Back to Events

Last Updated: 25 Jul 2026, 21:47

DTL — Down The Line

Down The Line at North Of England C.T.C

North Of England C.T.C

Saturday, 25 July 2026 · CPSA Results →

Weather loading...

Event Rating

Latest Visitor Reviews

No written reviews yet.

Entries

94.2%

Field Average

99.3%

Highest Score

73.3%

Lowest Score

Top 3 Overall

🥈 =2

Adrian •••••

John •••••

Paul •••••

296/300

98.67%

🥇

David •••••

298/300

99.33%

Event Difficulty

94.2% This Event

vs. North Of England C.T.C historical average (Down The Line)

↑ +0.7% easier than usual

Ground avg: 93.5%

Class Winners

AA 12 entered

298/300 — 99.33%

David •••••

2=: Adrian ••••• — 98.67%

A 15 entered

296/300 — 98.67%

John •••••

2: Eric ••••• — 97.67%

B 8 entered

294/300 — 98.00%

Andy •••••

2: Richard ••••• — 97.33%

C 4 entered

288/300 — 96.00%

Svetlana •••••

2: Carole ••••• — 88.33%

Field Shape

94.2%

Field avg

Down The Line at North Of England C.T.C had a 26.0 point scoring spread across 39 entries.

Spread 26.0 pts

Front 99.3%

Largest class A

A compact read of how the field performed: average, spread and where most shooters sat.

Score Distribution

90–100%

33 84.6%

80–89%

5 12.8%

70–79%

1 2.6%

60–69%

0 0.0%

50–59%

0 0.0%

<50%

0 0.0%

Field Achievement

% of competitors reaching each score threshold

90%+

84.6%

33 / 39

80%+

97.4%

38 / 39

70%+

100.0%

39 / 39

60%+

100.0%

39 / 39

50%+

100.0%

39 / 39

Unlock the full event analysis

Register free for historical ground trends, class averages and spread, score charts, class composition and a detailed classification breakdown.

Historical Trends at North Of England C.T.C

Down The Line performance across events held at this ground.

Last 12 months

Overall Average Trend

Classification Trend Comparison

Classification Deep Dive

4 active classifications

—

Member insight

Typical —

Best —

Lowest —

Middle 50% score range

vs Ground Avg (12m)—

—

Member insight

Typical —

Best —

Lowest —

Middle 50% score range

vs Ground Avg (12m)—

—

Member insight

Typical —

Best —

Lowest —

Middle 50% score range

vs Ground Avg (12m)—

—

Member insight

Typical —

Best —

Lowest —

Middle 50% score range

vs Ground Avg (12m)—

Event Performance Analysis

Registered insight

Average by Class

Class averages make it easier to see where the event played hardest across the field.

Field Spread by Class

91.3-99.3%

89.0-98.7%

88.0-98.0%

73.3-96.0%

Boxes show the middle 50% of each class. Orange line is the median.

Top 10 Score Lollipop

A quick visual read of how far the front of the field separated itself.

Score Histogram

High gun: 99.3%. The high-gun band is outlined.

Class Breakdown

Rotate your device to see High/Low scores and the class winner

Class	Count	Average	High	Low	Winner
AA	12	96.6%	99.3%	91.3%	David •••••
A	15	94.9%	98.7%	89.0%	John •••••
B	8	93.4%	98.0%	88.0%	Andy •••••
C	4	86.2%	96.0%	73.3%	Svetlana •••••

Class Composition

12 30.8%

15 38.5%

8 20.5%

4 10.3%

Largest class: A — 15 competitors (38.5%)

Full Results — 39 entries

🔒 The Class Rank and vs Class Avg columns are hidden — register free to unlock both insights.

Rotate your device to see the full results table: score, class placing, class average and delta.

