Back to Events
OTR — Olympic Trap

Olympic Trap at Nuthampstead Shooting Ground LLP

Saturday, 02 May 2026  ·  CPSA Results →
Weather loading...
Event Rating
5.0 (1)
Select a star to rate or review this event
Latest Visitor Reviews
No written reviews yet.
84
Entries
80.0%
Field Average
96.0%
Highest Score
52.0%
Lowest Score
Top 3 Overall
🥉 =3
Jack Heslip
A
Nathan Hales
A
117/125
93.60%
🥇 =1
Matthew Coward-Holley
A
Thomas Betts
A
120/125
96.00%
Event Difficulty
80.0% This Event
vs. Nuthampstead Shooting Ground LLP historical average (Olympic Trap)
↑ +4.3% easier than usual
Ground avg: 75.7%
Class Winners
A 18 entered
120/125 — 96.00%
Matthew Coward-Holley(tied) Thomas Betts(tied)
3=: Jack Heslip — 93.60%
B 33 entered
113/125 — 90.40%
Abbey Ling
2: Marc Potts — 89.60%
C 16 entered
114/125 — 91.20%
Bayram Baysal
2: Stuart Turner — 84.00%
D 17 entered
106/125 — 84.80%
Mark Hogan
2: Kelvin Page — 78.40%
Field Shape
80.0%
Field avg
Olympic Trap at Nuthampstead Shooting Ground LLP had a 44.0 point scoring spread across 84 entries.
Spread 44.0 pts
Front 96.0%
Largest class B
A compact read of how the field performed: average, spread and where most shooters sat.
Score Distribution
90–100%
12 14.3%
80–89%
36 42.9%
70–79%
22 26.2%
60–69%
11 13.1%
50–59%
3 3.6%
<50%
0 0.0%
Field Achievement
% of competitors reaching each score threshold
90%+
14.3%
12 / 84
80%+
57.1%
48 / 84
70%+
83.3%
70 / 84
60%+
96.4%
81 / 84
50%+
100.0%
84 / 84

Unlock the full event analysis

Register free for historical ground trends, class averages and spread, score charts, class composition and a detailed classification breakdown.

