Back to Events

OTR — Olympic Trap

Olympic Trap at Nuthampstead Shooting Ground LLP

Nuthampstead Shooting Ground LLP

Sunday, 17 May 2015 · CPSA Results →

Weather loading...

Event Rating

Latest Visitor Reviews

No written reviews yet.

Entries

80.3%

Field Average

96.8%

Highest Score

53.6%

Lowest Score

Top 3 Overall

🥈

Ian Peel

118/125

94.40%

🥇

Ed Ling

121/125

96.80%

🥉

Mark Evans

117/125

93.60%

Event Difficulty

80.3% This Event

vs. Nuthampstead Shooting Ground LLP historical average (Olympic Trap)

↑ +4.5% easier than usual

Ground avg: 75.8%

Class Winners

A 15 entered

121/125 — 96.80%

Ed Ling

2: Ian Peel — 94.40%

B 17 entered

117/125 — 93.60%

Mark Evans

2=: Nigel Caves — 90.40%

C 14 entered

111/125 — 88.80%

Matthew Lawrence(tied) Paul Owen(tied)

3=: Mike Davis — 86.40%

D 13 entered

101/125 — 80.80%

Paul Bailey

2: Mark Wright — 80.00%

Other 1 entered

73/125 — 58.40%

James Spratt

Field Shape

80.3%

Field avg

Olympic Trap at Nuthampstead Shooting Ground LLP had a 43.2 point scoring spread across 60 entries.

Spread 43.2 pts

Front 96.8%

Largest class B

A compact read of how the field performed: average, spread and where most shooters sat.

Score Distribution

90–100%

6 10.0%

80–89%

32 53.3%

70–79%

14 23.3%

60–69%

5 8.3%

50–59%

3 5.0%

<50%

0 0.0%

Field Achievement

% of competitors reaching each score threshold

90%+

10.0%

6 / 60

80%+

63.3%

38 / 60

70%+

86.7%

52 / 60

60%+

95.0%

57 / 60

50%+

100.0%

60 / 60

Unlock the full event analysis

Register free for historical ground trends, class averages and spread, score charts, class composition and a detailed classification breakdown.

Historical Trends at Nuthampstead Shooting Ground LLP

Olympic Trap performance across events held at this ground.

Last 12 months

Overall Average Trend

Classification Trend Comparison

Classification Deep Dive

4 active classifications

—

Member insight

Typical —

Best —

Lowest —

Middle 50% score range

vs Ground Avg (12m)—

—

Member insight

Typical —

Best —

Lowest —

Middle 50% score range

vs Ground Avg (12m)—

—

Member insight

Typical —

Best —

Lowest —

Middle 50% score range

vs Ground Avg (12m)—

—

Member insight

Typical —

Best —

Lowest —

Middle 50% score range

vs Ground Avg (12m)—

Event Performance Analysis

Registered insight

Average by Class

Class averages make it easier to see where the event played hardest across the field.

Field Spread by Class

78.4-96.8%

69.6-93.6%

72.0-88.8%

53.6-80.8%

Other

58.4-58.4%

Boxes show the middle 50% of each class. Orange line is the median.

Top 10 Score Lollipop

A quick visual read of how far the front of the field separated itself.

Score Histogram

High gun: 96.8%. The high-gun band is outlined.

Class Breakdown

Rotate your device to see High/Low scores and the class winner

Class	Count	Average	High	Low	Winner
A	15	86.8%	96.8%	78.4%	Ed Ling
B	17	82.8%	93.6%	69.6%	Mark Evans
C	14	82.3%	88.8%	72.0%	Matthew Lawrence
D	13	68.8%	80.8%	53.6%	Paul Bailey
Other	1	58.4%	58.4%	58.4%	James Spratt

Class Composition

15 25.0%

17 28.3%

14 23.3%

13 21.7%

Other

1 1.7%

Largest class: B — 17 competitors (28.3%)

Full Results — 60 entries

🔒 The Class Rank and vs Class Avg columns are hidden — register free to unlock both insights.

