Back to Events

OTR — Olympic Trap

Olympic Trap at Fauxdegla Shooting Ground

Fauxdegla Shooting Ground

Saturday, 06 September 2025 · CPSA Results →

Weather loading...

Event Rating

Latest Visitor Reviews

No written reviews yet.

Entries

81.6%

Field Average

96.8%

Highest Score

65.6%

Lowest Score

Top 3 Overall

🥈 =2

David Kirk

Matthew Coward-Holley

119/125

95.20%

🥇

Nathan Hales

121/125

96.80%

Event Difficulty

81.6% This Event

vs. Fauxdegla Shooting Ground historical average (Olympic Trap)

↑ +6.0% easier than usual

Ground avg: 75.6%

Class Winners

A 18 entered

121/125 — 96.80%

Nathan Hales

2=: David Kirk — 95.20%

B 18 entered

111/125 — 88.80%

Finley Bowles(tied) Lee Betts(tied)

3: Maciej Bilkiewicz — 87.20%

C 10 entered

108/125 — 86.40%

Isabelle MacKintosh

2: Peter Parker — 79.20%

D 9 entered

100/125 — 80.00%

Abbie Coutanche

2: Holly Maddams — 78.40%

Field Shape

81.6%

Field avg

Olympic Trap at Fauxdegla Shooting Ground had a 31.2 point scoring spread across 55 entries.

Spread 31.2 pts

Front 96.8%

Largest class A

A compact read of how the field performed: average, spread and where most shooters sat.

Score Distribution

90–100%

9 16.4%

80–89%

22 40.0%

70–79%

20 36.4%

60–69%

4 7.3%

50–59%

0 0.0%

<50%

0 0.0%

Field Achievement

% of competitors reaching each score threshold

90%+

16.4%

9 / 55

80%+

56.4%

31 / 55

70%+

92.7%

51 / 55

60%+

100.0%

55 / 55

50%+

100.0%

55 / 55

Unlock the full event analysis

Register free for historical ground trends, class averages and spread, score charts, class composition and a detailed classification breakdown.

Historical Trends at Fauxdegla Shooting Ground

Olympic Trap performance across events held at this ground.

Last 12 months

Overall Average Trend

Classification Trend Comparison

Classification Deep Dive

4 active classifications

—

Member insight

Typical —

Best —

Lowest —

Middle 50% score range

vs Ground Avg (12m)—

—

Member insight

Typical —

Best —

Lowest —

Middle 50% score range

vs Ground Avg (12m)—

—

Member insight

Typical —

Best —

Lowest —

Middle 50% score range

vs Ground Avg (12m)—

—

Member insight

Typical —

Best —

Lowest —

Middle 50% score range

vs Ground Avg (12m)—

Event Performance Analysis

Registered insight

Average by Class

Class averages make it easier to see where the event played hardest across the field.

Field Spread by Class

71.2-96.8%

68.8-90.0%

65.6-86.4%

66.4-80.0%

Boxes show the middle 50% of each class. Orange line is the median.

Top 10 Score Lollipop

A quick visual read of how far the front of the field separated itself.

Score Histogram

High gun: 96.8%. The high-gun band is outlined.

Class Breakdown

Rotate your device to see High/Low scores and the class winner

Class	Count	Average	High	Low	Winner
A	18	89.1%	96.8%	71.2%	Nathan Hales
B	18	81.1%	90.0%	68.8%	Finley Bowles
C	10	75.8%	86.4%	65.6%	Isabelle MacKintosh
D	9	74.1%	80.0%	66.4%	Abbie Coutanche

Class Composition

18 32.7%

10 18.2%

9 16.4%

Largest class: A — 18 competitors (32.7%)

Full Results — 55 entries

🔒 The Class Rank and vs Class Avg columns are hidden — register free to unlock both insights.

