Back to Events
OTR — Olympic Trap

Olympic Trap at Nuthampstead Shooting Ground LLP

Saturday, 14 June 2025  ·  CPSA Results →
Weather loading...
Event Rating
Rate
Select a star to rate or review this event
Latest Visitor Reviews
No written reviews yet.
72
Entries
80.7%
Field Average
98.4%
Highest Score
37.6%
Lowest Score
Top 3 Overall
🥈 =2
David Kirk
A
Thomas Betts
A
117/125
93.60%
🥇
Matthew Coward-Holley
A
123/125
98.40%
Event Difficulty
80.7% This Event
vs. Nuthampstead Shooting Ground LLP historical average (Olympic Trap)
↑ +5.0% easier than usual
Ground avg: 75.7%
Class Winners
A 17 entered
123/125 — 98.40%
Matthew Coward-Holley
2=: David Kirk — 93.60%
B 26 entered
116/125 — 92.80%
Finley Bowles
2: Leah Southall — 91.20%
C 17 entered
112/125 — 89.60%
Cemal Seziner
2=: Peter Lunn — 85.60%
D 12 entered
101/125 — 80.80%
Anne Phillips
2=: Holly Maddams — 74.40%
Field Shape
80.7%
Field avg
Olympic Trap at Nuthampstead Shooting Ground LLP had a 60.8 point scoring spread across 72 entries.
Spread 60.8 pts
Front 98.4%
Largest class B
A compact read of how the field performed: average, spread and where most shooters sat.
Score Distribution
90–100%
12 16.7%
80–89%
30 41.7%
70–79%
21 29.2%
60–69%
4 5.6%
50–59%
4 5.6%
<50%
1 1.4%
Field Achievement
% of competitors reaching each score threshold
90%+
16.7%
12 / 72
80%+
58.3%
42 / 72
70%+
87.5%
63 / 72
60%+
93.1%
67 / 72
50%+
98.6%
71 / 72

Unlock the full event analysis

Register free for historical ground trends, class averages and spread, score charts, class composition and a detailed classification breakdown.

