Back to Events

Last Updated: 01 May 2026, 16:53

FSP — FITASC Sporting

FITASC Sporting at Purbeck Shooting School

Purbeck Shooting School

Sunday, 06 January 2002 · CPSA Results →

Weather loading...

Event Rating

Latest Visitor Reviews

No written reviews yet.

Entries

81.8%

Field Average

96.0%

Highest Score

49.0%

Lowest Score

Top 3 Overall

🥈 =2

Anthony •••••

Desmond •••••

93/100

93.00%

🥇

Dennis •••••

96/100

96.00%

Event Difficulty

81.8% This Event

vs. Purbeck Shooting School historical average (FITASC Sporting)

↑ +5.9% easier than usual

Ground avg: 75.9%

Class Winners

A 7 entered

96/100 — 96.00%

Dennis •••••

2=: Anthony ••••• — 93.00%

B 17 entered

91/100 — 91.00%

Michael •••••

2=: Chris ••••• — 89.00%

C 7 entered

88/100 — 88.00%

Julian •••••

2: John ••••• — 87.00%

D 6 entered

77/100 — 77.00%

Robert •••••

2: John ••••• — 74.00%

Other 3 entered

67/100 — 67.00%

Ian •••••(tied) Michael •••••(tied)

3: Neil ••••• — 49.00%

Field Shape

81.8%

Field avg

FITASC Sporting at Purbeck Shooting School had a 47.0 point scoring spread across 40 entries.

Spread 47.0 pts

Front 96.0%

Largest class B

A compact read of how the field performed: average, spread and where most shooters sat.

Score Distribution

90–100%

6 15.0%

80–89%

20 50.0%

70–79%

9 22.5%

60–69%

4 10.0%

50–59%

0 0.0%

<50%

1 2.5%

Field Achievement

% of competitors reaching each score threshold

90%+

15.0%

6 / 40

80%+

65.0%

26 / 40

70%+

87.5%

35 / 40

60%+

97.5%

39 / 40

50%+

97.5%

39 / 40

Unlock the full event analysis

Register free for historical ground trends, class averages and spread, score charts, class composition and a detailed classification breakdown.

Historical Trends at Purbeck Shooting School

FITASC Sporting performance across events held at this ground.

Last 12 months

Overall Average Trend

Classification Trend Comparison

Classification Deep Dive

4 active classifications

—

Member insight

Typical —

Best —

Lowest —

Middle 50% score range

vs Ground Avg (12m)—

—

Member insight

Typical —

Best —

Lowest —

Middle 50% score range

vs Ground Avg (12m)—

—

Member insight

Typical —

Best —

Lowest —

Middle 50% score range

vs Ground Avg (12m)—

—

Member insight

Typical —

Best —

Lowest —

Middle 50% score range

vs Ground Avg (12m)—

Event Performance Analysis

Registered insight

Average by Class

Class averages make it easier to see where the event played hardest across the field.

Field Spread by Class

86.0-96.0%

79.0-91.0%

74.0-88.0%

68.0-77.0%

Other

49.0-67.0%

Boxes show the middle 50% of each class. Orange line is the median.

Top 10 Score Lollipop

A quick visual read of how far the front of the field separated itself.

Score Histogram

High gun: 96.0%. The high-gun band is outlined.

Class Breakdown

Rotate your device to see High/Low scores and the class winner

Class	Count	Average	High	Low	Winner
A	7	91.3%	96.0%	86.0%	Dennis •••••
B	17	85.3%	91.0%	79.0%	Michael •••••
C	7	81.0%	88.0%	74.0%	Julian •••••
D	6	71.8%	77.0%	68.0%	Robert •••••
Other	3	61.0%	67.0%	49.0%	Ian •••••

Class Composition

7 17.5%

17 42.5%

7 17.5%

6 15.0%

Other

3 7.5%

Largest class: B — 17 competitors (42.5%)

Full Results — 40 entries

🔒 The Class Rank and vs Class Avg columns are hidden — register free to unlock both insights.

Rotate your device to see the full results table: score, class placing, class average and delta.

