Back to Events

Last Updated: 06 Jul 2026, 11:35

DTL — Down The Line

Down The Line at Fauxdegla Shooting Ground

Fauxdegla Shooting Ground

Saturday, 04 July 2026 · CPSA Results →

Weather loading...

Event Rating

Latest Visitor Reviews

No written reviews yet.

Entries

84.5%

Field Average

99.3%

Highest Score

62.7%

Lowest Score

Top 3 Overall

🥈

Karl •••••

294/300

98.00%

🥇

Keith •••••

298/300

99.33%

🥉 =3

Daniel •••••

Paul •••••

291/300

97.00%

Event Difficulty

84.5% This Event

vs. Fauxdegla Shooting Ground historical average (Down The Line)

↓ -3.7% harder than usual

Ground avg: 88.2%

Class Winners

AA 11 entered

298/300 — 99.33%

Keith •••••

2: Karl ••••• — 98.00%

A 23 entered

286/300 — 95.33%

Thomas •••••

2: Christopher ••••• — 94.00%

B 20 entered

279/300 — 93.00%

Patrick •••••

2: Celyn ••••• — 92.00%

C 26 entered

262/300 — 87.33%

Miles •••••

2: Stephen ••••• — 86.67%

Field Shape

84.5%

Field avg

Down The Line at Fauxdegla Shooting Ground had a 36.6 point scoring spread across 80 entries.

Spread 36.6 pts

Front 99.3%

Largest class C

A compact read of how the field performed: average, spread and where most shooters sat.

Score Distribution

90–100%

27 33.8%

80–89%

28 35.0%

70–79%

21 26.2%

60–69%

4 5.0%

50–59%

0 0.0%

<50%

0 0.0%

Field Achievement

% of competitors reaching each score threshold

90%+

33.8%

27 / 80

80%+

68.8%

55 / 80

70%+

95.0%

76 / 80

60%+

100.0%

80 / 80

50%+

100.0%

80 / 80

Unlock the full event analysis

Register free for historical ground trends, class averages and spread, score charts, class composition and a detailed classification breakdown.

Historical Trends at Fauxdegla Shooting Ground

Down The Line performance across events held at this ground.

Last 12 months

Overall Average Trend

Classification Trend Comparison

Classification Deep Dive

4 active classifications

—

Member insight

Typical —

Best —

Lowest —

Middle 50% score range

vs Ground Avg (12m)—

—

Member insight

Typical —

Best —

Lowest —

Middle 50% score range

vs Ground Avg (12m)—

—

Member insight

Typical —

Best —

Lowest —

Middle 50% score range

vs Ground Avg (12m)—

—

Member insight

Typical —

Best —

Lowest —

Middle 50% score range

vs Ground Avg (12m)—

Event Performance Analysis

Registered insight

Average by Class

Class averages make it easier to see where the event played hardest across the field.

Field Spread by Class

92.7-99.3%

77.3-95.3%

71.0-93.0%

62.7-87.3%

Boxes show the middle 50% of each class. Orange line is the median.

Top 10 Score Lollipop

A quick visual read of how far the front of the field separated itself.

Score Histogram

High gun: 99.3%. The high-gun band is outlined.

Class Breakdown

Rotate your device to see High/Low scores and the class winner

Class	Count	Average	High	Low	Winner
AA	11	95.7%	99.3%	92.7%	Keith •••••
A	23	88.7%	95.3%	77.3%	Thomas •••••
B	20	83.2%	93.0%	71.0%	Patrick •••••
C	26	77.2%	87.3%	62.7%	Miles •••••

Class Composition

11 13.8%

23 28.7%

20 25.0%

26 32.5%

Largest class: C — 26 competitors (32.5%)

Full Results — 80 entries

🔒 The Class Rank and vs Class Avg columns are hidden — register free to unlock both insights.

Rotate your device to see the full results table: score, class placing, class average and delta.