Full Results — 84 entries
🔒 The Class Rank and vs Class Avg columns are hidden — register free to unlock both insights.
Class A
Score 120/125
vs Class Avg +0.0%
Profile Open →
Class A
Score 120/125
vs Class Avg +0.0%
Profile Open →
Class A
Score 117/125
vs Class Avg +0.0%
Profile Open →
Class A
Score 117/125
vs Class Avg +0.0%
Profile Open →
Class A
Score 116/125
vs Class Avg +0.0%
Profile Open →
Class A
Score 115/125
vs Class Avg +0.0%
Profile Open →
Class A
Score 115/125
vs Class Avg +0.0%
Profile Open →
Class C
Score 114/125
vs Class Avg +0.0%
Profile Open →
Class A
Score 114/125
vs Class Avg +0.0%
Profile Open →
Class B
Score 113/125
vs Class Avg +0.0%
Profile Open →
Class A
Score 113/125
vs Class Avg +0.0%
Profile Open →
Class A
Score 113/125
vs Class Avg +0.0%
Profile Open →
Class B
Score 112/125
vs Class Avg +0.0%
Profile Open →
Class A
Score 111/125
vs Class Avg +0.0%
Profile Open →
Class A
Score 111/125
vs Class Avg +0.0%
Profile Open →
Class A
Score 111/125
vs Class Avg +0.0%
Profile Open →
Class A
Score 111/125
vs Class Avg +0.0%
Profile Open →
Class B
Score 110/125
vs Class Avg +0.0%
Profile Open →
Class A
Score 110/125
vs Class Avg +0.0%
Profile Open →
Class B
Score 110/125
vs Class Avg +0.0%
Profile Open →
Class B
Score 110/125
vs Class Avg +0.0%
Profile Open →
Class B
Score 110/125
vs Class Avg +0.0%
Profile Open →
Class B
Score 110/125
vs Class Avg +0.0%
Profile Open →
Class B
Score 109/125
vs Class Avg +0.0%
Profile Open →
Class B
Score 107/125
vs Class Avg +0.0%
Profile Open →
Class B
Score 107/125
vs Class Avg +0.0%
Profile Open →
Class B
Score 107/125
vs Class Avg +0.0%
Profile Open →
Class B
Score 106/125
vs Class Avg +0.0%
Profile Open →
Class D
Score 106/125
vs Class Avg +0.0%
Profile Open →
Class B
Score 105/125
vs Class Avg +0.0%
Profile Open →
Class B
Score 105/125
vs Class Avg +0.0%
Profile Open →
Class B
Score 105/125
vs Class Avg +0.0%
Profile Open →
Class B
Score 105/125
vs Class Avg +0.0%
Profile Open →
Class B
Score 105/125
vs Class Avg +0.0%
Profile Open →
Class C
Score 105/125
vs Class Avg +0.0%
Profile Open →
Class C
Score 104/125
vs Class Avg +0.0%
Profile Open →
Class B
Score 104/125
vs Class Avg +0.0%
Profile Open →
Class B
Score 104/125
vs Class Avg +0.0%
Profile Open →
Class B
Score 104/125
vs Class Avg +0.0%
Profile Open →
Class C
Score 103/125
vs Class Avg +0.0%
Profile Open →
Class A
Score 102/125
vs Class Avg +0.0%
Profile Open →
Class B
Score 102/125
vs Class Avg +0.0%
Profile Open →
Class B
Score 102/125
vs Class Avg +0.0%
Profile Open →
Class C
Score 102/125
vs Class Avg +0.0%
Profile Open →
Class B
Score 102/125
vs Class Avg +0.0%
Profile Open →
Class B
Score 102/125
vs Class Avg +0.0%
Profile Open →
Class B
Score 101/125
vs Class Avg +0.0%
Profile Open →
Class C
Score 100/125
vs Class Avg +0.0%
Profile Open →
Class A
Score 99/125
vs Class Avg +0.0%
Profile Open →
Class B
Score 98/125
vs Class Avg +0.0%
Profile Open →
Class B
Score 98/125
vs Class Avg +0.0%
Profile Open →
Class C