Class A

Score 96/100

Class placing 1

Class average 91.3%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class A

Score 93/100

Class placing 1

Class average 91.3%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class A

Score 93/100

Class placing 1

Class average 91.3%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class A

Score 93/100

Class placing 1

Class average 91.3%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 91/100

Class placing 1

Class average 85.3%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class A

Score 90/100

Class placing 1

Class average 91.3%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 89/100

Class placing 1

Class average 85.3%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 89/100

Class placing 1

Class average 85.3%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 89/100

Class placing 1

Class average 85.3%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class C

Score 88/100

Class placing 1

Class average 81.0%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 88/100

Class placing 1

Class average 85.3%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class A

Score 88/100

Class placing 1

Class average 91.3%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 87/100

Class placing 1

Class average 85.3%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class C

Score 87/100

Class placing 1

Class average 81.0%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 86/100

Class placing 1

Class average 85.3%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class A

Score 86/100

Class placing 1

Class average 91.3%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class C

Score 86/100

Class placing 1

Class average 81.0%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 86/100

Class placing 1

Class average 85.3%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 86/100

Class placing 1

Class average 85.3%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 85/100

Class placing 1

Class average 85.3%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 84/100

Class placing 1

Class average 85.3%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 84/100

Class placing 1

Class average 85.3%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 83/100

Class placing 1

Class average 85.3%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 83/100

Class placing 1

Class average 85.3%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 81/100

Class placing 1

Class average 85.3%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 80/100

Class placing 1

Class average 85.3%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 79/100

Class placing 1

Class average 85.3%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class C

Score 79/100

Class placing 1

Class average 81.0%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class C

Score 78/100

Class placing 1

Class average 81.0%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class D

Score 77/100

Class placing 1

Class average 71.8%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class C

Score 75/100

Class placing 1

Class average 81.0%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class C

Score 74/100

Class placing 1

Class average 81.0%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class D

Score 74/100

Class placing 1

Class average 71.8%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class D

Score 73/100

Class placing 1

Class average 71.8%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class D

Score 70/100

Class placing 1

Class average 71.8%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class D

Score 69/100

Class placing 1

Class average 71.8%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class D

Score 68/100

Class placing 1

Class average 71.8%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class Unknown

Score 67/100

Class placing 1

Class average 61.0%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class Unknown

Score 67/100

Class placing 1

Class average 61.0%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class Unknown

