Back to Events

Last Updated: 02 Aug 2026, 17:01

UTR — Universal Trench

Universal Trench at Fauxdegla Shooting Ground

Fauxdegla Shooting Ground

Sunday, 02 August 2026 · CPSA Results →

Weather loading...

Event Rating

Latest Visitor Reviews

No written reviews yet.

Entries

84.6%

Field Average

98.0%

Highest Score

61.0%

Lowest Score

Top 3 Overall

🥈

Adam •••••

96/100

96.00%

🥇

Matthew •••••

98/100

98.00%

🥉 =3

Graham •••••

Michael •••••

95/100

95.00%

Event Difficulty

84.6% This Event

vs. Fauxdegla Shooting Ground historical average (Universal Trench)

↑ +5.4% easier than usual

Ground avg: 79.2%

Class Winners

A 11 entered

98/100 — 98.00%

Matthew •••••

2: Adam ••••• — 96.00%

B 10 entered

95/100 — 95.00%

Graham •••••

2=: David ••••• — 91.00%

C 11 entered

92/100 — 92.00%

Christopher •••••

2: Jim ••••• — 89.00%

D 4 entered

82/100 — 82.00%

Michael •••••

2: Paul ••••• — 81.00%

Other 5 entered

92/100 — 92.00%

Robert •••••

2: Malcolm ••••• — 87.00%

Field Shape

84.6%

Field avg

Universal Trench at Fauxdegla Shooting Ground had a 37.0 point scoring spread across 41 entries.

Spread 37.0 pts

Front 98.0%

Largest class A

A compact read of how the field performed: average, spread and where most shooters sat.

Score Distribution

90–100%

12 29.3%

80–89%

20 48.8%

70–79%

8 19.5%

60–69%

1 2.4%

50–59%

0 0.0%

<50%

0 0.0%

Field Achievement

% of competitors reaching each score threshold

90%+

29.3%

12 / 41

80%+

78.0%

32 / 41

70%+

97.6%

40 / 41

60%+

100.0%

41 / 41

50%+

100.0%

41 / 41

Unlock the full event analysis

Register free for historical ground trends, class averages and spread, score charts, class composition and a detailed classification breakdown.

Historical Trends at Fauxdegla Shooting Ground

Universal Trench performance across events held at this ground.

Last 12 months

Overall Average Trend

Classification Trend Comparison

Classification Deep Dive

4 active classifications

—

Member insight

Typical —

Best —

Lowest —

Middle 50% score range

vs Ground Avg (12m)—

—

Member insight

Typical —

Best —

Lowest —

Middle 50% score range

vs Ground Avg (12m)—

—

Member insight

Typical —

Best —

Lowest —

Middle 50% score range

vs Ground Avg (12m)—

—

Member insight

Typical —

Best —

Lowest —

Middle 50% score range

vs Ground Avg (12m)—

Event Performance Analysis

Registered insight

Average by Class

Class averages make it easier to see where the event played hardest across the field.

Field Spread by Class

84.0-98.0%

61.0-95.0%

72.0-92.0%

75.0-82.0%

Other

72.0-92.0%

Boxes show the middle 50% of each class. Orange line is the median.

Top 10 Score Lollipop

A quick visual read of how far the front of the field separated itself.

Score Histogram

High gun: 98.0%. The high-gun band is outlined.

Class Breakdown

Rotate your device to see High/Low scores and the class winner

Class	Count	Average	High	Low	Winner
A	11	90.6%	98.0%	84.0%	Matthew •••••
B	10	84.2%	95.0%	61.0%	Graham •••••
C	11	82.2%	92.0%	72.0%	Christopher •••••
D	4	79.5%	82.0%	75.0%	Michael •••••
Other	5	81.6%	92.0%	72.0%	Robert •••••

Class Composition

11 26.8%

10 24.4%

11 26.8%

4 9.8%

Other

5 12.2%

Largest class: A — 11 competitors (26.8%)

Full Results — 41 entries

🔒 The Class Rank and vs Class Avg columns are hidden — register free to unlock both insights.

Rotate your device to see the full results table: score, class placing, class average and delta.

