Back to Events

DTL — Down The Line

Down The Line at North Of England C.T.C

North Of England C.T.C

Saturday, 04 May 2024 · CPSA Results →

Weather loading...

Event Rating

Latest Visitor Reviews

No written reviews yet.

Entries

94.1%

Field Average

100.0%

Highest Score

62.7%

Lowest Score

Top 3 Overall

🥈

Paul Meakin

299/300

99.67%

🥇

Tom Robinson

300/300

100.00%

🥉 =3

Harry Lufflum

Robert Dietz

298/300

99.33%

Event Difficulty

94.1% This Event

vs. North Of England C.T.C historical average (Down The Line)

↑ +0.6% easier than usual

Ground avg: 93.5%

Class Winners

AA 35 entered

300/300 — 100.00%

Tom Robinson

2: Paul Meakin — 99.67%

A 41 entered

294/300 — 98.00%

Markie Van Allen(tied) Nick Haley(tied)

3: George Madden — 97.67%

B 15 entered

293/300 — 97.67%

Joshua Kind

2: Calum Willey — 97.00%

C 3 entered

272/300 — 90.67%

George Dilley

2: Justine Howe — 88.33%

Field Shape

94.1%

Field avg

Down The Line at North Of England C.T.C had a 37.3 point scoring spread across 94 entries.

Spread 37.3 pts

Front 100.0%

Largest class A

A compact read of how the field performed: average, spread and where most shooters sat.

Score Distribution

90–100%

81 86.2%

80–89%

12 12.8%

70–79%

0 0.0%

60–69%

1 1.1%

50–59%

0 0.0%

<50%

0 0.0%

Field Achievement

% of competitors reaching each score threshold

90%+

86.2%

81 / 94

80%+

98.9%

93 / 94

70%+

98.9%

93 / 94

60%+

100.0%

94 / 94

50%+

100.0%

94 / 94

Unlock the full event analysis

Register free for historical ground trends, class averages and spread, score charts, class composition and a detailed classification breakdown.

Historical Trends at North Of England C.T.C

Down The Line performance across events held at this ground.

Last 12 months

Overall Average Trend

Classification Trend Comparison

Classification Deep Dive

4 active classifications

—

Member insight

Typical —

Best —

Lowest —

Middle 50% score range

vs Ground Avg (12m)—

—

Member insight

Typical —

Best —

Lowest —

Middle 50% score range

vs Ground Avg (12m)—

—

Member insight

Typical —

Best —

Lowest —

Middle 50% score range

vs Ground Avg (12m)—

—

Member insight

Typical —

Best —

Lowest —

Middle 50% score range

vs Ground Avg (12m)—

Event Performance Analysis

Registered insight

Average by Class

Class averages make it easier to see where the event played hardest across the field.

Field Spread by Class

91.7-100.0%

84.7-98.0%

62.7-97.7%

85.0-90.7%

Boxes show the middle 50% of each class. Orange line is the median.

Top 10 Score Lollipop

A quick visual read of how far the front of the field separated itself.

Score Histogram

High gun: 100.0%. The high-gun band is outlined.

Class Breakdown

Rotate your device to see High/Low scores and the class winner

Class	Count	Average	High	Low	Winner
AA	35	97.1%	100.0%	91.7%	Tom Robinson
A	41	94.0%	98.0%	84.7%	Markie Van Allen
B	15	89.0%	97.7%	62.7%	Joshua Kind
C	3	88.0%	90.7%	85.0%	George Dilley

Class Composition

35 37.2%

41 43.6%

15 16.0%

3 3.2%

Largest class: A — 41 competitors (43.6%)

Full Results — 94 entries

🔒 The Class Rank and vs Class Avg columns are hidden — register free to unlock both insights.

