Back to Events

Last Updated: 11 Apr 2026, 17:00

OSK — Olympic Skeet

Olympic Skeet at Beverley & East Yorkshire Shooting Ground

Beverley & East Yorkshire Shooting Ground

Saturday, 11 April 2026 · CPSA Results →

Weather loading...

Event Rating

Latest Visitor Reviews

No written reviews yet.

Entries

82.0%

Field Average

96.0%

Highest Score

62.4%

Lowest Score

Top 3 Overall

🥈 =2

Ben •••••

Hugh •••••

118/125

94.40%

🥇

Mitchell •••••

120/125

96.00%

Event Difficulty

82.0% This Event

vs. Beverley & East Yorkshire Shooting Ground historical average (Olympic Skeet)

— About average difficulty

Ground avg: 81.8%

Class Winners

A 10 entered

120/125 — 96.00%

Mitchell •••••

2=: Ben ••••• — 94.40%

B 11 entered

114/125 — 91.20%

Thomas •••••

2=: Andrew ••••• — 90.40%

C 11 entered

109/125 — 87.20%

Ragan •••••

2: Oliver ••••• — 84.80%

D 9 entered

101/125 — 80.80%

Robert •••••

2: Simon ••••• — 76.00%

Other 1 entered

88/125 — 70.40%

Andrew •••••

Field Shape

82.0%

Field avg

Olympic Skeet at Beverley & East Yorkshire Shooting Ground had a 33.6 point scoring spread across 42 entries.

Spread 33.6 pts

Front 96.0%

Largest class B

A compact read of how the field performed: average, spread and where most shooters sat.

Score Distribution

90–100%

12 28.6%

80–89%

14 33.3%

70–79%

10 23.8%

60–69%

6 14.3%

50–59%

0 0.0%

<50%

0 0.0%

Field Achievement

% of competitors reaching each score threshold

90%+

28.6%

12 / 42

80%+

61.9%

26 / 42

70%+

85.7%

36 / 42

60%+

100.0%

42 / 42

50%+

100.0%

42 / 42

Unlock the full event analysis

Register free for historical ground trends, class averages and spread, score charts, class composition and a detailed classification breakdown.

Historical Trends at Beverley & East Yorkshire Shooting Ground

Olympic Skeet performance across events held at this ground.

Last 12 months

Overall Average Trend

Classification Trend Comparison

Classification Deep Dive

4 active classifications

—

Member insight

Typical —

Best —

Lowest —

Middle 50% score range

vs Ground Avg (12m)—

—

Member insight

Typical —

Best —

Lowest —

Middle 50% score range

vs Ground Avg (12m)—

—

Member insight

Typical —

Best —

Lowest —

Middle 50% score range

vs Ground Avg (12m)—

—

Member insight

Typical —

Best —

Lowest —

Middle 50% score range

vs Ground Avg (12m)—

Event Performance Analysis

Registered insight

Average by Class

Class averages make it easier to see where the event played hardest across the field.

Field Spread by Class

88.8-96.0%

83.2-91.2%

68.8-87.2%

62.4-80.8%

Other

70.4-70.4%

Boxes show the middle 50% of each class. Orange line is the median.

Top 10 Score Lollipop

A quick visual read of how far the front of the field separated itself.

Score Histogram

High gun: 96.0%. The high-gun band is outlined.

Class Breakdown

Rotate your device to see High/Low scores and the class winner

Class	Count	Average	High	Low	Winner
A	10	92.8%	96.0%	88.8%	Mitchell •••••
B	11	88.8%	91.2%	83.2%	Thomas •••••
C	11	77.3%	87.2%	68.8%	Ragan •••••
D	9	68.9%	80.8%	62.4%	Robert •••••
Other	1	70.4%	70.4%	70.4%	Andrew •••••

Class Composition

10 23.8%

11 26.2%

9 21.4%

Other

1 2.4%

Largest class: B — 11 competitors (26.2%)

Full Results — 42 entries

🔒 The Class Rank and vs Class Avg columns are hidden — register free to unlock both insights.

Rotate your device to see the full results table: score, class placing, class average and delta.

