Back to Events

FSP — FITASC Sporting

FITASC Sporting at Mount Farm Sporting Clays

Mount Farm Sporting Clays

Saturday, 18 January 2025 · CPSA Results →

Weather loading...

Event Rating

Latest Visitor Reviews

No written reviews yet.

Entries

67.2%

Field Average

87.0%

Highest Score

35.0%

Lowest Score

Top 3 Overall

🥈

Glenn Hunt

86/100

86.00%

🥇

John Dunne

87/100

87.00%

🥉 =3

Gary Taylor

Thomas Heath

82/100

82.00%

Event Difficulty

67.2% This Event

vs. Mount Farm Sporting Clays historical average (FITASC Sporting)

↓ -4.7% harder than usual

Ground avg: 71.9%

Class Winners

A 6 entered

87/100 — 87.00%

John Dunne

2: M Delf — 81.00%

B 20 entered

86/100 — 86.00%

Glenn Hunt

2=: Gary Taylor — 82.00%

C 22 entered

80/100 — 80.00%

Guy Watson(tied) Maxwell Drelincourt(tied) Sam Winterburn(tied)

4: Richard Lee — 77.00%

D 16 entered

69/100 — 69.00%

Andrew Miller

2: John Harrison — 67.00%

Other 1 entered

79/100 — 79.00%

James Mather

Field Shape

67.2%

Field avg

FITASC Sporting at Mount Farm Sporting Clays had a 52.0 point scoring spread across 65 entries.

Spread 52.0 pts

Front 87.0%

Largest class C

A compact read of how the field performed: average, spread and where most shooters sat.

Score Distribution

90–100%

0 0.0%

80–89%

10 15.4%

70–79%

22 33.8%

60–69%

19 29.2%

50–59%

7 10.8%

<50%

7 10.8%

Field Achievement

% of competitors reaching each score threshold

90%+

0 / 65

80%+

15.4%

10 / 65

70%+

49.2%

32 / 65

60%+

78.5%

51 / 65

50%+

89.2%

58 / 65

Unlock the full event analysis

Register free for historical ground trends, class averages and spread, score charts, class composition and a detailed classification breakdown.

Historical Trends at Mount Farm Sporting Clays

FITASC Sporting performance across events held at this ground.

Last 12 months

Overall Average Trend

Classification Trend Comparison

Classification Deep Dive

4 active classifications

—

Member insight

Typical —

Best —

Lowest —

Middle 50% score range

vs Ground Avg (12m)—

—

Member insight

Typical —

Best —

Lowest —

Middle 50% score range

vs Ground Avg (12m)—

—

Member insight

Typical —

Best —

Lowest —

Middle 50% score range

vs Ground Avg (12m)—

—

Member insight

Typical —

Best —

Lowest —

Middle 50% score range

vs Ground Avg (12m)—

Event Performance Analysis

Registered insight

Average by Class

Class averages make it easier to see where the event played hardest across the field.

Field Spread by Class

64.0-87.0%

60.0-86.0%

35.0-80.0%

38.8-69.0%

Other

79.0-79.0%

Boxes show the middle 50% of each class. Orange line is the median.

Top 10 Score Lollipop

A quick visual read of how far the front of the field separated itself.

Score Histogram

High gun: 87.0%. The high-gun band is outlined.

Class Breakdown

Rotate your device to see High/Low scores and the class winner

Class	Count	Average	High	Low	Winner
A	6	74.8%	87.0%	64.0%	John Dunne
B	20	74.3%	86.0%	60.0%	Glenn Hunt
C	22	66.8%	80.0%	35.0%	Guy Watson
D	16	55.1%	69.0%	38.8%	Andrew Miller
Other	1	79.0%	79.0%	79.0%	James Mather

Class Composition

6 9.2%

20 30.8%

22 33.8%

16 24.6%

Other

1 1.5%

Largest class: C — 22 competitors (33.8%)

Full Results — 65 entries

🔒 The Class Rank and vs Class Avg columns are hidden — register free to unlock both insights.

