Back to Events

Last Updated: 24 Mar 2026, 17:32

OTR — Olympic Trap

Olympic Trap at Fauxdegla Shooting Ground

Fauxdegla Shooting Ground

Friday, 29 August 2025 · CPSA Results →

Weather loading...

Event Rating

Latest Visitor Reviews

No written reviews yet.

Entries

77.3%

Field Average

96.0%

Highest Score

50.7%

Lowest Score

Top 3 Overall

🥈

Lewis •••••

68/75

90.67%

🥇

Michael •••••

72/75

96.00%

🥉

David •••••

67/75

89.33%

Event Difficulty

77.3% This Event

vs. Fauxdegla Shooting Ground historical average (Olympic Trap)

↑ +1.5% easier than usual

Ground avg: 75.8%

Class Winners

A 3 entered

72/75 — 96.00%

Michael •••••

2: David ••••• — 89.33%

B 15 entered

68/75 — 90.67%

Lewis •••••

2: Paul ••••• — 88.00%

C 13 entered

63/75 — 84.00%

James •••••(tied) Peter •••••(tied) Robert •••••(tied) Stuart •••••(tied)

5: Pauric ••••• — 82.67%

D 8 entered

57/75 — 76.00%

James •••••(tied) Russ •••••(tied)

3=: Astrid ••••• — 74.67%

Field Shape

77.3%

Field avg

Olympic Trap at Fauxdegla Shooting Ground had a 45.3 point scoring spread across 39 entries.

Spread 45.3 pts

Front 96.0%

Largest class B

A compact read of how the field performed: average, spread and where most shooters sat.

Score Distribution

90–100%

2 5.1%

80–89%

17 43.6%

70–79%

13 33.3%

60–69%

4 10.3%

50–59%

3 7.7%

<50%

0 0.0%

Field Achievement

% of competitors reaching each score threshold

90%+

2 / 39

80%+

48.7%

19 / 39

70%+

82.1%

32 / 39

60%+

92.3%

36 / 39

50%+

100.0%

39 / 39

Unlock the full event analysis

Register free for historical ground trends, class averages and spread, score charts, class composition and a detailed classification breakdown.

Historical Trends at Fauxdegla Shooting Ground

Olympic Trap performance across events held at this ground.

Last 12 months

Overall Average Trend

Classification Trend Comparison

Classification Deep Dive

4 active classifications

—

Member insight

Typical —

Best —

Lowest —

Middle 50% score range

vs Ground Avg (12m)—

—

Member insight

Typical —

Best —

Lowest —

Middle 50% score range

vs Ground Avg (12m)—

—

Member insight

Typical —

Best —

Lowest —

Middle 50% score range

vs Ground Avg (12m)—

—

Member insight

Typical —

Best —

Lowest —

Middle 50% score range

vs Ground Avg (12m)—

Event Performance Analysis

Registered insight

Average by Class

Class averages make it easier to see where the event played hardest across the field.

Field Spread by Class

82.7-96.0%

66.7-90.7%

64.0-84.0%

50.7-76.0%

Boxes show the middle 50% of each class. Orange line is the median.

Top 10 Score Lollipop

A quick visual read of how far the front of the field separated itself.

Score Histogram

High gun: 96.0%. The high-gun band is outlined.

Class Breakdown

Rotate your device to see High/Low scores and the class winner

Class	Count	Average	High	Low	Winner
A	3	89.3%	96.0%	82.7%	Michael •••••
B	15	79.9%	90.7%	66.7%	Lewis •••••
C	13	78.1%	84.0%	64.0%	James •••••
D	8	66.7%	76.0%	50.7%	James •••••

Class Composition

3 7.7%

15 38.5%

13 33.3%

8 20.5%

Largest class: B — 15 competitors (38.5%)

Full Results — 39 entries

🔒 The Class Rank and vs Class Avg columns are hidden — register free to unlock both insights.

Rotate your device to see the full results table: score, class placing, class average and delta.

