Back to Events

CSP — Compak Sporting

Compak Sporting at Eaton Hall Shooting Ground

Eaton Hall Shooting Ground

Friday, 28 November 2025 · CPSA Results →

Weather loading...

Event Rating

Latest Visitor Reviews

No written reviews yet.

Entries

83.4%

Field Average

98.0%

Highest Score

49.0%

Lowest Score

Top 3 Overall

🥉 =3

Adrian Parkin-Coates

Martin Myers

96/100

96.00%

🥇 =1

Brett Winstanley

Ross Holmes

98/100

98.00%

Event Difficulty

83.4% This Event

vs. Eaton Hall Shooting Ground historical average (Compak Sporting)

↓ -3.1% harder than usual

Ground avg: 86.5%

Class Winners

A 12 entered

98/100 — 98.00%

Brett Winstanley(tied) Ross Holmes(tied)

3=: Adrian Parkin-Coates — 96.00%

B 12 entered

94/100 — 94.00%

Samuel Ward

2: Paul Foster — 93.00%

C 9 entered

92/100 — 92.00%

Keith Roe

2: Daniel Whittall — 90.00%

D 21 entered

83/100 — 83.00%

Finley Jacques(tied) Sam Voisey(tied)

3=: Brian Eccles — 82.00%

Other 1 entered

85/100 — 85.00%

Daniel Laddiman

Field Shape

83.4%

Field avg

Compak Sporting at Eaton Hall Shooting Ground had a 49.0 point scoring spread across 55 entries.

Spread 49.0 pts

Front 98.0%

Largest class D

A compact read of how the field performed: average, spread and where most shooters sat.

Score Distribution

90–100%

16 29.1%

80–89%

23 41.8%

70–79%

12 21.8%

60–69%

3 5.5%

50–59%

0 0.0%

<50%

1 1.8%

Field Achievement

% of competitors reaching each score threshold

90%+

29.1%

16 / 55

80%+

70.9%

39 / 55

70%+

92.7%

51 / 55

60%+

98.2%

54 / 55

50%+

98.2%

54 / 55

Unlock the full event analysis

Register free for historical ground trends, class averages and spread, score charts, class composition and a detailed classification breakdown.

Historical Trends at Eaton Hall Shooting Ground

Compak Sporting performance across events held at this ground.

Last 12 months

Overall Average Trend

Classification Trend Comparison

Classification Deep Dive

4 active classifications

—

Member insight

Typical —

Best —

Lowest —

Middle 50% score range

vs Ground Avg (12m)—

—

Member insight

Typical —

Best —

Lowest —

Middle 50% score range

vs Ground Avg (12m)—

—

Member insight

Typical —

Best —

Lowest —

Middle 50% score range

vs Ground Avg (12m)—

—

Member insight

Typical —

Best —

Lowest —

Middle 50% score range

vs Ground Avg (12m)—

Event Performance Analysis

Registered insight

Average by Class

Class averages make it easier to see where the event played hardest across the field.

Field Spread by Class

82.0-98.0%

75.0-94.0%

79.0-92.0%

49.0-83.0%

Other

85.0-85.0%

Boxes show the middle 50% of each class. Orange line is the median.

Top 10 Score Lollipop

A quick visual read of how far the front of the field separated itself.

Score Histogram

High gun: 98.0%. The high-gun band is outlined.

Class Breakdown

Rotate your device to see High/Low scores and the class winner

Class	Count	Average	High	Low	Winner
A	12	92.6%	98.0%	82.0%	Brett Winstanley
B	12	86.9%	94.0%	75.0%	Samuel Ward
C	9	85.4%	92.0%	79.0%	Keith Roe
D	21	75.1%	83.0%	49.0%	Finley Jacques
Other	1	85.0%	85.0%	85.0%	Daniel Laddiman

Class Composition

12 21.8%

9 16.4%

21 38.2%

Other

1 1.8%

Largest class: D — 21 competitors (38.2%)

Full Results — 55 entries

🔒 The Class Rank and vs Class Avg columns are hidden — register free to unlock both insights.