Class AA

Score 298/300

Class placing 1

Class average 95.7%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class AA

Score 294/300

Class placing 1

Class average 95.7%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class AA

Score 291/300

Class placing 1

Class average 95.7%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class AA

Score 291/300

Class placing 1

Class average 95.7%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class AA

Score 290/300

Class placing 1

Class average 95.7%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class AA

Score 289/300

Class placing 1

Class average 95.7%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class A

Score 286/300

Class placing 1

Class average 88.7%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class A

Score 282/300

Class placing 1

Class average 88.7%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class AA

Score 282/300

Class placing 1

Class average 95.7%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class AA

Score 282/300

Class placing 1

Class average 95.7%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class AA

Score 282/300

Class placing 1

Class average 95.7%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class A

Score 281/300

Class placing 1

Class average 88.7%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class AA

Score 280/300

Class placing 1

Class average 95.7%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class A

Score 279/300

Class placing 1

Class average 88.7%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 279/300

Class placing 1

Class average 83.2%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class A

Score 279/300

Class placing 1

Class average 88.7%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class AA

Score 278/300

Class placing 1

Class average 95.7%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class A

Score 276/300

Class placing 1

Class average 88.7%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 276/300

Class placing 1

Class average 83.2%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class A

Score 276/300

Class placing 1

Class average 88.7%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class A

Score 276/300

Class placing 1

Class average 88.7%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class A

Score 275/300

Class placing 1

Class average 88.7%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 274/300

Class placing 1

Class average 83.2%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class A

Score 274/300

Class placing 1

Class average 88.7%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 272/300

Class placing 1

Class average 83.2%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class A

Score 270/300

Class placing 1

Class average 88.7%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class A

Score 270/300

Class placing 1

Class average 88.7%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class A

Score 269/300

Class placing 1

Class average 88.7%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class A

Score 267/300

Class placing 1

Class average 88.7%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class A

Score 266/300

Class placing 1

Class average 88.7%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 262/300

Class placing 1

Class average 83.2%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class C

Score 262/300

Class placing 1

Class average 77.2%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 261/300

Class placing 1

Class average 83.2%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class C

Score 260/300

Class placing 1

Class average 77.2%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class A

Score 259/300

Class placing 1

Class average 88.7%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class A

Score 259/300

Class placing 1

Class average 88.7%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class A

Score 257/300

Class placing 1

Class average 88.7%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 257/300

Class placing 1

Class average 83.2%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class C

Score 257/300

Class placing 1

Class average 77.2%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class C