Class A

Score 72/75

Class placing 1

Class average 89.3%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 68/75

Class placing 1

Class average 79.9%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class A

Score 67/75

Class placing 1

Class average 89.3%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 66/75

Class placing 1

Class average 79.9%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 65/75

Class placing 1

Class average 79.9%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class C

Score 63/75

Class placing 1

Class average 78.1%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class C

Score 63/75

Class placing 1

Class average 78.1%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class C

Score 63/75

Class placing 1

Class average 78.1%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class C

Score 63/75

Class placing 1

Class average 78.1%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class A

Score 62/75

Class placing 1

Class average 89.3%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 62/75

Class placing 1

Class average 79.9%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 62/75

Class placing 1

Class average 79.9%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 62/75

Class placing 1

Class average 79.9%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class C

Score 62/75

Class placing 1

Class average 78.1%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 62/75

Class placing 1

Class average 79.9%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 61/75

Class placing 1

Class average 79.9%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 61/75

Class placing 1

Class average 79.9%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class C

Score 61/75

Class placing 1

Class average 78.1%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class C

Score 60/75

Class placing 1

Class average 78.1%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class C

Score 59/75

Class placing 1

Class average 78.1%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 59/75

Class placing 1

Class average 79.9%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 58/75

Class placing 1

Class average 79.9%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 58/75

Class placing 1

Class average 79.9%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class C

Score 58/75

Class placing 1

Class average 78.1%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class D

Score 57/75

Class placing 1

Class average 66.7%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class D

Score 57/75

Class placing 1

Class average 66.7%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class D

Score 56/75

Class placing 1

Class average 66.7%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class D

Score 56/75

Class placing 1

Class average 66.7%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class C

Score 55/75

Class placing 1

Class average 78.1%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class C

Score 54/75

Class placing 1

Class average 78.1%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 53/75

Class placing 1

Class average 79.9%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class D

Score 53/75

Class placing 1

Class average 66.7%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class C

Score 52/75

Class placing 1

Class average 78.1%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 52/75

Class placing 1

Class average 79.9%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 50/75

Class placing 1

Class average 79.9%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class C

