Back to Events

UTR — Universal Trench

Universal Trench at Nuthampstead Shooting Ground LLP

Nuthampstead Shooting Ground LLP

Saturday, 27 September 2025 · CPSA Results →

Weather loading...

Event Rating

Latest Visitor Reviews

No written reviews yet.

Entries

84.6%

Field Average

98.0%

Highest Score

55.0%

Lowest Score

Top 3 Overall

🥈

David Kirk

193/200

96.50%

🥇

Mark Shaw

196/200

98.00%

🥉

Darren Burtenshaw

192/200

96.00%

Event Difficulty

84.6% This Event

vs. Nuthampstead Shooting Ground LLP historical average (Universal Trench)

↑ +4.2% easier than usual

Ground avg: 80.4%

Class Winners

A 23 entered

196/200 — 98.00%

Mark Shaw

2: David Kirk — 96.50%

B 26 entered

192/200 — 96.00%

Darren Burtenshaw

2: Neil Leeming — 94.00%

C 26 entered

181/200 — 90.50%

Rhys Dixon

2: Fletcher Watson — 89.50%

D 11 entered

165/200 — 82.50%

Wayne Phillips

2: James Farrell — 81.00%

Field Shape

84.6%

Field avg

Universal Trench at Nuthampstead Shooting Ground LLP had a 43.0 point scoring spread across 86 entries.

Spread 43.0 pts

Front 98.0%

Largest class B

A compact read of how the field performed: average, spread and where most shooters sat.

Score Distribution

90–100%

28 32.6%

80–89%

38 44.2%

70–79%

17 19.8%

60–69%

1 1.2%

50–59%

2 2.3%

<50%

0 0.0%

Field Achievement

% of competitors reaching each score threshold

90%+

32.6%

28 / 86

80%+

76.7%

66 / 86

70%+

96.5%

83 / 86

60%+

97.7%

84 / 86

50%+

100.0%

86 / 86

Unlock the full event analysis

Register free for historical ground trends, class averages and spread, score charts, class composition and a detailed classification breakdown.

Historical Trends at Nuthampstead Shooting Ground LLP

Universal Trench performance across events held at this ground.

Last 12 months

Overall Average Trend

Classification Trend Comparison

Classification Deep Dive

4 active classifications

—

Member insight

Typical —

Best —

Lowest —

Middle 50% score range

vs Ground Avg (12m)—

—

Member insight

Typical —

Best —

Lowest —

Middle 50% score range

vs Ground Avg (12m)—

—

Member insight

Typical —

Best —

Lowest —

Middle 50% score range

vs Ground Avg (12m)—

—

Member insight

Typical —

Best —

Lowest —

Middle 50% score range

vs Ground Avg (12m)—

Event Performance Analysis

Registered insight

Average by Class

Class averages make it easier to see where the event played hardest across the field.

Field Spread by Class

87.5-98.0%

75.5-96.0%

70.5-90.5%

55.0-82.5%

Boxes show the middle 50% of each class. Orange line is the median.

Top 10 Score Lollipop

A quick visual read of how far the front of the field separated itself.

Score Histogram

High gun: 98.0%. The high-gun band is outlined.

Class Breakdown

Rotate your device to see High/Low scores and the class winner

Class	Count	Average	High	Low	Winner
A	23	92.6%	98.0%	87.5%	Mark Shaw
B	26	85.7%	96.0%	75.5%	Darren Burtenshaw
C	26	82.0%	90.5%	70.5%	Rhys Dixon
D	11	71.8%	82.5%	55.0%	Wayne Phillips

Class Composition

23 26.7%

26 30.2%

11 12.8%

Largest class: B — 26 competitors (30.2%)

Full Results — 86 entries

🔒 The Class Rank and vs Class Avg columns are hidden — register free to unlock both insights.

