Back to Events

FSP — FITASC Sporting

FITASC Sporting at Sporting Targets Ltd

Sporting Targets Ltd

Thursday, 22 February 2018 · CPSA Results →

Weather loading...

Event Rating

Latest Visitor Reviews

No written reviews yet.

Entries

79.2%

Field Average

93.0%

Highest Score

57.0%

Lowest Score

Top 3 Overall

🥇 =1

Paul Lovick

Phil Gray

Steve Brightwell

93/100

93.00%

Event Difficulty

79.2% This Event

vs. Sporting Targets Ltd historical average (FITASC Sporting)

↑ +1.8% easier than usual

Ground avg: 77.4%

Class Winners

A 16 entered

93/100 — 93.00%

Paul Lovick(tied) Phil Gray(tied) Steve Brightwell(tied)

4=: David Ferriman — 90.00%

B 17 entered

88/100 — 88.00%

Jo Smith(tied) Peter Simpson(tied)

3: Glen Spalding — 87.00%

C 9 entered

90/100 — 90.00%

Philip Simpson

2: Peter Garrod — 80.00%

D 14 entered

77/100 — 77.00%

David Hull(tied) John Harrison(tied)

3: John Foord — 73.00%

Other 2 entered

74/100 — 74.00%

William Reeve

2: Steven Howling — 73.00%

Field Shape

79.2%

Field avg

FITASC Sporting at Sporting Targets Ltd had a 36.0 point scoring spread across 58 entries.

Spread 36.0 pts

Front 93.0%

Largest class B

A compact read of how the field performed: average, spread and where most shooters sat.

Score Distribution

90–100%

6 10.3%

80–89%

21 36.2%

70–79%

24 41.4%

60–69%

6 10.3%

50–59%

1 1.7%

<50%

0 0.0%

Field Achievement

% of competitors reaching each score threshold

90%+

10.3%

6 / 58

80%+

46.6%

27 / 58

70%+

87.9%

51 / 58

60%+

98.3%

57 / 58

50%+

100.0%

58 / 58

Unlock the full event analysis

Register free for historical ground trends, class averages and spread, score charts, class composition and a detailed classification breakdown.

Historical Trends at Sporting Targets Ltd

FITASC Sporting performance across events held at this ground.

Last 12 months

Overall Average Trend

Classification Trend Comparison

Classification Deep Dive

4 active classifications

—

Member insight

Typical —

Best —

Lowest —

Middle 50% score range

vs Ground Avg (12m)—

—

Member insight

Typical —

Best —

Lowest —

Middle 50% score range

vs Ground Avg (12m)—

—

Member insight

Typical —

Best —

Lowest —

Middle 50% score range

vs Ground Avg (12m)—

—

Member insight

Typical —

Best —

Lowest —

Middle 50% score range

vs Ground Avg (12m)—

Event Performance Analysis

Registered insight

Average by Class

Class averages make it easier to see where the event played hardest across the field.

Field Spread by Class

79.0-93.0%

71.0-88.0%

66.0-90.0%

57.0-77.0%

Other

73.0-74.0%

Boxes show the middle 50% of each class. Orange line is the median.

Top 10 Score Lollipop

A quick visual read of how far the front of the field separated itself.

Score Histogram

High gun: 93.0%. The high-gun band is outlined.

Class Breakdown

Rotate your device to see High/Low scores and the class winner

Class	Count	Average	High	Low	Winner
A	16	87.8%	93.0%	79.0%	Paul Lovick
B	17	81.4%	88.0%	71.0%	Jo Smith
C	9	76.6%	90.0%	66.0%	Philip Simpson
D	14	69.4%	77.0%	57.0%	David Hull
Other	2	73.5%	74.0%	73.0%	William Reeve

Class Composition

16 27.6%

17 29.3%

9 15.5%

14 24.1%

Other

2 3.4%

Largest class: B — 17 competitors (29.3%)

Full Results — 58 entries

🔒 The Class Rank and vs Class Avg columns are hidden — register free to unlock both insights.

