Back to Events

CSP — Compak Sporting

Compak Sporting at E.J.Churchill Group Ltd

E.J.Churchill Group Ltd

Saturday, 25 April 2026 · CPSA Results →

Weather loading...

Event Rating

Latest Visitor Reviews

No written reviews yet.

Entries

86.6%

Field Average

97.0%

Highest Score

62.0%

Lowest Score

Top 3 Overall

🥉 =3

Brendan O'Brien

Chistophe Beaume Luzi

Matt Watling

Neil Cousins

Paul Gillett

Sean Gamblen

Steve Cox

Vincent Di Vittorio

94/100

94.00%

🥇 =1

Matt Hance

Troy Thornell

97/100

97.00%

Event Difficulty

86.6% This Event

vs. E.J.Churchill Group Ltd historical average (Compak Sporting)

— About average difficulty

Ground avg: 86.3%

Class Winners

A 10 entered

97/100 — 97.00%

Matt Hance

2=: Chistophe Beaume Luzi — 94.00%

B 23 entered

97/100 — 97.00%

Troy Thornell

2=: Brendan O'Brien — 94.00%

C 15 entered

92/100 — 92.00%

Tim Connolly

2: Peter Woodliffe-Thomas — 91.00%

D 9 entered

85/100 — 85.00%

Trevor Edden

2: Karen Shoreman — 81.00%

Other 1 entered

88/100 — 88.00%

Matt Martin

Field Shape

86.6%

Field avg

Compak Sporting at E.J.Churchill Group Ltd had a 35.0 point scoring spread across 58 entries.

Spread 35.0 pts

Front 97.0%

Largest class B

A compact read of how the field performed: average, spread and where most shooters sat.

Score Distribution

90–100%

22 37.9%

80–89%

27 46.6%

70–79%

8 13.8%

60–69%

1 1.7%

50–59%

0 0.0%

<50%

0 0.0%

Field Achievement

% of competitors reaching each score threshold

90%+

37.9%

22 / 58

80%+

84.5%

49 / 58

70%+

98.3%

57 / 58

60%+

100.0%

58 / 58

50%+

100.0%

58 / 58

Unlock the full event analysis

Register free for historical ground trends, class averages and spread, score charts, class composition and a detailed classification breakdown.

Historical Trends at E.J.Churchill Group Ltd

Compak Sporting performance across events held at this ground.

Last 12 months

Overall Average Trend

Classification Trend Comparison

Classification Deep Dive

4 active classifications

—

Member insight

Typical —

Best —

Lowest —

Middle 50% score range

vs Ground Avg (12m)—

—

Member insight

Typical —

Best —

Lowest —

Middle 50% score range

vs Ground Avg (12m)—

—

Member insight

Typical —

Best —

Lowest —

Middle 50% score range

vs Ground Avg (12m)—

—

Member insight

Typical —

Best —

Lowest —

Middle 50% score range

vs Ground Avg (12m)—

Event Performance Analysis

Registered insight

Average by Class

Class averages make it easier to see where the event played hardest across the field.

Field Spread by Class

89.0-97.0%

73.0-97.0%

79.0-92.0%

62.0-85.0%

Other

88.0-88.0%

Boxes show the middle 50% of each class. Orange line is the median.

Top 10 Score Lollipop

A quick visual read of how far the front of the field separated itself.

Score Histogram

High gun: 97.0%. The high-gun band is outlined.

Class Breakdown

Rotate your device to see High/Low scores and the class winner

Class	Count	Average	High	Low	Winner
A	10	93.1%	97.0%	89.0%	Matt Hance
B	23	88.8%	97.0%	73.0%	Troy Thornell
C	15	85.7%	92.0%	79.0%	Tim Connolly
D	9	74.8%	85.0%	62.0%	Trevor Edden
Other	1	88.0%	88.0%	88.0%	Matt Martin

Class Composition

10 17.2%

23 39.7%

15 25.9%

9 15.5%

Other

1 1.7%

Largest class: B — 23 competitors (39.7%)

Full Results — 58 entries

🔒 The Class Rank and vs Class Avg columns are hidden — register free to unlock both insights.

