Back to Events

Last Updated: 19 Jun 2026, 16:00

ESP — English Sporting

English Sporting at Hangman's Stone Sporting Clays

Hangman's Stone Sporting Clays

Sunday, 20 August 2017 · CPSA Results →

Weather loading...

Event Rating

Latest Visitor Reviews

No written reviews yet.

Entries

70.7%

Field Average

92.0%

Highest Score

39.0%

Lowest Score

Top 3 Overall

🥈

Robin •••••

91/100

91.00%

🥇

Joe •••••

92/100

92.00%

🥉

Sean •••••

AAA

90/100

90.00%

Event Difficulty

70.7% This Event

vs. Hangman's Stone Sporting Clays historical average (English Sporting)

↓ -6.5% harder than usual

Ground avg: 77.2%

Class Winners

AAA 3 entered

90/100 — 90.00%

Sean •••••

2: Phil ••••• — 87.00%

AA 10 entered

92/100 — 92.00%

Joe •••••

2: Robin ••••• — 91.00%

A 28 entered

87/100 — 87.00%

Robert •••••

2=: Hedley ••••• — 86.00%

B 17 entered

86/100 — 86.00%

Oliver •••••

2: Nick ••••• — 82.00%

C 21 entered

72/100 — 72.00%

Christopher •••••

2: Martin ••••• — 69.00%

Other 1 entered

51/100 — 51.00%

Adam •••••

Field Shape

70.7%

Field avg

English Sporting at Hangman's Stone Sporting Clays had a 53.0 point scoring spread across 80 entries.

Spread 53.0 pts

Front 92.0%

Largest class A

A compact read of how the field performed: average, spread and where most shooters sat.

Score Distribution

90–100%

3 3.8%

80–89%

18 22.5%

70–79%

26 32.5%

60–69%

17 21.2%

50–59%

13 16.2%

<50%

3 3.8%

Field Achievement

% of competitors reaching each score threshold

90%+

3 / 80

80%+

26.2%

21 / 80

70%+

58.8%

47 / 80

60%+

80.0%

64 / 80

50%+

96.2%

77 / 80

Unlock the full event analysis

Register free for historical ground trends, class averages and spread, score charts, class composition and a detailed classification breakdown.

Historical Trends at Hangman's Stone Sporting Clays

English Sporting performance across events held at this ground.

Last 12 months

Overall Average Trend

Classification Trend Comparison

Classification Deep Dive

5 active classifications

AAA

—

Member insight

Typical —

Best —

Lowest —

Middle 50% score range

vs Ground Avg (12m)—

—

Member insight

Typical —

Best —

Lowest —

Middle 50% score range

vs Ground Avg (12m)—

—

Member insight

Typical —

Best —

Lowest —

Middle 50% score range

vs Ground Avg (12m)—

—

Member insight

Typical —

Best —

Lowest —

Middle 50% score range

vs Ground Avg (12m)—

—

Member insight

Typical —

Best —

Lowest —

Middle 50% score range

vs Ground Avg (12m)—

Event Performance Analysis

Registered insight

Average by Class

Class averages make it easier to see where the event played hardest across the field.

Field Spread by Class

AAA

86.0-90.0%

76.0-92.0%

62.0-87.0%

54.0-86.0%

39.0-72.0%

Other

51.0-51.0%

Boxes show the middle 50% of each class. Orange line is the median.

Top 10 Score Lollipop

A quick visual read of how far the front of the field separated itself.

Score Histogram

High gun: 92.0%. The high-gun band is outlined.

