Back to Events

OTR — Olympic Trap

Olympic Trap at Griffin-Lloyd Shooting Ground

Griffin-Lloyd Shooting Ground

Friday, 15 August 2025 · CPSA Results →

Weather loading...

Event Rating

Latest Visitor Reviews

No written reviews yet.

Entries

82.8%

Field Average

95.3%

Highest Score

62.0%

Lowest Score

Top 3 Overall

🥈 =2

Andrew Greenwood

Wayne Byrne

142/150

94.67%

🥇

Matthew Coward-Holley

143/150

95.33%

Event Difficulty

82.8% This Event

vs. Griffin-Lloyd Shooting Ground historical average (Olympic Trap)

↑ +6.5% easier than usual

Ground avg: 76.3%

Class Winners

A 15 entered

143/150 — 95.33%

Matthew Coward-Holley

2=: Andrew Greenwood — 94.67%

B 15 entered

141/150 — 94.00%

Leah Southall

2: John Falconer — 90.67%

C 15 entered

131/150 — 87.33%

Michael Bradley

2: James Jones — 86.67%

D 20 entered

134/150 — 89.33%

John Breen

2: Katie Forde — 84.00%

Field Shape

82.8%

Field avg

Olympic Trap at Griffin-Lloyd Shooting Ground had a 33.3 point scoring spread across 65 entries.

Spread 33.3 pts

Front 95.3%

Largest class D

A compact read of how the field performed: average, spread and where most shooters sat.

Score Distribution

90–100%

12 18.5%

80–89%

30 46.2%

70–79%

18 27.7%

60–69%

5 7.7%

50–59%

0 0.0%

<50%

0 0.0%

Field Achievement

% of competitors reaching each score threshold

90%+

18.5%

12 / 65

80%+

64.6%

42 / 65

70%+

92.3%

60 / 65

60%+

100.0%

65 / 65

50%+

100.0%

65 / 65

Unlock the full event analysis

Register free for historical ground trends, class averages and spread, score charts, class composition and a detailed classification breakdown.

Historical Trends at Griffin-Lloyd Shooting Ground

Olympic Trap performance across events held at this ground.

Last 12 months

Overall Average Trend

Classification Trend Comparison

Classification Deep Dive

4 active classifications

—

Member insight

Typical —

Best —

Lowest —

Middle 50% score range

vs Ground Avg (12m)—

—

Member insight

Typical —

Best —

Lowest —

Middle 50% score range

vs Ground Avg (12m)—

—

Member insight

Typical —

Best —

Lowest —

Middle 50% score range

vs Ground Avg (12m)—

—

Member insight

Typical —

Best —

Lowest —

Middle 50% score range

vs Ground Avg (12m)—

Event Performance Analysis

Registered insight

Average by Class

Class averages make it easier to see where the event played hardest across the field.

Field Spread by Class

79.3-95.3%

78.0-94.0%

66.7-87.3%

62.0-89.3%

Boxes show the middle 50% of each class. Orange line is the median.

Top 10 Score Lollipop

A quick visual read of how far the front of the field separated itself.

Score Histogram

High gun: 95.3%. The high-gun band is outlined.

Class Breakdown

Rotate your device to see High/Low scores and the class winner

Class	Count	Average	High	Low	Winner
A	15	90.6%	95.3%	79.3%	Matthew Coward-Holley
B	15	86.6%	94.0%	78.0%	Leah Southall
C	15	79.4%	87.3%	66.7%	Michael Bradley
D	20	76.7%	89.3%	62.0%	John Breen

Class Composition

15 23.1%

20 30.8%

Largest class: D — 20 competitors (30.8%)

Full Results — 65 entries

🔒 The Class Rank and vs Class Avg columns are hidden — register free to unlock both insights.

