Back to Events

Last Updated: 30 Apr 2026, 12:47

OTR — Olympic Trap

Olympic Trap at Griffin-Lloyd Shooting Ground

Griffin-Lloyd Shooting Ground

Friday, 15 August 2025 · CPSA Results →

Weather loading...

Event Rating

Latest Visitor Reviews

No written reviews yet.

Entries

82.8%

Field Average

95.3%

Highest Score

62.0%

Lowest Score

Top 3 Overall

🥈 =2

Andrew •••••

Wayne •••••

142/150

94.67%

🥇

Matthew •••••

143/150

95.33%

Event Difficulty

82.8% This Event

vs. Griffin-Lloyd Shooting Ground historical average (Olympic Trap)

↑ +6.5% easier than usual

Ground avg: 76.3%

Class Winners

A 15 entered

143/150 — 95.33%

Matthew •••••

2=: Andrew ••••• — 94.67%

B 15 entered

141/150 — 94.00%

Leah •••••

2: John ••••• — 90.67%

C 15 entered

131/150 — 87.33%

Michael •••••

2: James ••••• — 86.67%

D 20 entered

134/150 — 89.33%

John •••••

2: Katie ••••• — 84.00%

Field Shape

82.8%

Field avg

Olympic Trap at Griffin-Lloyd Shooting Ground had a 33.3 point scoring spread across 65 entries.

Spread 33.3 pts

Front 95.3%

Largest class D

A compact read of how the field performed: average, spread and where most shooters sat.

Score Distribution

90–100%

12 18.5%

80–89%

30 46.2%

70–79%

18 27.7%

60–69%

5 7.7%

50–59%

0 0.0%

<50%

0 0.0%

Field Achievement

% of competitors reaching each score threshold

90%+

18.5%

12 / 65

80%+

64.6%

42 / 65

70%+

92.3%

60 / 65

60%+

100.0%

65 / 65

50%+

100.0%

65 / 65

Unlock the full event analysis

Register free for historical ground trends, class averages and spread, score charts, class composition and a detailed classification breakdown.

Historical Trends at Griffin-Lloyd Shooting Ground

Olympic Trap performance across events held at this ground.

Last 12 months

Overall Average Trend

Classification Trend Comparison

Classification Deep Dive

4 active classifications

—

Member insight

Typical —

Best —

Lowest —

Middle 50% score range

vs Ground Avg (12m)—

—

Member insight

Typical —

Best —

Lowest —

Middle 50% score range

vs Ground Avg (12m)—

—

Member insight

Typical —

Best —

Lowest —

Middle 50% score range

vs Ground Avg (12m)—

—

Member insight

Typical —

Best —

Lowest —

Middle 50% score range

vs Ground Avg (12m)—

Event Performance Analysis

Registered insight

Average by Class

Class averages make it easier to see where the event played hardest across the field.

Field Spread by Class

79.3-95.3%

78.0-94.0%

66.7-87.3%

62.0-89.3%

Boxes show the middle 50% of each class. Orange line is the median.

Top 10 Score Lollipop

A quick visual read of how far the front of the field separated itself.

Score Histogram

High gun: 95.3%. The high-gun band is outlined.

Class Breakdown

Rotate your device to see High/Low scores and the class winner

Class	Count	Average	High	Low	Winner
A	15	90.6%	95.3%	79.3%	Matthew •••••
B	15	86.6%	94.0%	78.0%	Leah •••••
C	15	79.4%	87.3%	66.7%	Michael •••••
D	20	76.7%	89.3%	62.0%	John •••••

Class Composition

15 23.1%

20 30.8%

Largest class: D — 20 competitors (30.8%)

Full Results — 65 entries

🔒 The Class Rank and vs Class Avg columns are hidden — register free to unlock both insights.

Rotate your device to see the full results table: score, class placing, class average and delta.