Class A

Score 121/125

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class A

Score 118/125

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 117/125

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class A

Score 113/125

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 113/125

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 113/125

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 112/125

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 112/125

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 112/125

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class A

Score 111/125

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class C

Score 111/125

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class C

Score 111/125

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class A

Score 110/125

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class A

Score 110/125

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class A

Score 109/125

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class A

Score 108/125

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class C

Score 108/125

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 108/125

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class C

Score 108/125

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class C

Score 108/125

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class C

Score 106/125

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class A

Score 106/125

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class A

Score 106/125

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class A

Score 106/125

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class A

Score 104/125

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class C

Score 104/125

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class A

Score 104/125

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class A

Score 104/125

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 103/125

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class C

Score 103/125

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 102/125

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class C

Score 101/125

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class C

Score 101/125

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class D

Score 101/125

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class C

Score 101/125

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 101/125

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 101/125

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class D

Score 100/125

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class C

Score 98/125

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 98/125

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class A

Score 98/125

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 97/125

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class D

Score 96/125

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 95/125

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 95/125

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class D

Score 94/125

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 94/125

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class D

Score 92/125

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class C

Score 91/125

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class D

Score 91/125

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class D

Score 91/125

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class C

Score 90/125

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 87/125

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class D

Score 83/125

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class D

Score 81/125

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class D

Score 78/125

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class D

Score 76/125

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class Unknown

Score 73/125

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class D

Score 68/125

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class D

Score 67/125

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

#	Name	Class	Score	Score %	Class Rank 🔒	vs Class Avg
1	Ed Ling	A	121/125	96.80%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
2	Ian Peel	A	118/125	94.40%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
3	Mark Evans	B	117/125	93.60%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
4=	Nathan Hales	A	113/125	90.40%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
4=	Nigel Caves	B	113/125	90.40%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
4=	Reg Toms	B	113/125	90.40%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
7=	Jack Wilkinson	B	112/125	89.60%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
7=	Maciej Bilkiewicz	B	112/125	89.60%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
7=	Matthew Panter	B	112/125	89.60%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
10=	Adam Gutteridge	A	111/125	88.80%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
10=	Matthew Lawrence	C	111/125	88.80%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
10=	Paul Owen	C	111/125	88.80%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
13=	David Kirk	A	110/125	88.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
13=	David Sipling	A	110/125	88.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
15	Bradley Davis	A	109/125	87.20%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
16=	Chris Tate	A	108/125	86.40%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
16=	Mike Davis	C	108/125	86.40%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
16=	Paul Jenkins	B	108/125	86.40%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
16=	Philip Sanders	C	108/125	86.40%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
16=	Theo Ling	C	108/125	86.40%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
21=	Ian Mulliner	C	106/125	84.80%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
21=	John Winn	A	106/125	84.80%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
21=	Michael Wixey	A	106/125	84.80%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
21=	Rod Gould	A	106/125	84.80%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
25=	Bernard Yeoh	A	104/125	83.20%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
25=	Gary McCann	C	104/125	83.20%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
25=	Keith Kilvington	A	104/125	83.20%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
25=	Mark Shaw	A	104/125	83.20%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
29=	Chris Wright	B	103/125	82.40%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
29=	Graham Carter	C	103/125	82.40%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
31	Stuart Donaldson	B	102/125	81.60%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
32=	Matthew Goodwin	C	101/125	80.80%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
32=	Nicholas Harris	C	101/125	80.80%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
32=	Paul Bailey	D	101/125	80.80%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
32=	Richard Smith	C	101/125	80.80%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
32=	Roger Westaway	B	101/125	80.80%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
32=	Tim Connolly	B	101/125	80.80%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
38	Mark Wright	D	100/125	80.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
39=	Douglas Jones	C	98/125	78.40%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
39=	Giovanni Russo	B	98/125	78.40%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
39=	Jonathan Reid	A	98/125	78.40%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
42	Jonathan Davis	B	97/125	77.60%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
43	Michael Bovingdon	D	96/125	76.80%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
44=	Frank Chetcuti	B	95/125	76.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
44=	Marc Potts	B	95/125	76.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
46=	Carl Burrow	D	94/125	75.20%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
46=	David Izzard	B	94/125	75.20%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
48	Robert Mulliner	D	92/125	73.60%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
49=	Christopher McReynolds	C	91/125	72.80%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
49=	Michael Faux	D	91/125	72.80%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
49=	Owen Clark	D	91/125	72.80%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
52	Richard Fox	C	90/125	72.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
53	Michael Wensley	B	87/125	69.60%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
54	Laugharne Jones	D	83/125	66.40%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
55	Alan Haynes	D	81/125	64.80%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
56	Fletcher King	D	78/125	62.40%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
57	George Seaborne	D	76/125	60.80%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
58	James Spratt	Unknown	73/125	58.40%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
59	Emyr Davies	D	68/125	54.40%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
60	Paul Culverwell	D	67/125	53.60%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%

Other OTR Events at Nuthampstead Shooting Ground LLP

⚙ Performance Stats DRAG TO MOVE

0.038s ● FAST

DB 34% · Py 38% · Render 27%

12 queries · avg 1.1ms · max 1.8ms

Render Breakdown

Python Logic (Pre-Render) 0.0146s

DB Logic (Pre-Render) 0.0133s

Full Page Render 0.0105s

QUERY TABLES ▾

⚠ event_review 4× 0.004s

shoot_event 2× 0.003s

shoot_score 2× 0.003s

site_configuration 2× 0.002s

ground 1× 0.001s

admin_menu_item 1× 0.001s

⚠ = queried 3+ times (cache candidate)