Class A

Score 98/100

Class placing 1

Class average 90.6%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class A

Score 96/100

Class placing 1

Class average 90.6%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 95/100

Class placing 1

Class average 84.2%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class A

Score 95/100

Class placing 1

Class average 90.6%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class C

Score 92/100

Class placing 1

Class average 82.2%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class A

Score 92/100

Class placing 1

Class average 90.6%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class NONE

Score 92/100

Class placing 1

Class average 81.6%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class A

Score 92/100

Class placing 1

Class average 90.6%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 91/100

Class placing 1

Class average 84.2%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 91/100

Class placing 1

Class average 84.2%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class A

Score 90/100

Class placing 1

Class average 90.6%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class A

Score 90/100

Class placing 1

Class average 90.6%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 89/100

Class placing 1

Class average 84.2%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class A

Score 89/100

Class placing 1

Class average 90.6%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class C

Score 89/100

Class placing 1

Class average 82.2%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class C

Score 88/100

Class placing 1

Class average 82.2%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class C

Score 88/100

Class placing 1

Class average 82.2%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class NONE

Score 87/100

Class placing 1

Class average 81.6%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 86/100

Class placing 1

Class average 84.2%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 86/100

Class placing 1

Class average 84.2%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class A

Score 86/100

Class placing 1

Class average 90.6%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class A

Score 85/100

Class placing 1

Class average 90.6%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class A

Score 84/100

Class placing 1

Class average 90.6%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 83/100

Class placing 1

Class average 84.2%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 83/100

Class placing 1

Class average 84.2%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class C

Score 82/100

Class placing 1

Class average 82.2%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class D

Score 82/100

Class placing 1

Class average 79.5%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class C

Score 82/100

Class placing 1

Class average 82.2%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class NONE

Score 82/100

Class placing 1

Class average 81.6%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class D

Score 81/100

Class placing 1

Class average 79.5%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class C

Score 80/100

Class placing 1

Class average 82.2%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class D

Score 80/100

Class placing 1

Class average 79.5%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class C

Score 79/100

Class placing 1

Class average 82.2%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class C

Score 78/100

Class placing 1

Class average 82.2%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 77/100

Class placing 1

Class average 84.2%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class D

Score 75/100

Class placing 1

Class average 79.5%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class NONE

Score 75/100

Class placing 1

Class average 81.6%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class C

Score 74/100

Class placing 1

Class average 82.2%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class C

Score 72/100

Class placing 1

Class average 82.2%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class NONE