Class A

Score 120/125

Class placing 1

Class average 92.8%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class A

Score 118/125

Class placing 1

Class average 92.8%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class A

Score 118/125

Class placing 1

Class average 92.8%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class A

Score 117/125

Class placing 1

Class average 92.8%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class A

Score 117/125

Class placing 1

Class average 92.8%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class A

Score 115/125

Class placing 1

Class average 92.8%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class A

Score 115/125

Class placing 1

Class average 92.8%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class A

Score 115/125

Class placing 1

Class average 92.8%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class A

Score 114/125

Class placing 1

Class average 92.8%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 114/125

Class placing 1

Class average 88.8%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 113/125

Class placing 1

Class average 88.8%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 113/125

Class placing 1

Class average 88.8%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 112/125

Class placing 1

Class average 88.8%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 112/125

Class placing 1

Class average 88.8%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 111/125

Class placing 1

Class average 88.8%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 111/125

Class placing 1

Class average 88.8%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class A

Score 111/125

Class placing 1

Class average 92.8%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 111/125

Class placing 1

Class average 88.8%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 111/125

Class placing 1

Class average 88.8%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 109/125

Class placing 1

Class average 88.8%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class C

Score 109/125

Class placing 1

Class average 77.3%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class C

Score 106/125

Class placing 1

Class average 77.3%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 104/125

Class placing 1

Class average 88.8%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class C

Score 103/125

Class placing 1

Class average 77.3%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class C

Score 102/125

Class placing 1

Class average 77.3%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class D

Score 101/125

Class placing 1

Class average 68.9%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class C

Score 99/125

Class placing 1

Class average 77.3%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class C

Score 96/125

Class placing 1

Class average 77.3%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class D

Score 95/125

Class placing 1

Class average 68.9%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class D

Score 93/125

Class placing 1

Class average 68.9%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class C

Score 92/125

Class placing 1

Class average 77.3%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class C

Score 90/125

Class placing 1

Class average 77.3%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class Unknown