Score 98/125
vs Class Avg +0.0%
Profile Open →
Class C
Score 98/125
vs Class Avg +0.0%
Profile Open →
Class D
Score 98/125
vs Class Avg +0.0%
Profile Open →
Class C
Score 98/125
vs Class Avg +0.0%
Profile Open →
Class C
Score 98/125
vs Class Avg +0.0%
Profile Open →
Class D
Score 97/125
vs Class Avg +0.0%
Profile Open →
Class C
Score 97/125
vs Class Avg +0.0%
Profile Open →
Class B
Score 96/125
vs Class Avg +0.0%
Profile Open →
Class D
Score 96/125
vs Class Avg +0.0%
Profile Open →
Class D
Score 95/125
vs Class Avg +0.0%
Profile Open →
Class B
Score 94/125
vs Class Avg +0.0%
Profile Open →
Class A
Score 93/125
vs Class Avg +0.0%
Profile Open →
Class D
Score 92/125
vs Class Avg +0.0%
Profile Open →
Class C
Score 92/125
vs Class Avg +0.0%
Profile Open →
Class C
Score 92/125
vs Class Avg +0.0%
Profile Open →
Class C
Score 92/125
vs Class Avg +0.0%
Profile Open →
Class C
Score 90/125
vs Class Avg +0.0%
Profile Open →
Class B
Score 90/125
vs Class Avg +0.0%
Profile Open →
Class B
Score 88/125
vs Class Avg +0.0%
Profile Open →
Class C
Score 87/125
vs Class Avg +0.0%
Profile Open →
Class D
Score 86/125
vs Class Avg +0.0%
Profile Open →
Class D
Score 85/125
vs Class Avg +0.0%
Profile Open →
Class B
Score 85/125
vs Class Avg +0.0%
Profile Open →
Class D
Score 84/125
vs Class Avg +0.0%
Profile Open →
Class D
Score 80/125
vs Class Avg +0.0%
Profile Open →
Class D
Score 79/125
vs Class Avg +0.0%
Profile Open →
Class D
Score 79/125
vs Class Avg +0.0%
Profile Open →
Class D
Score 79/125
vs Class Avg +0.0%
Profile Open →
Class D
Score 77/125
vs Class Avg +0.0%
Profile Open →
Class D
Score 72/125
vs Class Avg +0.0%
Profile Open →
Class D
Score 66/125
vs Class Avg +0.0%
Profile Open →
Class B
Score 64/100
vs Class Avg +0.0%
Profile Open →
Class D
Score 39/75
vs Class Avg +0.0%
Profile Open →
# Name Class Score Score % Class Rank 🔒 vs Class Avg
1= Matthew Coward-Holley A 120/125 96.00% 🔒 1 🔒 +0.0%
1= Thomas Betts A 120/125 96.00% 🔒 1 🔒 +0.0%
3= Jack Heslip A 117/125 93.60% 🔒 1 🔒 +0.0%
3= Nathan Hales A 117/125 93.60% 🔒 1 🔒 +0.0%
5 William Gilbert A 116/125 92.80% 🔒 1 🔒 +0.0%
6= Leah Southall A 115/125 92.00% 🔒 1 🔒 +0.0%
6= Michael Wixey A 115/125 92.00% 🔒 1 🔒 +0.0%
8= Bayram Baysal C 114/125 91.20% 🔒 1 🔒 +0.0%
8= Madeleine Purser A 114/125 91.20% 🔒 1 🔒 +0.0%
10= Abbey Ling B 113/125 90.40% 🔒 1 🔒 +0.0%
10= David Kirk A 113/125 90.40% 🔒 1 🔒 +0.0%
10= Mark Robinson A 113/125 90.40% 🔒 1 🔒 +0.0%
13 Marc Potts B 112/125 89.60% 🔒 1 🔒 +0.0%
14= James Dedman A 111/125 88.80% 🔒 1 🔒 +0.0%
14= Mark Shaw A 111/125 88.80% 🔒 1 🔒 +0.0%
14= Mathew Paley A 111/125 88.80% 🔒 1 🔒 +0.0%
14= Matthew Panter A 111/125 88.80% 🔒 1 🔒 +0.0%
18= Alexander Williams B 110/125 88.00% 🔒 1 🔒 +0.0%
18= Andrew Greenwood A 110/125 88.00% 🔒 1 🔒 +0.0%
18= Christopher Dean B 110/125 88.00% 🔒 1 🔒 +0.0%
18= Ellie Seward B 110/125 88.00% 🔒 1 🔒 +0.0%
18= Lewis Kirk B 110/125 88.00% 🔒 1 🔒 +0.0%
18= Michael Wensley B 110/125 88.00% 🔒 1 🔒 +0.0%
24 George Eyston B 109/125 87.20% 🔒 1 🔒 +0.0%
