Back to Events
OTR — Olympic Trap

Olympic Trap at Nuthampstead Shooting Ground LLP

Sunday, 22 March 2026  ·  CPSA Results →
Weather loading...
Event Rating
Rate
Select a star to rate or review this event
Latest Visitor Reviews
No written reviews yet.
35
Entries
71.1%
Field Average
97.0%
Highest Score
35.0%
Lowest Score
Top 3 Overall
🥈
Nathan Hales
A
96/100
96.00%
🥇
Thomas Betts
A
97/100
97.00%
🥉 =3
Lucas Hyde
B
Mathew Paley
A
90/100
90.00%
Event Difficulty
71.1% This Event
vs. Nuthampstead Shooting Ground LLP historical average (Olympic Trap)
↓ -5.2% harder than usual
Ground avg: 76.3%
Class Winners
A 7 entered
97/100 — 97.00%
Thomas Betts
2: Nathan Hales — 96.00%
B 9 entered
90/100 — 90.00%
Lucas Hyde
2: Joe Turner — 85.00%
C 6 entered
83/100 — 83.00%
Bayram Baysal
2: Francesca Chau — 82.00%
D 13 entered
75/100 — 75.00%
Katie Durrant
2: Chris Wright — 74.00%
Field Shape
71.1%
Field avg
Olympic Trap at Nuthampstead Shooting Ground LLP had a 62.0 point scoring spread across 35 entries.
Spread 62.0 pts
Front 97.0%
Largest class D
A compact read of how the field performed: average, spread and where most shooters sat.
Score Distribution
90–100%
4 11.4%
80–89%
8 22.9%
70–79%
8 22.9%
60–69%
8 22.9%
50–59%
3 8.6%
<50%
4 11.4%
Field Achievement
% of competitors reaching each score threshold
90%+
11.4%
4 / 35
80%+
34.3%
12 / 35
70%+
57.1%
20 / 35
60%+
80.0%
28 / 35
50%+
88.6%
31 / 35

Unlock the full event analysis

Register free for historical ground trends, class averages and spread, score charts, class composition and a detailed classification breakdown.