Class AA

Score 298/300

Class placing 1

Class average 96.6%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class AA

Score 296/300

Class placing 1

Class average 96.6%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class A

Score 296/300

Class placing 1

Class average 94.9%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class AA

Score 296/300

Class placing 1

Class average 96.6%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class AA

Score 295/300

Class placing 1

Class average 96.6%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class AA

Score 295/300

Class placing 1

Class average 96.6%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 294/300

Class placing 1

Class average 93.4%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class A

Score 293/300

Class placing 1

Class average 94.9%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 292/300

Class placing 1

Class average 93.4%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class A

Score 292/300

Class placing 1

Class average 94.9%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class AA

Score 291/300

Class placing 1

Class average 96.6%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class AA

Score 291/300

Class placing 1

Class average 96.6%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class A

Score 291/300

Class placing 1

Class average 94.9%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class AA

Score 289/300

Class placing 1

Class average 96.6%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class A

Score 288/300

Class placing 1

Class average 94.9%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class AA

Score 288/300

Class placing 1

Class average 96.6%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class C

Score 288/300

Class placing 1

Class average 86.2%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class A

Score 286/300

Class placing 1

Class average 94.9%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class A

Score 286/300

Class placing 1

Class average 94.9%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class AA

Score 285/300

Class placing 1

Class average 96.6%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class A

Score 285/300

Class placing 1

Class average 94.9%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class A

Score 285/300

Class placing 1

Class average 94.9%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 285/300

Class placing 1

Class average 93.4%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 284/300

Class placing 1

Class average 93.4%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class A

Score 284/300

Class placing 1

Class average 94.9%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class A

Score 284/300

Class placing 1

Class average 94.9%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class A

Score 282/300

Class placing 1

Class average 94.9%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class AA

Score 281/300

Class placing 1

Class average 96.6%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class A

Score 280/300

Class placing 1

Class average 94.9%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 277/300

Class placing 1

Class average 93.4%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 276/300

Class placing 1

Class average 93.4%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class AA

Score 274/300

Class placing 1

Class average 96.6%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class A

Score 273/300

Class placing 1

Class average 94.9%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 269/300

Class placing 1

Class average 93.4%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class A

Score 267/300

Class placing 1

