Back to Events
Last Updated: 24 Mar 2026, 17:32
OTR — Olympic Trap

Olympic Trap at Fauxdegla Shooting Ground

Fauxdegla Shooting Ground
Saturday, 06 September 2025  ·  CPSA Results →
Weather loading...
Event Rating
Rate
Select a star to rate or review this event
Latest Visitor Reviews
No written reviews yet.
55
Entries
81.6%
Field Average
96.8%
Highest Score
65.6%
Lowest Score
Top 3 Overall
🥈 =2
David •••••
A
Matthew •••••
A
119/125
95.20%
🥇
Nathan •••••
A
121/125
96.80%
Event Difficulty
81.6% This Event
vs. Fauxdegla Shooting Ground historical average (Olympic Trap)
↑ +6.0% easier than usual
Ground avg: 75.6%
Class Winners
A 18 entered
121/125 — 96.80%
Nathan •••••
2=: David ••••• — 95.20%
B 18 entered
111/125 — 88.80%
Finley •••••(tied) Lee •••••(tied)
3: Maciej ••••• — 87.20%
C 10 entered
108/125 — 86.40%
Isabelle •••••
2: Peter ••••• — 79.20%
D 9 entered
100/125 — 80.00%
Abbie •••••
2: Holly ••••• — 78.40%
Field Shape
81.6%
Field avg
Olympic Trap at Fauxdegla Shooting Ground had a 31.2 point scoring spread across 55 entries.
Spread 31.2 pts
Front 96.8%
Largest class A
A compact read of how the field performed: average, spread and where most shooters sat.
Score Distribution
90–100%
9 16.4%
80–89%
22 40.0%
70–79%
20 36.4%
60–69%
4 7.3%
50–59%
0 0.0%
<50%
0 0.0%
Field Achievement
% of competitors reaching each score threshold
90%+
16.4%
9 / 55
80%+
56.4%
31 / 55
70%+
92.7%
51 / 55
60%+
100.0%
55 / 55
50%+
100.0%
55 / 55

Unlock the full event analysis

Register free for historical ground trends, class averages and spread, score charts, class composition and a detailed classification breakdown.

