Back to Events

Last Updated: 01 May 2026, 16:53

UTR — Universal Trench

Universal Trench at National Clay Shooting Centre

National Clay Shooting Centre

Sunday, 23 September 2012 · CPSA Results →

Weather loading...

Event Rating

Latest Visitor Reviews

No written reviews yet.

Entries

83.2%

Field Average

96.0%

Highest Score

66.0%

Lowest Score

Top 3 Overall

🥈

Chris •••••

191/200

95.50%

🥇

Michael •••••

192/200

96.00%

🥉 =3

Mark •••••

Nigel •••••

187/200

93.50%

Event Difficulty

83.2% This Event

vs. National Clay Shooting Centre historical average (Universal Trench)

↑ +6.2% easier than usual

Ground avg: 77.0%

Class Winners

A 9 entered

192/200 — 96.00%

Michael •••••

2: Chris ••••• — 95.50%

B 11 entered

187/200 — 93.50%

Mark •••••

2: Neil ••••• — 90.50%

C 7 entered

184/200 — 92.00%

Stuart •••••

2: Wayne ••••• — 89.00%

D 12 entered

172/200 — 86.00%

Fletcher •••••

2: Michael ••••• — 81.00%

Other 3 entered

182/200 — 91.00%

Matthew •••••

2: Maciej ••••• — 77.50%

Field Shape

83.2%

Field avg

Universal Trench at National Clay Shooting Centre had a 30.0 point scoring spread across 42 entries.

Spread 30.0 pts

Front 96.0%

Largest class D

A compact read of how the field performed: average, spread and where most shooters sat.

Score Distribution

90–100%

11 26.2%

80–89%

17 40.5%

70–79%

12 28.6%

60–69%

2 4.8%

50–59%

0 0.0%

<50%

0 0.0%

Field Achievement

% of competitors reaching each score threshold

90%+

26.2%

11 / 42

80%+

66.7%

28 / 42

70%+

95.2%

40 / 42

60%+

100.0%

42 / 42

50%+

100.0%

42 / 42

Unlock the full event analysis

Register free for historical ground trends, class averages and spread, score charts, class composition and a detailed classification breakdown.

Historical Trends at National Clay Shooting Centre

Universal Trench performance across events held at this ground.

Last 12 months

Overall Average Trend

Classification Trend Comparison

Classification Deep Dive

4 active classifications

—

Member insight

Typical —

Best —

Lowest —

Middle 50% score range

vs Ground Avg (12m)—

—

Member insight

Typical —

Best —

Lowest —

Middle 50% score range

vs Ground Avg (12m)—

—

Member insight

Typical —

Best —

Lowest —

Middle 50% score range

vs Ground Avg (12m)—

—

Member insight

Typical —

Best —

Lowest —

Middle 50% score range

vs Ground Avg (12m)—

Event Performance Analysis

Registered insight

Average by Class

Class averages make it easier to see where the event played hardest across the field.

Field Spread by Class

66.0-96.0%

75.0-93.5%

73.5-92.0%

66.0-86.0%

Other

72.5-91.0%

Boxes show the middle 50% of each class. Orange line is the median.

Top 10 Score Lollipop

A quick visual read of how far the front of the field separated itself.

Score Histogram

High gun: 96.0%. The high-gun band is outlined.

Class Breakdown

Rotate your device to see High/Low scores and the class winner

Class	Count	Average	High	Low	Winner
A	9	89.2%	96.0%	66.0%	Michael •••••
B	11	86.0%	93.5%	75.0%	Mark •••••
C	7	84.7%	92.0%	73.5%	Stuart •••••
D	12	76.0%	86.0%	66.0%	Fletcher •••••
Other	3	80.3%	91.0%	72.5%	Matthew •••••

Class Composition

9 21.4%

11 26.2%

7 16.7%

12 28.6%

Other

3 7.1%

Largest class: D — 12 competitors (28.6%)

Full Results — 42 entries

🔒 The Class Rank and vs Class Avg columns are hidden — register free to unlock both insights.

Rotate your device to see the full results table: score, class placing, class average and delta.