Class A

Score 143/150

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class A

Score 142/150

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class A

Score 142/150

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class A

Score 141/150

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 141/150

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class A

Score 141/150

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class A

Score 140/150

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class A

Score 138/150

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class A

Score 137/150

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 136/150

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 135/150

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class A

Score 135/150

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 134/150

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class D

Score 134/150

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class A

Score 134/150

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class A

Score 134/150

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 133/150

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class A

Score 133/150

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 133/150

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 132/150

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class C

Score 131/150

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 131/150

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class C

Score 130/150

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class A

Score 130/150

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class A

Score 130/150

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class C

Score 129/150

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 129/150

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 128/150

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 128/150

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 126/150

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class D

Score 126/150

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class C

Score 124/150

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 123/150

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class D

Score 123/150

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 123/150

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class D

Score 123/150

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class C

Score 123/150

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class D

Score 123/150

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class C

Score 122/150

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class C

Score 122/150

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class C

Score 121/150

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class D

Score 120/150

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class C

Score 119/150

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class A

Score 119/150

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class D

Score 118/150

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class D

Score 118/150

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class D

Score 117/150

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 117/150

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class D

Score 117/150

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class C

Score 117/150

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class D

Score 116/150

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class C

Score 116/150

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class C

Score 115/150

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class D

Score 115/150

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class D

Score 114/150

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class D

Score 114/150

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class C

Score 113/150

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class D

Score 112/150

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class D

Score 110/150

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class D

Score 109/150

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class C

Score 104/150

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class D

Score 104/150

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class C

Score 100/150

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class D

Score 95/150

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class D

Score 93/150

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

#	Name	Class	Score	Score %	Class Rank 🔒	vs Class Avg
1	Matthew Coward-Holley	A	143/150	95.33%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
2=	Andrew Greenwood	A	142/150	94.67%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
2=	Wayne Byrne	A	142/150	94.67%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
4=	Derek Burnett	A	141/150	94.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
4=	Leah Southall	B	141/150	94.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
4=	Mark Shaw	A	141/150	94.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
7	James Dedman	A	140/150	93.33%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
8	Owain Humphreys	A	138/150	92.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
9	Dan McLoughlin	A	137/150	91.33%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
10	John Falconer	B	136/150	90.67%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
11=	Jonathan Davis	B	135/150	90.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
11=	Thomas Betts	A	135/150	90.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
13=	Ian Mulliner	B	134/150	89.33%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
13=	John Breen	D	134/150	89.33%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
13=	Lucas Hyde	A	134/150	89.33%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
13=	Mark Robinson	A	134/150	89.33%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
17=	Alexander Williams	B	133/150	88.67%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
17=	Fred Jaeger	A	133/150	88.67%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
17=	Tim Smith	B	133/150	88.67%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
20	Phillip Dando	B	132/150	88.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
21=	Michael Bradley	C	131/150	87.33%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
21=	Nick Mccarthy	B	131/150	87.33%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
23=	James Jones	C	130/150	86.67%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
23=	John Cully	A	130/150	86.67%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
23=	Robert Lewis	A	130/150	86.67%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
26=	Lloyd Jones	C	129/150	86.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
26=	Paul Culverwell	B	129/150	86.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
28=	Caledfryn Pritchard	B	128/150	85.33%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
28=	George Seaborne	B	128/150	85.33%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
30=	Howard Beaumont	B	126/150	84.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
30=	Katie Forde	D	126/150	84.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
32	Scott Magill	C	124/150	82.67%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
33=	C Barr	B	123/150	82.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
33=	Charles Hutchison	D	123/150	82.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
33=	Harry Poolman	B	123/150	82.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
33=	Michael Ward	D	123/150	82.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
33=	Rhys Dixon	C	123/150	82.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
33=	William Gray	D	123/150	82.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
39=	Chloe Davies	C	122/150	81.33%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
39=	Isabelle MacKintosh	C	122/150	81.33%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
41	Elise Dixon	C	121/150	80.67%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
42	Jacquelyn Lewis	D	120/150	80.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
43=	Dennis Evans	C	119/150	79.33%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
43=	Marc Potts	A	119/150	79.33%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
45=	Gareth Mitchell	D	118/150	78.67%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
45=	Jim Buchan	D	118/150	78.67%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
47=	Francis Knott	D	117/150	78.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
47=	Liam Crabb	B	117/150	78.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
47=	Sarah Nichols-Weaver	D	117/150	78.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
47=	Steven Dugay	C	117/150	78.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
51=	Conor Brennan	D	116/150	77.33%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
51=	William Donnelly	C	116/150	77.33%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
53=	Douglas Jones	C	115/150	76.67%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
53=	Hugh Pinkerton	D	115/150	76.67%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
55=	John Agnew	D	114/150	76.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
55=	Valdemar Hefer	D	114/150	76.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
57	Stuart Turner	C	113/150	75.33%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
58	Robert Parry	D	112/150	74.67%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
59	Eric Reid	D	110/150	73.33%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
60	Norman Gilmore	D	109/150	72.67%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
61=	Alan Williams	C	104/150	69.33%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
61=	T Murphy	D	104/150	69.33%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
63	Andrew Morrison	C	100/150	66.67%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
64	Douglas Hendry	D	95/150	63.33%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
65	James Wright	D	93/150	62.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%

Other OTR Events at Griffin-Lloyd Shooting Ground

⚙ Performance Stats DRAG TO MOVE

0.033s ● FAST

DB 42% · Py 41% · Render 17%

12 queries · avg 1.2ms · max 2.0ms

Render Breakdown

DB Logic (Pre-Render) 0.0139s

Python Logic (Pre-Render) 0.0134s

Full Page Render 0.0058s

QUERY TABLES ▾

⚠ event_review 4× 0.004s

shoot_event 2× 0.003s

shoot_score 2× 0.003s

site_configuration 2× 0.002s

ground 1× 0.001s

admin_menu_item 1× 0.001s

⚠ = queried 3+ times (cache candidate)