Class Breakdown

Rotate your device to see High/Low scores and the class winner

Class	Count	Average	High	Low	Winner
AAA	3	87.7%	90.0%	86.0%	Sean •••••
AA	10	83.8%	92.0%	76.0%	Joe •••••
A	28	76.6%	87.0%	62.0%	Robert •••••
B	17	69.2%	86.0%	54.0%	Oliver •••••
C	21	56.5%	72.0%	39.0%	Christopher •••••
Other	1	51.0%	51.0%	51.0%	Adam •••••

Class Composition

AAA

3 3.8%

10 12.5%

28 35.0%

17 21.2%

21 26.2%

Other

1 1.2%

Largest class: A — 28 competitors (35.0%)

Full Results — 80 entries

🔒 The Class Rank and vs Class Avg columns are hidden — register free to unlock both insights.

Rotate your device to see the full results table: score, class placing, class average and delta.

Class AA

Score 92/100

Class placing 1

Class average 83.8%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class AA

Score 91/100

Class placing 1

Class average 83.8%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class AAA

Score 90/100

Class placing 1

Class average 87.7%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class AAA

Score 87/100

Class placing 1

Class average 87.7%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class A

Score 87/100

Class placing 1

Class average 76.6%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class AA

Score 86/100

Class placing 1

Class average 83.8%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class AA

Score 86/100

Class placing 1

Class average 83.8%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class A

Score 86/100

Class placing 1

Class average 76.6%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class AAA