Class A

Score 192/200

Class placing 1

Class average 89.2%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class A

Score 191/200

Class placing 1

Class average 89.2%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 187/200

Class placing 1

Class average 86.0%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class A

Score 187/200

Class placing 1

Class average 89.2%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class A

Score 185/200

Class placing 1

Class average 89.2%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class A

Score 185/200

Class placing 1

Class average 89.2%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class A

Score 184/200

Class placing 1

Class average 89.2%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class C

Score 184/200

Class placing 1

Class average 84.7%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class Unknown

Score 182/200

Class placing 1

Class average 80.3%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 181/200

Class placing 1

Class average 86.0%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 180/200

Class placing 1

Class average 86.0%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 178/200

Class placing 1

Class average 86.0%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class C

Score 178/200

Class placing 1

Class average 84.7%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class A

Score 177/200

Class placing 1

Class average 89.2%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 176/200

Class placing 1

Class average 86.0%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 174/200

Class placing 1

Class average 86.0%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class C

Score 174/200

Class placing 1

Class average 84.7%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 173/200

Class placing 1

Class average 86.0%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class D

Score 172/200

Class placing 1

Class average 76.0%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 172/200

Class placing 1

Class average 86.0%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class A

Score 172/200

Class placing 1

Class average 89.2%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class C

Score 172/200

Class placing 1

Class average 84.7%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class C

Score 170/200

Class placing 1

Class average 84.7%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 162/200

Class placing 1

Class average 86.0%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class D

Score 162/200

Class placing 1

Class average 76.0%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class C

Score 161/200

Class placing 1

Class average 84.7%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class D

Score 161/200

Class placing 1

Class average 76.0%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 160/200

Class placing 1

Class average 86.0%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class D

Score 159/200

Class placing 1

Class average 76.0%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class D

Score 156/200

Class placing 1

Class average 76.0%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class Unknown

Score 155/200

Class placing 1

Class average 80.3%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class D

Score 152/200

Class placing 1

Class average 76.0%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class D

Score 152/200

Class placing 1

Class average 76.0%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 150/200

Class placing 1

Class average 86.0%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class D

Score 149/200

Class placing 1

Class average 76.0%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class C

Score 147/200

Class placing 1

Class average 84.7%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class D

Score 145/200

Class placing 1

Class average 76.0%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class Unknown

