Back to Events

OTR — Olympic Trap

Olympic Trap at Nuthampstead Shooting Ground LLP

Nuthampstead Shooting Ground LLP

Sunday, 20 July 2025 · CPSA Results →

Weather loading...

Event Rating

Latest Visitor Reviews

No written reviews yet.

Entries

80.5%

Field Average

96.0%

Highest Score

53.6%

Lowest Score

Top 3 Overall

🥈

Madeleine Purser

117/125

93.60%

🥇

Thomas Betts

120/125

96.00%

🥉 =3

Alexander Williams

Leah Southall

Mark Shaw

Nathan Hales

116/125

92.80%

Event Difficulty

80.5% This Event

vs. Nuthampstead Shooting Ground LLP historical average (Olympic Trap)

↑ +4.7% easier than usual

Ground avg: 75.8%

Class Winners

A 16 entered

120/125 — 96.00%

Thomas Betts

2: Madeleine Purser — 93.60%

B 17 entered

116/125 — 92.80%

Alexander Williams(tied) Leah Southall(tied)

3: Finley Bowles — 89.60%

C 19 entered

115/125 — 92.00%

Oliver Austin

2: James Ward — 89.60%

D 16 entered

102/125 — 81.60%

Karl Weaver

2: Holly Maddams — 78.40%

Other 1 entered

93/125 — 74.40%

Joshua Kind

Field Shape

80.5%

Field avg

Olympic Trap at Nuthampstead Shooting Ground LLP had a 42.4 point scoring spread across 69 entries.

Spread 42.4 pts

Front 96.0%

Largest class C

A compact read of how the field performed: average, spread and where most shooters sat.

Score Distribution

90–100%

13 18.8%

80–89%

27 39.1%

70–79%

17 24.6%

60–69%

11 15.9%

50–59%

1 1.4%

<50%

0 0.0%

Field Achievement

% of competitors reaching each score threshold

90%+

18.8%

13 / 69

80%+

58.0%

40 / 69

70%+

82.6%

57 / 69

60%+

98.6%

68 / 69

50%+

100.0%

69 / 69

Unlock the full event analysis

Register free for historical ground trends, class averages and spread, score charts, class composition and a detailed classification breakdown.

Historical Trends at Nuthampstead Shooting Ground LLP

Olympic Trap performance across events held at this ground.

Last 12 months

Overall Average Trend

Classification Trend Comparison

Classification Deep Dive

4 active classifications

—

Member insight

Typical —

Best —

Lowest —

Middle 50% score range

vs Ground Avg (12m)—

—

Member insight

Typical —

Best —

Lowest —

Middle 50% score range

vs Ground Avg (12m)—

—

Member insight

Typical —

Best —

Lowest —

Middle 50% score range

vs Ground Avg (12m)—

—

Member insight

Typical —

Best —

Lowest —

Middle 50% score range

vs Ground Avg (12m)—

Event Performance Analysis

Registered insight

Average by Class

Class averages make it easier to see where the event played hardest across the field.

Field Spread by Class

84.8-96.0%

60.0-92.8%

64.0-92.0%

53.6-81.6%

Other

74.4-74.4%

Boxes show the middle 50% of each class. Orange line is the median.

Top 10 Score Lollipop

A quick visual read of how far the front of the field separated itself.

Score Histogram

High gun: 96.0%. The high-gun band is outlined.

Class Breakdown

Rotate your device to see High/Low scores and the class winner

Class	Count	Average	High	Low	Winner
A	16	90.5%	96.0%	84.8%	Thomas Betts
B	17	83.3%	92.8%	60.0%	Alexander Williams
C	19	80.3%	92.0%	64.0%	Oliver Austin
D	16	68.0%	81.6%	53.6%	Karl Weaver
Other	1	74.4%	74.4%	74.4%	Joshua Kind

Class Composition

16 23.2%

17 24.6%

19 27.5%

16 23.2%

Other

1 1.4%

Largest class: C — 19 competitors (27.5%)

Full Results — 69 entries

🔒 The Class Rank and vs Class Avg columns are hidden — register free to unlock both insights.

