Back to Events

OTR — Olympic Trap

Olympic Trap at Nuthampstead Shooting Ground LLP

Nuthampstead Shooting Ground LLP

Sunday, 23 June 2013 · CPSA Results →

Weather loading...

Event Rating

Latest Visitor Reviews

No written reviews yet.

Entries

73.4%

Field Average

92.0%

Highest Score

21.3%

Lowest Score

Top 3 Overall

🥈

Ian Peel

109/125

87.20%

🥇

Ed Ling

115/125

92.00%

🥉

Mark Evans

108/125

86.40%

Event Difficulty

73.4% This Event

vs. Nuthampstead Shooting Ground LLP historical average (Olympic Trap)

↓ -2.9% harder than usual

Ground avg: 76.3%

Class Winners

A 16 entered

115/125 — 92.00%

Ed Ling

2: Ian Peel — 87.20%

B 15 entered

107/125 — 85.60%

Jonathan Reid

2=: Jack Wilkinson — 84.80%

C 9 entered

99/125 — 79.20%

David Izzard

2: Richard Smith — 78.40%

D 11 entered

96/125 — 76.80%

Ian Mulliner

2: Graham Carter — 71.20%

Other 5 entered

97/125 — 77.60%

Stuart Donaldson

2: Paul Bailey — 64.80%

Field Shape

73.4%

Field avg

Olympic Trap at Nuthampstead Shooting Ground LLP had a 70.7 point scoring spread across 56 entries.

Spread 70.7 pts

Front 92.0%

Largest class A

A compact read of how the field performed: average, spread and where most shooters sat.

Score Distribution

90–100%

1 1.8%

80–89%

18 32.1%

70–79%

19 33.9%

60–69%

12 21.4%

50–59%

4 7.1%

<50%

2 3.6%

Field Achievement

% of competitors reaching each score threshold

90%+

1 / 56

80%+

33.9%

19 / 56

70%+

67.9%

38 / 56

60%+

89.3%

50 / 56

50%+

96.4%

54 / 56

Unlock the full event analysis

Register free for historical ground trends, class averages and spread, score charts, class composition and a detailed classification breakdown.

Historical Trends at Nuthampstead Shooting Ground LLP

Olympic Trap performance across events held at this ground.

Last 12 months

Overall Average Trend

Classification Trend Comparison

Classification Deep Dive

4 active classifications

—

Member insight

Typical —

Best —

Lowest —

Middle 50% score range

vs Ground Avg (12m)—

—

Member insight

Typical —

Best —

Lowest —

Middle 50% score range

vs Ground Avg (12m)—

—

Member insight

Typical —

Best —

Lowest —

Middle 50% score range

vs Ground Avg (12m)—

—

Member insight

Typical —

Best —

Lowest —

Middle 50% score range

vs Ground Avg (12m)—

Event Performance Analysis

Registered insight

Average by Class

Class averages make it easier to see where the event played hardest across the field.

Field Spread by Class

64.8-92.0%

66.4-85.6%

65.6-79.2%

44.0-76.8%

Other

21.3-77.6%

Boxes show the middle 50% of each class. Orange line is the median.

Top 10 Score Lollipop

A quick visual read of how far the front of the field separated itself.

Score Histogram

High gun: 92.0%. The high-gun band is outlined.

Class Breakdown

Rotate your device to see High/Low scores and the class winner

Class	Count	Average	High	Low	Winner
A	16	82.8%	92.0%	64.8%	Ed Ling
B	15	76.9%	85.6%	66.4%	Jonathan Reid
C	9	73.2%	79.2%	65.6%	David Izzard
D	11	61.8%	76.8%	44.0%	Ian Mulliner
Other	5	59.6%	77.6%	21.3%	Stuart Donaldson

Class Composition

16 28.6%

15 26.8%

9 16.1%

11 19.6%

Other

5 8.9%

Largest class: A — 16 competitors (28.6%)

Full Results — 56 entries

🔒 The Class Rank and vs Class Avg columns are hidden — register free to unlock both insights.