Score 257/300

Class placing 1

Class average 77.2%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 257/300

Class placing 1

Class average 83.2%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class C

Score 257/300

Class placing 1

Class average 77.2%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class C

Score 252/300

Class placing 1

Class average 77.2%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 252/300

Class placing 1

Class average 83.2%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 252/300

Class placing 1

Class average 83.2%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 251/300

Class placing 1

Class average 83.2%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 250/300

Class placing 1

Class average 83.2%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class A

Score 250/300

Class placing 1

Class average 88.7%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class A

Score 249/300

Class placing 1

Class average 88.7%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class A

Score 247/300

Class placing 1

Class average 88.7%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 247/300

Class placing 1

Class average 83.2%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class C

Score 244/300

Class placing 1

Class average 77.2%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 242/300

Class placing 1

Class average 83.2%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 242/300

Class placing 1

Class average 83.2%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class C

Score 240/300

Class placing 1

Class average 77.2%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class C

Score 239/300

Class placing 1

Class average 77.2%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class C

Score 239/300

Class placing 1

Class average 77.2%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class C

Score 238/300

Class placing 1

Class average 77.2%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class A

Score 238/300

Class placing 1

Class average 88.7%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class C

Score 235/300

Class placing 1

Class average 77.2%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class C

Score 234/300

Class placing 1

Class average 77.2%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 234/300

Class placing 1

Class average 83.2%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class C

Score 232/300

Class placing 1

Class average 77.2%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class A

Score 232/300

Class placing 1

Class average 88.7%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class C

Score 232/300

Class placing 1

Class average 77.2%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class C

Score 231/300

Class placing 1

Class average 77.2%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class C

Score 230/300

Class placing 1

Class average 77.2%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 229/300

Class placing 1

Class average 83.2%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 226/300

Class placing 1

Class average 83.2%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class C

Score 225/300

Class placing 1

Class average 77.2%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class C

Score 224/300

Class placing 1

Class average 77.2%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class C

Score 221/300

Class placing 1

Class average 77.2%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class C

Score 219/300

Class placing 1

Class average 77.2%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class C

Score 218/300

Class placing 1

Class average 77.2%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 214/300

Class placing 1

Class average 83.2%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 213/300

Class placing 1

Class average 83.2%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class C

Score 204/300

Class placing 1

Class average 77.2%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class C

Score 193/300

Class placing 1

Class average 77.2%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class C

Score 191/300

Class placing 1

Class average 77.2%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class C