Class A

Score 93/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class A

Score 93/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class A

Score 93/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class A

Score 90/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class A

Score 90/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class C

Score 90/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class A

Score 89/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class A

Score 89/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class A

Score 89/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class A

Score 88/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class A

Score 88/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 88/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 88/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 87/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class A

Score 87/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class A

Score 87/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class A

Score 86/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 85/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 85/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 84/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 83/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 83/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 82/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class A

Score 82/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class A

Score 82/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 81/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class C

Score 80/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 79/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class A

Score 79/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class C

Score 79/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class C

Score 78/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 78/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 78/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 77/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class D

Score 77/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 77/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class D

Score 77/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 77/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class C

Score 76/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class C

Score 75/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class C

Score 74/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class Unknown

Score 74/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class D

Score 73/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class Unknown

Score 73/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class D

Score 72/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class D

Score 71/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 71/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class C

Score 71/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class D

Score 70/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class D

Score 70/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class D

Score 70/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class D

Score 69/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class D

Score 68/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class D

Score 67/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class C

Score 66/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class D

Score 66/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class D

Score 65/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class D

Score 57/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

#	Name	Class	Score	Score %	Class Rank 🔒	vs Class Avg
1=	Paul Lovick	A	93/100	93.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
1=	Phil Gray	A	93/100	93.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
1=	Steve Brightwell	A	93/100	93.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
4=	David Ferriman	A	90/100	90.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
4=	Edward Solomons	A	90/100	90.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
4=	Philip Simpson	C	90/100	90.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
7=	John Wells	A	89/100	89.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
7=	Paul Batchelor	A	89/100	89.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
7=	Stuart Clarke	A	89/100	89.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
10=	Andrew Clifton	A	88/100	88.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
10=	Colin Saich	A	88/100	88.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
10=	Jo Smith	B	88/100	88.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
10=	Peter Simpson	B	88/100	88.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
14=	Glen Spalding	B	87/100	87.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
14=	Oliver Wilde	A	87/100	87.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
14=	Tony Leonard	A	87/100	87.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
17	Jack Lovick	A	86/100	86.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
18=	Brian Dunbavin	B	85/100	85.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
18=	Ian Schwier	B	85/100	85.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
20	John Price	B	84/100	84.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
21=	Jamie Harding	B	83/100	83.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
21=	Laurence Greenleaf	B	83/100	83.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
23=	Danny Smith	B	82/100	82.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
23=	Gavin Smith	A	82/100	82.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
23=	Joseph De Mulder	A	82/100	82.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
26	Adrian Smith	B	81/100	81.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
27	Peter Garrod	C	80/100	80.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
28=	Kenneth Bennett	B	79/100	79.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
28=	Nathan Batchelor	A	79/100	79.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
28=	Stewart Chester	C	79/100	79.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
31=	Pip Bayley	C	78/100	78.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
31=	Robert Allen	B	78/100	78.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
31=	Simon Smith	B	78/100	78.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
34=	Andy Armstrong	B	77/100	77.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
34=	David Hull	D	77/100	77.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
34=	Geoffrey Burton	B	77/100	77.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
34=	John Harrison	D	77/100	77.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
34=	Neville Jay	B	77/100	77.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
39	Jeremy Bland	C	76/100	76.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
40	Paul Mudd	C	75/100	75.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
41=	David Payne	C	74/100	74.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
41=	William Reeve	Unknown	74/100	74.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
43=	John Foord	D	73/100	73.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
43=	Steven Howling	Unknown	73/100	73.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
45	Simon Smith	D	72/100	72.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
46=	David Lidbetter	D	71/100	71.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
46=	Rebecca McKenzie	B	71/100	71.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
46=	Trevor Surridge	C	71/100	71.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
49=	Bill Jowett	D	70/100	70.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
49=	Jim Grant	D	70/100	70.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
49=	John Lawn	D	70/100	70.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
52	Ruth De Mulder	D	69/100	69.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
53	Andrew Stratford	D	68/100	68.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
54	Robert Francis	D	67/100	67.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
55=	Daniel West	C	66/100	66.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
55=	Jordan Bonnett	D	66/100	66.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
57	Nicholas Wood	D	65/100	65.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
58	Andrew Kozera	D	57/100	57.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%

Other FSP Events at Sporting Targets Ltd

⚙ Performance Stats DRAG TO MOVE

0.034s ● FAST

DB 39% · Py 38% · Render 24%

12 queries · avg 1.1ms · max 1.8ms

Render Breakdown

DB Logic (Pre-Render) 0.0131s

Python Logic (Pre-Render) 0.0127s

Full Page Render 0.0080s

QUERY TABLES ▾

⚠ event_review 4× 0.004s

shoot_event 2× 0.003s

shoot_score 2× 0.003s

site_configuration 2× 0.002s

ground 1× 0.001s

admin_menu_item 1× 0.001s

⚠ = queried 3+ times (cache candidate)