Class A

Score 120/125

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class A

Score 117/125

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 116/125

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 116/125

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class A

Score 116/125

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class A

Score 116/125

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class A

Score 115/125

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class A

Score 115/125

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class C

Score 115/125

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class A

Score 114/125

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class A

Score 113/125

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class A

Score 113/125

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class A

Score 113/125

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 112/125

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class C

Score 112/125

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class A

Score 112/125

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 111/125

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 111/125

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class A

Score 111/125

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class A

Score 111/125

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class A

Score 110/125

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 110/125

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class C

Score 109/125

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class C

Score 109/125

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class C

Score 108/125

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 108/125

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class A

Score 108/125

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 107/125

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 107/125

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class A

Score 106/125

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 105/125

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 104/125

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 103/125

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class C

Score 103/125

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class D

Score 102/125

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class C

Score 102/125

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 101/125

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class C

Score 101/125

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class C

Score 100/125

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class C

Score 100/125

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class C

Score 99/125

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class C

Score 99/125

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class C

Score 99/125

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class D

Score 98/125

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class C

Score 97/125

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class C

Score 96/125

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class C

Score 95/125

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class D

Score 95/125

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 95/125

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class D

Score 94/125

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 94/125

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class C

Score 94/125

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class Unknown

Score 93/125

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class D

Score 92/125

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class D

Score 91/125

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class C

Score 90/125

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class D

Score 87/125

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class D

Score 85/125

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class D

Score 84/125

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class D

Score 81/125

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class D

Score 80/125

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class D

Score 78/125

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class D

Score 76/125

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class D

Score 75/125

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class D

Score 75/125

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class D

Score 67/125

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 57/75

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class C

Score 32/50

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 15/25

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

#	Name	Class	Score	Score %	Class Rank 🔒	vs Class Avg
1	Thomas Betts	A	120/125	96.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
2	Madeleine Purser	A	117/125	93.60%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
3=	Alexander Williams	B	116/125	92.80%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
3=	Leah Southall	B	116/125	92.80%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
3=	Mark Shaw	A	116/125	92.80%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
3=	Nathan Hales	A	116/125	92.80%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
7=	Andrew Greenwood	A	115/125	92.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
7=	Mark Robinson	A	115/125	92.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
7=	Oliver Austin	C	115/125	92.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
10	David Kirk	A	114/125	91.20%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
11=	Argun Ismet	A	113/125	90.40%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
11=	Christopher Dean	A	113/125	90.40%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
11=	Lucy Hall	A	113/125	90.40%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
14=	Finley Bowles	B	112/125	89.60%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
14=	James Ward	C	112/125	89.60%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
14=	Matthew Panter	A	112/125	89.60%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
17=	Lee Betts	B	111/125	88.80%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
17=	Lewis Kirk	B	111/125	88.80%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
17=	Lucas Hyde	A	111/125	88.80%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
17=	Marc Potts	A	111/125	88.80%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
21=	Ellie Seward	A	110/125	88.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
21=	Tim Smith	B	110/125	88.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
23=	Cemal Seziner	C	109/125	87.20%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
23=	William Marshall	C	109/125	87.20%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
25=	Francesca Chau	C	108/125	86.40%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
25=	Ian Mulliner	B	108/125	86.40%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
25=	Rob Hall	A	108/125	86.40%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
28=	Joseph Robbins	B	107/125	85.60%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
28=	Maciej Bilkiewicz	B	107/125	85.60%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
30	Abbey Ling	A	106/125	84.80%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
31	Philip Sanders	B	105/125	84.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
32	Howard Beaumont	B	104/125	83.20%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
33=	Liam Crabb	B	103/125	82.40%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
33=	Richard Fox	C	103/125	82.40%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
35=	Karl Weaver	D	102/125	81.60%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
35=	Senol Tas	C	102/125	81.60%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
37=	Keith White	B	101/125	80.80%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
37=	William Maclennan	C	101/125	80.80%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
39=	Clive Rowe	C	100/125	80.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
39=	John Bowman	C	100/125	80.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
41=	Graham Carter	C	99/125	79.20%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
41=	Peter Lunn	C	99/125	79.20%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
41=	Rhys Dixon	C	99/125	79.20%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
44	Holly Maddams	D	98/125	78.40%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
45	Andy Savva	C	97/125	77.60%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
46	Tony Robbins	C	96/125	76.80%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
47=	Alan Haynes	C	95/125	76.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
47=	Jacquelyn Lewis	D	95/125	76.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
47=	Richard Travers	B	95/125	76.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
50=	Abbie Coutanche	D	94/125	75.20%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
50=	Stephen Hammersley	B	94/125	75.20%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
50=	Stuart Turner	C	94/125	75.20%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
53	Joshua Kind	Unknown	93/125	74.40%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
54	Kelvin Page	D	92/125	73.60%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
55	William Fowdrey	D	91/125	72.80%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
56	Frank Chetcuti	C	90/125	72.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
57	Michele Rowe	D	87/125	69.60%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
58	Bradley Pryor	D	85/125	68.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
59	Anne Phillips	D	84/125	67.20%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
60	Astrid Brocklehurst-Flynn	D	81/125	64.80%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
61	Janine Travers	D	80/125	64.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
62	Bulent Bayram	D	78/125	62.40%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
63	Stuart Purser	D	76/125	60.80%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
64=	Carmine Saccone	D	75/125	60.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
64=	David Izzard	D	75/125	60.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
66	Jane Robbins	D	67/125	53.60%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
67	Bayram Baysal	B	57/75	76.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
68	Reg Toms	C	32/50	64.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
69	Harry Poolman	B	15/25	60.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%