Score 88/125

Class placing 1

Class average 70.4%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class C

Score 88/125

Class placing 1

Class average 77.3%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class C

Score 86/125

Class placing 1

Class average 77.3%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class D

Score 81/125

Class placing 1

Class average 68.9%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class D

Score 80/125

Class placing 1

Class average 68.9%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class D

Score 79/125

Class placing 1

Class average 68.9%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class D

Score 78/125

Class placing 1

Class average 68.9%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class D

Score 78/125

Class placing 1

Class average 68.9%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class C

Score 55/75

Class placing 1

Class average 77.3%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class D

Score 54/75

Class placing 1

Class average 68.9%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

#	Name	Class	Score	Score %	Class Rank 🔒	Class Avg	vs Class Avg
1	Mitchell •••••	A	120/125	96.00%	🔒 1	92.80%	🔒 +0.0%
2=	Ben •••••	A	118/125	94.40%	🔒 1	92.80%	🔒 +0.0%
2=	Hugh •••••	A	118/125	94.40%	🔒 1	92.80%	🔒 +0.0%
4=	Arran •••••	A	117/125	93.60%	🔒 1	92.80%	🔒 +0.0%
4=	Owen •••••	A	117/125	93.60%	🔒 1	92.80%	🔒 +0.0%
6=	Dominic •••••	A	115/125	92.00%	🔒 1	92.80%	🔒 +0.0%
6=	Gareth •••••	A	115/125	92.00%	🔒 1	92.80%	🔒 +0.0%
6=	Phoebe •••••	A	115/125	92.00%	🔒 1	92.80%	🔒 +0.0%
9=	Luke •••••	A	114/125	91.20%	🔒 1	92.80%	🔒 +0.0%
9=	Thomas •••••	B	114/125	91.20%	🔒 1	88.80%	🔒 +0.0%
11=	Andrew •••••	B	113/125	90.40%	🔒 1	88.80%	🔒 +0.0%
11=	George •••••	B	113/125	90.40%	🔒 1	88.80%	🔒 +0.0%
13=	Charles •••••	B	112/125	89.60%	🔒 1	88.80%	🔒 +0.0%
13=	Harry •••••	B	112/125	89.60%	🔒 1	88.80%	🔒 +0.0%
15=	Jessica •••••	B	111/125	88.80%	🔒 1	88.80%	🔒 +0.0%
15=	Lee •••••	B	111/125	88.80%	🔒 1	88.80%	🔒 +0.0%
15=	Madeleine •••••	A	111/125	88.80%	🔒 1	92.80%	🔒 +0.0%
15=	Robert •••••	B	111/125	88.80%	🔒 1	88.80%	🔒 +0.0%
15=	Sophie •••••	B	111/125	88.80%	🔒 1	88.80%	🔒 +0.0%
20=	Jessica •••••	B	109/125	87.20%	🔒 1	88.80%	🔒 +0.0%
20=	Ragan •••••	C	109/125	87.20%	🔒 1	77.30%	🔒 +0.0%
22	Oliver •••••	C	106/125	84.80%	🔒 1	77.30%	🔒 +0.0%
23	Toby •••••	B	104/125	83.20%	🔒 1	88.80%	🔒 +0.0%
24	Frank •••••	C	103/125	82.40%	🔒 1	77.30%	🔒 +0.0%
25	Mathew •••••	C	102/125	81.60%	🔒 1	77.30%	🔒 +0.0%
26	Robert •••••	D	101/125	80.80%	🔒 1	68.90%	🔒 +0.0%
27	Ted •••••	C	99/125	79.20%	🔒 1	77.30%	🔒 +0.0%
28	Richard •••••	C	96/125	76.80%	🔒 1	77.30%	🔒 +0.0%
29	Simon •••••	D	95/125	76.00%	🔒 1	68.90%	🔒 +0.0%
30	Peter •••••	D	93/125	74.40%	🔒 1	68.90%	🔒 +0.0%
31	Jon-Paul •••••	C	92/125	73.60%	🔒 1	77.30%	🔒 +0.0%
32	Gary •••••	C	90/125	72.00%	🔒 1	77.30%	🔒 +0.0%
33=	Andrew •••••	Unknown	88/125	70.40%	🔒 1	70.40%	🔒 +0.0%
33=	Philip •••••	C	88/125	70.40%	🔒 1	77.30%	🔒 +0.0%
35	Giulio •••••	C	86/125	68.80%	🔒 1	77.30%	🔒 +0.0%
36	Peter •••••	D	81/125	64.80%	🔒 1	68.90%	🔒 +0.0%
37	Wayne •••••	D	80/125	64.00%	🔒 1	68.90%	🔒 +0.0%
38	Andrew •••••	D	79/125	63.20%	🔒 1	68.90%	🔒 +0.0%
39=	David •••••	D	78/125	62.40%	🔒 1	68.90%	🔒 +0.0%
39=	Stephen •••••	D	78/125	62.40%	🔒 1	68.90%	🔒 +0.0%
41	Tom •••••	C	55/75	73.33%	🔒 1	77.30%	🔒 +0.0%
42	Andrew •••••	D	54/75	72.00%	🔒 1	68.90%	🔒 +0.0%

Other OSK Events at Beverley & East Yorkshire Shooting Ground

⚙ Performance Stats DRAG TO MOVE

0.091s ● FAST

DB 26% · Py 22% · Render 52%

12 queries · avg 2.0ms · max 5.1ms

Render Breakdown

Full Page Render 0.0473s

DB Logic (Pre-Render) 0.0237s

Python Logic (Pre-Render) 0.0198s

QUERY TABLES ▾

⚠ event_review 4× 0.007s

shoot_event 2× 0.005s

shoot_score 2× 0.007s

site_configuration 2× 0.003s

ground 1× 0.001s

admin_menu_item 1× 0.001s

⚠ = queried 3+ times (cache candidate)

SQL QUERIES (12) — click to expand

#1 [21:50:48.596] 3.4ms

shoot_event

SELECT shoot_event.id AS shoot_event_id, shoot_event.cpsa_fixture_id AS shoot_event_cpsa_fixture_id, shoot_event.name AS shoot_event_name, shoot_event.date AS shoot_event_date, shoot_event.discipline AS shoot_event_discipline, shoot_event.ground AS shoot_event_ground, shoot_event.url AS shoot_event_…