Class AA

Score 300/300

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class AA

Score 299/300

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class AA

Score 298/300

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class AA

Score 298/300

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class AA

Score 297/300

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class AA

Score 296/300

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class AA

Score 296/300

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class AA

Score 296/300

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class AA

Score 295/300

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class AA

Score 295/300

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class AA

Score 294/300

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class A

Score 294/300

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class A

Score 294/300

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class AA

Score 294/300

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class AA

Score 294/300

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class A

Score 293/300

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 293/300

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class AA

Score 293/300

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class AA

Score 293/300

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class AA

Score 293/300

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class AA

Score 292/300

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 291/300

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class AA

Score 291/300

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class A

Score 291/300

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class AA

Score 291/300

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class AA

Score 291/300

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class A

Score 290/300

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class A

Score 290/300

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class AA

Score 290/300

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class A

Score 290/300

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class A

Score 290/300

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class A

Score 290/300

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class A

Score 290/300

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class AA

Score 289/300

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class AA

Score 289/300

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class A

Score 289/300

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class A

Score 289/300

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class AA

Score 288/300

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class A

Score 288/300

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class AA

Score 288/300

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class AA

Score 288/300

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class AA

Score 288/300

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class A

Score 288/300

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class A

Score 288/300

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class AA

Score 288/300

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class AA

Score 288/300

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class A

Score 288/300

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class A

Score 287/300

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class A

Score 287/300

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class AA

Score 287/300

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class A

Score 286/300

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class A

Score 286/300

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class AA

Score 286/300

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class AA

Score 285/300

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class AA

Score 285/300

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class A

Score 285/300

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class A

Score 285/300

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class A

Score 284/300

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class A

Score 283/300

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class A

Score 282/300

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class A

Score 282/300

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 282/300

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class AA

Score 281/300

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class A

Score 280/300

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class A

Score 280/300

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class A

Score 280/300

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class A

Score 280/300

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class A

Score 280/300

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class A

Score 279/300

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 278/300

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class A

Score 277/300

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 277/300

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class AA

Score 275/300

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 275/300

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 274/300

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 274/300

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 274/300

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class A

Score 274/300

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class C

Score 272/300

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class A

Score 272/300

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class A

Score 271/300

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class A

Score 269/300

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 268/300

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class C

Score 265/300

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class A

Score 262/300

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 258/300

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 258/300

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 258/300

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class A

Score 258/300

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class A

Score 257/300

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 256/300

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class A

Score 254/300

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 188/300

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class C

Score 85/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

#	Name	Class	Score	Score %	Class Rank 🔒	vs Class Avg
1	Tom Robinson	AA	300/300	100.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
2	Paul Meakin	AA	299/300	99.67%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
3=	Harry Lufflum	AA	298/300	99.33%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
3=	Robert Dietz	AA	298/300	99.33%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
5	David Weston	AA	297/300	99.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
6=	Daniel Price	AA	296/300	98.67%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
6=	Emma Holden Hardy	AA	296/300	98.67%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
6=	Steven Janes	AA	296/300	98.67%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
9=	Cory Doble	AA	295/300	98.33%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
9=	Nigel Chapman	AA	295/300	98.33%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
11=	Christopher Moule	AA	294/300	98.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