Score 49/100

Class placing 1

Class average 61.0%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

#	Name	Class	Score	Score %	Class Rank 🔒	Class Avg	vs Class Avg
1	Dennis •••••	A	96/100	96.00%	🔒 1	91.30%	🔒 +0.0%
2=	Anthony •••••	A	93/100	93.00%	🔒 1	91.30%	🔒 +0.0%
2=	Anthony •••••	A	93/100	93.00%	🔒 1	91.30%	🔒 +0.0%
2=	Desmond •••••	A	93/100	93.00%	🔒 1	91.30%	🔒 +0.0%
5	Michael •••••	B	91/100	91.00%	🔒 1	85.30%	🔒 +0.0%
6	John •••••	A	90/100	90.00%	🔒 1	91.30%	🔒 +0.0%
7=	Chris •••••	B	89/100	89.00%	🔒 1	85.30%	🔒 +0.0%
7=	Ray •••••	B	89/100	89.00%	🔒 1	85.30%	🔒 +0.0%
7=	Stephen •••••	B	89/100	89.00%	🔒 1	85.30%	🔒 +0.0%
10=	Julian •••••	C	88/100	88.00%	🔒 1	81.00%	🔒 +0.0%
10=	Stuart •••••	B	88/100	88.00%	🔒 1	85.30%	🔒 +0.0%
10=	Will •••••	A	88/100	88.00%	🔒 1	91.30%	🔒 +0.0%
13=	Bradley •••••	B	87/100	87.00%	🔒 1	85.30%	🔒 +0.0%
13=	John •••••	C	87/100	87.00%	🔒 1	81.00%	🔒 +0.0%
15=	Andy •••••	B	86/100	86.00%	🔒 1	85.30%	🔒 +0.0%
15=	George •••••	A	86/100	86.00%	🔒 1	91.30%	🔒 +0.0%
15=	Hugh •••••	C	86/100	86.00%	🔒 1	81.00%	🔒 +0.0%
15=	Karl •••••	B	86/100	86.00%	🔒 1	85.30%	🔒 +0.0%
15=	Mr •••••	B	86/100	86.00%	🔒 1	85.30%	🔒 +0.0%
20	Brian •••••	B	85/100	85.00%	🔒 1	85.30%	🔒 +0.0%
21=	Steve •••••	B	84/100	84.00%	🔒 1	85.30%	🔒 +0.0%
21=	Stuart •••••	B	84/100	84.00%	🔒 1	85.30%	🔒 +0.0%
23=	Mark •••••	B	83/100	83.00%	🔒 1	85.30%	🔒 +0.0%
23=	Robert •••••	B	83/100	83.00%	🔒 1	85.30%	🔒 +0.0%
25	Steven •••••	B	81/100	81.00%	🔒 1	85.30%	🔒 +0.0%
26	Adam •••••	B	80/100	80.00%	🔒 1	85.30%	🔒 +0.0%
27=	Alan •••••	B	79/100	79.00%	🔒 1	85.30%	🔒 +0.0%
27=	Glenn •••••	C	79/100	79.00%	🔒 1	81.00%	🔒 +0.0%
29	Steve •••••	C	78/100	78.00%	🔒 1	81.00%	🔒 +0.0%
30	Robert •••••	D	77/100	77.00%	🔒 1	71.80%	🔒 +0.0%
31	David •••••	C	75/100	75.00%	🔒 1	81.00%	🔒 +0.0%
32=	Colin •••••	C	74/100	74.00%	🔒 1	81.00%	🔒 +0.0%
32=	John •••••	D	74/100	74.00%	🔒 1	71.80%	🔒 +0.0%
34	Paul •••••	D	73/100	73.00%	🔒 1	71.80%	🔒 +0.0%
35	Peter •••••	D	70/100	70.00%	🔒 1	71.80%	🔒 +0.0%
36	Raymond •••••	D	69/100	69.00%	🔒 1	71.80%	🔒 +0.0%
37	Michael •••••	D	68/100	68.00%	🔒 1	71.80%	🔒 +0.0%
38=	Ian •••••	Unknown	67/100	67.00%	🔒 1	61.00%	🔒 +0.0%
38=	Michael •••••	Unknown	67/100	67.00%	🔒 1	61.00%	🔒 +0.0%
40	Neil •••••	Unknown	49/100	49.00%	🔒 1	61.00%	🔒 +0.0%

Other FSP Events at Purbeck Shooting School

⚙ Performance Stats DRAG TO MOVE

0.043s ● FAST

DB 38% · Py 33% · Render 29%

12 queries · avg 1.4ms · max 2.3ms

Render Breakdown

DB Logic (Pre-Render) 0.0165s

Python Logic (Pre-Render) 0.0139s

Full Page Render 0.0127s

QUERY TABLES ▾

⚠ event_review 4× 0.005s

shoot_event 2× 0.004s

shoot_score 2× 0.003s

site_configuration 2× 0.002s

ground 1× 0.001s

admin_menu_item 1× 0.001s

⚠ = queried 3+ times (cache candidate)

SQL QUERIES (12) — click to expand

#1 [23:41:52.852] 2.3ms

shoot_event

SELECT shoot_event.id AS shoot_event_id, shoot_event.cpsa_fixture_id AS shoot_event_cpsa_fixture_id, shoot_event.name AS shoot_event_name, shoot_event.date AS shoot_event_date, shoot_event.discipline AS shoot_event_discipline, shoot_event.ground AS shoot_event_ground, shoot_event.url AS shoot_event_…