Score 86/100

Class placing 1

Class average 87.7%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class AA

Score 86/100

Class placing 1

Class average 83.8%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 86/100

Class placing 1

Class average 69.2%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class A

Score 86/100

Class placing 1

Class average 76.6%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class A

Score 85/100

Class placing 1

Class average 76.6%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class A

Score 84/100

Class placing 1

Class average 76.6%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class AA

Score 84/100

Class placing 1

Class average 83.8%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class AA

Score 83/100

Class placing 1

Class average 83.8%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class A

Score 83/100

Class placing 1

Class average 76.6%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class A

Score 83/100

Class placing 1

Class average 76.6%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 82/100

Class placing 1

Class average 69.2%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class A

Score 81/100

Class placing 1

Class average 76.6%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class A

Score 81/100

Class placing 1

Class average 76.6%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class A

Score 79/100

Class placing 1

Class average 76.6%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class A

Score 79/100

Class placing 1

Class average 76.6%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class AA

Score 78/100

Class placing 1

Class average 83.8%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class A

Score 77/100

Class placing 1

Class average 76.6%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class A

Score 77/100

Class placing 1

Class average 76.6%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class A

Score 77/100

Class placing 1

Class average 76.6%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class A

Score 77/100

Class placing 1

Class average 76.6%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class AA

Score 76/100

Class placing 1

Class average 83.8%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class A

Score 76/100

Class placing 1

Class average 76.6%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class AA

Score 76/100

Class placing 1

Class average 83.8%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class A

Score 75/100

Class placing 1

Class average 76.6%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class A

Score 75/100

Class placing 1

Class average 76.6%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 75/100

Class placing 1

Class average 69.2%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 75/100

Class placing 1

Class average 69.2%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class A

Score 74/100

Class placing 1

Class average 76.6%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class A

Score 74/100

Class placing 1

Class average 76.6%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class A

Score 73/100

Class placing 1

Class average 76.6%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class A

Score 72/100

Class placing 1

Class average 76.6%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class C

Score 72/100

Class placing 1

Class average 56.5%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 72/100

Class placing 1

Class average 69.2%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 71/100

Class placing 1

Class average 69.2%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class A

Score 71/100

Class placing 1

Class average 76.6%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 71/100

Class placing 1

Class average 69.2%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class A

Score 71/100

Class placing 1

Class average 76.6%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 71/100

Class placing 1

Class average 69.2%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class A

Score 70/100

Class placing 1

Class average 76.6%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class C

Score 69/100

Class placing 1

Class average 56.5%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 68/100

Class placing 1

Class average 69.2%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 68/100

Class placing 1

Class average 69.2%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 67/100

Class placing 1

Class average 69.2%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 67/100

Class placing 1

Class average 69.2%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class A

Score 65/100

Class placing 1

Class average 76.6%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class A

Score 65/100

Class placing 1

Class average 76.6%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 64/100

Class placing 1

Class average 69.2%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 64/100

Class placing 1

Class average 69.2%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class C

Score 64/100

Class placing 1

Class average 56.5%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class C

Score 63/100

Class placing 1

Class average 56.5%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class C

Score 63/100

Class placing 1

Class average 56.5%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class A

Score 62/100

Class placing 1

Class average 76.6%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class C

Score 62/100

Class placing 1

Class average 56.5%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 61/100

Class placing 1

Class average 69.2%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 60/100

Class placing 1

Class average 69.2%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class C

Score 60/100

Class placing 1

Class average 56.5%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class C

Score 58/100

Class placing 1

Class average 56.5%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class C

Score 58/100

Class placing 1

Class average 56.5%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class C

Score 57/100

Class placing 1

Class average 56.5%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class C

Score 57/100

Class placing 1

Class average 56.5%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class C

Score 57/100

Class placing 1

Class average 56.5%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class C

Score 55/100

Class placing 1

Class average 56.5%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class C

Score 54/100

Class placing 1

Class average 56.5%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 54/100

Class placing 1

Class average 69.2%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class C

Score 52/100

Class placing 1

Class average 56.5%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class C

Score 52/100

Class placing 1

Class average 56.5%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class C

Score 52/100

Class placing 1

Class average 56.5%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class Unknown