Score 72/100

Class placing 1

Class average 81.6%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 61/100

Class placing 1

Class average 84.2%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

#	Name	Class	Score	Score %	Class Rank 🔒	Class Avg	vs Class Avg
1	Matthew •••••	A	98/100	98.00%	🔒 1	90.60%	🔒 +0.0%
2	Adam •••••	A	96/100	96.00%	🔒 1	90.60%	🔒 +0.0%
3=	Graham •••••	B	95/100	95.00%	🔒 1	84.20%	🔒 +0.0%
3=	Michael •••••	A	95/100	95.00%	🔒 1	90.60%	🔒 +0.0%
5=	Christopher •••••	C	92/100	92.00%	🔒 1	82.20%	🔒 +0.0%
5=	Lee •••••	A	92/100	92.00%	🔒 1	90.60%	🔒 +0.0%
5=	Robert •••••	NONE	92/100	92.00%	🔒 1	81.60%	🔒 +0.0%
5=	Sarah •••••	A	92/100	92.00%	🔒 1	90.60%	🔒 +0.0%
9=	David •••••	B	91/100	91.00%	🔒 1	84.20%	🔒 +0.0%
9=	Mark •••••	B	91/100	91.00%	🔒 1	84.20%	🔒 +0.0%
11=	Charlie •••••	A	90/100	90.00%	🔒 1	90.60%	🔒 +0.0%
11=	Thomas •••••	A	90/100	90.00%	🔒 1	90.60%	🔒 +0.0%
13=	David •••••	B	89/100	89.00%	🔒 1	84.20%	🔒 +0.0%
13=	James •••••	A	89/100	89.00%	🔒 1	90.60%	🔒 +0.0%
13=	Jim •••••	C	89/100	89.00%	🔒 1	82.20%	🔒 +0.0%
16=	Andrew •••••	C	88/100	88.00%	🔒 1	82.20%	🔒 +0.0%
16=	Michael •••••	C	88/100	88.00%	🔒 1	82.20%	🔒 +0.0%
18	Malcolm •••••	NONE	87/100	87.00%	🔒 1	81.60%	🔒 +0.0%
19=	Darren •••••	B	86/100	86.00%	🔒 1	84.20%	🔒 +0.0%
19=	Mark •••••	B	86/100	86.00%	🔒 1	84.20%	🔒 +0.0%
19=	Ray •••••	A	86/100	86.00%	🔒 1	90.60%	🔒 +0.0%
22	Nicholas •••••	A	85/100	85.00%	🔒 1	90.60%	🔒 +0.0%
23	Tim •••••	A	84/100	84.00%	🔒 1	90.60%	🔒 +0.0%
24=	Ian •••••	B	83/100	83.00%	🔒 1	84.20%	🔒 +0.0%
24=	John •••••	B	83/100	83.00%	🔒 1	84.20%	🔒 +0.0%
26=	Craig •••••	C	82/100	82.00%	🔒 1	82.20%	🔒 +0.0%
26=	Michael •••••	D	82/100	82.00%	🔒 1	79.50%	🔒 +0.0%
26=	Philip •••••	C	82/100	82.00%	🔒 1	82.20%	🔒 +0.0%
26=	Steven •••••	NONE	82/100	82.00%	🔒 1	81.60%	🔒 +0.0%
30	Paul •••••	D	81/100	81.00%	🔒 1	79.50%	🔒 +0.0%
31=	Clive •••••	C	80/100	80.00%	🔒 1	82.20%	🔒 +0.0%
31=	Hazel •••••	D	80/100	80.00%	🔒 1	79.50%	🔒 +0.0%
33	Robert •••••	C	79/100	79.00%	🔒 1	82.20%	🔒 +0.0%
34	Paul •••••	C	78/100	78.00%	🔒 1	82.20%	🔒 +0.0%
35	Neil •••••	B	77/100	77.00%	🔒 1	84.20%	🔒 +0.0%
36=	Ian •••••	D	75/100	75.00%	🔒 1	79.50%	🔒 +0.0%
36=	Ian •••••	NONE	75/100	75.00%	🔒 1	81.60%	🔒 +0.0%
38	Chris •••••	C	74/100	74.00%	🔒 1	82.20%	🔒 +0.0%
39=	Michael •••••	C	72/100	72.00%	🔒 1	82.20%	🔒 +0.0%
39=	Paul •••••	NONE	72/100	72.00%	🔒 1	81.60%	🔒 +0.0%
41	Fletcher •••••	B	61/100	61.00%	🔒 1	84.20%	🔒 +0.0%

Other UTR Events at Fauxdegla Shooting Ground

⚙ Performance Stats DRAG TO MOVE

0.046s ● FAST

DB 47% · Py 27% · Render 25%

12 queries · avg 1.8ms · max 4.1ms

Render Breakdown

DB Logic (Pre-Render) 0.0220s

Python Logic (Pre-Render) 0.0126s

Full Page Render 0.0117s

QUERY TABLES ▾

⚠ event_review 4× 0.006s

shoot_event 2× 0.005s

shoot_score 2× 0.004s

site_configuration 2× 0.005s

ground 1× 0.002s

admin_menu_item 1× 0.001s

⚠ = queried 3+ times (cache candidate)

SQL QUERIES (12) — click to expand

#1 [22:03:48.368] 2.5ms

shoot_event

SELECT shoot_event.id AS shoot_event_id, shoot_event.cpsa_fixture_id AS shoot_event_cpsa_fixture_id, shoot_event.name AS shoot_event_name, shoot_event.date AS shoot_event_date, shoot_event.discipline AS shoot_event_discipline, shoot_event.ground AS shoot_event_ground, shoot_event.url AS shoot_event_…