Class A

Score 143/150

Class placing 1

Class average 90.6%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class A

Score 142/150

Class placing 1

Class average 90.6%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class A

Score 142/150

Class placing 1

Class average 90.6%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class A

Score 141/150

Class placing 1

Class average 90.6%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 141/150

Class placing 1

Class average 86.6%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class A

Score 141/150

Class placing 1

Class average 90.6%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class A

Score 140/150

Class placing 1

Class average 90.6%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class A

Score 138/150

Class placing 1

Class average 90.6%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class A

Score 137/150

Class placing 1

Class average 90.6%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 136/150

Class placing 1

Class average 86.6%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 135/150

Class placing 1

Class average 86.6%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class A

Score 135/150

Class placing 1

Class average 90.6%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 134/150

Class placing 1

Class average 86.6%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class D

Score 134/150

Class placing 1

Class average 76.7%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class A

Score 134/150

Class placing 1

Class average 90.6%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class A

Score 134/150

Class placing 1

Class average 90.6%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 133/150

Class placing 1

Class average 86.6%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class A

Score 133/150

Class placing 1

Class average 90.6%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 133/150

Class placing 1

Class average 86.6%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 132/150

Class placing 1

Class average 86.6%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class C

Score 131/150

Class placing 1

Class average 79.4%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 131/150

Class placing 1

Class average 86.6%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class C

Score 130/150

Class placing 1

Class average 79.4%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class A

Score 130/150

Class placing 1

Class average 90.6%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class A

Score 130/150

Class placing 1

Class average 90.6%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class C

Score 129/150

Class placing 1

Class average 79.4%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 129/150

Class placing 1

Class average 86.6%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 128/150

Class placing 1

Class average 86.6%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 128/150

Class placing 1

Class average 86.6%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 126/150

Class placing 1

Class average 86.6%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class D

Score 126/150

Class placing 1

Class average 76.7%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class C

Score 124/150

Class placing 1

Class average 79.4%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 123/150

Class placing 1

Class average 86.6%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class D