Score 51/100

Class placing 1

Class average 51.0%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class C

Score 51/100

Class placing 1

Class average 56.5%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class C

Score 47/100

Class placing 1

Class average 56.5%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class C

Score 44/100

Class placing 1

Class average 56.5%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class C

Score 39/100

Class placing 1

Class average 56.5%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

#	Name	Class	Score	Score %	Class Rank 🔒	Class Avg	vs Class Avg
1	Joe •••••	AA	92/100	92.00%	🔒 1	83.80%	🔒 +0.0%
2	Robin •••••	AA	91/100	91.00%	🔒 1	83.80%	🔒 +0.0%
3	Sean •••••	AAA	90/100	90.00%	🔒 1	87.70%	🔒 +0.0%
4=	Phil •••••	AAA	87/100	87.00%	🔒 1	87.70%	🔒 +0.0%
4=	Robert •••••	A	87/100	87.00%	🔒 1	76.60%	🔒 +0.0%
6=	Adrian •••••	AA	86/100	86.00%	🔒 1	83.80%	🔒 +0.0%
6=	Graham •••••	AA	86/100	86.00%	🔒 1	83.80%	🔒 +0.0%
6=	Hedley •••••	A	86/100	86.00%	🔒 1	76.60%	🔒 +0.0%
6=	Jeffrey •••••	AAA	86/100	86.00%	🔒 1	87.70%	🔒 +0.0%
6=	Mark •••••	AA	86/100	86.00%	🔒 1	83.80%	🔒 +0.0%
6=	Oliver •••••	B	86/100	86.00%	🔒 1	69.20%	🔒 +0.0%
6=	Russell •••••	A	86/100	86.00%	🔒 1	76.60%	🔒 +0.0%
13	Peter •••••	A	85/100	85.00%	🔒 1	76.60%	🔒 +0.0%
14=	Rory •••••	A	84/100	84.00%	🔒 1	76.60%	🔒 +0.0%
14=	William •••••	AA	84/100	84.00%	🔒 1	83.80%	🔒 +0.0%
16=	Albert •••••	AA	83/100	83.00%	🔒 1	83.80%	🔒 +0.0%
16=	Philip •••••	A	83/100	83.00%	🔒 1	76.60%	🔒 +0.0%
16=	Timothy •••••	A	83/100	83.00%	🔒 1	76.60%	🔒 +0.0%
19	Nick •••••	B	82/100	82.00%	🔒 1	69.20%	🔒 +0.0%
20=	Bernard •••••	A	81/100	81.00%	🔒 1	76.60%	🔒 +0.0%
20=	Simon •••••	A	81/100	81.00%	🔒 1	76.60%	🔒 +0.0%
22=	Andrew •••••	A	79/100	79.00%	🔒 1	76.60%	🔒 +0.0%
22=	Oliver •••••	A	79/100	79.00%	🔒 1	76.60%	🔒 +0.0%
24	Doug •••••	AA	78/100	78.00%	🔒 1	83.80%	🔒 +0.0%
25=	Jason •••••	A	77/100	77.00%	🔒 1	76.60%	🔒 +0.0%
25=	Mark •••••	A	77/100	77.00%	🔒 1	76.60%	🔒 +0.0%
25=	Mark •••••	A	77/100	77.00%	🔒 1	76.60%	🔒 +0.0%
25=	Richard •••••	A	77/100	77.00%	🔒 1	76.60%	🔒 +0.0%
29=	John •••••	AA	76/100	76.00%	🔒 1	83.80%	🔒 +0.0%
29=	Nick •••••	A	76/100	76.00%	🔒 1	76.60%	🔒 +0.0%
29=	Paul •••••	AA	76/100	76.00%	🔒 1	83.80%	🔒 +0.0%
32=	Amy •••••	A	75/100	75.00%	🔒 1	76.60%	🔒 +0.0%
32=	Mr •••••	A	75/100	75.00%	🔒 1	76.60%	🔒 +0.0%
32=	Richard •••••	B	75/100	75.00%	🔒 1	69.20%	🔒 +0.0%
32=	Tim •••••	B	75/100	75.00%	🔒 1	69.20%	🔒 +0.0%
36=	Gary •••••	A	74/100	74.00%	🔒 1	76.60%	🔒 +0.0%
36=	Karl •••••	A	74/100	74.00%	🔒 1	76.60%	🔒 +0.0%
38	Stephen •••••	A	73/100	73.00%	🔒 1	76.60%	🔒 +0.0%
39=	Adrian •••••	A	72/100	72.00%	🔒 1	76.60%	🔒 +0.0%
39=	Christopher •••••	C	72/100	72.00%	🔒 1	56.50%	🔒 +0.0%
39=	Edward •••••	B	72/100	72.00%	🔒 1	69.20%	🔒 +0.0%
42=	Bernard •••••	B	71/100	71.00%	🔒 1	69.20%	🔒 +0.0%
42=	David •••••	A	71/100	71.00%	🔒 1	76.60%	🔒 +0.0%
42=	Mark •••••	B	71/100	71.00%	🔒 1	69.20%	🔒 +0.0%
42=	Martin •••••	A	71/100	71.00%	🔒 1	76.60%	🔒 +0.0%
42=	Timothy •••••	B	71/100	71.00%	🔒 1	69.20%	🔒 +0.0%
47	Mr •••••	A	70/100	70.00%	🔒 1	76.60%	🔒 +0.0%
48	Martin •••••	C	69/100	69.00%	🔒 1	56.50%	🔒 +0.0%
49=	Christopher •••••	B	68/100	68.00%	🔒 1	69.20%	🔒 +0.0%
49=	Ken •••••	B	68/100	68.00%	🔒 1	69.20%	🔒 +0.0%
51=	Richard •••••	B	67/100	67.00%	🔒 1	69.20%	🔒 +0.0%
51=	Tim •••••	B	67/100	67.00%	🔒 1	69.20%	🔒 +0.0%
53=	Jonathan •••••	A	65/100	65.00%	🔒 1	76.60%	🔒 +0.0%
53=	Lee •••••	A	65/100	65.00%	🔒 1	76.60%	🔒 +0.0%
55=	Richard •••••	B	64/100	64.00%	🔒 1	69.20%	🔒 +0.0%
55=	Stephen •••••	B	64/100	64.00%	🔒 1	69.20%	🔒 +0.0%
55=	Zea •••••	C	64/100	64.00%	🔒 1	56.50%	🔒 +0.0%
58=	Kenneth •••••	C	63/100	63.00%	🔒 1	56.50%	🔒 +0.0%
58=	Ray •••••	C	63/100	63.00%	🔒 1	56.50%	🔒 +0.0%
60=	Brian •••••	A	62/100	62.00%	🔒 1	76.60%	🔒 +0.0%
60=	Michael •••••	C	62/100	62.00%	🔒 1	56.50%	🔒 +0.0%
62	Trevor •••••	B	61/100	61.00%	🔒 1	69.20%	🔒 +0.0%
63=	Dudley •••••	B	60/100	60.00%	🔒 1	69.20%	🔒 +0.0%
63=	Kenneth •••••	C	60/100	60.00%	🔒 1	56.50%	🔒 +0.0%
65=	David •••••	C	58/100	58.00%	🔒 1	56.50%	🔒 +0.0%
65=	Jim •••••	C	58/100	58.00%	🔒 1	56.50%	🔒 +0.0%
67=	Emma •••••	C	57/100	57.00%	🔒 1	56.50%	🔒 +0.0%
67=	Roger •••••	C	57/100	57.00%	🔒 1	56.50%	🔒 +0.0%
67=	William •••••	C	57/100	57.00%	🔒 1	56.50%	🔒 +0.0%
70	Martin •••••	C	55/100	55.00%	🔒 1	56.50%	🔒 +0.0%
71=	Barry •••••	C	54/100	54.00%	🔒 1	56.50%	🔒 +0.0%
71=	David •••••	B	54/100	54.00%	🔒 1	69.20%	🔒 +0.0%
73=	Mark •••••	C	52/100	52.00%	🔒 1	56.50%	🔒 +0.0%
73=	Philip •••••	C	52/100	52.00%	🔒 1	56.50%	🔒 +0.0%
73=	Sue •••••	C	52/100	52.00%	🔒 1	56.50%	🔒 +0.0%
76=	Adam •••••	Unknown	51/100	51.00%	🔒 1	51.00%	🔒 +0.0%
76=	John •••••	C	51/100	51.00%	🔒 1	56.50%	🔒 +0.0%
78	Natalie •••••	C	47/100	47.00%	🔒 1	56.50%	🔒 +0.0%
79	Gary •••••	C	44/100	44.00%	🔒 1	56.50%	🔒 +0.0%
80	Chris •••••	C	39/100	39.00%	🔒 1	56.50%	🔒 +0.0%