#2 [23:41:52.855] 1.7ms

shoot_score

SELECT shoot_score.id AS shoot_score_id, shoot_score.targets AS shoot_score_targets, shoot_score.hits AS shoot_score_hits, shoot_score.points AS shoot_score_points, shoot_score.percentage AS shoot_score_percentage, shoot_score.course_breakdown AS shoot_score_course_breakdown, shoot_score.shooter_id …

#3 [23:41:52.859] 1.5ms

shoot_score

SELECT avg(shoot_score.percentage) AS avg_1 
FROM shoot_score JOIN shoot_event ON shoot_score.event_id = shoot_event.id 
WHERE shoot_event.ground = %(ground_1)s AND shoot_event.discipline = %(discipline_1)s AND shoot_event.is_scraped = true AND shoot_event.admin_hidden != true AND shoot_event.id != …

#4 [23:41:52.861] 1.4ms

shoot_event

SELECT shoot_event.id AS shoot_event_id, shoot_event.cpsa_fixture_id AS shoot_event_cpsa_fixture_id, shoot_event.name AS shoot_event_name, shoot_event.date AS shoot_event_date, shoot_event.discipline AS shoot_event_discipline, shoot_event.ground AS shoot_event_ground, shoot_event.url AS shoot_event_…

#5 [23:41:52.864] 1.2ms

event_review

SELECT avg(event_review.rating) AS avg_1, count(event_review.id) AS count_1 
FROM event_review 
WHERE event_review.event_id = %(event_id_1)s

#6 [23:41:52.865] 1.2ms

event_review

SELECT count(*) AS count_1 
FROM (SELECT event_review.id AS event_review_id, event_review.event_id AS event_review_event_id, event_review.rating AS event_review_rating, event_review.review_text AS event_review_review_text, event_review.reviewer_name AS event_review_reviewer_name, event_review.review…

#7 [23:41:52.867] 1.3ms

event_review

SELECT event_review.id AS event_review_id, event_review.event_id AS event_review_event_id, event_review.rating AS event_review_rating, event_review.review_text AS event_review_review_text, event_review.reviewer_name AS event_review_reviewer_name, event_review.reviewer_hash AS event_review_reviewer_h…

#8 [23:41:52.869] 1.1ms

event_review

SELECT event_review.id AS event_review_id, event_review.event_id AS event_review_event_id, event_review.rating AS event_review_rating, event_review.review_text AS event_review_review_text, event_review.reviewer_name AS event_review_reviewer_name, event_review.reviewer_hash AS event_review_reviewer_h…

#9 [23:41:52.871] 1.2ms

ground

SELECT ground.id AS ground_id, ground.name AS ground_name, ground.url AS ground_url, ground.postcode AS ground_postcode, ground.what3words AS ground_what3words, ground.email AS ground_email, ground.website AS ground_website, ground.num_events_cpsa AS ground_num_events_cpsa, ground.num_events_cpsa_la…

#10 [23:41:52.873] 1.2ms

site_configuration

SELECT site_configuration.id AS site_configuration_id, site_configuration.key AS site_configuration_key, site_configuration.value AS site_configuration_value 
FROM site_configuration 
WHERE site_configuration.key LIKE %(key_1)s OR site_configuration.key LIKE %(key_2)s

#11 [23:41:52.875] 1.2ms

site_configuration

SELECT site_configuration.id AS site_configuration_id, site_configuration.key AS site_configuration_key, site_configuration.value AS site_configuration_value 
FROM site_configuration 
WHERE site_configuration.key IN (%(key_1_1)s, %(key_1_2)s, %(key_1_3)s, %(key_1_4)s)

#12 [23:41:52.876] 1.1ms

admin_menu_item

SELECT DISTINCT admin_menu_item.active_tab AS admin_menu_item_active_tab 
FROM admin_menu_item

LIVE REQUESTS (0) — click to expand

FITASC Sporting at Purbeck Shooting School

Unlock the full event analysis

Historical Trends at Purbeck Shooting School

Classification Deep Dive

Event Performance Analysis

Analyzing Data...

Refresh Complete

Already Up to Date?

Analyzing Data...

Refresh Complete

Already Up to Date?