SQL QUERIES (12) — click to expand

#1 [00:14:57.225] 1.8ms

shoot_event

SELECT shoot_event.id AS shoot_event_id, shoot_event.cpsa_fixture_id AS shoot_event_cpsa_fixture_id, shoot_event.name AS shoot_event_name, shoot_event.date AS shoot_event_date, shoot_event.discipline AS shoot_event_discipline, shoot_event.ground AS shoot_event_ground, shoot_event.url AS shoot_event_…

#2 [00:14:57.228] 2.0ms

shoot_score

SELECT shoot_score.id AS shoot_score_id, shoot_score.targets AS shoot_score_targets, shoot_score.hits AS shoot_score_hits, shoot_score.points AS shoot_score_points, shoot_score.percentage AS shoot_score_percentage, shoot_score.shooter_id AS shoot_score_shooter_id, shoot_score.event_id AS shoot_score…

#3 [00:14:57.232] 1.3ms

shoot_score

SELECT avg(shoot_score.percentage) AS avg_1 
FROM shoot_score JOIN shoot_event ON shoot_score.event_id = shoot_event.id 
WHERE shoot_event.ground = %(ground_1)s AND shoot_event.discipline = %(discipline_1)s AND shoot_event.is_scraped = true AND shoot_event.admin_hidden != true AND shoot_event.id != …

#4 [00:14:57.234] 1.1ms

shoot_event

SELECT shoot_event.id AS shoot_event_id, shoot_event.cpsa_fixture_id AS shoot_event_cpsa_fixture_id, shoot_event.name AS shoot_event_name, shoot_event.date AS shoot_event_date, shoot_event.discipline AS shoot_event_discipline, shoot_event.ground AS shoot_event_ground, shoot_event.url AS shoot_event_…

#5 [00:14:57.236] 0.9ms

event_review

SELECT avg(event_review.rating) AS avg_1, count(event_review.id) AS count_1 
FROM event_review 
WHERE event_review.event_id = %(event_id_1)s

#6 [00:14:57.238] 0.9ms

event_review

SELECT count(*) AS count_1 
FROM (SELECT event_review.id AS event_review_id, event_review.event_id AS event_review_event_id, event_review.rating AS event_review_rating, event_review.review_text AS event_review_review_text, event_review.reviewer_name AS event_review_reviewer_name, event_review.review…

#7 [00:14:57.239] 0.9ms

event_review

SELECT event_review.id AS event_review_id, event_review.event_id AS event_review_event_id, event_review.rating AS event_review_rating, event_review.review_text AS event_review_review_text, event_review.reviewer_name AS event_review_reviewer_name, event_review.reviewer_hash AS event_review_reviewer_h…

#8 [00:14:57.241] 0.9ms

event_review

SELECT event_review.id AS event_review_id, event_review.event_id AS event_review_event_id, event_review.rating AS event_review_rating, event_review.review_text AS event_review_review_text, event_review.reviewer_name AS event_review_reviewer_name, event_review.reviewer_hash AS event_review_reviewer_h…

#9 [00:14:57.242] 1.3ms

ground

SELECT ground.id AS ground_id, ground.name AS ground_name, ground.url AS ground_url, ground.postcode AS ground_postcode, ground.what3words AS ground_what3words, ground.email AS ground_email, ground.website AS ground_website, ground.num_events_cpsa AS ground_num_events_cpsa, ground.num_events_cpsa_la…

#10 [00:14:57.244] 1.0ms

site_configuration

SELECT site_configuration.id AS site_configuration_id, site_configuration.key AS site_configuration_key, site_configuration.value AS site_configuration_value 
FROM site_configuration 
WHERE site_configuration.key LIKE %(key_1)s OR site_configuration.key LIKE %(key_2)s

#11 [00:14:57.245] 0.9ms

site_configuration

SELECT site_configuration.id AS site_configuration_id, site_configuration.key AS site_configuration_key, site_configuration.value AS site_configuration_value 
FROM site_configuration 
WHERE site_configuration.key IN (%(key_1_1)s, %(key_1_2)s, %(key_1_3)s, %(key_1_4)s)

#12 [00:14:57.247] 0.9ms

admin_menu_item

SELECT DISTINCT admin_menu_item.active_tab AS admin_menu_item_active_tab 
FROM admin_menu_item

LIVE REQUESTS (0) — click to expand

Olympic Trap at Griffin-Lloyd Shooting Ground

Unlock the full event analysis

Historical Trends at Griffin-Lloyd Shooting Ground

Classification Deep Dive

Event Performance Analysis

Analyzing Data...

Refresh Complete

Already Up to Date?

Analyzing Data...

Refresh Complete

Already Up to Date?