Class A

Score 97/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 97/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 94/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class A

Score 94/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 94/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 94/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class A

Score 94/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class A

Score 94/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class A

Score 94/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class A

Score 94/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 92/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class A

Score 92/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class A

Score 92/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class C

Score 92/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 91/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 91/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 91/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class A

Score 91/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class C

Score 91/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 90/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 90/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 90/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 89/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class C

Score 89/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 89/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 89/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 89/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class A

Score 89/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class Unknown

Score 88/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class C

Score 88/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 87/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class C

Score 87/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class C

Score 87/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class C

Score 87/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class C

Score 87/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 86/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 86/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 86/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class C

Score 86/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 85/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 85/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class C

Score 85/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class D

Score 85/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 84/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class C

Score 83/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class C

Score 83/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class C

Score 82/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class D

Score 81/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class C

Score 80/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class C

Score 79/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class D

Score 79/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class D

Score 78/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class D

Score 74/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 73/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class D

Score 73/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class D

Score 71/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class D

Score 70/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class D

Score 62/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

#	Name	Class	Score	Score %	Class Rank 🔒	vs Class Avg
1=	Matt Hance	A	97/100	97.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
1=	Troy Thornell	B	97/100	97.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
3=	Brendan O'Brien	B	94/100	94.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
3=	Chistophe Beaume Luzi	A	94/100	94.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
3=	Matt Watling	B	94/100	94.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
3=	Neil Cousins	B	94/100	94.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
3=	Paul Gillett	A	94/100	94.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
3=	Sean Gamblen	A	94/100	94.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
3=	Steve Cox	A	94/100	94.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
3=	Vincent Di Vittorio	A	94/100	94.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
11=	Jason Gaywood	B	92/100	92.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
11=	Julian Freeman	A	92/100	92.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
11=	Paul Cooper	A	92/100	92.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
11=	Tim Connolly	C	92/100	92.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
15=	Andy Seaman	B	91/100	91.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
15=	Charlotte Allen	B	91/100	91.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
15=	Chris Morgan	B	91/100	91.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
15=	Nick Harrison	A	91/100	91.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
15=	Peter Woodliffe-Thomas	C	91/100	91.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
20=	Aaron Christie	B	90/100	90.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
20=	Andrew Ashplant	B	90/100	90.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
20=	Jeffrey Dix	B	90/100	90.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
23=	Andrew Stubbs	B	89/100	89.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
23=	Doug Vidler	C	89/100	89.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
23=	Nicola Gryspeerdt	B	89/100	89.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
23=	Nigel Thornell	B	89/100	89.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
23=	Oliver Moore	B	89/100	89.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
23=	Timothy Richards	A	89/100	89.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
29=	Matt Martin	Unknown	88/100	88.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
29=	Scott Leonard	C	88/100	88.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
31=	Jamie Whitton	B	87/100	87.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
31=	John Smith	C	87/100	87.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
31=	Jonathan Plant	C	87/100	87.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
31=	Matthew Lazarczuk	C	87/100	87.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
31=	William Walker	C	87/100	87.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
36=	Louis Hart	B	86/100	86.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
36=	Martin Nobbs	B	86/100	86.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
36=	Nigel Tubb	B	86/100	86.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
36=	Philip Barnes	C	86/100	86.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
40=	Anthony Hoskins	B	85/100	85.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
40=	Keith Archer	B	85/100	85.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
40=	Kevin Allen	C	85/100	85.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
40=	Trevor Edden	D	85/100	85.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
44	Christian Schermaul	B	84/100	84.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
45=	Nick Oldfield	C	83/100	83.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
45=	Stephen Crowley	C	83/100	83.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
47	Neil Peppiatt	C	82/100	82.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
48	Karen Shoreman	D	81/100	81.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
49	Sian Hoskins	C	80/100	80.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
50=	Christopher Dennis	C	79/100	79.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
50=	Sabine Schermaul	D	79/100	79.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
52	Nigel Piper	D	78/100	78.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
53	Derek Monahan	D	74/100	74.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
54=	Andrew Seirlis	B	73/100	73.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
54=	Sam Betts	D	73/100	73.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
56	Simon Shoreman	D	71/100	71.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
57	Tanya Hollingworth	D	70/100	70.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
58	Susan Monahan	D	62/100	62.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%

Other CSP Events at E.J.Churchill Group Ltd

⚙ Performance Stats DRAG TO MOVE

0.072s ● FAST

DB 68% · Py 20% · Render 11%

12 queries · avg 4.1ms · max 35.3ms

Render Breakdown

DB Logic (Pre-Render) 0.0490s

Python Logic (Pre-Render) 0.0147s

Full Page Render 0.0081s

QUERY TABLES ▾

⚠ event_review 4× 0.038s

shoot_event 2× 0.003s

shoot_score 2× 0.004s

site_configuration 2× 0.002s

ground 1× 0.001s

admin_menu_item 1× 0.001s

⚠ = queried 3+ times (cache candidate)