Class A

Score 121/125

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class A

Score 119/125

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class A

Score 119/125

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class A

Score 116/125

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class A

Score 115/125

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class A

Score 114/125

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class A

Score 113/125

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class A

Score 113/125

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class A

Score 112/125

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class A

Score 112/125

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 111/125

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 111/125

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class A

Score 110/125

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class A

Score 110/125

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class A

Score 110/125

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class A

Score 110/125

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class A

Score 109/125

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 109/125

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class C

Score 108/125

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class A

Score 107/125

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 106/125

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class A

Score 106/125

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 105/125

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 104/125

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 102/125

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 101/125

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 101/125

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 101/125

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 101/125

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class D

Score 100/125

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class C

Score 99/125

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 98/125

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class D

Score 98/125

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 98/125

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class C

Score 97/125

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 97/125

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class C

Score 96/125

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class C

Score 96/125

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class C

Score 95/125

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class D

Score 95/125

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class C

Score 95/125

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class D

Score 94/125

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class D

Score 94/125

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class D

Score 93/125

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class C

Score 92/125

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class D

Score 92/125

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 92/125

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class A

Score 89/125

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 89/125

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class C

Score 88/125

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 86/125

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class D

Score 85/125

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class D

Score 83/125

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class C

Score 82/125

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 45/50

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

#	Name	Class	Score	Score %	Class Rank 🔒	vs Class Avg
1	Nathan Hales	A	121/125	96.80%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
2=	David Kirk	A	119/125	95.20%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
2=	Matthew Coward-Holley	A	119/125	95.20%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
4	Thomas Betts	A	116/125	92.80%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
5	Michael Wixey	A	115/125	92.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
6	James Dedman	A	114/125	91.20%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
7=	Lucas Hyde	A	113/125	90.40%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
7=	Mark Shaw	A	113/125	90.40%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
9=	Abbey Ling	A	112/125	89.60%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
9=	Mark Robinson	A	112/125	89.60%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
11=	Finley Bowles	B	111/125	88.80%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
11=	Lee Betts	B	111/125	88.80%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
13=	Andrew Greenwood	A	110/125	88.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
13=	Lucy Hall	A	110/125	88.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
13=	Madeleine Purser	A	110/125	88.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
13=	William Canter	A	110/125	88.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
17=	Ellie Seward	A	109/125	87.20%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
17=	Maciej Bilkiewicz	B	109/125	87.20%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
19	Isabelle MacKintosh	C	108/125	86.40%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
20	Owain Humphreys	A	107/125	85.60%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
21=	Joe Turner	B	106/125	84.80%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
21=	Thomas Burns	A	106/125	84.80%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
23	Lewis Kirk	B	105/125	84.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
24	Leah Southall	B	104/125	83.20%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
25	Liam Crabb	B	102/125	81.60%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
26=	Alexander Williams	B	101/125	80.80%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
26=	Harry Poolman	B	101/125	80.80%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
26=	John Falconer	B	101/125	80.80%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
26=	Paul Jenkins	B	101/125	80.80%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
30	Abbie Coutanche	D	100/125	80.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
31	Peter Parker	C	99/125	79.20%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
32=	Andrew Greenstock	B	98/125	78.40%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
32=	Holly Maddams	D	98/125	78.40%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
32=	Philip Sanders	B	98/125	78.40%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
35=	Hamish Munro	C	97/125	77.60%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
35=	Oliver Austin	B	97/125	77.60%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
37=	Michael Cooper	C	96/125	76.80%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
37=	William Maclennan	C	96/125	76.80%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
39=	Chloe Davies	C	95/125	76.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
39=	John Breen	D	95/125	76.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
39=	Pauric Greenan	C	95/125	76.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
42=	James Roberts	D	94/125	75.20%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
42=	Stuart Purser	D	94/125	75.20%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
44	Astrid Brocklehurst-Flynn	D	93/125	74.40%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
45=	Frank Chetcuti	C	92/125	73.60%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
45=	Kelvin Page	D	92/125	73.60%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
45=	Michael Faux	B	92/125	73.60%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
48=	Andrew Dunne	A	89/125	71.20%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
48=	David O'Donnell	B	89/125	71.20%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
50	James Ward	C	88/125	70.40%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
51	Charlie Morris	B	86/125	68.80%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
52	Paul Collins	D	85/125	68.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
53	Douglas Hendry	D	83/125	66.40%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
54	Francesca Chau	C	82/125	65.60%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
55	Christopher Dean	B	45/50	90.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%

Other OTR Events at Fauxdegla Shooting Ground

⚙ Performance Stats DRAG TO MOVE

0.102s ● FAST

DB 77% · Py 16% · Render 7%

12 queries · avg 6.5ms · max 63.6ms

Render Breakdown

DB Logic (Pre-Render) 0.0785s

Python Logic (Pre-Render) 0.0162s

Full Page Render 0.0068s

QUERY TABLES ▾

⚠ event_review 4× 0.066s

shoot_event 2× 0.006s

shoot_score 2× 0.003s

site_configuration 2× 0.002s

ground 1× 0.001s

admin_menu_item 1× 0.001s

⚠ = queried 3+ times (cache candidate)