Score 123/150

Class placing 1

Class average 76.7%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 123/150

Class placing 1

Class average 86.6%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class D

Score 123/150

Class placing 1

Class average 76.7%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class C

Score 123/150

Class placing 1

Class average 79.4%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class D

Score 123/150

Class placing 1

Class average 76.7%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class C

Score 122/150

Class placing 1

Class average 79.4%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class C

Score 122/150

Class placing 1

Class average 79.4%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class C

Score 121/150

Class placing 1

Class average 79.4%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class D

Score 120/150

Class placing 1

Class average 76.7%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class C

Score 119/150

Class placing 1

Class average 79.4%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class A

Score 119/150

Class placing 1

Class average 90.6%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class D

Score 118/150

Class placing 1

Class average 76.7%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class D

Score 118/150

Class placing 1

Class average 76.7%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class D

Score 117/150

Class placing 1

Class average 76.7%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 117/150

Class placing 1

Class average 86.6%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class D

Score 117/150

Class placing 1

Class average 76.7%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class C

Score 117/150

Class placing 1

Class average 79.4%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class D

Score 116/150

Class placing 1

Class average 76.7%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class C

Score 116/150

Class placing 1

Class average 79.4%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class C

Score 115/150

Class placing 1

Class average 79.4%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class D

Score 115/150

Class placing 1

Class average 76.7%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class D

Score 114/150

Class placing 1

Class average 76.7%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class D

Score 114/150

Class placing 1

Class average 76.7%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class C

Score 113/150

Class placing 1

Class average 79.4%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class D

Score 112/150

Class placing 1

Class average 76.7%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class D

Score 110/150

Class placing 1

Class average 76.7%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class D

Score 109/150

Class placing 1

Class average 76.7%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class C

Score 104/150

Class placing 1

Class average 79.4%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class D

Score 104/150

Class placing 1

Class average 76.7%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class C

Score 100/150

Class placing 1

Class average 79.4%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class D

Score 95/150

Class placing 1

Class average 76.7%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class D

Score 93/150