SQL QUERIES (12) — click to expand

#1 [02:22:39.140] 1.8ms

shoot_event

SELECT shoot_event.id AS shoot_event_id, shoot_event.cpsa_fixture_id AS shoot_event_cpsa_fixture_id, shoot_event.name AS shoot_event_name, shoot_event.date AS shoot_event_date, shoot_event.discipline AS shoot_event_discipline, shoot_event.ground AS shoot_event_ground, shoot_event.url AS shoot_event_…

#2 [02:22:39.143] 1.5ms

shoot_score

SELECT shoot_score.id AS shoot_score_id, shoot_score.targets AS shoot_score_targets, shoot_score.hits AS shoot_score_hits, shoot_score.points AS shoot_score_points, shoot_score.percentage AS shoot_score_percentage, shoot_score.shooter_id AS shoot_score_shooter_id, shoot_score.event_id AS shoot_score…

#3 [02:22:39.148] 1.8ms

shoot_score

SELECT avg(shoot_score.percentage) AS avg_1 
FROM shoot_score JOIN shoot_event ON shoot_score.event_id = shoot_event.id 
WHERE shoot_event.ground = %(ground_1)s AND shoot_event.discipline = %(discipline_1)s AND shoot_event.is_scraped = true AND shoot_event.admin_hidden != true AND shoot_event.id != …

#4 [02:22:39.150] 1.1ms

shoot_event

SELECT shoot_event.id AS shoot_event_id, shoot_event.cpsa_fixture_id AS shoot_event_cpsa_fixture_id, shoot_event.name AS shoot_event_name, shoot_event.date AS shoot_event_date, shoot_event.discipline AS shoot_event_discipline, shoot_event.ground AS shoot_event_ground, shoot_event.url AS shoot_event_…

#5 [02:22:39.152] 0.9ms

event_review

SELECT avg(event_review.rating) AS avg_1, count(event_review.id) AS count_1 
FROM event_review 
WHERE event_review.event_id = %(event_id_1)s

#6 [02:22:39.154] 0.9ms

event_review

SELECT count(*) AS count_1 
FROM (SELECT event_review.id AS event_review_id, event_review.event_id AS event_review_event_id, event_review.rating AS event_review_rating, event_review.review_text AS event_review_review_text, event_review.reviewer_name AS event_review_reviewer_name, event_review.review…

#7 [02:22:39.155] 0.9ms

event_review

SELECT event_review.id AS event_review_id, event_review.event_id AS event_review_event_id, event_review.rating AS event_review_rating, event_review.review_text AS event_review_review_text, event_review.reviewer_name AS event_review_reviewer_name, event_review.reviewer_hash AS event_review_reviewer_h…

#8 [02:22:39.157] 0.9ms

event_review

SELECT event_review.id AS event_review_id, event_review.event_id AS event_review_event_id, event_review.rating AS event_review_rating, event_review.review_text AS event_review_review_text, event_review.reviewer_name AS event_review_reviewer_name, event_review.reviewer_hash AS event_review_reviewer_h…

#9 [02:22:39.158] 0.9ms

ground

SELECT ground.id AS ground_id, ground.name AS ground_name, ground.url AS ground_url, ground.postcode AS ground_postcode, ground.what3words AS ground_what3words, ground.email AS ground_email, ground.website AS ground_website, ground.num_events_cpsa AS ground_num_events_cpsa, ground.num_events_cpsa_la…

#10 [02:22:39.160] 0.8ms

site_configuration

SELECT site_configuration.id AS site_configuration_id, site_configuration.key AS site_configuration_key, site_configuration.value AS site_configuration_value 
FROM site_configuration 
WHERE site_configuration.key LIKE %(key_1)s OR site_configuration.key LIKE %(key_2)s

#11 [02:22:39.161] 0.8ms

site_configuration

SELECT site_configuration.id AS site_configuration_id, site_configuration.key AS site_configuration_key, site_configuration.value AS site_configuration_value 
FROM site_configuration 
WHERE site_configuration.key IN (%(key_1_1)s, %(key_1_2)s, %(key_1_3)s, %(key_1_4)s)

#12 [02:22:39.163] 0.8ms

admin_menu_item

SELECT DISTINCT admin_menu_item.active_tab AS admin_menu_item_active_tab 
FROM admin_menu_item

LIVE REQUESTS (0) — click to expand

Olympic Trap at Nuthampstead Shooting Ground LLP

Unlock the full event analysis

Historical Trends at Nuthampstead Shooting Ground LLP

Classification Deep Dive

Event Performance Analysis

Analyzing Data...

Refresh Complete

Already Up to Date?

Analyzing Data...

Refresh Complete

Already Up to Date?