Full Results — 35 entries
🔒 The Class Rank and vs Class Avg columns are hidden — register free to unlock both insights.
Class A
Score 97/100
vs Class Avg +0.0%
Profile Open →
Class A
Score 96/100
vs Class Avg +0.0%
Profile Open →
Class B
Score 90/100
vs Class Avg +0.0%
Profile Open →
Class A
Score 90/100
vs Class Avg +0.0%
Profile Open →
Class A
Score 86/100
vs Class Avg +0.0%
Profile Open →
Class B
Score 85/100
vs Class Avg +0.0%
Profile Open →
Class A
Score 85/100
vs Class Avg +0.0%
Profile Open →
Class A
Score 85/100
vs Class Avg +0.0%
Profile Open →
Class B
Score 84/100
vs Class Avg +0.0%
Profile Open →
Class C
Score 83/100
vs Class Avg +0.0%
Profile Open →
Class B
Score 82/100
vs Class Avg +0.0%
Profile Open →
Class C
Score 82/100
vs Class Avg +0.0%
Profile Open →
Class C
Score 79/100
vs Class Avg +0.0%
Profile Open →
Class B
Score 78/100
vs Class Avg +0.0%
Profile Open →
Class A
Score 77/100
vs Class Avg +0.0%
Profile Open →
Class D
Score 75/100
vs Class Avg +0.0%
Profile Open →
Class B
Score 74/100
vs Class Avg +0.0%
Profile Open →
Class D
Score 74/100
vs Class Avg +0.0%
Profile Open →
Class B
Score 73/100
vs Class Avg +0.0%
Profile Open →
Class C
Score 70/100
vs Class Avg +0.0%
Profile Open →
Class C
Score 67/100
vs Class Avg +0.0%
Profile Open →
Class B
Score 67/100
vs Class Avg +0.0%
Profile Open →
Class C
Score 66/100
vs Class Avg +0.0%
Profile Open →
Class B
Score 65/100
vs Class Avg +0.0%
Profile Open →
Class D
Score 62/100
vs Class Avg +0.0%
Profile Open →
Class D
Score 61/100
vs Class Avg +0.0%
Profile Open →
Class D
Score 61/100
vs Class Avg +0.0%
Profile Open →
Class D
Score 60/100
vs Class Avg +0.0%
Profile Open →
Class D
Score 57/100
vs Class Avg +0.0%
Profile Open →
Class D
Score 56/100
vs Class Avg +0.0%
Profile Open →
Class D
Score 51/100
vs Class Avg +0.0%
Profile Open →
Class D
Score 49/100
vs Class Avg +0.0%
Profile Open →
Class D
Score 44/100
vs Class Avg +0.0%
Profile Open →
Class D
Score 41/100
vs Class Avg +0.0%
Profile Open →
Class D
Score 35/100
vs Class Avg +0.0%
Profile Open →
# Name Class Score Score % Class Rank 🔒 vs Class Avg
1 Thomas Betts A 97/100 97.00% 🔒 1 🔒 +0.0%
2 Nathan Hales A 96/100 96.00% 🔒 1 🔒 +0.0%
3= Lucas Hyde B 90/100 90.00% 🔒 1 🔒 +0.0%
3= Mathew Paley A 90/100 90.00% 🔒 1 🔒 +0.0%
5 Madeleine Purser A 86/100 86.00% 🔒 1 🔒 +0.0%
6= Joe Turner B 85/100 85.00% 🔒 1 🔒 +0.0%
6= William Canter A 85/100 85.00% 🔒 1 🔒 +0.0%
6= William Gilbert A 85/100 85.00% 🔒 1 🔒 +0.0%
9 Richard Gilbert B 84/100 84.00% 🔒 1 🔒 +0.0%
10 Bayram Baysal C 83/100 83.00% 🔒 1 🔒 +0.0%
11= Christopher Dean B 82/100 82.00% 🔒 1 🔒 +0.0%
11= Francesca Chau C 82/100 82.00% 🔒 1 🔒 +0.0%
13 John Bowman C 79/100 79.00% 🔒 1 🔒 +0.0%
14 Christopher Cheng B 78/100 78.00% 🔒 1 🔒 +0.0%
15 Mark Robinson A 77/100 77.00% 🔒 1 🔒 +0.0%
16 Katie Durrant D 75/100 75.00% 🔒 1 🔒 +0.0%
17= Benjamin Jordan B 74/100 74.00% 🔒 1 🔒 +0.0%
17= Chris Wright D 74/100 74.00% 🔒 1 🔒 +0.0%
19 John Haas B 73/100 73.00% 🔒 1 🔒 +0.0%
20 Andy Savva C 70/100 70.00% 🔒 1 🔒 +0.0%
21= Ian Lockwood C 67/100 67.00% 🔒 1 🔒 +0.0%
21= Liam Crabb B 67/100 67.00% 🔒 1 🔒 +0.0%
23 Clive Rowe C 66/100 66.00% 🔒 1 🔒 +0.0%
24 Tyler Minter B 65/100 65.00% 🔒 1 🔒 +0.0%
25 Mark Hogan D 62/100 62.00% 🔒 1 🔒 +0.0%
26= David Izzard D 61/100 61.00% 🔒 1 🔒 +0.0%
26= Michael Coutanche D 61/100 61.00% 🔒 1 🔒 +0.0%
28 Abbie Coutanche D 60/100 60.00% 🔒 1 🔒 +0.0%
29 Anastasia Mascali D 57/100 57.00% 🔒 1 🔒 +0.0%
30 Mark Burrows D 56/100 56.00% 🔒 1 🔒 +0.0%
31 William Fowdrey D 51/100 51.00% 🔒 1 🔒 +0.0%
32 Annie-May Peryer D 49/100 49.00% 🔒 1 🔒 +0.0%
33 Carmine Saccone D 44/100 44.00% 🔒 1 🔒 +0.0%
34 David Court D 41/100 41.00% 🔒 1 🔒 +0.0%
35 Paul Hogan D 35/100 35.00% 🔒 1 🔒 +0.0%
Other OTR Events at Nuthampstead Shooting Ground LLP
0%

Analyzing Data...

Connecting to CPSA...

Initial Scores
History Pages
Classifications
Fixture Details
VER: v0.7
BUILD:
DEPLOYED: 29 Aug 2026 15:58:46