Class A

Score 115/125

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class A

Score 109/125

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class A

Score 108/125

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class A

Score 107/125

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 107/125

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class A

Score 106/125

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 106/125

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 106/125

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class A

Score 106/125

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class A

Score 105/125

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class A

Score 105/125

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class A

Score 104/125

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class A

Score 103/125

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class A

Score 103/125

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class A

Score 102/125

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 100/125

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 100/125

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class C

Score 99/125

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class C

Score 98/125

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class C

Score 97/125

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class Unknown

Score 97/125

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class D

Score 96/125

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class A

Score 96/125

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 96/125

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class A

Score 95/125

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 95/125

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 92/125

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class C

Score 92/125

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class C

Score 90/125

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class C

Score 90/125

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class D

Score 89/125

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 88/125

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class C

Score 88/125

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class C

Score 87/125

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 87/125

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 86/125

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class D

Score 83/125

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 83/125

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class C

Score 82/125

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class Unknown

Score 81/125

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class A

Score 81/125

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class D

Score 80/125

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class Unknown

Score 76/125

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class D

Score 76/125

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class D

Score 74/125

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class D

Score 73/125

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class A

Score 66/75

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 64/75

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 59/75

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class Unknown

Score 55/75

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 54/75

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class D

Score 52/75

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class D

Score 41/75

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class D

Score 41/75

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class D

Score 33/75

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class Unknown

Score 16/75

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

#	Name	Class	Score	Score %	Class Rank 🔒	vs Class Avg
1	Ed Ling	A	115/125	92.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
2	Ian Peel	A	109/125	87.20%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
3	Mark Evans	A	108/125	86.40%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
4=	John MacDonald	A	107/125	85.60%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
4=	Jonathan Reid	B	107/125	85.60%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
6=	Chris Tate	A	106/125	84.80%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
6=	Jack Wilkinson	B	106/125	84.80%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
6=	Keith Kilvington	B	106/125	84.80%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
6=	Wesley Hann	A	106/125	84.80%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
10=	Adam Gutteridge	A	105/125	84.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
10=	Rod Gould	A	105/125	84.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
12	Bernard Yeoh	A	104/125	83.20%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
13=	David Kirk	A	103/125	82.40%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
13=	Ossie McLean (Jnr)	A	103/125	82.40%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
15	David Sipling	A	102/125	81.60%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
16=	Carl Burrow	B	100/125	80.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
16=	Mark Shaw	B	100/125	80.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
18	David Izzard	C	99/125	79.20%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
19	Richard Smith	C	98/125	78.40%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
20=	Maciej Bilkiewicz	C	97/125	77.60%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
20=	Stuart Donaldson	Unknown	97/125	77.60%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
22=	Ian Mulliner	D	96/125	76.80%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
22=	Michael Wixey	A	96/125	76.80%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
22=	Roger Westaway	B	96/125	76.80%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
25=	Bradley Davis	A	95/125	76.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
25=	Stephen Handley	B	95/125	76.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
27=	Nigel Caves	B	92/125	73.60%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
27=	Robert Dand	C	92/125	73.60%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
29=	Mark Wright	C	90/125	72.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
29=	Paul Jenkins	C	90/125	72.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
31	Graham Carter	D	89/125	71.20%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
32=	Graham Beal	B	88/125	70.40%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
32=	Reg Toms	C	88/125	70.40%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
34=	Alan Paige	C	87/125	69.60%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
34=	Andrew Womble	B	87/125	69.60%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
36	Kevin Tyler	B	86/125	68.80%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
37=	John Heading	D	83/125	66.40%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
37=	Renny Taylor	B	83/125	66.40%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
39	Robert Mulliner	C	82/125	65.60%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
40=	Paul Bailey	Unknown	81/125	64.80%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
40=	Philip Sanders	A	81/125	64.80%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
42	Theo Ling	D	80/125	64.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
43=	Andrew Greenwood	Unknown	76/125	60.80%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
43=	Laugharne Jones	D	76/125	60.80%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
45	Alan Haynes	D	74/125	59.20%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
46	Roy Hampton	D	73/125	58.40%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
47	Abbey Ling	A	66/75	88.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
48	Sarah Wixey	B	64/75	85.33%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
49	Charlotte Kerwood	B	59/75	78.67%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
50	Matthew Coward-Holley	Unknown	55/75	73.33%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
51	Anita North	B	54/75	72.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
52	Sharon Niven	D	52/75	69.33%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
53=	Jacquelyn Lewis	D	41/75	54.67%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
53=	Katie Cowell	D	41/75	54.67%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
55	Kath Bright	D	33/75	44.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
56	Daniel Fish-Halvorsen	Unknown	16/75	21.33%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%

Other OTR Events at Nuthampstead Shooting Ground LLP

⚙ Performance Stats DRAG TO MOVE

0.030s ● FAST

DB 42% · Py 37% · Render 22%

12 queries · avg 1.0ms · max 1.6ms

Render Breakdown

DB Logic (Pre-Render) 0.0123s

Python Logic (Pre-Render) 0.0108s

Full Page Render 0.0064s

QUERY TABLES ▾

⚠ event_review 4× 0.004s

shoot_event 2× 0.003s

shoot_score 2× 0.003s

site_configuration 2× 0.002s

ground 1× 0.001s

admin_menu_item 1× 0.001s

⚠ = queried 3+ times (cache candidate)