#2 [21:50:48.605] 5.1ms

shoot_score

SELECT shoot_score.id AS shoot_score_id, shoot_score.targets AS shoot_score_targets, shoot_score.hits AS shoot_score_hits, shoot_score.points AS shoot_score_points, shoot_score.percentage AS shoot_score_percentage, shoot_score.course_breakdown AS shoot_score_course_breakdown, shoot_score.shooter_id …

#3 [21:50:48.609] 1.7ms

shoot_score

SELECT avg(shoot_score.percentage) AS avg_1 
FROM shoot_score JOIN shoot_event ON shoot_score.event_id = shoot_event.id 
WHERE shoot_event.ground = %(ground_1)s AND shoot_event.discipline = %(discipline_1)s AND shoot_event.is_scraped = true AND shoot_event.admin_hidden != true AND shoot_event.id != …

#4 [21:50:48.612] 1.6ms

shoot_event

SELECT shoot_event.id AS shoot_event_id, shoot_event.cpsa_fixture_id AS shoot_event_cpsa_fixture_id, shoot_event.name AS shoot_event_name, shoot_event.date AS shoot_event_date, shoot_event.discipline AS shoot_event_discipline, shoot_event.ground AS shoot_event_ground, shoot_event.url AS shoot_event_…

#5 [21:50:48.616] 2.9ms

event_review

SELECT avg(event_review.rating) AS avg_1, count(event_review.id) AS count_1 
FROM event_review 
WHERE event_review.event_id = %(event_id_1)s

#6 [21:50:48.618] 1.2ms

event_review

SELECT count(*) AS count_1 
FROM (SELECT event_review.id AS event_review_id, event_review.event_id AS event_review_event_id, event_review.rating AS event_review_rating, event_review.review_text AS event_review_review_text, event_review.reviewer_name AS event_review_reviewer_name, event_review.review…

#7 [21:50:48.619] 1.3ms

event_review

SELECT event_review.id AS event_review_id, event_review.event_id AS event_review_event_id, event_review.rating AS event_review_rating, event_review.review_text AS event_review_review_text, event_review.reviewer_name AS event_review_reviewer_name, event_review.reviewer_hash AS event_review_reviewer_h…

#8 [21:50:48.621] 1.3ms

event_review

SELECT event_review.id AS event_review_id, event_review.event_id AS event_review_event_id, event_review.rating AS event_review_rating, event_review.review_text AS event_review_review_text, event_review.reviewer_name AS event_review_reviewer_name, event_review.reviewer_hash AS event_review_reviewer_h…

#9 [21:50:48.623] 1.4ms

ground

SELECT ground.id AS ground_id, ground.name AS ground_name, ground.url AS ground_url, ground.postcode AS ground_postcode, ground.what3words AS ground_what3words, ground.email AS ground_email, ground.website AS ground_website, ground.num_events_cpsa AS ground_num_events_cpsa, ground.num_events_cpsa_la…

#10 [21:50:48.626] 1.6ms

site_configuration

SELECT site_configuration.id AS site_configuration_id, site_configuration.key AS site_configuration_key, site_configuration.value AS site_configuration_value 
FROM site_configuration 
WHERE site_configuration.key LIKE %(key_1)s OR site_configuration.key LIKE %(key_2)s

#11 [21:50:48.627] 1.2ms

site_configuration

SELECT site_configuration.id AS site_configuration_id, site_configuration.key AS site_configuration_key, site_configuration.value AS site_configuration_value 
FROM site_configuration 
WHERE site_configuration.key IN (%(key_1_1)s, %(key_1_2)s, %(key_1_3)s, %(key_1_4)s)

#12 [21:50:48.629] 1.2ms

admin_menu_item

SELECT DISTINCT admin_menu_item.active_tab AS admin_menu_item_active_tab 
FROM admin_menu_item

LIVE REQUESTS (0) — click to expand

Olympic Skeet at Beverley & East Yorkshire Shooting Ground

Unlock the full event analysis

Historical Trends at Beverley & East Yorkshire Shooting Ground

Classification Deep Dive

Event Performance Analysis

Analyzing Data...

Refresh Complete

Already Up to Date?

Analyzing Data...

Refresh Complete

Already Up to Date?