Register free Log in
Full Results — 55 entries
🔒 The Class Rank and vs Class Avg columns are hidden — register free to unlock both insights.
Rotate your device to see the full results table: score, class placing, class average and delta.
Class A
Score 121/125
Class placing 1
Class average 89.1%
vs Class Avg +0.0%
Profile Open →
Class A
Score 119/125
Class placing 1
Class average 89.1%
vs Class Avg +0.0%
Profile Open →
Class A
Score 119/125
Class placing 1
Class average 89.1%
vs Class Avg +0.0%
Profile Open →
Class A
Score 116/125
Class placing 1
Class average 89.1%
vs Class Avg +0.0%
Profile Open →
Class A
Score 115/125
Class placing 1
Class average 89.1%
vs Class Avg +0.0%
Profile Open →
Class A
Score 114/125
Class placing 1
Class average 89.1%
vs Class Avg +0.0%
Profile Open →
Class A
Score 113/125
Class placing 1
Class average 89.1%
vs Class Avg +0.0%
Profile Open →
Class A
Score 113/125
Class placing 1
Class average 89.1%
vs Class Avg +0.0%
Profile Open →
Class A
Score 112/125
Class placing 1
Class average 89.1%
vs Class Avg +0.0%
Profile Open →
Class A
Score 112/125
Class placing 1
Class average 89.1%
vs Class Avg +0.0%
Profile Open →
Class B
Score 111/125
Class placing 1
Class average 81.1%
vs Class Avg +0.0%
Profile Open →
Class B
Score 111/125
Class placing 1
Class average 81.1%
vs Class Avg +0.0%
Profile Open →
Class A
Score 110/125
Class placing 1
Class average 89.1%
vs Class Avg +0.0%
Profile Open →
Class A
Score 110/125
Class placing 1
Class average 89.1%
vs Class Avg +0.0%
Profile Open →
Class A
Score 110/125
Class placing 1
Class average 89.1%
vs Class Avg +0.0%
Profile Open →
Class A
Score 110/125
Class placing 1
Class average 89.1%
vs Class Avg +0.0%
Profile Open →
Class A
Score 109/125
Class placing 1
Class average 89.1%
vs Class Avg +0.0%
Profile Open →
Class B
Score 109/125
Class placing 1
Class average 81.1%
vs Class Avg +0.0%
Profile Open →
Class C
Score 108/125
Class placing 1
Class average 75.8%
vs Class Avg +0.0%
Profile Open →
Class A
Score 107/125
Class placing 1
Class average 89.1%
vs Class Avg +0.0%
Profile Open →
Class B
Score 106/125
Class placing 1
Class average 81.1%
vs Class Avg +0.0%
Profile Open →
Class A
Score 106/125
Class placing 1
Class average 89.1%
vs Class Avg +0.0%
Profile Open →
Class B
Score 105/125
Class placing 1
Class average 81.1%
vs Class Avg +0.0%
Profile Open →
Class B
Score 104/125
Class placing 1
Class average 81.1%
vs Class Avg +0.0%
Profile Open →
Class B
Score 102/125
Class placing 1
Class average 81.1%
vs Class Avg +0.0%
Profile Open →
Class B
Score 101/125
Class placing 1
Class average 81.1%
vs Class Avg +0.0%
Profile Open →
Class B
Score 101/125
Class placing 1
Class average 81.1%
vs Class Avg +0.0%
Profile Open →
Class B
Score 101/125
Class placing 1
Class average 81.1%
vs Class Avg +0.0%
Profile Open →
Class B
Score 101/125
Class placing 1
Class average 81.1%
vs Class Avg +0.0%
Profile Open →
Class D
Score 100/125
Class placing 1
Class average 74.1%
vs Class Avg +0.0%
Profile Open →
Class C
Score 99/125
Class placing 1
Class average 75.8%
vs Class Avg +0.0%
Profile Open →
Class B
Score 98/125
Class placing 1
Class average 81.1%
vs Class Avg +0.0%
Profile Open →
Class D
Score 98/125
Class placing 1
Class average 74.1%
vs Class Avg +0.0%
Profile Open →
Class B
Score 98/125
Class placing 1
Class average 81.1%
vs Class Avg +0.0%
Profile Open →
Class C
Score 97/125
Class placing 1
Class average 75.8%
vs Class Avg +0.0%
Profile Open →
Class B
Score 97/125
Class placing 1
Class average 81.1%
vs Class Avg +0.0%
Profile Open →
Class C
Score 96/125
Class placing 1
Class average 75.8%
vs Class Avg +0.0%
Profile Open →
Class C
Score 96/125
Class placing 1
Class average 75.8%
vs Class Avg +0.0%
Profile Open →
Class C
Score 95/125
Class placing 1
Class average 75.8%
vs Class Avg +0.0%
Profile Open →
Class D
Score 95/125
Class placing 1
Class average 74.1%
vs Class Avg +0.0%
Profile Open →
Class C
Score 95/125
Class placing 1
Class average 75.8%
vs Class Avg +0.0%
Profile Open →
Class D
Score 94/125
Class placing 1
Class average 74.1%
vs Class Avg +0.0%
Profile Open →
Class D
Score 94/125
Class placing 1