Score 48/75

Class placing 1

Class average 78.1%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class D

Score 42/75

Class placing 1

Class average 66.7%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class D

Score 41/75

Class placing 1

Class average 66.7%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class D

Score 38/75

Class placing 1

Class average 66.7%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

#	Name	Class	Score	Score %	Class Rank 🔒	Class Avg	vs Class Avg
1	Michael •••••	A	72/75	96.00%	🔒 1	89.30%	🔒 +0.0%
2	Lewis •••••	B	68/75	90.67%	🔒 1	79.90%	🔒 +0.0%
3	David •••••	A	67/75	89.33%	🔒 1	89.30%	🔒 +0.0%
4	Paul •••••	B	66/75	88.00%	🔒 1	79.90%	🔒 +0.0%
5	John •••••	B	65/75	86.67%	🔒 1	79.90%	🔒 +0.0%
6=	James •••••	C	63/75	84.00%	🔒 1	78.10%	🔒 +0.0%
6=	Peter •••••	C	63/75	84.00%	🔒 1	78.10%	🔒 +0.0%
6=	Robert •••••	C	63/75	84.00%	🔒 1	78.10%	🔒 +0.0%
6=	Stuart •••••	C	63/75	84.00%	🔒 1	78.10%	🔒 +0.0%
10=	Abbey •••••	A	62/75	82.67%	🔒 1	89.30%	🔒 +0.0%
10=	Charlie •••••	B	62/75	82.67%	🔒 1	79.90%	🔒 +0.0%
10=	Graham •••••	B	62/75	82.67%	🔒 1	79.90%	🔒 +0.0%
10=	John •••••	B	62/75	82.67%	🔒 1	79.90%	🔒 +0.0%
10=	Pauric •••••	C	62/75	82.67%	🔒 1	78.10%	🔒 +0.0%
10=	Philip •••••	B	62/75	82.67%	🔒 1	79.90%	🔒 +0.0%
16=	Lee •••••	B	61/75	81.33%	🔒 1	79.90%	🔒 +0.0%
16=	Nicholas •••••	B	61/75	81.33%	🔒 1	79.90%	🔒 +0.0%
16=	Richard •••••	C	61/75	81.33%	🔒 1	78.10%	🔒 +0.0%
19	Graham •••••	C	60/75	80.00%	🔒 1	78.10%	🔒 +0.0%
20=	Michael •••••	C	59/75	78.67%	🔒 1	78.10%	🔒 +0.0%
20=	Tim •••••	B	59/75	78.67%	🔒 1	79.90%	🔒 +0.0%
22=	Andrew •••••	B	58/75	77.33%	🔒 1	79.90%	🔒 +0.0%
22=	Keith •••••	B	58/75	77.33%	🔒 1	79.90%	🔒 +0.0%
22=	Wayne •••••	C	58/75	77.33%	🔒 1	78.10%	🔒 +0.0%
25=	James •••••	D	57/75	76.00%	🔒 1	66.70%	🔒 +0.0%
25=	Russ •••••	D	57/75	76.00%	🔒 1	66.70%	🔒 +0.0%
27=	Astrid •••••	D	56/75	74.67%	🔒 1	66.70%	🔒 +0.0%
27=	Paul •••••	D	56/75	74.67%	🔒 1	66.70%	🔒 +0.0%
29	Jim •••••	C	55/75	73.33%	🔒 1	78.10%	🔒 +0.0%
30	Dennis •••••	C	54/75	72.00%	🔒 1	78.10%	🔒 +0.0%
31=	Michael •••••	B	53/75	70.67%	🔒 1	79.90%	🔒 +0.0%
31=	Stephen •••••	D	53/75	70.67%	🔒 1	66.70%	🔒 +0.0%
33=	Simon •••••	C	52/75	69.33%	🔒 1	78.10%	🔒 +0.0%
33=	Tegan •••••	B	52/75	69.33%	🔒 1	79.90%	🔒 +0.0%
35	David •••••	B	50/75	66.67%	🔒 1	79.90%	🔒 +0.0%
36	John •••••	C	48/75	64.00%	🔒 1	78.10%	🔒 +0.0%
37	Gareth •••••	D	42/75	56.00%	🔒 1	66.70%	🔒 +0.0%
38	Anne •••••	D	41/75	54.67%	🔒 1	66.70%	🔒 +0.0%
39	Robert •••••	D	38/75	50.67%	🔒 1	66.70%	🔒 +0.0%

Other OTR Events at Fauxdegla Shooting Ground

⚙ Performance Stats DRAG TO MOVE

0.053s ● FAST

DB 59% · Py 20% · Render 21%

12 queries · avg 2.6ms · max 7.6ms

Render Breakdown

DB Logic (Pre-Render) 0.0310s

Full Page Render 0.0111s

Python Logic (Pre-Render) 0.0104s

QUERY TABLES ▾

⚠ event_review 4× 0.007s

shoot_event 2× 0.004s

shoot_score 2× 0.008s

site_configuration 2× 0.010s

ground 1× 0.001s

admin_menu_item 1× 0.001s

⚠ = queried 3+ times (cache candidate)

SQL QUERIES (12) — click to expand

#1 [23:41:39.780] 2.4ms

shoot_event

SELECT shoot_event.id AS shoot_event_id, shoot_event.cpsa_fixture_id AS shoot_event_cpsa_fixture_id, shoot_event.name AS shoot_event_name, shoot_event.date AS shoot_event_date, shoot_event.discipline AS shoot_event_discipline, shoot_event.ground AS shoot_event_ground, shoot_event.url AS shoot_event_…

#2 [23:41:39.784] 3.1ms

shoot_score

SELECT shoot_score.id AS shoot_score_id, shoot_score.targets AS shoot_score_targets, shoot_score.hits AS shoot_score_hits, shoot_score.points AS shoot_score_points, shoot_score.percentage AS shoot_score_percentage, shoot_score.course_breakdown AS shoot_score_course_breakdown, shoot_score.shooter_id …