#2 [22:03:48.371] 1.9ms

shoot_score

SELECT shoot_score.id AS shoot_score_id, shoot_score.targets AS shoot_score_targets, shoot_score.hits AS shoot_score_hits, shoot_score.points AS shoot_score_points, shoot_score.percentage AS shoot_score_percentage, shoot_score.course_breakdown AS shoot_score_course_breakdown, shoot_score.shooter_id …

#3 [22:03:48.375] 1.9ms

shoot_score

SELECT avg(shoot_score.percentage) AS avg_1 
FROM shoot_score JOIN shoot_event ON shoot_score.event_id = shoot_event.id 
WHERE shoot_event.ground = %(ground_1)s AND shoot_event.discipline = %(discipline_1)s AND shoot_event.is_scraped = true AND shoot_event.admin_hidden != true AND shoot_event.id != …

#4 [22:03:48.378] 2.1ms

shoot_event

SELECT shoot_event.id AS shoot_event_id, shoot_event.cpsa_fixture_id AS shoot_event_cpsa_fixture_id, shoot_event.name AS shoot_event_name, shoot_event.date AS shoot_event_date, shoot_event.discipline AS shoot_event_discipline, shoot_event.ground AS shoot_event_ground, shoot_event.url AS shoot_event_…

#5 [22:03:48.380] 1.3ms

event_review

SELECT avg(event_review.rating) AS avg_1, count(event_review.id) AS count_1 
FROM event_review 
WHERE event_review.event_id = %(event_id_1)s

#6 [22:03:48.382] 1.3ms

event_review

SELECT count(*) AS count_1 
FROM (SELECT event_review.id AS event_review_id, event_review.event_id AS event_review_event_id, event_review.rating AS event_review_rating, event_review.review_text AS event_review_review_text, event_review.reviewer_name AS event_review_reviewer_name, event_review.review…

#7 [22:03:48.384] 1.3ms

event_review

SELECT event_review.id AS event_review_id, event_review.event_id AS event_review_event_id, event_review.rating AS event_review_rating, event_review.review_text AS event_review_review_text, event_review.reviewer_name AS event_review_reviewer_name, event_review.reviewer_hash AS event_review_reviewer_h…

#8 [22:03:48.386] 1.6ms

event_review

SELECT event_review.id AS event_review_id, event_review.event_id AS event_review_event_id, event_review.rating AS event_review_rating, event_review.review_text AS event_review_review_text, event_review.reviewer_name AS event_review_reviewer_name, event_review.reviewer_hash AS event_review_reviewer_h…

#9 [22:03:48.388] 1.5ms

ground

SELECT ground.id AS ground_id, ground.name AS ground_name, ground.url AS ground_url, ground.postcode AS ground_postcode, ground.what3words AS ground_what3words, ground.email AS ground_email, ground.website AS ground_website, ground.num_events_cpsa AS ground_num_events_cpsa, ground.num_events_cpsa_la…

#10 [22:03:48.393] 4.1ms

site_configuration

SELECT site_configuration.id AS site_configuration_id, site_configuration.key AS site_configuration_key, site_configuration.value AS site_configuration_value 
FROM site_configuration 
WHERE site_configuration.key LIKE %(key_1)s OR site_configuration.key LIKE %(key_2)s

#11 [22:03:48.395] 1.2ms

site_configuration

SELECT site_configuration.id AS site_configuration_id, site_configuration.key AS site_configuration_key, site_configuration.value AS site_configuration_value 
FROM site_configuration 
WHERE site_configuration.key IN (%(key_1_1)s, %(key_1_2)s, %(key_1_3)s, %(key_1_4)s)

#12 [22:03:48.396] 1.2ms

admin_menu_item

SELECT DISTINCT admin_menu_item.active_tab AS admin_menu_item_active_tab 
FROM admin_menu_item

LIVE REQUESTS (0) — click to expand

Universal Trench at Fauxdegla Shooting Ground

Unlock the full event analysis

Historical Trends at Fauxdegla Shooting Ground

Classification Deep Dive

Event Performance Analysis

Analyzing Data...

Refresh Complete

Already Up to Date?

Analyzing Data...

Refresh Complete

Already Up to Date?