SQL QUERIES (12) — click to expand

#1 [00:31:45.169] 1.9ms

shoot_event

SELECT shoot_event.id AS shoot_event_id, shoot_event.cpsa_fixture_id AS shoot_event_cpsa_fixture_id, shoot_event.name AS shoot_event_name, shoot_event.date AS shoot_event_date, shoot_event.discipline AS shoot_event_discipline, shoot_event.ground AS shoot_event_ground, shoot_event.url AS shoot_event_…

#2 [00:31:45.172] 1.6ms

shoot_score

SELECT shoot_score.id AS shoot_score_id, shoot_score.targets AS shoot_score_targets, shoot_score.hits AS shoot_score_hits, shoot_score.points AS shoot_score_points, shoot_score.percentage AS shoot_score_percentage, shoot_score.shooter_id AS shoot_score_shooter_id, shoot_score.event_id AS shoot_score…

#3 [00:31:45.178] 2.2ms

shoot_score

SELECT avg(shoot_score.percentage) AS avg_1 
FROM shoot_score JOIN shoot_event ON shoot_score.event_id = shoot_event.id 
WHERE shoot_event.ground = %(ground_1)s AND shoot_event.discipline = %(discipline_1)s AND shoot_event.is_scraped = true AND shoot_event.admin_hidden != true AND shoot_event.id != …

#4 [00:31:45.181] 1.3ms

shoot_event

SELECT shoot_event.id AS shoot_event_id, shoot_event.cpsa_fixture_id AS shoot_event_cpsa_fixture_id, shoot_event.name AS shoot_event_name, shoot_event.date AS shoot_event_date, shoot_event.discipline AS shoot_event_discipline, shoot_event.ground AS shoot_event_ground, shoot_event.url AS shoot_event_…

#5 [00:31:45.182] 0.9ms

event_review

SELECT avg(event_review.rating) AS avg_1, count(event_review.id) AS count_1 
FROM event_review 
WHERE event_review.event_id = %(event_id_1)s

#6 [00:31:45.184] 0.9ms

event_review

SELECT count(*) AS count_1 
FROM (SELECT event_review.id AS event_review_id, event_review.event_id AS event_review_event_id, event_review.rating AS event_review_rating, event_review.review_text AS event_review_review_text, event_review.reviewer_name AS event_review_reviewer_name, event_review.review…

#7 [00:31:45.185] 0.9ms

event_review

SELECT event_review.id AS event_review_id, event_review.event_id AS event_review_event_id, event_review.rating AS event_review_rating, event_review.review_text AS event_review_review_text, event_review.reviewer_name AS event_review_reviewer_name, event_review.reviewer_hash AS event_review_reviewer_h…

#8 [00:31:45.221] 35.3ms

event_review

SELECT event_review.id AS event_review_id, event_review.event_id AS event_review_event_id, event_review.rating AS event_review_rating, event_review.review_text AS event_review_review_text, event_review.reviewer_name AS event_review_reviewer_name, event_review.reviewer_hash AS event_review_reviewer_h…

#9 [00:31:45.223] 1.1ms

ground

SELECT ground.id AS ground_id, ground.name AS ground_name, ground.url AS ground_url, ground.postcode AS ground_postcode, ground.what3words AS ground_what3words, ground.email AS ground_email, ground.website AS ground_website, ground.num_events_cpsa AS ground_num_events_cpsa, ground.num_events_cpsa_la…

#10 [00:31:45.225] 1.0ms

site_configuration

SELECT site_configuration.id AS site_configuration_id, site_configuration.key AS site_configuration_key, site_configuration.value AS site_configuration_value 
FROM site_configuration 
WHERE site_configuration.key LIKE %(key_1)s OR site_configuration.key LIKE %(key_2)s

#11 [00:31:45.227] 0.9ms

site_configuration

SELECT site_configuration.id AS site_configuration_id, site_configuration.key AS site_configuration_key, site_configuration.value AS site_configuration_value 
FROM site_configuration 
WHERE site_configuration.key IN (%(key_1_1)s, %(key_1_2)s, %(key_1_3)s, %(key_1_4)s)

#12 [00:31:45.228] 1.0ms

admin_menu_item

SELECT DISTINCT admin_menu_item.active_tab AS admin_menu_item_active_tab 
FROM admin_menu_item

LIVE REQUESTS (0) — click to expand

Compak Sporting at E.J.Churchill Group Ltd

Unlock the full event analysis

Historical Trends at E.J.Churchill Group Ltd

Classification Deep Dive

Event Performance Analysis

Analyzing Data...

Refresh Complete

Already Up to Date?

Analyzing Data...

Refresh Complete

Already Up to Date?