Class average 74.1%
vs Class Avg +0.0%
Profile Open →
Class D
Score 93/125
Class placing 1
Class average 74.1%
vs Class Avg +0.0%
Profile Open →
Class C
Score 92/125
Class placing 1
Class average 75.8%
vs Class Avg +0.0%
Profile Open →
Class D
Score 92/125
Class placing 1
Class average 74.1%
vs Class Avg +0.0%
Profile Open →
Class B
Score 92/125
Class placing 1
Class average 81.1%
vs Class Avg +0.0%
Profile Open →
Class A
Score 89/125
Class placing 1
Class average 89.1%
vs Class Avg +0.0%
Profile Open →
Class B
Score 89/125
Class placing 1
Class average 81.1%
vs Class Avg +0.0%
Profile Open →
Class C
Score 88/125
Class placing 1
Class average 75.8%
vs Class Avg +0.0%
Profile Open →
Class B
Score 86/125
Class placing 1
Class average 81.1%
vs Class Avg +0.0%
Profile Open →
Class D
Score 85/125
Class placing 1
Class average 74.1%
vs Class Avg +0.0%
Profile Open →
Class D
Score 83/125
Class placing 1
Class average 74.1%
vs Class Avg +0.0%
Profile Open →
Class C
Score 82/125
Class placing 1
Class average 75.8%
vs Class Avg +0.0%
Profile Open →
Class B
Score 45/50
Class placing 1
Class average 81.1%
vs Class Avg +0.0%
Profile Open →
# Name Class Score Score % Class Rank 🔒 Class Avg vs Class Avg
1 Nathan ••••• A 121/125 96.80% 🔒 1 89.10% 🔒 +0.0%
2= David ••••• A 119/125 95.20% 🔒 1 89.10% 🔒 +0.0%
2= Matthew ••••• A 119/125 95.20% 🔒 1 89.10% 🔒 +0.0%
4 Thomas ••••• A 116/125 92.80% 🔒 1 89.10% 🔒 +0.0%
5 Michael ••••• A 115/125 92.00% 🔒 1 89.10% 🔒 +0.0%
6 James ••••• A 114/125 91.20% 🔒 1 89.10% 🔒 +0.0%
7= Lucas ••••• A 113/125 90.40% 🔒 1 89.10% 🔒 +0.0%
7= Mark ••••• A 113/125 90.40% 🔒 1 89.10% 🔒 +0.0%
9= Abbey ••••• A 112/125 89.60% 🔒 1 89.10% 🔒 +0.0%
9= Mark ••••• A 112/125 89.60% 🔒 1 89.10% 🔒 +0.0%
11= Finley ••••• B 111/125 88.80% 🔒 1 81.10% 🔒 +0.0%
11= Lee ••••• B 111/125 88.80% 🔒 1 81.10% 🔒 +0.0%
13= Andrew ••••• A 110/125 88.00% 🔒 1 89.10% 🔒 +0.0%
13= Lucy ••••• A 110/125 88.00% 🔒 1 89.10% 🔒 +0.0%
13= Madeleine ••••• A 110/125 88.00% 🔒 1 89.10% 🔒 +0.0%
13= William ••••• A 110/125 88.00% 🔒 1 89.10% 🔒 +0.0%
17= Ellie ••••• A 109/125 87.20% 🔒 1 89.10% 🔒 +0.0%
17= Maciej ••••• B 109/125 87.20% 🔒 1 81.10% 🔒 +0.0%
19 Isabelle ••••• C 108/125 86.40% 🔒 1 75.80% 🔒 +0.0%
20 Owain ••••• A 107/125 85.60% 🔒 1 89.10% 🔒 +0.0%
21= Joe ••••• B 106/125 84.80% 🔒 1 81.10% 🔒 +0.0%
21= Thomas ••••• A 106/125 84.80% 🔒 1 89.10% 🔒 +0.0%
23 Lewis ••••• B 105/125 84.00% 🔒 1 81.10% 🔒 +0.0%
24 Leah ••••• B 104/125 83.20% 🔒 1 81.10% 🔒 +0.0%
25 Liam Crabb B 102/125 81.60% 🔒 1 81.10% 🔒 +0.0%
26= Alexander ••••• B 101/125 80.80% 🔒 1 81.10% 🔒 +0.0%
26= Harry ••••• B 101/125 80.80% 🔒 1 81.10% 🔒 +0.0%
26= John ••••• B 101/125 80.80% 🔒 1 81.10% 🔒 +0.0%
26= Paul ••••• B 101/125 80.80% 🔒 1 81.10% 🔒 +0.0%
30 Abbie ••••• D 100/125 80.00% 🔒 1 74.10% 🔒 +0.0%
31 Peter ••••• C 99/125 79.20% 🔒 1 75.80% 🔒 +0.0%
32= Andrew ••••• B 98/125 78.40% 🔒 1 81.10% 🔒 +0.0%
32= Holly ••••• D 98/125 78.40% 🔒 1 74.10% 🔒 +0.0%
32= Philip ••••• B 98/125 78.40% 🔒 1 81.10% 🔒 +0.0%
35= Hamish ••••• C 97/125 77.60% 🔒 1 75.80% 🔒 +0.0%
35= Oliver ••••• B 97/125 77.60% 🔒 1 81.10% 🔒 +0.0%
37= Michael ••••• C 96/125 76.80% 🔒 1 75.80% 🔒 +0.0%
37= William ••••• C 96/125 76.80% 🔒 1 75.80% 🔒 +0.0%
39= Chloe ••••• C 95/125 76.00% 🔒 1 75.80% 🔒 +0.0%
39= John ••••• D 95/125 76.00% 🔒 1 74.10% 🔒 +0.0%
39= Pauric ••••• C 95/125 76.00% 🔒 1 75.80% 🔒 +0.0%
42= James ••••• D 94/125 75.20% 🔒 1 74.10% 🔒 +0.0%
42= Stuart ••••• D 94/125 75.20% 🔒 1 74.10% 🔒 +0.0%
44 Astrid ••••• D 93/125 74.40% 🔒 1 74.10% 🔒 +0.0%
45= Frank ••••• C 92/125 73.60% 🔒 1 75.80% 🔒 +0.0%
45= Kelvin ••••• D 92/125 73.60% 🔒 1 74.10% 🔒 +0.0%
45= Michael ••••• B 92/125 73.60% 🔒 1 81.10% 🔒 +0.0%
48= Andrew ••••• A 89/125 71.20% 🔒 1 89.10% 🔒 +0.0%
48= David ••••• B 89/125 71.20% 🔒 1 81.10% 🔒 +0.0%
50 James ••••• C 88/125 70.40% 🔒 1 75.80% 🔒 +0.0%
51 Charlie ••••• B 86/125 68.80% 🔒 1 81.10% 🔒 +0.0%
52 Paul ••••• D 85/125 68.00% 🔒 1 74.10% 🔒 +0.0%
53 Douglas ••••• D 83/125 66.40% 🔒 1 74.10% 🔒 +0.0%
54 Francesca ••••• C 82/125 65.60% 🔒 1 75.80% 🔒 +0.0%
55 Christopher ••••• B 45/50 90.00% 🔒 1 81.10% 🔒 +0.0%
Other OTR Events at Fauxdegla Shooting Ground
VER: v0.7
BUILD:
DEPLOYED: 20 Oct 2026 09:42:57