11=	Markie Van Allen	A	294/300	98.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
11=	Nick Haley	A	294/300	98.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
11=	Richard Ryan	AA	294/300	98.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
11=	Shaun Gardener	AA	294/300	98.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
16=	George Madden	A	293/300	97.67%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
16=	Joshua Kind	B	293/300	97.67%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
16=	Leon Gill	AA	293/300	97.67%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
16=	Mark Stamper	AA	293/300	97.67%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
16=	Richard Chapple	AA	293/300	97.67%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
21	Alex Harris	AA	292/300	97.33%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
22=	Calum Willey	B	291/300	97.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
22=	David Garrett	AA	291/300	97.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
22=	George Turnes	A	291/300	97.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
22=	Lee Wilcoxson	AA	291/300	97.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
22=	Simon Ede	AA	291/300	97.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
27=	Andrew Heywood	A	290/300	96.67%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
27=	David Hurstfield	A	290/300	96.67%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
27=	Edward Armett	AA	290/300	96.67%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
27=	Keith Blaney	A	290/300	96.67%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
27=	Maurice Beedan	A	290/300	96.67%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
27=	Paul Sant	A	290/300	96.67%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
27=	Richard Smith	A	290/300	96.67%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
34=	Chris Bushell	AA	289/300	96.33%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
34=	Mark Shaw	AA	289/300	96.33%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
34=	Stephen Petch	A	289/300	96.33%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
34=	Toby Hurstfield	A	289/300	96.33%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
38=	Allan Henry	AA	288/300	96.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
38=	Cliff Pain	A	288/300	96.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
38=	Geoffrey Howlett	AA	288/300	96.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
38=	Gerrald Sweet	AA	288/300	96.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
38=	Ian Biggins	AA	288/300	96.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
38=	James Farrell	A	288/300	96.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
38=	Joe Turner	A	288/300	96.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
38=	Paul Cerri	AA	288/300	96.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
38=	Peter Relph	AA	288/300	96.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
38=	Stuart Cureton	A	288/300	96.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
48=	Garry Sayles	A	287/300	95.67%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
48=	Mike Hartley	A	287/300	95.67%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
48=	Paul Neal	AA	287/300	95.67%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
51=	Junior Haynes	A	286/300	95.33%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
51=	Olivia Stevens	A	286/300	95.33%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
51=	Stuart Kitchen	AA	286/300	95.33%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
54=	David Priestman	AA	285/300	95.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
54=	Edd Furber	AA	285/300	95.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
54=	Geoffrey Nutter	A	285/300	95.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
54=	Steven Price	A	285/300	95.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
58	Jason Linnell	A	284/300	94.67%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
59	Allan Hilton	A	283/300	94.33%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
60=	David Stanbrook	A	282/300	94.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
60=	John Barnett	A	282/300	94.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
60=	Sarah Milroy	B	282/300	94.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
63	David Whitehead	AA	281/300	93.67%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
64=	Ben Keightley	A	280/300	93.33%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
64=	Colin Liddell	A	280/300	93.33%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
64=	Jack Ruane	A	280/300	93.33%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
64=	Mitchell Hill	A	280/300	93.33%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
64=	Shaun Pullman	A	280/300	93.33%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
69	Peter Armett	A	279/300	93.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
70	Georgina Chamberlain	B	278/300	92.67%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
71=	Clive Weston	A	277/300	92.33%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
71=	Matthew Rowland	B	277/300	92.33%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
73=	Christopher Jones	AA	275/300	91.67%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
73=	John Mason	B	275/300	91.67%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
75=	Caroline Stanbrook	B	274/300	91.33%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
75=	Jane Hitchmough	B	274/300	91.33%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
75=	Joanna Fairclough	B	274/300	91.33%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
75=	Neil Farnsworth	A	274/300	91.33%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
79=	George Dilley	C	272/300	90.67%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
79=	Paul Cannon	A	272/300	90.67%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
81	Gary Bridger	A	271/300	90.33%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
82	John Adams	A	269/300	89.67%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
83	Caroline Whitehead	B	268/300	89.33%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
84	Justine Howe	C	265/300	88.33%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
85	Jean-Michel Wiart	A	262/300	87.33%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
86=	Andrew Milroy	B	258/300	86.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
86=	Gerry Stevenson	B	258/300	86.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
86=	Lewis Dalton	B	258/300	86.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
86=	Lorrie Greening	A	258/300	86.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
90	Malcolm Brown	A	257/300	85.67%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
91	Ellie Whitehead	B	256/300	85.33%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
92	John Laverick	A	254/300	84.67%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
93	Gary Boardman	B	188/300	62.67%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
94	Amanda Gallagher	C	85/100	85.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%

Other DTL Events at North Of England C.T.C

⚙ Performance Stats DRAG TO MOVE

0.036s ● FAST

DB 36% · Py 38% · Render 25%

12 queries · avg 1.1ms · max 1.9ms

Render Breakdown

Python Logic (Pre-Render) 0.0139s

DB Logic (Pre-Render) 0.0131s

Full Page Render 0.0092s

QUERY TABLES ▾

⚠ event_review 4× 0.004s

shoot_event 2× 0.003s

shoot_score 2× 0.004s

site_configuration 2× 0.002s

ground 1× 0.001s

admin_menu_item 1× 0.001s

⚠ = queried 3+ times (cache candidate)

SQL QUERIES (12) — click to expand

#1 [06:13:18.946] 1.8ms

shoot_event

SELECT shoot_event.id AS shoot_event_id, shoot_event.cpsa_fixture_id AS shoot_event_cpsa_fixture_id, shoot_event.name AS shoot_event_name, shoot_event.date AS shoot_event_date, shoot_event.discipline AS shoot_event_discipline, shoot_event.ground AS shoot_event_ground, shoot_event.url AS shoot_event_…