Score 145/200

Class placing 1

Class average 80.3%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class D

Score 143/200

Class placing 1

Class average 76.0%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class D

Score 141/200

Class placing 1

Class average 76.0%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class D

Score 132/200

Class placing 1

Class average 76.0%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class A

Score 132/200

Class placing 1

Class average 89.2%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

#	Name	Class	Score	Score %	Class Rank 🔒	Class Avg	vs Class Avg
1	Michael •••••	A	192/200	96.00%	🔒 1	89.20%	🔒 +0.0%
2	Chris •••••	A	191/200	95.50%	🔒 1	89.20%	🔒 +0.0%
3=	Mark •••••	B	187/200	93.50%	🔒 1	86.00%	🔒 +0.0%
3=	Nigel •••••	A	187/200	93.50%	🔒 1	89.20%	🔒 +0.0%
5=	David •••••	A	185/200	92.50%	🔒 1	89.20%	🔒 +0.0%
5=	Kevin •••••	A	185/200	92.50%	🔒 1	89.20%	🔒 +0.0%
7=	Rod •••••	A	184/200	92.00%	🔒 1	89.20%	🔒 +0.0%
7=	Stuart •••••	C	184/200	92.00%	🔒 1	84.70%	🔒 +0.0%
9	Matthew •••••	Unknown	182/200	91.00%	🔒 1	80.30%	🔒 +0.0%
10	Neil •••••	B	181/200	90.50%	🔒 1	86.00%	🔒 +0.0%
11	Ian •••••	B	180/200	90.00%	🔒 1	86.00%	🔒 +0.0%
12=	David •••••	B	178/200	89.00%	🔒 1	86.00%	🔒 +0.0%
12=	Wayne •••••	C	178/200	89.00%	🔒 1	84.70%	🔒 +0.0%
14	Jack •••••	A	177/200	88.50%	🔒 1	89.20%	🔒 +0.0%
15	Arnold •••••	B	176/200	88.00%	🔒 1	86.00%	🔒 +0.0%
16=	Nigel •••••	B	174/200	87.00%	🔒 1	86.00%	🔒 +0.0%
16=	Sue •••••	C	174/200	87.00%	🔒 1	84.70%	🔒 +0.0%
18	John •••••	B	173/200	86.50%	🔒 1	86.00%	🔒 +0.0%
19=	Fletcher •••••	D	172/200	86.00%	🔒 1	76.00%	🔒 +0.0%
19=	Gareth •••••	B	172/200	86.00%	🔒 1	86.00%	🔒 +0.0%
19=	Nigel •••••	A	172/200	86.00%	🔒 1	89.20%	🔒 +0.0%
19=	Phil •••••	C	172/200	86.00%	🔒 1	84.70%	🔒 +0.0%
23	Robert •••••	C	170/200	85.00%	🔒 1	84.70%	🔒 +0.0%
24=	Eamon •••••	B	162/200	81.00%	🔒 1	86.00%	🔒 +0.0%
24=	Michael •••••	D	162/200	81.00%	🔒 1	76.00%	🔒 +0.0%
26=	Joseph •••••	C	161/200	80.50%	🔒 1	84.70%	🔒 +0.0%
26=	Mark •••••	D	161/200	80.50%	🔒 1	76.00%	🔒 +0.0%
28	Alan •••••	B	160/200	80.00%	🔒 1	86.00%	🔒 +0.0%
29	Stephen •••••	D	159/200	79.50%	🔒 1	76.00%	🔒 +0.0%
30	Andrew •••••	D	156/200	78.00%	🔒 1	76.00%	🔒 +0.0%
31	Maciej •••••	Unknown	155/200	77.50%	🔒 1	80.30%	🔒 +0.0%
32=	John •••••	D	152/200	76.00%	🔒 1	76.00%	🔒 +0.0%
32=	Michele •••••	D	152/200	76.00%	🔒 1	76.00%	🔒 +0.0%
34	Frank •••••	B	150/200	75.00%	🔒 1	86.00%	🔒 +0.0%
35	Keith •••••	D	149/200	74.50%	🔒 1	76.00%	🔒 +0.0%
36	Tony •••••	C	147/200	73.50%	🔒 1	84.70%	🔒 +0.0%
37=	James •••••	D	145/200	72.50%	🔒 1	76.00%	🔒 +0.0%
37=	Katie •••••	Unknown	145/200	72.50%	🔒 1	80.30%	🔒 +0.0%
39	Jacquelyn •••••	D	143/200	71.50%	🔒 1	76.00%	🔒 +0.0%
40	Theo •••••	D	141/200	70.50%	🔒 1	76.00%	🔒 +0.0%
41=	John •••••	D	132/200	66.00%	🔒 1	76.00%	🔒 +0.0%
41=	Wesley •••••	A	132/200	66.00%	🔒 1	89.20%	🔒 +0.0%

Other UTR Events at National Clay Shooting Centre

⚙ Performance Stats DRAG TO MOVE

0.045s ● FAST

DB 39% · Py 26% · Render 35%

12 queries · avg 1.4ms · max 2.4ms

Render Breakdown

DB Logic (Pre-Render) 0.0172s

Full Page Render 0.0156s

Python Logic (Pre-Render) 0.0117s

QUERY TABLES ▾

⚠ event_review 4× 0.005s

shoot_event 2× 0.004s

shoot_score 2× 0.003s

site_configuration 2× 0.002s

ground 1× 0.001s

admin_menu_item 1× 0.001s

⚠ = queried 3+ times (cache candidate)

SQL QUERIES (12) — click to expand

#1 [22:40:08.742] 2.4ms

shoot_event

SELECT shoot_event.id AS shoot_event_id, shoot_event.cpsa_fixture_id AS shoot_event_cpsa_fixture_id, shoot_event.name AS shoot_event_name, shoot_event.date AS shoot_event_date, shoot_event.discipline AS shoot_event_discipline, shoot_event.ground AS shoot_event_ground, shoot_event.url AS shoot_event_…