25= Joseph Robbins B 107/125 85.60% 🔒 1 🔒 +0.0%
25= Lee Betts B 107/125 85.60% 🔒 1 🔒 +0.0%
25= Liam Crabb B 107/125 85.60% 🔒 1 🔒 +0.0%
28= Finley Bowles B 106/125 84.80% 🔒 1 🔒 +0.0%
28= Mark Hogan D 106/125 84.80% 🔒 1 🔒 +0.0%
30= Cemal Seziner B 105/125 84.00% 🔒 1 🔒 +0.0%
30= David Allwood B 105/125 84.00% 🔒 1 🔒 +0.0%
30= Lucas Hyde B 105/125 84.00% 🔒 1 🔒 +0.0%
30= Maciej Bilkiewicz B 105/125 84.00% 🔒 1 🔒 +0.0%
30= Mackenzie Vandertuin B 105/125 84.00% 🔒 1 🔒 +0.0%
30= Stuart Turner C 105/125 84.00% 🔒 1 🔒 +0.0%
36= Francesca Chau C 104/125 83.20% 🔒 1 🔒 +0.0%
36= Howard Beaumont B 104/125 83.20% 🔒 1 🔒 +0.0%
36= Oliver Sampson B 104/125 83.20% 🔒 1 🔒 +0.0%
36= Tim Smith B 104/125 83.20% 🔒 1 🔒 +0.0%
40 Andy Savva C 103/125 82.40% 🔒 1 🔒 +0.0%
41= Adam Gutteridge A 102/125 81.60% 🔒 1 🔒 +0.0%
41= Chris Tate B 102/125 81.60% 🔒 1 🔒 +0.0%
41= Michael Drever B 102/125 81.60% 🔒 1 🔒 +0.0%
41= Pauric Greenan C 102/125 81.60% 🔒 1 🔒 +0.0%
41= Robert Lewis B 102/125 81.60% 🔒 1 🔒 +0.0%
41= Thomas Burns B 102/125 81.60% 🔒 1 🔒 +0.0%
47 Isabelle MacKintosh B 101/125 80.80% 🔒 1 🔒 +0.0%
48 Elise Dixon C 100/125 80.00% 🔒 1 🔒 +0.0%
49 Adam Holmes A 99/125 79.20% 🔒 1 🔒 +0.0%
50= Anthony Paley B 98/125 78.40% 🔒 1 🔒 +0.0%
50= Dean Rickford B 98/125 78.40% 🔒 1 🔒 +0.0%
50= Graham Carter C 98/125 78.40% 🔒 1 🔒 +0.0%
50= John Bowman C 98/125 78.40% 🔒 1 🔒 +0.0%
50= Kelvin Page D 98/125 78.40% 🔒 1 🔒 +0.0%
50= Peter Lunn C 98/125 78.40% 🔒 1 🔒 +0.0%
50= Philip Sanders C 98/125 78.40% 🔒 1 🔒 +0.0%
57= James Farrell D 97/125 77.60% 🔒 1 🔒 +0.0%
57= William Maclennan C 97/125 77.60% 🔒 1 🔒 +0.0%
59= Christopher Cheng B 96/125 76.80% 🔒 1 🔒 +0.0%
59= Frank Chetcuti D 96/125 76.80% 🔒 1 🔒 +0.0%
61 Michael Cooper D 95/125 76.00% 🔒 1 🔒 +0.0%
62 Joe Turner B 94/125 75.20% 🔒 1 🔒 +0.0%
63 Argun Ismet A 93/125 74.40% 🔒 1 🔒 +0.0%
64= Abbie Coutanche D 92/125 73.60% 🔒 1 🔒 +0.0%
64= Alan Haynes C 92/125 73.60% 🔒 1 🔒 +0.0%
64= Matthew Rowland C 92/125 73.60% 🔒 1 🔒 +0.0%
64= Richard Fox C 92/125 73.60% 🔒 1 🔒 +0.0%
68= Karl Weaver C 90/125 72.00% 🔒 1 🔒 +0.0%
68= Keith White B 90/125 72.00% 🔒 1 🔒 +0.0%
70 Ian Mulliner B 88/125 70.40% 🔒 1 🔒 +0.0%
71 Molly Hall C 87/125 69.60% 🔒 1 🔒 +0.0%
72 Keith Foote D 86/125 68.80% 🔒 1 🔒 +0.0%
73= Astrid Brocklehurst-Flynn D 85/125 68.00% 🔒 1 🔒 +0.0%
73= Tyler Minter B 85/125 68.00% 🔒 1 🔒 +0.0%
75 Ceyla Ismet D 84/125 67.20% 🔒 1 🔒 +0.0%
76 Anastasia Mascali D 80/125 64.00% 🔒 1 🔒 +0.0%
77= Benjamin Jordan D 79/125 63.20% 🔒 1 🔒 +0.0%
77= Stuart Purser D 79/125 63.20% 🔒 1 🔒 +0.0%
77= William Norman D 79/125 63.20% 🔒 1 🔒 +0.0%
80 David Izzard D 77/125 61.60% 🔒 1 🔒 +0.0%
81 Robert Moss D 72/125 57.60% 🔒 1 🔒 +0.0%
82 Carmine Saccone D 66/125 52.80% 🔒 1 🔒 +0.0%
83 Paul Atkinson B 64/100 64.00% 🔒 1 🔒 +0.0%
84 Gareth Roberts D 39/75 52.00% 🔒 1 🔒 +0.0%
Other OTR Events at Nuthampstead Shooting Ground LLP
0%

Analyzing Data...

Connecting to CPSA...

Initial Scores
History Pages
Classifications
Fixture Details
VER: v0.7
BUILD:
DEPLOYED: 29 Aug 2026 15:58:46