#2 [06:13:18.949] 1.7ms

shoot_score

SELECT shoot_score.id AS shoot_score_id, shoot_score.targets AS shoot_score_targets, shoot_score.hits AS shoot_score_hits, shoot_score.points AS shoot_score_points, shoot_score.percentage AS shoot_score_percentage, shoot_score.shooter_id AS shoot_score_shooter_id, shoot_score.event_id AS shoot_score…

#3 [06:13:18.954] 1.9ms

shoot_score

SELECT avg(shoot_score.percentage) AS avg_1 
FROM shoot_score JOIN shoot_event ON shoot_score.event_id = shoot_event.id 
WHERE shoot_event.ground = %(ground_1)s AND shoot_event.discipline = %(discipline_1)s AND shoot_event.is_scraped = true AND shoot_event.admin_hidden != true AND shoot_event.id != …

#4 [06:13:18.956] 1.0ms

shoot_event

SELECT shoot_event.id AS shoot_event_id, shoot_event.cpsa_fixture_id AS shoot_event_cpsa_fixture_id, shoot_event.name AS shoot_event_name, shoot_event.date AS shoot_event_date, shoot_event.discipline AS shoot_event_discipline, shoot_event.ground AS shoot_event_ground, shoot_event.url AS shoot_event_…

#5 [06:13:18.958] 0.8ms

event_review

SELECT avg(event_review.rating) AS avg_1, count(event_review.id) AS count_1 
FROM event_review 
WHERE event_review.event_id = %(event_id_1)s

#6 [06:13:18.960] 0.9ms

event_review

SELECT count(*) AS count_1 
FROM (SELECT event_review.id AS event_review_id, event_review.event_id AS event_review_event_id, event_review.rating AS event_review_rating, event_review.review_text AS event_review_review_text, event_review.reviewer_name AS event_review_reviewer_name, event_review.review…

#7 [06:13:18.961] 1.0ms

event_review

SELECT event_review.id AS event_review_id, event_review.event_id AS event_review_event_id, event_review.rating AS event_review_rating, event_review.review_text AS event_review_review_text, event_review.reviewer_name AS event_review_reviewer_name, event_review.reviewer_hash AS event_review_reviewer_h…

#8 [06:13:18.963] 0.9ms

event_review

SELECT event_review.id AS event_review_id, event_review.event_id AS event_review_event_id, event_review.rating AS event_review_rating, event_review.review_text AS event_review_review_text, event_review.reviewer_name AS event_review_reviewer_name, event_review.reviewer_hash AS event_review_reviewer_h…

#9 [06:13:18.964] 0.9ms

ground

SELECT ground.id AS ground_id, ground.name AS ground_name, ground.url AS ground_url, ground.postcode AS ground_postcode, ground.what3words AS ground_what3words, ground.email AS ground_email, ground.website AS ground_website, ground.num_events_cpsa AS ground_num_events_cpsa, ground.num_events_cpsa_la…

#10 [06:13:18.965] 0.9ms

site_configuration

SELECT site_configuration.id AS site_configuration_id, site_configuration.key AS site_configuration_key, site_configuration.value AS site_configuration_value 
FROM site_configuration 
WHERE site_configuration.key LIKE %(key_1)s OR site_configuration.key LIKE %(key_2)s

#11 [06:13:18.967] 0.8ms

site_configuration

SELECT site_configuration.id AS site_configuration_id, site_configuration.key AS site_configuration_key, site_configuration.value AS site_configuration_value 
FROM site_configuration 
WHERE site_configuration.key IN (%(key_1_1)s, %(key_1_2)s, %(key_1_3)s, %(key_1_4)s)

#12 [06:13:18.968] 0.8ms

admin_menu_item

SELECT DISTINCT admin_menu_item.active_tab AS admin_menu_item_active_tab 
FROM admin_menu_item

LIVE REQUESTS (0) — click to expand

Down The Line at North Of England C.T.C

Unlock the full event analysis

Historical Trends at North Of England C.T.C

Classification Deep Dive

Event Performance Analysis

Analyzing Data...

Refresh Complete

Already Up to Date?

Analyzing Data...

Refresh Complete

Already Up to Date?