Score 188/300

Class placing 1

Class average 77.2%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

#	Name	Class	Score	Score %	Class Rank 🔒	Class Avg	vs Class Avg
1	Keith •••••	AA	298/300	99.33%	🔒 1	95.70%	🔒 +0.0%
2	Karl •••••	AA	294/300	98.00%	🔒 1	95.70%	🔒 +0.0%
3=	Daniel •••••	AA	291/300	97.00%	🔒 1	95.70%	🔒 +0.0%
3=	Paul •••••	AA	291/300	97.00%	🔒 1	95.70%	🔒 +0.0%
5	Shaun •••••	AA	290/300	96.67%	🔒 1	95.70%	🔒 +0.0%
6	Phillip •••••	AA	289/300	96.33%	🔒 1	95.70%	🔒 +0.0%
7	Thomas •••••	A	286/300	95.33%	🔒 1	88.70%	🔒 +0.0%
8=	Christopher •••••	A	282/300	94.00%	🔒 1	88.70%	🔒 +0.0%
8=	Darren •••••	AA	282/300	94.00%	🔒 1	95.70%	🔒 +0.0%
8=	Elis •••••	AA	282/300	94.00%	🔒 1	95.70%	🔒 +0.0%
8=	Iwan •••••	AA	282/300	94.00%	🔒 1	95.70%	🔒 +0.0%
12	Tony •••••	A	281/300	93.67%	🔒 1	88.70%	🔒 +0.0%
13	Mark •••••	AA	280/300	93.33%	🔒 1	95.70%	🔒 +0.0%
14=	David •••••	A	279/300	93.00%	🔒 1	88.70%	🔒 +0.0%
14=	Patrick •••••	B	279/300	93.00%	🔒 1	83.20%	🔒 +0.0%
14=	Richard •••••	A	279/300	93.00%	🔒 1	88.70%	🔒 +0.0%
17	Alan •••••	AA	278/300	92.67%	🔒 1	95.70%	🔒 +0.0%
18=	Alan •••••	A	276/300	92.00%	🔒 1	88.70%	🔒 +0.0%
18=	Celyn •••••	B	276/300	92.00%	🔒 1	83.20%	🔒 +0.0%
18=	Mark •••••	A	276/300	92.00%	🔒 1	88.70%	🔒 +0.0%
18=	Will •••••	A	276/300	92.00%	🔒 1	88.70%	🔒 +0.0%
22	Steve •••••	A	275/300	91.67%	🔒 1	88.70%	🔒 +0.0%
23=	John •••••	B	274/300	91.33%	🔒 1	83.20%	🔒 +0.0%
23=	Lee •••••	A	274/300	91.33%	🔒 1	88.70%	🔒 +0.0%
25	David •••••	B	272/300	90.67%	🔒 1	83.20%	🔒 +0.0%
26=	Michael •••••	A	270/300	90.00%	🔒 1	88.70%	🔒 +0.0%
26=	Tom •••••	A	270/300	90.00%	🔒 1	88.70%	🔒 +0.0%
28	John •••••	A	269/300	89.67%	🔒 1	88.70%	🔒 +0.0%
29	Richard •••••	A	267/300	89.00%	🔒 1	88.70%	🔒 +0.0%
30	Calum •••••	A	266/300	88.67%	🔒 1	88.70%	🔒 +0.0%
31=	John •••••	B	262/300	87.33%	🔒 1	83.20%	🔒 +0.0%
31=	Miles •••••	C	262/300	87.33%	🔒 1	77.20%	🔒 +0.0%
33	Andrew •••••	B	261/300	87.00%	🔒 1	83.20%	🔒 +0.0%
34	Stephen •••••	C	260/300	86.67%	🔒 1	77.20%	🔒 +0.0%
35=	Gwyn •••••	A	259/300	86.33%	🔒 1	88.70%	🔒 +0.0%
35=	Philip •••••	A	259/300	86.33%	🔒 1	88.70%	🔒 +0.0%
37=	Geoffrey •••••	A	257/300	85.67%	🔒 1	88.70%	🔒 +0.0%
37=	Gethin •••••	B	257/300	85.67%	🔒 1	83.20%	🔒 +0.0%
37=	John •••••	C	257/300	85.67%	🔒 1	77.20%	🔒 +0.0%
37=	Martin •••••	C	257/300	85.67%	🔒 1	77.20%	🔒 +0.0%
37=	Russell •••••	B	257/300	85.67%	🔒 1	83.20%	🔒 +0.0%
37=	William •••••	C	257/300	85.67%	🔒 1	77.20%	🔒 +0.0%
43=	Chun •••••	C	252/300	84.00%	🔒 1	77.20%	🔒 +0.0%
43=	Janine •••••	B	252/300	84.00%	🔒 1	83.20%	🔒 +0.0%
43=	John •••••	B	252/300	84.00%	🔒 1	83.20%	🔒 +0.0%
46	Karen •••••	B	251/300	83.67%	🔒 1	83.20%	🔒 +0.0%
47=	Ann •••••	B	250/300	83.33%	🔒 1	83.20%	🔒 +0.0%
47=	Thomas •••••	A	250/300	83.33%	🔒 1	88.70%	🔒 +0.0%
49	Andy •••••	A	249/300	83.00%	🔒 1	88.70%	🔒 +0.0%
50=	John •••••	A	247/300	82.33%	🔒 1	88.70%	🔒 +0.0%
50=	Nigel •••••	B	247/300	82.33%	🔒 1	83.20%	🔒 +0.0%
52	John •••••	C	244/300	81.33%	🔒 1	77.20%	🔒 +0.0%
53=	Jeremy •••••	B	242/300	80.67%	🔒 1	83.20%	🔒 +0.0%
53=	Paige •••••	B	242/300	80.67%	🔒 1	83.20%	🔒 +0.0%
55	Marco •••••	C	240/300	80.00%	🔒 1	77.20%	🔒 +0.0%
56=	Emlyn •••••	C	239/300	79.67%	🔒 1	77.20%	🔒 +0.0%
56=	Emrys •••••	C	239/300	79.67%	🔒 1	77.20%	🔒 +0.0%
58=	Allan •••••	C	238/300	79.33%	🔒 1	77.20%	🔒 +0.0%
58=	Garry •••••	A	238/300	79.33%	🔒 1	88.70%	🔒 +0.0%
60	Paul •••••	C	235/300	78.33%	🔒 1	77.20%	🔒 +0.0%
61=	Alan •••••	C	234/300	78.00%	🔒 1	77.20%	🔒 +0.0%
61=	Edward •••••	B	234/300	78.00%	🔒 1	83.20%	🔒 +0.0%
63=	Darren •••••	C	232/300	77.33%	🔒 1	77.20%	🔒 +0.0%
63=	Justine •••••	A	232/300	77.33%	🔒 1	88.70%	🔒 +0.0%
63=	Kenneth •••••	C	232/300	77.33%	🔒 1	77.20%	🔒 +0.0%
66	Kevin •••••	C	231/300	77.00%	🔒 1	77.20%	🔒 +0.0%
67	Diana •••••	C	230/300	76.67%	🔒 1	77.20%	🔒 +0.0%
68	Richard •••••	B	229/300	76.33%	🔒 1	83.20%	🔒 +0.0%
69	Mick •••••	B	226/300	75.33%	🔒 1	83.20%	🔒 +0.0%
70	Michael •••••	C	225/300	75.00%	🔒 1	77.20%	🔒 +0.0%
71	Jason •••••	C	224/300	74.67%	🔒 1	77.20%	🔒 +0.0%
72	David •••••	C	221/300	73.67%	🔒 1	77.20%	🔒 +0.0%
73	Nicola •••••	C	219/300	73.00%	🔒 1	77.20%	🔒 +0.0%
74	Osian •••••	C	218/300	72.67%	🔒 1	77.20%	🔒 +0.0%
75	Michael •••••	B	214/300	71.33%	🔒 1	83.20%	🔒 +0.0%
76	Trevor •••••	B	213/300	71.00%	🔒 1	83.20%	🔒 +0.0%
77	Carole •••••	C	204/300	68.00%	🔒 1	77.20%	🔒 +0.0%
78	Aimee •••••	C	193/300	64.33%	🔒 1	77.20%	🔒 +0.0%
79	Rhiannon •••••	C	191/300	63.67%	🔒 1	77.20%	🔒 +0.0%
80	Jane •••••	C	188/300	62.67%	🔒 1	77.20%	🔒 +0.0%

