	96.67%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
25=	Rene Aas	B	290/300	96.67%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
30=	David Garrett	AA	289/300	96.33%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
30=	Geoffrey Nutter	A	289/300	96.33%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
30=	James Ramsey	B	289/300	96.33%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
33=	Colin Liddell	A	287/300	95.67%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
33=	Ellie Whitehead	B	287/300	95.67%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
33=	Stuart Kitchen	A	287/300	95.67%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
36	Rodney Dalton	B	286/300	95.33%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
37=	Alan Fowkes	A	285/300	95.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
37=	Graham Taylor	A	285/300	95.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
37=	John Titterington	B	285/300	95.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
40=	Caroline Whitehead	B	284/300	94.67%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
40=	Garry Sayles	A	284/300	94.67%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
42=	Adrian Parish	AA	283/300	94.33%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
42=	Steven Price	A	283/300	94.33%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
44	Lewis Dalton	B	282/300	94.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
45=	Brian Whitehead	B	280/300	93.33%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
45=	Craig Hall	B	280/300	93.33%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
45=	John Adams	A	280/300	93.33%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
48=	David Robinson	B	279/300	93.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
48=	Richard Northey	C	279/300	93.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
50=	David Bell	A	278/300	92.67%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
50=	John Randle	B	278/300	92.67%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
50=	Roger Wright	B	278/300	92.67%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
53	David Taberner	A	275/300	91.67%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
54	Mark Child	A	274/300	91.33%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
55	Peter Shipley	A	273/300	91.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
56	Steven Pape	C	269/300	89.67%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
57=	Paul Worthington	C	268/300	89.33%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
57=	Ross Stonehouse	C	268/300	89.33%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
59	Michael Lawson	C	264/300	88.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
60	Katie Parker	C	263/300	87.67%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
61	Kevin Shaduwa	C	262/300	87.33%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
62	Richard Shirt	A	224/300	74.67%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
63	Dan Kitching	B	83/100	83.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%

Other DTL Events at North Of England C.T.C

⚙ Performance Stats DRAG TO MOVE

0.045s ● FAST

DB 38% · Py 48% · Render 15%

12 queries · avg 1.4ms · max 2.5ms

Render Breakdown

Python Logic (Pre-Render) 0.0217s

DB Logic (Pre-Render) 0.0171s

Full Page Render 0.0067s

QUERY TABLES ▾

⚠ event_review 4× 0.005s

shoot_event 2× 0.003s

shoot_score 2× 0.004s

site_configuration 2× 0.002s

ground 1× 0.001s

admin_menu_item 1× 0.001s

⚠ = queried 3+ times (cache candidate)

SQL QUERIES (12) — click to expand

#1 [04:24:17.458] 2.2ms

shoot_event

SELECT shoot_event.id AS shoot_event_id, shoot_event.cpsa_fixture_id AS shoot_event_cpsa_fixture_id, shoot_event.name AS shoot_event_name, shoot_event.date AS shoot_event_date, shoot_event.discipline AS shoot_event_discipline, shoot_event.ground AS shoot_event_ground, shoot_event.url AS shoot_event_…

#2 [04:24:17.461] 1.9ms

shoot_score

SELECT shoot_score.id AS shoot_score_id, shoot_score.targets AS shoot_score_targets, shoot_score.hits AS shoot_score_hits, shoot_score.points AS shoot_score_points, shoot_score.percentage AS shoot_score_percentage, shoot_score.shooter_id AS shoot_score_shooter_id, shoot_score.event_id AS shoot_score…

#3 [04:24:17.468] 2.5ms

shoot_score

SELECT avg(shoot_score.percentage) AS avg_1 
FROM shoot_score JOIN shoot_event ON shoot_score.event_id = shoot_event.id 
WHERE shoot_event.ground = %(ground_1)s AND shoot_event.discipline = %(discipline_1)s AND shoot_event.is_scraped = true AND shoot_event.admin_hidden != true AND shoot_event.id != …

#4 [04:24:17.470] 1.3ms

shoot_event

SELECT shoot_event.id AS shoot_event_id, shoot_event.cpsa_fixture_id AS shoot_event_cpsa_fixture_id, shoot_event.name AS shoot_event_name, shoot_event.date AS shoot_event_date, shoot_event.discipline AS shoot_event_discipline, shoot_event.ground AS shoot_event_ground, shoot_event.url AS shoot_event_…

#5 [04:24:17.473] 2.3ms

event_review

SELECT avg(event_review.rating) AS avg_1, count(event_review.id) AS count_1 
FROM event_review 
WHERE event_review.event_id = %(event_id_1)s

#6 [04:24:17.475] 1.0ms

event_review

SELECT count(*) AS count_1 
FROM (SELECT event_review.id AS event_review_id, event_review.event_id AS event_review_event_id, event_review.rating AS event_review_rating, event_review.review_text AS event_review_review_text, event_review.reviewer_name AS event_review_reviewer_name, event_review.review…

#7 [04:24:17.477] 1.0ms

event_review

SELECT event_review.id AS event_review_id, event_review.event_id AS event_review_event_id, event_review.rating AS event_review_rating, event_review.review_text AS event_review_review_text, event_review.reviewer_name AS event_review_reviewer_name, event_review.reviewer_hash AS event_review_reviewer_h…

#8 [04:24:17.479] 0.9ms

event_review

SELECT event_review.id AS event_review_id, event_review.event_id AS event_review_event_id, event_review.rating AS event_review_rating, event_review.review_text AS event_review_review_text, event_review.reviewer_name AS event_review_reviewer_name, event_review.reviewer_hash AS event_review_reviewer_h…

#9 [04:24:17.480] 1.0ms

ground

SELECT ground.id AS ground_id, ground.name AS ground_name, ground.url AS ground_url, ground.postcode AS ground_postcode, ground.what3words AS ground_what3words, ground.email AS ground_email, ground.website AS ground_website, ground.num_events_cpsa AS ground_num_events_cpsa, ground.num_events_cpsa_la…

#10 [04:24:17.482] 1.0ms

site_configuration

SELECT site_configuration.id AS site_configuration_id, site_configuration.key AS site_configuration_key, site_configuration.value AS site_configuration_value 
FROM site_configuration 
WHERE site_configuration.key LIKE %(key_1)s OR site_configuration.key LIKE %(key_2)s

#11 [04:24:17.484] 0.9ms

site_configuration

SELECT site_configuration.id AS site_configuration_id, site_configuration.key AS site_configuration_key, site_configuration.value AS site_configuration_value 
FROM site_configuration 
WHERE site_configuration.key IN (%(key_1_1)s, %(key_1_2)s, %(key_1_3)s, %(key_1_4)s)

#12 [04:24:17.485] 1.0ms

admin_menu_item

SELECT DISTINCT admin_menu_item.active_tab AS admin_menu_item_active_tab 
FROM admin_menu_item

LIVE REQUESTS (0) — click to expand

Down The Line at North Of England C.T.C

Unlock the full event analysis

Historical Trends at North Of England C.T.C

Classification Deep Dive

Event Performance Analysis

Analyzing Data...

Refresh Complete

Already Up to Date?

Analyzing Data...

Refresh Complete

Already Up to Date?