Class average 94.9%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class C

Score 265/300

Class placing 1

Class average 86.2%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 264/300

Class placing 1

Class average 93.4%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class C

Score 262/300

Class placing 1

Class average 86.2%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class C

Score 220/300

Class placing 1

Class average 86.2%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

#	Name	Class	Score	Score %	Class Rank 🔒	Class Avg	vs Class Avg
1	David •••••	AA	298/300	99.33%	🔒 1	96.60%	🔒 +0.0%
2=	Adrian •••••	AA	296/300	98.67%	🔒 1	96.60%	🔒 +0.0%
2=	John •••••	A	296/300	98.67%	🔒 1	94.90%	🔒 +0.0%
2=	Paul •••••	AA	296/300	98.67%	🔒 1	96.60%	🔒 +0.0%
5=	Ian •••••	AA	295/300	98.33%	🔒 1	96.60%	🔒 +0.0%
5=	Keith •••••	AA	295/300	98.33%	🔒 1	96.60%	🔒 +0.0%
7	Andy •••••	B	294/300	98.00%	🔒 1	93.40%	🔒 +0.0%
8	Eric •••••	A	293/300	97.67%	🔒 1	94.90%	🔒 +0.0%
9=	Richard •••••	B	292/300	97.33%	🔒 1	93.40%	🔒 +0.0%
9=	Stewart •••••	A	292/300	97.33%	🔒 1	94.90%	🔒 +0.0%
11=	John •••••	AA	291/300	97.00%	🔒 1	96.60%	🔒 +0.0%
11=	Stephen •••••	AA	291/300	97.00%	🔒 1	96.60%	🔒 +0.0%
11=	Steven •••••	A	291/300	97.00%	🔒 1	94.90%	🔒 +0.0%
14	John •••••	AA	289/300	96.33%	🔒 1	96.60%	🔒 +0.0%
15=	Daniel •••••	A	288/300	96.00%	🔒 1	94.90%	🔒 +0.0%
15=	Ian •••••	AA	288/300	96.00%	🔒 1	96.60%	🔒 +0.0%
15=	Svetlana •••••	C	288/300	96.00%	🔒 1	86.20%	🔒 +0.0%
18=	Geoffrey •••••	A	286/300	95.33%	🔒 1	94.90%	🔒 +0.0%
18=	Thomas •••••	A	286/300	95.33%	🔒 1	94.90%	🔒 +0.0%
20=	David •••••	AA	285/300	95.00%	🔒 1	96.60%	🔒 +0.0%
20=	Gerry •••••	A	285/300	95.00%	🔒 1	94.90%	🔒 +0.0%
20=	John •••••	A	285/300	95.00%	🔒 1	94.90%	🔒 +0.0%
20=	Steven •••••	B	285/300	95.00%	🔒 1	93.40%	🔒 +0.0%
24=	David •••••	B	284/300	94.67%	🔒 1	93.40%	🔒 +0.0%
24=	Graham •••••	A	284/300	94.67%	🔒 1	94.90%	🔒 +0.0%
24=	Nicholas •••••	A	284/300	94.67%	🔒 1	94.90%	🔒 +0.0%
27	David •••••	A	282/300	94.00%	🔒 1	94.90%	🔒 +0.0%
28	Geoff •••••	AA	281/300	93.67%	🔒 1	96.60%	🔒 +0.0%
29	John •••••	A	280/300	93.33%	🔒 1	94.90%	🔒 +0.0%
30	Kevin •••••	B	277/300	92.33%	🔒 1	93.40%	🔒 +0.0%
31	Stephen •••••	B	276/300	92.00%	🔒 1	93.40%	🔒 +0.0%
32	Stuart •••••	AA	274/300	91.33%	🔒 1	96.60%	🔒 +0.0%
33	Garry •••••	A	273/300	91.00%	🔒 1	94.90%	🔒 +0.0%
34	Michael •••••	B	269/300	89.67%	🔒 1	93.40%	🔒 +0.0%
35	David •••••	A	267/300	89.00%	🔒 1	94.90%	🔒 +0.0%
36	Carole •••••	C	265/300	88.33%	🔒 1	86.20%	🔒 +0.0%
37	Michael •••••	B	264/300	88.00%	🔒 1	93.40%	🔒 +0.0%
38	James •••••	C	262/300	87.33%	🔒 1	86.20%	🔒 +0.0%
39	Karen •••••	C	220/300	73.33%	🔒 1	86.20%	🔒 +0.0%

Other DTL Events at North Of England C.T.C

⚙ Performance Stats DRAG TO MOVE

0.305s ● FAST

DB 6% · Py 78% · Render 15%

12 queries · avg 1.6ms · max 3.1ms

Render Breakdown

Python Logic (Pre-Render) 0.2392s

Full Page Render 0.0471s

DB Logic (Pre-Render) 0.0188s

QUERY TABLES ▾

⚠ event_review 4× 0.005s

shoot_event 2× 0.004s

shoot_score 2× 0.005s

site_configuration 2× 0.002s

ground 1× 0.001s

admin_menu_item 1× 0.001s

⚠ = queried 3+ times (cache candidate)

SQL QUERIES (12) — click to expand

#1 [22:38:30.987] 2.4ms

shoot_event

SELECT shoot_event.id AS shoot_event_id, shoot_event.cpsa_fixture_id AS shoot_event_cpsa_fixture_id, shoot_event.name AS shoot_event_name, shoot_event.date AS shoot_event_date, shoot_event.discipline AS shoot_event_discipline, shoot_event.ground AS shoot_event_ground, shoot_event.url AS shoot_event_…

#2 [22:38:30.990] 1.9ms

shoot_score

SELECT shoot_score.id AS shoot_score_id, shoot_score.targets AS shoot_score_targets, shoot_score.hits AS shoot_score_hits, shoot_score.points AS shoot_score_points, shoot_score.percentage AS shoot_score_percentage, shoot_score.course_breakdown AS shoot_score_course_breakdown, shoot_score.shooter_id …