Other ESP Events at Hangman's Stone Sporting Clays

⚙ Performance Stats DRAG TO MOVE

0.072s ● FAST

DB 52% · Py 22% · Render 26%

12 queries · avg 3.1ms · max 14.0ms

Render Breakdown

DB Logic (Pre-Render) 0.0373s

Full Page Render 0.0191s

Python Logic (Pre-Render) 0.0157s

QUERY TABLES ▾

⚠ event_review 4× 0.007s

shoot_event 2× 0.017s

shoot_score 2× 0.007s

site_configuration 2× 0.003s

ground 1× 0.002s

admin_menu_item 1× 0.001s

⚠ = queried 3+ times (cache candidate)

SQL QUERIES (12) — click to expand

#1 [22:43:11.060] 3.4ms

shoot_event

SELECT shoot_event.id AS shoot_event_id, shoot_event.cpsa_fixture_id AS shoot_event_cpsa_fixture_id, shoot_event.name AS shoot_event_name, shoot_event.date AS shoot_event_date, shoot_event.discipline AS shoot_event_discipline, shoot_event.ground AS shoot_event_ground, shoot_event.url AS shoot_event_…

#2 [22:43:11.063] 2.2ms

shoot_score

SELECT shoot_score.id AS shoot_score_id, shoot_score.targets AS shoot_score_targets, shoot_score.hits AS shoot_score_hits, shoot_score.points AS shoot_score_points, shoot_score.percentage AS shoot_score_percentage, shoot_score.course_breakdown AS shoot_score_course_breakdown, shoot_score.shooter_id …