Class A

Score 196/200

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class A

Score 193/200

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 192/200

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class A

Score 191/200

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class A

Score 190/200

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class A

Score 189/200

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class A

Score 188/200

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class A

Score 188/200

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 188/200

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class A

Score 187/200

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class A

Score 187/200

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class A

Score 187/200

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class A

Score 186/200

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class A

Score 185/200

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class A

Score 185/200

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class A

Score 184/200

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class A

Score 183/200

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class A

Score 183/200

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 183/200

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class A

Score 182/200

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 182/200

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class A

Score 182/200

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class C

Score 181/200

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 181/200

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class A

Score 180/200

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 180/200

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class A

Score 180/200

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class A

Score 180/200

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class C

Score 179/200

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 179/200

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 178/200

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class A

Score 178/200

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 176/200

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class C

Score 176/200

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class A

Score 175/200

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class C

Score 175/200

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 174/200

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 174/200

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 173/200

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class C

Score 172/200

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class C

Score 172/200

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class C

Score 172/200

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class C

Score 171/200

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class C

Score 171/200

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 171/200

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 169/200

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 169/200

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 169/200

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 169/200

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 169/200

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class C

Score 168/200

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class C

Score 167/200

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 166/200

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class C

Score 166/200

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class C

Score 166/200

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 166/200

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 166/200

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class C

Score 165/200

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class C

Score 165/200

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class D

Score 165/200

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class C

Score 164/200

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class C

Score 163/200

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class C

Score 163/200

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class D

Score 162/200

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 162/200

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 160/200

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class C

Score 159/200

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 159/200

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class D

Score 158/200

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class C

Score 156/200

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class D

Score 155/200

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class C

Score 154/200

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class C

Score 154/200

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class D

Score 153/200

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 151/200

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 151/200

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class C

Score 151/200

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class C

Score 150/200

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class D

Score 149/200

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class D

Score 143/200

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class D

Score 142/200

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class C

Score 142/200

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class C

Score 141/200

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class D

Score 124/200

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class D

Score 118/200

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class D

Score 110/200

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

#	Name	Class	Score	Score %	Class Rank 🔒	vs Class Avg
1	Mark Shaw	A	196/200	98.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
2	David Kirk	A	193/200	96.50%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
3	Darren Burtenshaw	B	192/200	96.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
4	Thomas Betts	A	191/200	95.50%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
5	Oliver Sampson	A	190/200	95.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
6	Richard Fletton	A	189/200	94.50%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
7=	David Lloyd	A	188/200	94.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
7=	Jo Smith	A	188/200	94.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
7=	Neil Leeming	B	188/200	94.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
10=	Chris Tate	A	187/200	93.50%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
10=	Kevin Borley	A	187/200	93.50%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