Class A

Score 87/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 86/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 82/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 82/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 81/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class A

Score 81/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class C

Score 80/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class C

Score 80/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 80/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class C

Score 80/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class Unknown

Score 79/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 79/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class A

Score 79/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 79/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 78/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class C

Score 77/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 76/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 75/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class C

Score 75/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class C

Score 74/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class C

Score 74/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 74/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class C

Score 73/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 73/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 73/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class C

Score 73/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class A

Score 73/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 72/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class C

Score 72/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class C

Score 71/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 71/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 70/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class D

Score 69/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class C

Score 69/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class C

Score 69/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class D

Score 67/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 67/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 66/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class C

Score 66/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class A

Score 65/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class C

Score 65/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class D

Score 64/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class A

Score 64/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 63/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class C

Score 63/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class D

Score 62/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class C

Score 62/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class D

Score 62/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class D

Score 62/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class D

Score 61/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 60/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class D

Score 57/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class C

Score 56/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class C

Score 56/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class D

Score 54/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class D

Score 54/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class D

Score 54/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class C

Score 49/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class D

Score 45/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class D

Score 45/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class D

Score 44/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class D

Score 43/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class C

Score 35/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class D

Score 31/80

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class C

Score 31/60

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

#	Name	Class	Score	Score %	Class Rank 🔒	vs Class Avg
1	John Dunne	A	87/100	87.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
2	Glenn Hunt	B	86/100	86.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
3=	Gary Taylor	B	82/100	82.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
3=	Thomas Heath	B	82/100	82.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
5=	Dave Hughes	B	81/100	81.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
5=	M Delf	A	81/100	81.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
7=	Guy Watson	C	80/100	80.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
7=	Maxwell Drelincourt	C	80/100	80.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
7=	Phil Rowbottom	B	80/100	80.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
7=	Sam Winterburn	C	80/100	80.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
11=	James Mather	Unknown	79/100	79.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
11=	Mark Fisher	B	79/100	79.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
11=	Shaun Bulcock	A	79/100	79.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
11=	Simon Davis	B	79/100	79.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
15	Stephen Dale	B	78/100	78.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
16	Richard Lee	C	77/100	77.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
17	David Woolley	B	76/100	76.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
18=	Andy Armstrong	B	75/100	75.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
18=	Gary Hicks	C	75/100	75.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
20=	Christopher Little	C	74/100	74.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
20=	Gugsy Ahmed	C	74/100	74.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
20=	Jamie Harding	B	74/100	74.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
23=	Connor Davis	C	73/100	73.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
23=	Marcus Rigby	B	73/100	73.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
23=	Mark Webster	B	73/100	73.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
23=	Peter Brockley	C	73/100	73.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
23=	Thomas Brown	A	73/100	73.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
28=	Julian Brockley	B	72/100	72.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
28=	Lucy Earl	C	72/100	72.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
30=	Max Payne	C	71/100	71.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
30=	Thomas Booth	B	71/100	71.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
32	Martin Walsh	B	70/100	70.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
33=	Andrew Miller	D	69/100	69.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
33=	James Hollingworth	C	69/100	69.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
33=	Michael Snape	C	69/100	69.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
36=	John Harrison	D	67/100	67.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
36=	Mark Allen	B	67/100	67.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
38=	Chris Harrison	B	66/100	66.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
38=	Thomas Oliver	C	66/100	66.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
40=	Luke Mortimer	A	65/100	65.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
40=	Paul Zaitschenko	C	65/100	65.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
42=	George Wiszniewski	D	64/100	64.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
42=	Rebecca McKenzie	A	64/100	64.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
44=	Andrew Kettlewood	B	63/100	63.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
44=	Grant Davidson	C	63/100	63.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
46=	Alan Ayers	D	62/100	62.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
46=	Ben Kettlewood	C	62/100	62.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
46=	Daniel Rimmer	D	62/100	62.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
46=	Martyn Shepherd	D	62/100	62.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
50	Phil Davies	D	61/100	61.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
51	Callum Noble	B	60/100	60.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
52	Sean Allison	D	57/100	57.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
53=	Alan Hall	C	56/100	56.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
53=	James Gott	C	56/100	56.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
55=	John Hamblin	D	54/100	54.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
55=	Mike Haw	D	54/100	54.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
55=	SR Hurt	D	54/100	54.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
58	Richard Noble	C	49/100	49.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
59=	Paul Gillespie	D	45/100	45.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
59=	Robin Stone	D	45/100	45.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
61	Colin Winterburn	D	44/100	44.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
62	William Evans	D	43/100	43.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
63	Andrew Marritt	C	35/100	35.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
64=	Eric Bowe	D	31/80	38.75%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
64=	John Lawn	C	31/60	51.67%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%

Other FSP Events at Mount Farm Sporting Clays

⚙ Performance Stats DRAG TO MOVE

0.042s ● FAST

DB 35% · Py 40% · Render 25%

12 queries · avg 1.2ms · max 1.8ms

Render Breakdown

Python Logic (Pre-Render) 0.0170s

DB Logic (Pre-Render) 0.0147s

Full Page Render 0.0106s

QUERY TABLES ▾

⚠ event_review 4× 0.004s

shoot_event 2× 0.003s

shoot_score 2× 0.003s

site_configuration 2× 0.002s

ground 1× 0.002s

admin_menu_item 1× 0.001s

⚠ = queried 3+ times (cache candidate)