#3 [23:41:39.790] 4.6ms

shoot_score

SELECT avg(shoot_score.percentage) AS avg_1 
FROM shoot_score JOIN shoot_event ON shoot_score.event_id = shoot_event.id 
WHERE shoot_event.ground = %(ground_1)s AND shoot_event.discipline = %(discipline_1)s AND shoot_event.is_scraped = true AND shoot_event.admin_hidden != true AND shoot_event.id != …

#4 [23:41:39.792] 1.5ms

shoot_event

SELECT shoot_event.id AS shoot_event_id, shoot_event.cpsa_fixture_id AS shoot_event_cpsa_fixture_id, shoot_event.name AS shoot_event_name, shoot_event.date AS shoot_event_date, shoot_event.discipline AS shoot_event_discipline, shoot_event.ground AS shoot_event_ground, shoot_event.url AS shoot_event_…

#5 [23:41:39.794] 1.2ms

event_review

SELECT avg(event_review.rating) AS avg_1, count(event_review.id) AS count_1 
FROM event_review 
WHERE event_review.event_id = %(event_id_1)s

#6 [23:41:39.796] 1.2ms

event_review

SELECT count(*) AS count_1 
FROM (SELECT event_review.id AS event_review_id, event_review.event_id AS event_review_event_id, event_review.rating AS event_review_rating, event_review.review_text AS event_review_review_text, event_review.reviewer_name AS event_review_reviewer_name, event_review.review…

#7 [23:41:39.797] 1.2ms

event_review

SELECT event_review.id AS event_review_id, event_review.event_id AS event_review_event_id, event_review.rating AS event_review_rating, event_review.review_text AS event_review_review_text, event_review.reviewer_name AS event_review_reviewer_name, event_review.reviewer_hash AS event_review_reviewer_h…

#8 [23:41:39.801] 3.5ms

event_review

SELECT event_review.id AS event_review_id, event_review.event_id AS event_review_event_id, event_review.rating AS event_review_rating, event_review.review_text AS event_review_review_text, event_review.reviewer_name AS event_review_reviewer_name, event_review.reviewer_hash AS event_review_reviewer_h…

#9 [23:41:39.803] 1.5ms

ground

SELECT ground.id AS ground_id, ground.name AS ground_name, ground.url AS ground_url, ground.postcode AS ground_postcode, ground.what3words AS ground_what3words, ground.email AS ground_email, ground.website AS ground_website, ground.num_events_cpsa AS ground_num_events_cpsa, ground.num_events_cpsa_la…

#10 [23:41:39.806] 2.1ms

site_configuration

SELECT site_configuration.id AS site_configuration_id, site_configuration.key AS site_configuration_key, site_configuration.value AS site_configuration_value 
FROM site_configuration 
WHERE site_configuration.key LIKE %(key_1)s OR site_configuration.key LIKE %(key_2)s

#11 [23:41:39.814] 7.6ms

site_configuration

SELECT site_configuration.id AS site_configuration_id, site_configuration.key AS site_configuration_key, site_configuration.value AS site_configuration_value 
FROM site_configuration 
WHERE site_configuration.key IN (%(key_1_1)s, %(key_1_2)s, %(key_1_3)s, %(key_1_4)s)

#12 [23:41:39.816] 1.2ms

admin_menu_item

SELECT DISTINCT admin_menu_item.active_tab AS admin_menu_item_active_tab 
FROM admin_menu_item

LIVE REQUESTS (0) — click to expand

Olympic Trap at Fauxdegla Shooting Ground

Unlock the full event analysis

Historical Trends at Fauxdegla Shooting Ground

Classification Deep Dive

Event Performance Analysis

Analyzing Data...

Refresh Complete

Already Up to Date?

Analyzing Data...

Refresh Complete

Already Up to Date?