SQL QUERIES (12) — click to expand

#1 [02:19:03.192] 1.6ms

shoot_event

SELECT shoot_event.id AS shoot_event_id, shoot_event.cpsa_fixture_id AS shoot_event_cpsa_fixture_id, shoot_event.name AS shoot_event_name, shoot_event.date AS shoot_event_date, shoot_event.discipline AS shoot_event_discipline, shoot_event.ground AS shoot_event_ground, shoot_event.url AS shoot_event_…

#2 [02:19:03.194] 1.3ms

shoot_score

SELECT shoot_score.id AS shoot_score_id, shoot_score.targets AS shoot_score_targets, shoot_score.hits AS shoot_score_hits, shoot_score.points AS shoot_score_points, shoot_score.percentage AS shoot_score_percentage, shoot_score.shooter_id AS shoot_score_shooter_id, shoot_score.event_id AS shoot_score…

#3 [02:19:03.198] 1.5ms

shoot_score

SELECT avg(shoot_score.percentage) AS avg_1 
FROM shoot_score JOIN shoot_event ON shoot_score.event_id = shoot_event.id 
WHERE shoot_event.ground = %(ground_1)s AND shoot_event.discipline = %(discipline_1)s AND shoot_event.is_scraped = true AND shoot_event.admin_hidden != true AND shoot_event.id != …

#4 [02:19:03.200] 1.0ms

shoot_event

SELECT shoot_event.id AS shoot_event_id, shoot_event.cpsa_fixture_id AS shoot_event_cpsa_fixture_id, shoot_event.name AS shoot_event_name, shoot_event.date AS shoot_event_date, shoot_event.discipline AS shoot_event_discipline, shoot_event.ground AS shoot_event_ground, shoot_event.url AS shoot_event_…

#5 [02:19:03.201] 0.9ms

event_review

SELECT avg(event_review.rating) AS avg_1, count(event_review.id) AS count_1 
FROM event_review 
WHERE event_review.event_id = %(event_id_1)s

#6 [02:19:03.203] 0.9ms

event_review

SELECT count(*) AS count_1 
FROM (SELECT event_review.id AS event_review_id, event_review.event_id AS event_review_event_id, event_review.rating AS event_review_rating, event_review.review_text AS event_review_review_text, event_review.reviewer_name AS event_review_reviewer_name, event_review.review…

#7 [02:19:03.204] 0.9ms

event_review

SELECT event_review.id AS event_review_id, event_review.event_id AS event_review_event_id, event_review.rating AS event_review_rating, event_review.review_text AS event_review_review_text, event_review.reviewer_name AS event_review_reviewer_name, event_review.reviewer_hash AS event_review_reviewer_h…

#8 [02:19:03.205] 0.8ms

event_review

SELECT event_review.id AS event_review_id, event_review.event_id AS event_review_event_id, event_review.rating AS event_review_rating, event_review.review_text AS event_review_review_text, event_review.reviewer_name AS event_review_reviewer_name, event_review.reviewer_hash AS event_review_reviewer_h…

#9 [02:19:03.207] 0.9ms

ground

SELECT ground.id AS ground_id, ground.name AS ground_name, ground.url AS ground_url, ground.postcode AS ground_postcode, ground.what3words AS ground_what3words, ground.email AS ground_email, ground.website AS ground_website, ground.num_events_cpsa AS ground_num_events_cpsa, ground.num_events_cpsa_la…

#10 [02:19:03.208] 0.9ms

site_configuration

SELECT site_configuration.id AS site_configuration_id, site_configuration.key AS site_configuration_key, site_configuration.value AS site_configuration_value 
FROM site_configuration 
WHERE site_configuration.key LIKE %(key_1)s OR site_configuration.key LIKE %(key_2)s

#11 [02:19:03.209] 0.8ms

site_configuration

SELECT site_configuration.id AS site_configuration_id, site_configuration.key AS site_configuration_key, site_configuration.value AS site_configuration_value 
FROM site_configuration 
WHERE site_configuration.key IN (%(key_1_1)s, %(key_1_2)s, %(key_1_3)s, %(key_1_4)s)

#12 [02:19:03.210] 0.8ms

admin_menu_item

SELECT DISTINCT admin_menu_item.active_tab AS admin_menu_item_active_tab 
FROM admin_menu_item

LIVE REQUESTS (0) — click to expand

Olympic Trap at Nuthampstead Shooting Ground LLP

Unlock the full event analysis

Historical Trends at Nuthampstead Shooting Ground LLP

Classification Deep Dive

Event Performance Analysis

Analyzing Data...

Refresh Complete

Already Up to Date?

Analyzing Data...

Refresh Complete

Already Up to Date?