SQL QUERIES (12) — click to expand

#1 [02:17:28.844] 1.8ms

shoot_event

SELECT shoot_event.id AS shoot_event_id, shoot_event.cpsa_fixture_id AS shoot_event_cpsa_fixture_id, shoot_event.name AS shoot_event_name, shoot_event.date AS shoot_event_date, shoot_event.discipline AS shoot_event_discipline, shoot_event.ground AS shoot_event_ground, shoot_event.url AS shoot_event_…

#2 [02:17:28.846] 1.5ms

shoot_score

SELECT shoot_score.id AS shoot_score_id, shoot_score.targets AS shoot_score_targets, shoot_score.hits AS shoot_score_hits, shoot_score.points AS shoot_score_points, shoot_score.percentage AS shoot_score_percentage, shoot_score.shooter_id AS shoot_score_shooter_id, shoot_score.event_id AS shoot_score…

#3 [02:17:28.851] 1.5ms

shoot_score

SELECT avg(shoot_score.percentage) AS avg_1 
FROM shoot_score JOIN shoot_event ON shoot_score.event_id = shoot_event.id 
WHERE shoot_event.ground = %(ground_1)s AND shoot_event.discipline = %(discipline_1)s AND shoot_event.is_scraped = true AND shoot_event.admin_hidden != true AND shoot_event.id != …

#4 [02:17:28.856] 3.8ms

shoot_event

SELECT shoot_event.id AS shoot_event_id, shoot_event.cpsa_fixture_id AS shoot_event_cpsa_fixture_id, shoot_event.name AS shoot_event_name, shoot_event.date AS shoot_event_date, shoot_event.discipline AS shoot_event_discipline, shoot_event.ground AS shoot_event_ground, shoot_event.url AS shoot_event_…

#5 [02:17:28.921] 63.6ms

event_review

SELECT avg(event_review.rating) AS avg_1, count(event_review.id) AS count_1 
FROM event_review 
WHERE event_review.event_id = %(event_id_1)s

#6 [02:17:28.924] 1.0ms

event_review

SELECT count(*) AS count_1 
FROM (SELECT event_review.id AS event_review_id, event_review.event_id AS event_review_event_id, event_review.rating AS event_review_rating, event_review.review_text AS event_review_review_text, event_review.reviewer_name AS event_review_reviewer_name, event_review.review…

#7 [02:17:28.925] 0.9ms

event_review

SELECT event_review.id AS event_review_id, event_review.event_id AS event_review_event_id, event_review.rating AS event_review_rating, event_review.review_text AS event_review_review_text, event_review.reviewer_name AS event_review_reviewer_name, event_review.reviewer_hash AS event_review_reviewer_h…

#8 [02:17:28.927] 0.8ms

event_review

SELECT event_review.id AS event_review_id, event_review.event_id AS event_review_event_id, event_review.rating AS event_review_rating, event_review.review_text AS event_review_review_text, event_review.reviewer_name AS event_review_reviewer_name, event_review.reviewer_hash AS event_review_reviewer_h…

#9 [02:17:28.928] 0.9ms

ground

SELECT ground.id AS ground_id, ground.name AS ground_name, ground.url AS ground_url, ground.postcode AS ground_postcode, ground.what3words AS ground_what3words, ground.email AS ground_email, ground.website AS ground_website, ground.num_events_cpsa AS ground_num_events_cpsa, ground.num_events_cpsa_la…

#10 [02:17:28.930] 0.9ms

site_configuration

SELECT site_configuration.id AS site_configuration_id, site_configuration.key AS site_configuration_key, site_configuration.value AS site_configuration_value 
FROM site_configuration 
WHERE site_configuration.key LIKE %(key_1)s OR site_configuration.key LIKE %(key_2)s

#11 [02:17:28.932] 0.9ms

site_configuration

SELECT site_configuration.id AS site_configuration_id, site_configuration.key AS site_configuration_key, site_configuration.value AS site_configuration_value 
FROM site_configuration 
WHERE site_configuration.key IN (%(key_1_1)s, %(key_1_2)s, %(key_1_3)s, %(key_1_4)s)

#12 [02:17:28.933] 0.9ms

admin_menu_item

SELECT DISTINCT admin_menu_item.active_tab AS admin_menu_item_active_tab 
FROM admin_menu_item

LIVE REQUESTS (0) — click to expand

Olympic Trap at Fauxdegla Shooting Ground

Unlock the full event analysis

Historical Trends at Fauxdegla Shooting Ground

Classification Deep Dive

Event Performance Analysis

Analyzing Data...

Refresh Complete

Already Up to Date?

Analyzing Data...

Refresh Complete

Already Up to Date?