SQL QUERIES (12) — click to expand

#1 [00:31:31.727] 1.7ms

shoot_event

SELECT shoot_event.id AS shoot_event_id, shoot_event.cpsa_fixture_id AS shoot_event_cpsa_fixture_id, shoot_event.name AS shoot_event_name, shoot_event.date AS shoot_event_date, shoot_event.discipline AS shoot_event_discipline, shoot_event.ground AS shoot_event_ground, shoot_event.url AS shoot_event_…

#2 [00:31:31.730] 1.5ms

shoot_score

SELECT shoot_score.id AS shoot_score_id, shoot_score.targets AS shoot_score_targets, shoot_score.hits AS shoot_score_hits, shoot_score.points AS shoot_score_points, shoot_score.percentage AS shoot_score_percentage, shoot_score.shooter_id AS shoot_score_shooter_id, shoot_score.event_id AS shoot_score…

#3 [00:31:31.735] 1.8ms

shoot_score

SELECT avg(shoot_score.percentage) AS avg_1 
FROM shoot_score JOIN shoot_event ON shoot_score.event_id = shoot_event.id 
WHERE shoot_event.ground = %(ground_1)s AND shoot_event.discipline = %(discipline_1)s AND shoot_event.is_scraped = true AND shoot_event.admin_hidden != true AND shoot_event.id != …

#4 [00:31:31.737] 1.1ms

shoot_event

SELECT shoot_event.id AS shoot_event_id, shoot_event.cpsa_fixture_id AS shoot_event_cpsa_fixture_id, shoot_event.name AS shoot_event_name, shoot_event.date AS shoot_event_date, shoot_event.discipline AS shoot_event_discipline, shoot_event.ground AS shoot_event_ground, shoot_event.url AS shoot_event_…

#5 [00:31:31.738] 0.9ms

event_review

SELECT avg(event_review.rating) AS avg_1, count(event_review.id) AS count_1 
FROM event_review 
WHERE event_review.event_id = %(event_id_1)s

#6 [00:31:31.740] 0.9ms

event_review

SELECT count(*) AS count_1 
FROM (SELECT event_review.id AS event_review_id, event_review.event_id AS event_review_event_id, event_review.rating AS event_review_rating, event_review.review_text AS event_review_review_text, event_review.reviewer_name AS event_review_reviewer_name, event_review.review…

#7 [00:31:31.741] 0.9ms

event_review

SELECT event_review.id AS event_review_id, event_review.event_id AS event_review_event_id, event_review.rating AS event_review_rating, event_review.review_text AS event_review_review_text, event_review.reviewer_name AS event_review_reviewer_name, event_review.reviewer_hash AS event_review_reviewer_h…

#8 [00:31:31.743] 1.0ms

event_review

SELECT event_review.id AS event_review_id, event_review.event_id AS event_review_event_id, event_review.rating AS event_review_rating, event_review.review_text AS event_review_review_text, event_review.reviewer_name AS event_review_reviewer_name, event_review.reviewer_hash AS event_review_reviewer_h…

#9 [00:31:31.745] 0.8ms

ground

SELECT ground.id AS ground_id, ground.name AS ground_name, ground.url AS ground_url, ground.postcode AS ground_postcode, ground.what3words AS ground_what3words, ground.email AS ground_email, ground.website AS ground_website, ground.num_events_cpsa AS ground_num_events_cpsa, ground.num_events_cpsa_la…

#10 [00:31:31.746] 0.9ms

site_configuration

SELECT site_configuration.id AS site_configuration_id, site_configuration.key AS site_configuration_key, site_configuration.value AS site_configuration_value 
FROM site_configuration 
WHERE site_configuration.key LIKE %(key_1)s OR site_configuration.key LIKE %(key_2)s

#11 [00:31:31.748] 0.8ms

site_configuration

SELECT site_configuration.id AS site_configuration_id, site_configuration.key AS site_configuration_key, site_configuration.value AS site_configuration_value 
FROM site_configuration 
WHERE site_configuration.key IN (%(key_1_1)s, %(key_1_2)s, %(key_1_3)s, %(key_1_4)s)

#12 [00:31:31.749] 0.8ms

admin_menu_item

SELECT DISTINCT admin_menu_item.active_tab AS admin_menu_item_active_tab 
FROM admin_menu_item

LIVE REQUESTS (0) — click to expand

FITASC Sporting at Sporting Targets Ltd

Unlock the full event analysis

Historical Trends at Sporting Targets Ltd

Classification Deep Dive

Event Performance Analysis

Analyzing Data...

Refresh Complete

Already Up to Date?

Analyzing Data...

Refresh Complete

Already Up to Date?