#3 [22:38:31.221] 3.1ms

shoot_score

SELECT avg(shoot_score.percentage) AS avg_1 
FROM shoot_score JOIN shoot_event ON shoot_score.event_id = shoot_event.id 
WHERE shoot_event.ground = %(ground_1)s AND shoot_event.discipline = %(discipline_1)s AND shoot_event.is_scraped = true AND shoot_event.admin_hidden != true AND shoot_event.id != …

#4 [22:38:31.224] 1.4ms

shoot_event

SELECT shoot_event.id AS shoot_event_id, shoot_event.cpsa_fixture_id AS shoot_event_cpsa_fixture_id, shoot_event.name AS shoot_event_name, shoot_event.date AS shoot_event_date, shoot_event.discipline AS shoot_event_discipline, shoot_event.ground AS shoot_event_ground, shoot_event.url AS shoot_event_…

#5 [22:38:31.226] 1.2ms

event_review

SELECT avg(event_review.rating) AS avg_1, count(event_review.id) AS count_1 
FROM event_review 
WHERE event_review.event_id = %(event_id_1)s

#6 [22:38:31.228] 1.3ms

event_review

SELECT count(*) AS count_1 
FROM (SELECT event_review.id AS event_review_id, event_review.event_id AS event_review_event_id, event_review.rating AS event_review_rating, event_review.review_text AS event_review_review_text, event_review.reviewer_name AS event_review_reviewer_name, event_review.review…

#7 [22:38:31.230] 1.4ms

event_review

SELECT event_review.id AS event_review_id, event_review.event_id AS event_review_event_id, event_review.rating AS event_review_rating, event_review.review_text AS event_review_review_text, event_review.reviewer_name AS event_review_reviewer_name, event_review.reviewer_hash AS event_review_reviewer_h…

#8 [22:38:31.232] 1.2ms

event_review

SELECT event_review.id AS event_review_id, event_review.event_id AS event_review_event_id, event_review.rating AS event_review_rating, event_review.review_text AS event_review_review_text, event_review.reviewer_name AS event_review_reviewer_name, event_review.reviewer_hash AS event_review_reviewer_h…

#9 [22:38:31.234] 1.2ms

ground

SELECT ground.id AS ground_id, ground.name AS ground_name, ground.url AS ground_url, ground.postcode AS ground_postcode, ground.what3words AS ground_what3words, ground.email AS ground_email, ground.website AS ground_website, ground.num_events_cpsa AS ground_num_events_cpsa, ground.num_events_cpsa_la…

#10 [22:38:31.236] 1.2ms

site_configuration

SELECT site_configuration.id AS site_configuration_id, site_configuration.key AS site_configuration_key, site_configuration.value AS site_configuration_value 
FROM site_configuration 
WHERE site_configuration.key LIKE %(key_1)s OR site_configuration.key LIKE %(key_2)s

#11 [22:38:31.238] 1.2ms

site_configuration

SELECT site_configuration.id AS site_configuration_id, site_configuration.key AS site_configuration_key, site_configuration.value AS site_configuration_value 
FROM site_configuration 
WHERE site_configuration.key IN (%(key_1_1)s, %(key_1_2)s, %(key_1_3)s, %(key_1_4)s)

#12 [22:38:31.239] 1.1ms

admin_menu_item

SELECT DISTINCT admin_menu_item.active_tab AS admin_menu_item_active_tab 
FROM admin_menu_item

LIVE REQUESTS (0) — click to expand

Down The Line at North Of England C.T.C

Unlock the full event analysis

Historical Trends at North Of England C.T.C

Classification Deep Dive

Event Performance Analysis

Analyzing Data...

Refresh Complete

Already Up to Date?

Analyzing Data...

Refresh Complete

Already Up to Date?