Class placing 1

Class average 76.7%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

#	Name	Class	Score	Score %	Class Rank 🔒	Class Avg	vs Class Avg
1	Matthew •••••	A	143/150	95.33%	🔒 1	90.60%	🔒 +0.0%
2=	Andrew •••••	A	142/150	94.67%	🔒 1	90.60%	🔒 +0.0%
2=	Wayne •••••	A	142/150	94.67%	🔒 1	90.60%	🔒 +0.0%
4=	Derek •••••	A	141/150	94.00%	🔒 1	90.60%	🔒 +0.0%
4=	Leah •••••	B	141/150	94.00%	🔒 1	86.60%	🔒 +0.0%
4=	Mark •••••	A	141/150	94.00%	🔒 1	90.60%	🔒 +0.0%
7	James •••••	A	140/150	93.33%	🔒 1	90.60%	🔒 +0.0%
8	Owain •••••	A	138/150	92.00%	🔒 1	90.60%	🔒 +0.0%
9	Dan •••••	A	137/150	91.33%	🔒 1	90.60%	🔒 +0.0%
10	John •••••	B	136/150	90.67%	🔒 1	86.60%	🔒 +0.0%
11=	Jonathan •••••	B	135/150	90.00%	🔒 1	86.60%	🔒 +0.0%
11=	Thomas •••••	A	135/150	90.00%	🔒 1	90.60%	🔒 +0.0%
13=	Ian •••••	B	134/150	89.33%	🔒 1	86.60%	🔒 +0.0%
13=	John •••••	D	134/150	89.33%	🔒 1	76.70%	🔒 +0.0%
13=	Lucas •••••	A	134/150	89.33%	🔒 1	90.60%	🔒 +0.0%
13=	Mark •••••	A	134/150	89.33%	🔒 1	90.60%	🔒 +0.0%
17=	Alexander •••••	B	133/150	88.67%	🔒 1	86.60%	🔒 +0.0%
17=	Fred •••••	A	133/150	88.67%	🔒 1	90.60%	🔒 +0.0%
17=	Tim •••••	B	133/150	88.67%	🔒 1	86.60%	🔒 +0.0%
20	Phillip •••••	B	132/150	88.00%	🔒 1	86.60%	🔒 +0.0%
21=	Michael •••••	C	131/150	87.33%	🔒 1	79.40%	🔒 +0.0%
21=	Nick •••••	B	131/150	87.33%	🔒 1	86.60%	🔒 +0.0%
23=	James •••••	C	130/150	86.67%	🔒 1	79.40%	🔒 +0.0%
23=	John •••••	A	130/150	86.67%	🔒 1	90.60%	🔒 +0.0%
23=	Robert •••••	A	130/150	86.67%	🔒 1	90.60%	🔒 +0.0%
26=	Lloyd •••••	C	129/150	86.00%	🔒 1	79.40%	🔒 +0.0%
26=	Paul •••••	B	129/150	86.00%	🔒 1	86.60%	🔒 +0.0%
28=	Caledfryn •••••	B	128/150	85.33%	🔒 1	86.60%	🔒 +0.0%
28=	George •••••	B	128/150	85.33%	🔒 1	86.60%	🔒 +0.0%
30=	Howard •••••	B	126/150	84.00%	🔒 1	86.60%	🔒 +0.0%
30=	Katie •••••	D	126/150	84.00%	🔒 1	76.70%	🔒 +0.0%
32	Scott •••••	C	124/150	82.67%	🔒 1	79.40%	🔒 +0.0%
33=	C •••••	B	123/150	82.00%	🔒 1	86.60%	🔒 +0.0%
33=	Charles •••••	D	123/150	82.00%	🔒 1	76.70%	🔒 +0.0%
33=	Harry •••••	B	123/150	82.00%	🔒 1	86.60%	🔒 +0.0%
33=	Michael •••••	D	123/150	82.00%	🔒 1	76.70%	🔒 +0.0%
33=	Rhys •••••	C	123/150	82.00%	🔒 1	79.40%	🔒 +0.0%
33=	William •••••	D	123/150	82.00%	🔒 1	76.70%	🔒 +0.0%
39=	Chloe •••••	C	122/150	81.33%	🔒 1	79.40%	🔒 +0.0%
39=	Isabelle •••••	C	122/150	81.33%	🔒 1	79.40%	🔒 +0.0%
41	Elise •••••	C	121/150	80.67%	🔒 1	79.40%	🔒 +0.0%
42	Jacquelyn •••••	D	120/150	80.00%	🔒 1	76.70%	🔒 +0.0%
43=	Dennis •••••	C	119/150	79.33%	🔒 1	79.40%	🔒 +0.0%
43=	Marc •••••	A	119/150	79.33%	🔒 1	90.60%	🔒 +0.0%
45=	Gareth •••••	D	118/150	78.67%	🔒 1	76.70%	🔒 +0.0%
45=	Jim •••••	D	118/150	78.67%	🔒 1	76.70%	🔒 +0.0%
47=	Francis •••••	D	117/150	78.00%	🔒 1	76.70%	🔒 +0.0%
47=	Liam Crabb	B	117/150	78.00%	🔒 1	86.60%	🔒 +0.0%
47=	Sarah •••••	D	117/150	78.00%	🔒 1	76.70%	🔒 +0.0%
47=	Steven •••••	C	117/150	78.00%	🔒 1	79.40%	🔒 +0.0%
51=	Conor •••••	D	116/150	77.33%	🔒 1	76.70%	🔒 +0.0%
51=	William •••••	C	116/150	77.33%	🔒 1	79.40%	🔒 +0.0%
53=	Douglas •••••	C	115/150	76.67%	🔒 1	79.40%	🔒 +0.0%
53=	Hugh •••••	D	115/150	76.67%	🔒 1	76.70%	🔒 +0.0%
55=	John •••••	D	114/150	76.00%	🔒 1	76.70%	🔒 +0.0%
55=	Valdemar •••••	D	114/150	76.00%	🔒 1	76.70%	🔒 +0.0%
57	Stuart •••••	C	113/150	75.33%	🔒 1	79.40%	🔒 +0.0%
58	Robert •••••	D	112/150	74.67%	🔒 1	76.70%	🔒 +0.0%
59	Eric •••••	D	110/150	73.33%	🔒 1	76.70%	🔒 +0.0%
60	Norman •••••	D	109/150	72.67%	🔒 1	76.70%	🔒 +0.0%
61=	Alan •••••	C	104/150	69.33%	🔒 1	79.40%	🔒 +0.0%
61=	T •••••	D	104/150	69.33%	🔒 1	76.70%	🔒 +0.0%
63	Andrew •••••	C	100/150	66.67%	🔒 1	79.40%	🔒 +0.0%
64	Douglas •••••	D	95/150	63.33%	🔒 1	76.70%	🔒 +0.0%
65	James •••••	D	93/150	62.00%	🔒 1	76.70%	🔒 +0.0%