#3 [22:43:11.071] 4.7ms

shoot_score

SELECT avg(shoot_score.percentage) AS avg_1 
FROM shoot_score JOIN shoot_event ON shoot_score.event_id = shoot_event.id 
WHERE shoot_event.ground = %(ground_1)s AND shoot_event.discipline = %(discipline_1)s AND shoot_event.is_scraped = true AND shoot_event.admin_hidden != true AND shoot_event.id != …

#4 [22:43:11.086] 14.0ms

shoot_event

SELECT shoot_event.id AS shoot_event_id, shoot_event.cpsa_fixture_id AS shoot_event_cpsa_fixture_id, shoot_event.name AS shoot_event_name, shoot_event.date AS shoot_event_date, shoot_event.discipline AS shoot_event_discipline, shoot_event.ground AS shoot_event_ground, shoot_event.url AS shoot_event_…

#5 [22:43:11.088] 1.7ms

event_review

SELECT avg(event_review.rating) AS avg_1, count(event_review.id) AS count_1 
FROM event_review 
WHERE event_review.event_id = %(event_id_1)s

#6 [22:43:11.091] 1.4ms

event_review

SELECT count(*) AS count_1 
FROM (SELECT event_review.id AS event_review_id, event_review.event_id AS event_review_event_id, event_review.rating AS event_review_rating, event_review.review_text AS event_review_review_text, event_review.reviewer_name AS event_review_reviewer_name, event_review.review…

#7 [22:43:11.092] 1.3ms

event_review

SELECT event_review.id AS event_review_id, event_review.event_id AS event_review_event_id, event_review.rating AS event_review_rating, event_review.review_text AS event_review_review_text, event_review.reviewer_name AS event_review_reviewer_name, event_review.reviewer_hash AS event_review_reviewer_h…

#8 [22:43:11.096] 2.3ms

event_review

SELECT event_review.id AS event_review_id, event_review.event_id AS event_review_event_id, event_review.rating AS event_review_rating, event_review.review_text AS event_review_review_text, event_review.reviewer_name AS event_review_reviewer_name, event_review.reviewer_hash AS event_review_reviewer_h…

#9 [22:43:11.098] 1.6ms

ground

SELECT ground.id AS ground_id, ground.name AS ground_name, ground.url AS ground_url, ground.postcode AS ground_postcode, ground.what3words AS ground_what3words, ground.email AS ground_email, ground.website AS ground_website, ground.num_events_cpsa AS ground_num_events_cpsa, ground.num_events_cpsa_la…

#10 [22:43:11.100] 1.9ms

site_configuration

SELECT site_configuration.id AS site_configuration_id, site_configuration.key AS site_configuration_key, site_configuration.value AS site_configuration_value 
FROM site_configuration 
WHERE site_configuration.key LIKE %(key_1)s OR site_configuration.key LIKE %(key_2)s

#11 [22:43:11.102] 1.4ms

site_configuration

SELECT site_configuration.id AS site_configuration_id, site_configuration.key AS site_configuration_key, site_configuration.value AS site_configuration_value 
FROM site_configuration 
WHERE site_configuration.key IN (%(key_1_1)s, %(key_1_2)s, %(key_1_3)s, %(key_1_4)s)

#12 [22:43:11.104] 1.3ms

admin_menu_item

SELECT DISTINCT admin_menu_item.active_tab AS admin_menu_item_active_tab 
FROM admin_menu_item

LIVE REQUESTS (0) — click to expand

English Sporting at Hangman's Stone Sporting Clays

Unlock the full event analysis

Historical Trends at Hangman's Stone Sporting Clays

Classification Deep Dive

Event Performance Analysis

Analyzing Data...

Refresh Complete

Already Up to Date?

Analyzing Data...

Refresh Complete

Already Up to Date?