10=	Ray Sutton	A	187/200	93.50%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
13	Robert Bright	A	186/200	93.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
14=	Howard Batt	A	185/200	92.50%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
14=	Ian Moore	A	185/200	92.50%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
16	Ian Woodhead	A	184/200	92.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
17=	Carl Burrow	A	183/200	91.50%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
17=	Lee Betts	A	183/200	91.50%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
17=	Mark Wright	B	183/200	91.50%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
20=	George Seaborne	A	182/200	91.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
20=	Leanne Palmer	B	182/200	91.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
20=	Matthew Panter	A	182/200	91.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
23=	Rhys Dixon	C	181/200	90.50%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
23=	Stefan Roberts	B	181/200	90.50%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
25=	David Hardy	A	180/200	90.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
25=	Lewis Kirk	B	180/200	90.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
25=	Lucas Hyde	A	180/200	90.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
25=	Michael Wensley	A	180/200	90.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
29=	Fletcher Watson	C	179/200	89.50%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
29=	James Ward	B	179/200	89.50%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
31=	Nicholas Harris	B	178/200	89.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
31=	Stephen Corner	A	178/200	89.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
33=	Matthew Rowland	B	176/200	88.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
33=	Michael Barker	C	176/200	88.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
35=	Bayram Baysal	A	175/200	87.50%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
35=	Richard Travers	C	175/200	87.50%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
37=	Brett Winfield	B	174/200	87.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
37=	David O'Donnell	B	174/200	87.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
39	John Bowman	B	173/200	86.50%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
40=	Clive Rowe	C	172/200	86.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
40=	Graham Carter	C	172/200	86.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
40=	Ian Shaw	C	172/200	86.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
43=	Emyr Davies	C	171/200	85.50%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
43=	Julian Fairburn	C	171/200	85.50%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
43=	Katie Cowell	B	171/200	85.50%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
46=	Alan Haynes	B	169/200	84.50%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
46=	Andrew Dearman	B	169/200	84.50%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
46=	Nicholas Dewe	B	169/200	84.50%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
46=	Oliver Austin	B	169/200	84.50%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
46=	Paul Atkinson	B	169/200	84.50%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
51	Phil Rowley	C	168/200	84.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
52	Dean Rickford	C	167/200	83.50%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
53=	Benjamin Hibbert	B	166/200	83.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
53=	Jacquelyn Lewis	C	166/200	83.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
53=	John Slatter	C	166/200	83.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
53=	Philip Sanders	B	166/200	83.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
53=	Phillip Dando	B	166/200	83.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
58=	George Mitchell	C	165/200	82.50%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
58=	Mark Baker	C	165/200	82.50%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
58=	Wayne Phillips	D	165/200	82.50%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
61	Stephen Parker	C	164/200	82.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
62=	John Stephenson	C	163/200	81.50%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
62=	Karl Weaver	C	163/200	81.50%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
64=	James Farrell	D	162/200	81.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
64=	Robert Dalzell	B	162/200	81.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
66	Christopher McReynolds	B	160/200	80.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
67=	Arnold Cliffe	C	159/200	79.50%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
67=	Darrin Donaldson	B	159/200	79.50%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
69	Wayne Dukes	D	158/200	79.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
70	William Fowdrey	C	156/200	78.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
71	Janine Travers	D	155/200	77.50%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
72=	Paul Insley	C	154/200	77.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
72=	Paul Titterington	C	154/200	77.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
74	Emma Ralph	D	153/200	76.50%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
75=	David Wright	B	151/200	75.50%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
75=	John Reilly	B	151/200	75.50%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
75=	Robert Gallagher	C	151/200	75.50%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
78	Elise Dixon	C	150/200	75.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
79	David Izzard	D	149/200	74.50%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
80	Michael Feather	D	143/200	71.50%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
81=	Geoff Darke	D	142/200	71.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
81=	Sue Bate	C	142/200	71.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
83	Richard Fox	C	141/200	70.50%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
84	Anne Phillips	D	124/200	62.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
85	Carmine Saccone	D	118/200	59.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
86	Rebecca LLoyd	D	110/200	55.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%

Other UTR Events at Nuthampstead Shooting Ground LLP

⚙ Performance Stats DRAG TO MOVE

0.039s ● FAST

DB 35% · Py 32% · Render 33%

12 queries · avg 1.1ms · max 1.7ms

Render Breakdown

DB Logic (Pre-Render) 0.0136s

Full Page Render 0.0129s

Python Logic (Pre-Render) 0.0122s

QUERY TABLES ▾

⚠ event_review 4× 0.004s

shoot_event 2× 0.003s

shoot_score 2× 0.003s

site_configuration 2× 0.002s

ground 1× 0.001s

admin_menu_item 1× 0.001s

⚠ = queried 3+ times (cache candidate)

SQL QUERIES (12) — click to expand

#1 [02:15:59.160] 1.7ms

shoot_event

SELECT shoot_event.id AS shoot_event_id, shoot_event.cpsa_fixture_id AS shoot_event_cpsa_fixture_id, shoot_event.name AS shoot_event_name, shoot_event.date AS shoot_event_date, shoot_event.discipline AS shoot_event_discipline, shoot_event.ground AS shoot_event_ground, shoot_event.url AS shoot_event_…