Other OTR Events at Griffin-Lloyd Shooting Ground

⚙ Performance Stats DRAG TO MOVE

0.047s ● FAST

DB 43% · Py 27% · Render 30%

12 queries · avg 1.7ms · max 3.3ms

Render Breakdown

DB Logic (Pre-Render) 0.0198s

Full Page Render 0.0140s

Python Logic (Pre-Render) 0.0127s

QUERY TABLES ▾

⚠ event_review 4× 0.006s

shoot_event 2× 0.005s

shoot_score 2× 0.004s

site_configuration 2× 0.003s

ground 1× 0.001s

admin_menu_item 1× 0.001s

⚠ = queried 3+ times (cache candidate)

SQL QUERIES (12) — click to expand

#1 [23:42:19.405] 3.3ms

shoot_event

SELECT shoot_event.id AS shoot_event_id, shoot_event.cpsa_fixture_id AS shoot_event_cpsa_fixture_id, shoot_event.name AS shoot_event_name, shoot_event.date AS shoot_event_date, shoot_event.discipline AS shoot_event_discipline, shoot_event.ground AS shoot_event_ground, shoot_event.url AS shoot_event_…

#2 [23:42:19.408] 2.0ms

shoot_score

SELECT shoot_score.id AS shoot_score_id, shoot_score.targets AS shoot_score_targets, shoot_score.hits AS shoot_score_hits, shoot_score.points AS shoot_score_points, shoot_score.percentage AS shoot_score_percentage, shoot_score.course_breakdown AS shoot_score_course_breakdown, shoot_score.shooter_id …

#3 [23:42:19.412] 1.7ms

shoot_score

SELECT avg(shoot_score.percentage) AS avg_1 
FROM shoot_score JOIN shoot_event ON shoot_score.event_id = shoot_event.id 
WHERE shoot_event.ground = %(ground_1)s AND shoot_event.discipline = %(discipline_1)s AND shoot_event.is_scraped = true AND shoot_event.admin_hidden != true AND shoot_event.id != …

#4 [23:42:19.414] 1.4ms

shoot_event

SELECT shoot_event.id AS shoot_event_id, shoot_event.cpsa_fixture_id AS shoot_event_cpsa_fixture_id, shoot_event.name AS shoot_event_name, shoot_event.date AS shoot_event_date, shoot_event.discipline AS shoot_event_discipline, shoot_event.ground AS shoot_event_ground, shoot_event.url AS shoot_event_…

#5 [23:42:19.417] 2.2ms

event_review

SELECT avg(event_review.rating) AS avg_1, count(event_review.id) AS count_1 
FROM event_review 
WHERE event_review.event_id = %(event_id_1)s

#6 [23:42:19.419] 1.2ms

event_review

SELECT count(*) AS count_1 
FROM (SELECT event_review.id AS event_review_id, event_review.event_id AS event_review_event_id, event_review.rating AS event_review_rating, event_review.review_text AS event_review_review_text, event_review.reviewer_name AS event_review_reviewer_name, event_review.review…

#7 [23:42:19.421] 1.3ms

event_review

SELECT event_review.id AS event_review_id, event_review.event_id AS event_review_event_id, event_review.rating AS event_review_rating, event_review.review_text AS event_review_review_text, event_review.reviewer_name AS event_review_reviewer_name, event_review.reviewer_hash AS event_review_reviewer_h…

#8 [23:42:19.423] 1.1ms

event_review

SELECT event_review.id AS event_review_id, event_review.event_id AS event_review_event_id, event_review.rating AS event_review_rating, event_review.review_text AS event_review_review_text, event_review.reviewer_name AS event_review_reviewer_name, event_review.reviewer_hash AS event_review_reviewer_h…

#9 [23:42:19.425] 1.2ms

ground

SELECT ground.id AS ground_id, ground.name AS ground_name, ground.url AS ground_url, ground.postcode AS ground_postcode, ground.what3words AS ground_what3words, ground.email AS ground_email, ground.website AS ground_website, ground.num_events_cpsa AS ground_num_events_cpsa, ground.num_events_cpsa_la…

#10 [23:42:19.427] 2.0ms

site_configuration

SELECT site_configuration.id AS site_configuration_id, site_configuration.key AS site_configuration_key, site_configuration.value AS site_configuration_value 
FROM site_configuration 
WHERE site_configuration.key LIKE %(key_1)s OR site_configuration.key LIKE %(key_2)s

#11 [23:42:19.429] 1.2ms

site_configuration

SELECT site_configuration.id AS site_configuration_id, site_configuration.key AS site_configuration_key, site_configuration.value AS site_configuration_value 
FROM site_configuration 
WHERE site_configuration.key IN (%(key_1_1)s, %(key_1_2)s, %(key_1_3)s, %(key_1_4)s)

#12 [23:42:19.431] 1.2ms

admin_menu_item

SELECT DISTINCT admin_menu_item.active_tab AS admin_menu_item_active_tab 
FROM admin_menu_item

LIVE REQUESTS (0) — click to expand

Olympic Trap at Griffin-Lloyd Shooting Ground

Unlock the full event analysis

Historical Trends at Griffin-Lloyd Shooting Ground

Classification Deep Dive

Event Performance Analysis

Analyzing Data...

Refresh Complete

Already Up to Date?

Analyzing Data...

Refresh Complete

Already Up to Date?