Other DTL Events at Fauxdegla Shooting Ground

⚙ Performance Stats DRAG TO MOVE

0.056s ● FAST

DB 43% · Py 31% · Render 26%

12 queries · avg 2.0ms · max 3.6ms

Render Breakdown

DB Logic (Pre-Render) 0.0243s

Python Logic (Pre-Render) 0.0172s

Full Page Render 0.0145s

QUERY TABLES ▾

⚠ event_review 4× 0.007s

shoot_event 2× 0.006s

shoot_score 2× 0.006s

site_configuration 2× 0.003s

ground 1× 0.001s

admin_menu_item 1× 0.001s

⚠ = queried 3+ times (cache candidate)

SQL QUERIES (12) — click to expand

#1 [22:39:40.199] 2.4ms

shoot_event

SELECT shoot_event.id AS shoot_event_id, shoot_event.cpsa_fixture_id AS shoot_event_cpsa_fixture_id, shoot_event.name AS shoot_event_name, shoot_event.date AS shoot_event_date, shoot_event.discipline AS shoot_event_discipline, shoot_event.ground AS shoot_event_ground, shoot_event.url AS shoot_event_…

#2 [22:39:40.203] 3.0ms

shoot_score

SELECT shoot_score.id AS shoot_score_id, shoot_score.targets AS shoot_score_targets, shoot_score.hits AS shoot_score_hits, shoot_score.points AS shoot_score_points, shoot_score.percentage AS shoot_score_percentage, shoot_score.course_breakdown AS shoot_score_course_breakdown, shoot_score.shooter_id …

#3 [22:39:40.209] 2.8ms

shoot_score

SELECT avg(shoot_score.percentage) AS avg_1 
FROM shoot_score JOIN shoot_event ON shoot_score.event_id = shoot_event.id 
WHERE shoot_event.ground = %(ground_1)s AND shoot_event.discipline = %(discipline_1)s AND shoot_event.is_scraped = true AND shoot_event.admin_hidden != true AND shoot_event.id != …

#4 [22:39:40.214] 3.6ms

shoot_event

SELECT shoot_event.id AS shoot_event_id, shoot_event.cpsa_fixture_id AS shoot_event_cpsa_fixture_id, shoot_event.name AS shoot_event_name, shoot_event.date AS shoot_event_date, shoot_event.discipline AS shoot_event_discipline, shoot_event.ground AS shoot_event_ground, shoot_event.url AS shoot_event_…

#5 [22:39:40.216] 1.3ms

event_review

SELECT avg(event_review.rating) AS avg_1, count(event_review.id) AS count_1 
FROM event_review 
WHERE event_review.event_id = %(event_id_1)s

#6 [22:39:40.218] 1.3ms

event_review

SELECT count(*) AS count_1 
FROM (SELECT event_review.id AS event_review_id, event_review.event_id AS event_review_event_id, event_review.rating AS event_review_rating, event_review.review_text AS event_review_review_text, event_review.reviewer_name AS event_review_reviewer_name, event_review.review…

#7 [22:39:40.220] 1.5ms

event_review

SELECT event_review.id AS event_review_id, event_review.event_id AS event_review_event_id, event_review.rating AS event_review_rating, event_review.review_text AS event_review_review_text, event_review.reviewer_name AS event_review_reviewer_name, event_review.reviewer_hash AS event_review_reviewer_h…

#8 [22:39:40.224] 3.2ms

event_review

SELECT event_review.id AS event_review_id, event_review.event_id AS event_review_event_id, event_review.rating AS event_review_rating, event_review.review_text AS event_review_review_text, event_review.reviewer_name AS event_review_reviewer_name, event_review.reviewer_hash AS event_review_reviewer_h…

#9 [22:39:40.226] 1.3ms

ground

SELECT ground.id AS ground_id, ground.name AS ground_name, ground.url AS ground_url, ground.postcode AS ground_postcode, ground.what3words AS ground_what3words, ground.email AS ground_email, ground.website AS ground_website, ground.num_events_cpsa AS ground_num_events_cpsa, ground.num_events_cpsa_la…

#10 [22:39:40.228] 1.4ms

site_configuration

SELECT site_configuration.id AS site_configuration_id, site_configuration.key AS site_configuration_key, site_configuration.value AS site_configuration_value 
FROM site_configuration 
WHERE site_configuration.key LIKE %(key_1)s OR site_configuration.key LIKE %(key_2)s

#11 [22:39:40.230] 1.2ms

site_configuration

SELECT site_configuration.id AS site_configuration_id, site_configuration.key AS site_configuration_key, site_configuration.value AS site_configuration_value 
FROM site_configuration 
WHERE site_configuration.key IN (%(key_1_1)s, %(key_1_2)s, %(key_1_3)s, %(key_1_4)s)

#12 [22:39:40.232] 1.3ms

admin_menu_item

SELECT DISTINCT admin_menu_item.active_tab AS admin_menu_item_active_tab 
FROM admin_menu_item

LIVE REQUESTS (0) — click to expand

Down The Line at Fauxdegla Shooting Ground

Unlock the full event analysis

Historical Trends at Fauxdegla Shooting Ground

Classification Deep Dive

Event Performance Analysis

Analyzing Data...

Refresh Complete

Already Up to Date?

Analyzing Data...

Refresh Complete

Already Up to Date?