Other OTR Events at Nuthampstead Shooting Ground LLP

⚙ Performance Stats DRAG TO MOVE

0.037s ● FAST

DB 34% · Py 43% · Render 23%

12 queries · avg 1.1ms · max 1.8ms

Render Breakdown

Python Logic (Pre-Render) 0.0158s

DB Logic (Pre-Render) 0.0127s

Full Page Render 0.0084s

QUERY TABLES ▾

⚠ event_review 4× 0.004s

shoot_event 2× 0.003s

shoot_score 2× 0.003s

site_configuration 2× 0.002s

ground 1× 0.001s

admin_menu_item 1× 0.001s

⚠ = queried 3+ times (cache candidate)

SQL QUERIES (12) — click to expand

#1 [04:23:31.757] 1.8ms

shoot_event

SELECT shoot_event.id AS shoot_event_id, shoot_event.cpsa_fixture_id AS shoot_event_cpsa_fixture_id, shoot_event.name AS shoot_event_name, shoot_event.date AS shoot_event_date, shoot_event.discipline AS shoot_event_discipline, shoot_event.ground AS shoot_event_ground, shoot_event.url AS shoot_event_…

#2 [04:23:31.760] 1.3ms

shoot_score

SELECT shoot_score.id AS shoot_score_id, shoot_score.targets AS shoot_score_targets, shoot_score.hits AS shoot_score_hits, shoot_score.points AS shoot_score_points, shoot_score.percentage AS shoot_score_percentage, shoot_score.shooter_id AS shoot_score_shooter_id, shoot_score.event_id AS shoot_score…

#3 [04:23:31.765] 1.5ms

shoot_score

SELECT avg(shoot_score.percentage) AS avg_1 
FROM shoot_score JOIN shoot_event ON shoot_score.event_id = shoot_event.id 
WHERE shoot_event.ground = %(ground_1)s AND shoot_event.discipline = %(discipline_1)s AND shoot_event.is_scraped = true AND shoot_event.admin_hidden != true AND shoot_event.id != …

#4 [04:23:31.767] 1.1ms

shoot_event

SELECT shoot_event.id AS shoot_event_id, shoot_event.cpsa_fixture_id AS shoot_event_cpsa_fixture_id, shoot_event.name AS shoot_event_name, shoot_event.date AS shoot_event_date, shoot_event.discipline AS shoot_event_discipline, shoot_event.ground AS shoot_event_ground, shoot_event.url AS shoot_event_…

#5 [04:23:31.770] 0.9ms

event_review

SELECT avg(event_review.rating) AS avg_1, count(event_review.id) AS count_1 
FROM event_review 
WHERE event_review.event_id = %(event_id_1)s

#6 [04:23:31.772] 0.9ms

event_review

SELECT count(*) AS count_1 
FROM (SELECT event_review.id AS event_review_id, event_review.event_id AS event_review_event_id, event_review.rating AS event_review_rating, event_review.review_text AS event_review_review_text, event_review.reviewer_name AS event_review_reviewer_name, event_review.review…

#7 [04:23:31.773] 0.9ms

event_review

SELECT event_review.id AS event_review_id, event_review.event_id AS event_review_event_id, event_review.rating AS event_review_rating, event_review.review_text AS event_review_review_text, event_review.reviewer_name AS event_review_reviewer_name, event_review.reviewer_hash AS event_review_reviewer_h…

#8 [04:23:31.775] 0.9ms

event_review

SELECT event_review.id AS event_review_id, event_review.event_id AS event_review_event_id, event_review.rating AS event_review_rating, event_review.review_text AS event_review_review_text, event_review.reviewer_name AS event_review_reviewer_name, event_review.reviewer_hash AS event_review_reviewer_h…

#9 [04:23:31.776] 0.9ms

ground

SELECT ground.id AS ground_id, ground.name AS ground_name, ground.url AS ground_url, ground.postcode AS ground_postcode, ground.what3words AS ground_what3words, ground.email AS ground_email, ground.website AS ground_website, ground.num_events_cpsa AS ground_num_events_cpsa, ground.num_events_cpsa_la…

#10 [04:23:31.778] 0.9ms

site_configuration

SELECT site_configuration.id AS site_configuration_id, site_configuration.key AS site_configuration_key, site_configuration.value AS site_configuration_value 
FROM site_configuration 
WHERE site_configuration.key LIKE %(key_1)s OR site_configuration.key LIKE %(key_2)s

#11 [04:23:31.780] 0.9ms

site_configuration

SELECT site_configuration.id AS site_configuration_id, site_configuration.key AS site_configuration_key, site_configuration.value AS site_configuration_value 
FROM site_configuration 
WHERE site_configuration.key IN (%(key_1_1)s, %(key_1_2)s, %(key_1_3)s, %(key_1_4)s)

#12 [04:23:31.781] 0.9ms

admin_menu_item

SELECT DISTINCT admin_menu_item.active_tab AS admin_menu_item_active_tab 
FROM admin_menu_item

LIVE REQUESTS (0) — click to expand

Olympic Trap at Nuthampstead Shooting Ground LLP

Unlock the full event analysis

Historical Trends at Nuthampstead Shooting Ground LLP

Classification Deep Dive

Event Performance Analysis

Analyzing Data...

Refresh Complete

Already Up to Date?

Analyzing Data...

Refresh Complete

Already Up to Date?