Full Results — 72 entries
🔒 The Class Rank and vs Class Avg columns are hidden — register free to unlock both insights.
Class A
Score 123/125
vs Class Avg +0.0%
Profile Open →
Class A
Score 117/125
vs Class Avg +0.0%
Profile Open →
Class A
Score 117/125
vs Class Avg +0.0%
Profile Open →
Class A
Score 116/125
vs Class Avg +0.0%
Profile Open →
Class B
Score 116/125
vs Class Avg +0.0%
Profile Open →
Class A
Score 115/125
vs Class Avg +0.0%
Profile Open →
Class A
Score 115/125
vs Class Avg +0.0%
Profile Open →
Class A
Score 115/125
vs Class Avg +0.0%
Profile Open →
Class B
Score 114/125
vs Class Avg +0.0%
Profile Open →
Class A
Score 114/125
vs Class Avg +0.0%
Profile Open →
Class A
Score 114/125
vs Class Avg +0.0%
Profile Open →
Class B
Score 113/125
vs Class Avg +0.0%
Profile Open →
Class C
Score 112/125
vs Class Avg +0.0%
Profile Open →
Class B
Score 111/125
vs Class Avg +0.0%
Profile Open →
Class B
Score 110/125
vs Class Avg +0.0%
Profile Open →
Class B
Score 110/125
vs Class Avg +0.0%
Profile Open →
Class A
Score 110/125
vs Class Avg +0.0%
Profile Open →
Class A
Score 110/125
vs Class Avg +0.0%
Profile Open →
Class A
Score 110/125
vs Class Avg +0.0%
Profile Open →
Class B
Score 110/125
vs Class Avg +0.0%
Profile Open →
Class B
Score 109/125
vs Class Avg +0.0%
Profile Open →
Class A
Score 109/125
vs Class Avg +0.0%
Profile Open →
Class B
Score 108/125
vs Class Avg +0.0%
Profile Open →
Class A
Score 108/125
vs Class Avg +0.0%
Profile Open →
Class A
Score 107/125
vs Class Avg +0.0%
Profile Open →
Class B
Score 107/125
vs Class Avg +0.0%
Profile Open →
Class C
Score 107/125
vs Class Avg +0.0%
Profile Open →
Class C
Score 107/125
vs Class Avg +0.0%
Profile Open →
Class B
Score 107/125
vs Class Avg +0.0%
Profile Open →
Class A
Score 106/125
vs Class Avg +0.0%
Profile Open →
Class C
Score 106/125
vs Class Avg +0.0%
Profile Open →
Class C
Score 105/125
vs Class Avg +0.0%
Profile Open →
Class B
Score 105/125
vs Class Avg +0.0%
Profile Open →
Class B
Score 105/125
vs Class Avg +0.0%
Profile Open →
Class B
Score 105/125
vs Class Avg +0.0%
Profile Open →
Class B
Score 103/125
vs Class Avg +0.0%
Profile Open →
Class B
Score 102/125
vs Class Avg +0.0%
Profile Open →
Class B
Score 102/125
vs Class Avg +0.0%
Profile Open →
Class B
Score 102/125
vs Class Avg +0.0%
Profile Open →
Class C
Score 101/125
vs Class Avg +0.0%
Profile Open →
Class D
Score 101/125
vs Class Avg +0.0%
Profile Open →
Class B
Score 101/125
vs Class Avg +0.0%
Profile Open →
Class B
Score 99/125
vs Class Avg +0.0%
Profile Open →
Class C
Score 99/125
vs Class Avg +0.0%
Profile Open →
Class C
Score 99/125
vs Class Avg +0.0%
Profile Open →
Class B
Score 98/125
vs Class Avg +0.0%
Profile Open →
Class C
Score 98/125
vs Class Avg +0.0%
Profile Open →
Class B
Score 98/125
vs Class Avg +0.0%
Profile Open →
Class B
Score 97/125
vs Class Avg +0.0%
Profile Open →
Class C
Score 97/125
vs Class Avg +0.0%
Profile Open →
Class A
Score 97/125
vs Class Avg +0.0%
Profile Open →
Class B
Score 97/125
vs Class Avg +0.0%
Profile Open →
Class B
Score 97/125
vs Class Avg +0.0%
Profile Open →
Class C
Score 97/125
vs Class Avg +0.0%
Profile Open →
Class C
Score 97/125
vs Class Avg +0.0%
Profile Open →
Class B
Score 96/125
vs Class Avg +0.0%
Profile Open →
Class C
Score 94/125
vs Class Avg +0.0%
Profile Open →
Class C
Score 94/125
vs Class Avg +0.0%
Profile Open →
Class D
Score 93/125
vs Class Avg +0.0%
Profile Open →
Class C
Score 93/125
vs Class Avg +0.0%
Profile Open →
Class D
Score 93/125
vs Class Avg +0.0%
Profile Open →
Class C
Score 89/125
vs Class Avg +0.0%
Profile Open →
Class D
Score 88/125
vs Class Avg +0.0%
Profile Open →
Class C
Score 85/125
vs Class Avg +0.0%
Profile Open →
Class D
Score 85/125
vs Class Avg +0.0%
Profile Open →
Class D
Score 82/125
vs Class Avg +0.0%
Profile Open →
Class D
Score 76/125
vs Class Avg +0.0%
Profile Open →
Class D