#2 [22:40:08.745] 1.8ms

shoot_score

SELECT shoot_score.id AS shoot_score_id, shoot_score.targets AS shoot_score_targets, shoot_score.hits AS shoot_score_hits, shoot_score.points AS shoot_score_points, shoot_score.percentage AS shoot_score_percentage, shoot_score.course_breakdown AS shoot_score_course_breakdown, shoot_score.shooter_id …

#3 [22:40:08.749] 1.5ms

shoot_score

SELECT avg(shoot_score.percentage) AS avg_1 
FROM shoot_score JOIN shoot_event ON shoot_score.event_id = shoot_event.id 
WHERE shoot_event.ground = %(ground_1)s AND shoot_event.discipline = %(discipline_1)s AND shoot_event.is_scraped = true AND shoot_event.admin_hidden != true AND shoot_event.id != …

#4 [22:40:08.751] 1.5ms

shoot_event

SELECT shoot_event.id AS shoot_event_id, shoot_event.cpsa_fixture_id AS shoot_event_cpsa_fixture_id, shoot_event.name AS shoot_event_name, shoot_event.date AS shoot_event_date, shoot_event.discipline AS shoot_event_discipline, shoot_event.ground AS shoot_event_ground, shoot_event.url AS shoot_event_…

#5 [22:40:08.753] 1.3ms

event_review

SELECT avg(event_review.rating) AS avg_1, count(event_review.id) AS count_1 
FROM event_review 
WHERE event_review.event_id = %(event_id_1)s

#6 [22:40:08.755] 1.3ms

event_review

SELECT count(*) AS count_1 
FROM (SELECT event_review.id AS event_review_id, event_review.event_id AS event_review_event_id, event_review.rating AS event_review_rating, event_review.review_text AS event_review_review_text, event_review.reviewer_name AS event_review_reviewer_name, event_review.review…

#7 [22:40:08.757] 1.3ms

event_review

SELECT event_review.id AS event_review_id, event_review.event_id AS event_review_event_id, event_review.rating AS event_review_rating, event_review.review_text AS event_review_review_text, event_review.reviewer_name AS event_review_reviewer_name, event_review.reviewer_hash AS event_review_reviewer_h…

#8 [22:40:08.758] 1.3ms

event_review

SELECT event_review.id AS event_review_id, event_review.event_id AS event_review_event_id, event_review.rating AS event_review_rating, event_review.review_text AS event_review_review_text, event_review.reviewer_name AS event_review_reviewer_name, event_review.reviewer_hash AS event_review_reviewer_h…

#9 [22:40:08.760] 1.2ms

ground

SELECT ground.id AS ground_id, ground.name AS ground_name, ground.url AS ground_url, ground.postcode AS ground_postcode, ground.what3words AS ground_what3words, ground.email AS ground_email, ground.website AS ground_website, ground.num_events_cpsa AS ground_num_events_cpsa, ground.num_events_cpsa_la…

#10 [22:40:08.762] 1.3ms

site_configuration

SELECT site_configuration.id AS site_configuration_id, site_configuration.key AS site_configuration_key, site_configuration.value AS site_configuration_value 
FROM site_configuration 
WHERE site_configuration.key LIKE %(key_1)s OR site_configuration.key LIKE %(key_2)s

#11 [22:40:08.764] 1.2ms

site_configuration

SELECT site_configuration.id AS site_configuration_id, site_configuration.key AS site_configuration_key, site_configuration.value AS site_configuration_value 
FROM site_configuration 
WHERE site_configuration.key IN (%(key_1_1)s, %(key_1_2)s, %(key_1_3)s, %(key_1_4)s)

#12 [22:40:08.765] 1.2ms

admin_menu_item

SELECT DISTINCT admin_menu_item.active_tab AS admin_menu_item_active_tab 
FROM admin_menu_item

LIVE REQUESTS (0) — click to expand

Universal Trench at National Clay Shooting Centre

Unlock the full event analysis

Historical Trends at National Clay Shooting Centre

Classification Deep Dive

Event Performance Analysis

Analyzing Data...

Refresh Complete

Already Up to Date?

Analyzing Data...

Refresh Complete

Already Up to Date?