#2 [02:15:59.162] 1.6ms

shoot_score

SELECT shoot_score.id AS shoot_score_id, shoot_score.targets AS shoot_score_targets, shoot_score.hits AS shoot_score_hits, shoot_score.points AS shoot_score_points, shoot_score.percentage AS shoot_score_percentage, shoot_score.shooter_id AS shoot_score_shooter_id, shoot_score.event_id AS shoot_score…

#3 [02:15:59.168] 1.7ms

shoot_score

SELECT avg(shoot_score.percentage) AS avg_1 
FROM shoot_score JOIN shoot_event ON shoot_score.event_id = shoot_event.id 
WHERE shoot_event.ground = %(ground_1)s AND shoot_event.discipline = %(discipline_1)s AND shoot_event.is_scraped = true AND shoot_event.admin_hidden != true AND shoot_event.id != …

#4 [02:15:59.169] 1.1ms

shoot_event

SELECT shoot_event.id AS shoot_event_id, shoot_event.cpsa_fixture_id AS shoot_event_cpsa_fixture_id, shoot_event.name AS shoot_event_name, shoot_event.date AS shoot_event_date, shoot_event.discipline AS shoot_event_discipline, shoot_event.ground AS shoot_event_ground, shoot_event.url AS shoot_event_…

#5 [02:15:59.171] 0.9ms

event_review

SELECT avg(event_review.rating) AS avg_1, count(event_review.id) AS count_1 
FROM event_review 
WHERE event_review.event_id = %(event_id_1)s

#6 [02:15:59.172] 0.9ms

event_review

SELECT count(*) AS count_1 
FROM (SELECT event_review.id AS event_review_id, event_review.event_id AS event_review_event_id, event_review.rating AS event_review_rating, event_review.review_text AS event_review_review_text, event_review.reviewer_name AS event_review_reviewer_name, event_review.review…

#7 [02:15:59.174] 0.9ms

event_review

SELECT event_review.id AS event_review_id, event_review.event_id AS event_review_event_id, event_review.rating AS event_review_rating, event_review.review_text AS event_review_review_text, event_review.reviewer_name AS event_review_reviewer_name, event_review.reviewer_hash AS event_review_reviewer_h…

#8 [02:15:59.176] 1.2ms

event_review

SELECT event_review.id AS event_review_id, event_review.event_id AS event_review_event_id, event_review.rating AS event_review_rating, event_review.review_text AS event_review_review_text, event_review.reviewer_name AS event_review_reviewer_name, event_review.reviewer_hash AS event_review_reviewer_h…

#9 [02:15:59.177] 0.9ms

ground

SELECT ground.id AS ground_id, ground.name AS ground_name, ground.url AS ground_url, ground.postcode AS ground_postcode, ground.what3words AS ground_what3words, ground.email AS ground_email, ground.website AS ground_website, ground.num_events_cpsa AS ground_num_events_cpsa, ground.num_events_cpsa_la…

#10 [02:15:59.179] 0.9ms

site_configuration

SELECT site_configuration.id AS site_configuration_id, site_configuration.key AS site_configuration_key, site_configuration.value AS site_configuration_value 
FROM site_configuration 
WHERE site_configuration.key LIKE %(key_1)s OR site_configuration.key LIKE %(key_2)s

#11 [02:15:59.180] 0.8ms

site_configuration

SELECT site_configuration.id AS site_configuration_id, site_configuration.key AS site_configuration_key, site_configuration.value AS site_configuration_value 
FROM site_configuration 
WHERE site_configuration.key IN (%(key_1_1)s, %(key_1_2)s, %(key_1_3)s, %(key_1_4)s)

#12 [02:15:59.181] 0.9ms

admin_menu_item

SELECT DISTINCT admin_menu_item.active_tab AS admin_menu_item_active_tab 
FROM admin_menu_item

LIVE REQUESTS (0) — click to expand

Universal Trench at Nuthampstead Shooting Ground LLP

Unlock the full event analysis

Historical Trends at Nuthampstead Shooting Ground LLP

Classification Deep Dive

Event Performance Analysis

Analyzing Data...

Refresh Complete

Already Up to Date?

Analyzing Data...

Refresh Complete

Already Up to Date?