Score 73/125
vs Class Avg +0.0%
Profile Open →
Class D
Score 73/125
vs Class Avg +0.0%
Profile Open →
Class D
Score 73/125
vs Class Avg +0.0%
Profile Open →
Class D
Score 72/125
vs Class Avg +0.0%
Profile Open →
Class D
Score 47/125
vs Class Avg +0.0%
Profile Open →
# Name Class Score Score % Class Rank 🔒 vs Class Avg
1 Matthew Coward-Holley A 123/125 98.40% 🔒 1 🔒 +0.0%
2= David Kirk A 117/125 93.60% 🔒 1 🔒 +0.0%
2= Thomas Betts A 117/125 93.60% 🔒 1 🔒 +0.0%
4= Andrew Greenwood A 116/125 92.80% 🔒 1 🔒 +0.0%
4= Finley Bowles B 116/125 92.80% 🔒 1 🔒 +0.0%
6= Ellie Seward A 115/125 92.00% 🔒 1 🔒 +0.0%
6= Nathan Hales A 115/125 92.00% 🔒 1 🔒 +0.0%
6= Steve Scott A 115/125 92.00% 🔒 1 🔒 +0.0%
9= Leah Southall B 114/125 91.20% 🔒 1 🔒 +0.0%
9= Mark Robinson A 114/125 91.20% 🔒 1 🔒 +0.0%
9= Mathew Paley A 114/125 91.20% 🔒 1 🔒 +0.0%
12 Alexander Williams B 113/125 90.40% 🔒 1 🔒 +0.0%
13 Cemal Seziner C 112/125 89.60% 🔒 1 🔒 +0.0%
14 Liam Crabb B 111/125 88.80% 🔒 1 🔒 +0.0%
15= Anthony Paley B 110/125 88.00% 🔒 1 🔒 +0.0%
15= Hollie Lumsden B 110/125 88.00% 🔒 1 🔒 +0.0%
15= James Dedman A 110/125 88.00% 🔒 1 🔒 +0.0%
15= Madeleine Purser A 110/125 88.00% 🔒 1 🔒 +0.0%
15= Mark Shaw A 110/125 88.00% 🔒 1 🔒 +0.0%
15= Michael Wensley B 110/125 88.00% 🔒 1 🔒 +0.0%
21= Mackenzie Vandertuin B 109/125 87.20% 🔒 1 🔒 +0.0%
21= Michael Wixey A 109/125 87.20% 🔒 1 🔒 +0.0%
23= Lewis Kirk B 108/125 86.40% 🔒 1 🔒 +0.0%
23= William Gilbert A 108/125 86.40% 🔒 1 🔒 +0.0%
25= Abbey Ling A 107/125 85.60% 🔒 1 🔒 +0.0%
25= Howard Beaumont B 107/125 85.60% 🔒 1 🔒 +0.0%
25= Peter Lunn C 107/125 85.60% 🔒 1 🔒 +0.0%
25= Rhys Dixon C 107/125 85.60% 🔒 1 🔒 +0.0%
25= Tim Smith B 107/125 85.60% 🔒 1 🔒 +0.0%
30= Christopher Dean A 106/125 84.80% 🔒 1 🔒 +0.0%
30= Molly Hall C 106/125 84.80% 🔒 1 🔒 +0.0%
32= Clive Rowe C 105/125 84.00% 🔒 1 🔒 +0.0%
32= Maciej Bilkiewicz B 105/125 84.00% 🔒 1 🔒 +0.0%
32= Philip Sanders B 105/125 84.00% 🔒 1 🔒 +0.0%
32= Tegan Hart B 105/125 84.00% 🔒 1 🔒 +0.0%
36 Arran Greenwood B 103/125 82.40% 🔒 1 🔒 +0.0%
37= Dean Molnar B 102/125 81.60% 🔒 1 🔒 +0.0%
37= Ian Mulliner B 102/125 81.60% 🔒 1 🔒 +0.0%
37= Jake Janes B 102/125 81.60% 🔒 1 🔒 +0.0%
40= Andy Savva C 101/125 80.80% 🔒 1 🔒 +0.0%
40= Anne Phillips D 101/125 80.80% 🔒 1 🔒 +0.0%
40= Joseph Robbins B 101/125 80.80% 🔒 1 🔒 +0.0%
43= Keith White B 99/125 79.20% 🔒 1 🔒 +0.0%
43= Oliver Austin C 99/125 79.20% 🔒 1 🔒 +0.0%
43= Reg Toms C 99/125 79.20% 🔒 1 🔒 +0.0%
46= Bayram Baysal B 98/125 78.40% 🔒 1 🔒 +0.0%
46= Francesca Chau C 98/125 78.40% 🔒 1 🔒 +0.0%
46= John Lucy B 98/125 78.40% 🔒 1 🔒 +0.0%
49= Christopher Cheng B 97/125 77.60% 🔒 1 🔒 +0.0%
49= Graham Carter C 97/125 77.60% 🔒 1 🔒 +0.0%
49= Lucas Hyde A 97/125 77.60% 🔒 1 🔒 +0.0%
49= Michael Faux B 97/125 77.60% 🔒 1 🔒 +0.0%
49= Paul Culverwell B 97/125 77.60% 🔒 1 🔒 +0.0%
49= Tony Robbins C 97/125 77.60% 🔒 1 🔒 +0.0%
49= William Maclennan C 97/125 77.60% 🔒 1 🔒 +0.0%
56 Charlie Morris B 96/125 76.80% 🔒 1 🔒 +0.0%
57= Elise Dixon C 94/125 75.20% 🔒 1 🔒 +0.0%
57= Michael Cooper C 94/125 75.20% 🔒 1 🔒 +0.0%
59= Holly Maddams D 93/125 74.40% 🔒 1 🔒 +0.0%
59= John Bowman C 93/125 74.40% 🔒 1 🔒 +0.0%
59= Karl Weaver D 93/125 74.40% 🔒 1 🔒 +0.0%
62 Joshua Kind C 89/125 71.20% 🔒 1 🔒 +0.0%
63 Ian Cunliffe D 88/125 70.40% 🔒 1 🔒 +0.0%
64= Frank Chetcuti C 85/125 68.00% 🔒 1 🔒 +0.0%
64= Nicola Heron D 85/125 68.00% 🔒 1 🔒 +0.0%
66 David Izzard D 82/125 65.60% 🔒 1 🔒 +0.0%
67 Hazel Denney-Cunliffe D 76/125 60.80% 🔒 1 🔒 +0.0%
68= Abbie Coutanche D 73/125 58.40% 🔒 1 🔒 +0.0%
68= Anastasia Mascali D 73/125 58.40% 🔒 1 🔒 +0.0%
68= Stuart Purser D 73/125 58.40% 🔒 1 🔒 +0.0%
71 Carmine Saccone D 72/125 57.60% 🔒 1 🔒 +0.0%
72 Jane Robbins D 47/125 37.60% 🔒 1 🔒 +0.0%
Other OTR Events at Nuthampstead Shooting Ground LLP
0%

Analyzing Data...

Connecting to CPSA...

Initial Scores
History Pages
Classifications
Fixture Details
VER: v0.7
BUILD:
DEPLOYED: 29 Aug 2026 15:58:46