SQL QUERIES (12) — click to expand

#1 [02:17:30.764] 1.7ms

shoot_event

SELECT shoot_event.id AS shoot_event_id, shoot_event.cpsa_fixture_id AS shoot_event_cpsa_fixture_id, shoot_event.name AS shoot_event_name, shoot_event.date AS shoot_event_date, shoot_event.discipline AS shoot_event_discipline, shoot_event.ground AS shoot_event_ground, shoot_event.url AS shoot_event_…

#2 [02:17:30.766] 1.5ms

shoot_score

SELECT shoot_score.id AS shoot_score_id, shoot_score.targets AS shoot_score_targets, shoot_score.hits AS shoot_score_hits, shoot_score.points AS shoot_score_points, shoot_score.percentage AS shoot_score_percentage, shoot_score.shooter_id AS shoot_score_shooter_id, shoot_score.event_id AS shoot_score…

#3 [02:17:30.772] 1.6ms

shoot_score

SELECT avg(shoot_score.percentage) AS avg_1 
FROM shoot_score JOIN shoot_event ON shoot_score.event_id = shoot_event.id 
WHERE shoot_event.ground = %(ground_1)s AND shoot_event.discipline = %(discipline_1)s AND shoot_event.is_scraped = true AND shoot_event.admin_hidden != true AND shoot_event.id != …

#4 [02:17:30.774] 1.3ms

shoot_event

SELECT shoot_event.id AS shoot_event_id, shoot_event.cpsa_fixture_id AS shoot_event_cpsa_fixture_id, shoot_event.name AS shoot_event_name, shoot_event.date AS shoot_event_date, shoot_event.discipline AS shoot_event_discipline, shoot_event.ground AS shoot_event_ground, shoot_event.url AS shoot_event_…

#5 [02:17:30.776] 1.0ms

event_review

SELECT avg(event_review.rating) AS avg_1, count(event_review.id) AS count_1 
FROM event_review 
WHERE event_review.event_id = %(event_id_1)s

#6 [02:17:30.778] 0.9ms

event_review

SELECT count(*) AS count_1 
FROM (SELECT event_review.id AS event_review_id, event_review.event_id AS event_review_event_id, event_review.rating AS event_review_rating, event_review.review_text AS event_review_review_text, event_review.reviewer_name AS event_review_reviewer_name, event_review.review…

#7 [02:17:30.780] 0.9ms

event_review

SELECT event_review.id AS event_review_id, event_review.event_id AS event_review_event_id, event_review.rating AS event_review_rating, event_review.review_text AS event_review_review_text, event_review.reviewer_name AS event_review_reviewer_name, event_review.reviewer_hash AS event_review_reviewer_h…

#8 [02:17:30.782] 0.9ms

event_review

SELECT event_review.id AS event_review_id, event_review.event_id AS event_review_event_id, event_review.rating AS event_review_rating, event_review.review_text AS event_review_review_text, event_review.reviewer_name AS event_review_reviewer_name, event_review.reviewer_hash AS event_review_reviewer_h…

#9 [02:17:30.784] 1.8ms

ground

SELECT ground.id AS ground_id, ground.name AS ground_name, ground.url AS ground_url, ground.postcode AS ground_postcode, ground.what3words AS ground_what3words, ground.email AS ground_email, ground.website AS ground_website, ground.num_events_cpsa AS ground_num_events_cpsa, ground.num_events_cpsa_la…

#10 [02:17:30.786] 1.1ms

site_configuration

SELECT site_configuration.id AS site_configuration_id, site_configuration.key AS site_configuration_key, site_configuration.value AS site_configuration_value 
FROM site_configuration 
WHERE site_configuration.key LIKE %(key_1)s OR site_configuration.key LIKE %(key_2)s

#11 [02:17:30.788] 1.0ms

site_configuration

SELECT site_configuration.id AS site_configuration_id, site_configuration.key AS site_configuration_key, site_configuration.value AS site_configuration_value 
FROM site_configuration 
WHERE site_configuration.key IN (%(key_1_1)s, %(key_1_2)s, %(key_1_3)s, %(key_1_4)s)

#12 [02:17:30.790] 1.0ms

admin_menu_item

SELECT DISTINCT admin_menu_item.active_tab AS admin_menu_item_active_tab 
FROM admin_menu_item

LIVE REQUESTS (0) — click to expand

FITASC Sporting at Mount Farm Sporting Clays

Unlock the full event analysis

Historical Trends at Mount Farm Sporting Clays

Classification Deep Dive

Event Performance Analysis

Analyzing Data...

Refresh Complete

Already Up to Date?

Analyzing Data...

Refresh Complete

Already Up to Date?