Class A

Score 98/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class A

Score 98/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class A

Score 96/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class A

Score 96/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class A

Score 95/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class A

Score 94/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 94/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class A

Score 93/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 93/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class C

Score 92/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 92/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class A

Score 92/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 91/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class C

Score 90/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 90/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class A

Score 90/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class C

Score 89/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class A

Score 89/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class A

Score 88/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 88/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class C

Score 88/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 88/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 87/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class Unknown

Score 85/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 85/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class C

Score 84/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class D

Score 83/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class C

Score 83/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class D

Score 83/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class D

Score 82/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class D

Score 82/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class D

Score 82/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class C

Score 82/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class D

Score 82/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class C

Score 82/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class A

Score 82/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class D

Score 80/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 80/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 80/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class C

Score 79/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class D

Score 78/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class D

Score 77/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class D

Score 76/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class D

Score 76/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class D

Score 76/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 75/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class D

Score 75/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class D

Score 74/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class D

Score 74/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class D

Score 73/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class D

Score 73/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class D

Score 69/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class D

Score 67/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class D

Score 66/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class D

Score 49/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

#	Name	Class	Score	Score %	Class Rank 🔒	vs Class Avg
1=	Brett Winstanley	A	98/100	98.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
1=	Ross Holmes	A	98/100	98.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
3=	Adrian Parkin-Coates	A	96/100	96.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
3=	Martin Myers	A	96/100	96.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
5	Nick Hendrick	A	95/100	95.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
6=	Chris Childerhouse	A	94/100	94.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
6=	Samuel Ward	B	94/100	94.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
8=	Archie Gale	A	93/100	93.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
8=	Paul Foster	B	93/100	93.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
10=	Keith Roe	C	92/100	92.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
10=	Mike Cashmore	B	92/100	92.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
10=	Paul Gillett	A	92/100	92.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
13	Maxwell Drelincourt	B	91/100	91.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
14=	Daniel Whittall	C	90/100	90.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
14=	Harry Minkley	B	90/100	90.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
14=	Stuart Lodge	A	90/100	90.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
17=	Peter Cantrill	C	89/100	89.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
17=	Troy Thornell	A	89/100	89.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
19=	David Kempley	A	88/100	88.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
19=	Nigel Lane	B	88/100	88.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
19=	Paul Cockle	C	88/100	88.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
19=	Phil Rowbottom	B	88/100	88.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
23	Mark Kettel	B	87/100	87.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
24=	Daniel Laddiman	Unknown	85/100	85.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
24=	Michael Pennington	B	85/100	85.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
26	William Pennington	C	84/100	84.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
27=	Finley Jacques	D	83/100	83.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
27=	Gary Bown	C	83/100	83.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
27=	Sam Voisey	D	83/100	83.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
30=	Brian Eccles	D	82/100	82.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
30=	Denzil Grose	D	82/100	82.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
30=	John Rogers	D	82/100	82.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
30=	Kyle Garner	C	82/100	82.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
30=	Michael Jones	D	82/100	82.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
30=	Steven Woodward	C	82/100	82.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
30=	Tom Miller	A	82/100	82.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
37=	Charlie Tavernor	D	80/100	80.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
37=	Guy Watson	B	80/100	80.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
37=	Jeffrey Dix	B	80/100	80.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
40	Roger Grimshaw	C	79/100	79.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
41	Colin Penter	D	78/100	78.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
42	Oliver Rowell	D	77/100	77.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
43=	Dale Cross	D	76/100	76.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
43=	Dave Harley	D	76/100	76.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
43=	Zac Jacques	D	76/100	76.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
46=	Andrew Jones	B	75/100	75.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
46=	David Smith	D	75/100	75.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
48=	Jonathan Dennis	D	74/100	74.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
48=	Kevin Miller	D	74/100	74.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
50=	Phil Grose	D	73/100	73.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
50=	Stephen Trow	D	73/100	73.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
52	Jamie Grose	D	69/100	69.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
53	William Hewitt	D	67/100	67.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
54	Philip Heath	D	66/100	66.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
55	Pana Brenner	D	49/100	49.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%

Other CSP Events at Eaton Hall Shooting Ground

⚙ Performance Stats DRAG TO MOVE

0.040s ● FAST

DB 31% · Py 53% · Render 16%

12 queries · avg 1.0ms · max 1.8ms

Render Breakdown

Python Logic (Pre-Render) 0.0213s

DB Logic (Pre-Render) 0.0124s

Full Page Render 0.0064s

QUERY TABLES ▾

⚠ event_review 4× 0.003s

shoot_event 2× 0.003s

shoot_score 2× 0.003s

site_configuration 2× 0.002s

ground 1× 0.001s

admin_menu_item 1× 0.001s

⚠ = queried 3+ times (cache candidate)

SQL QUERIES (12) — click to expand

#1 [02:33:17.637] 1.8ms

shoot_event

SELECT shoot_event.id AS shoot_event_id, shoot_event.cpsa_fixture_id AS shoot_event_cpsa_fixture_id, shoot_event.name AS shoot_event_name, shoot_event.date AS shoot_event_date, shoot_event.discipline AS shoot_event_discipline, shoot_event.ground AS shoot_event_ground, shoot_event.url AS shoot_event_…

#2 [02:33:17.649] 1.5ms

shoot_score

SELECT shoot_score.id AS shoot_score_id, shoot_score.targets AS shoot_score_targets, shoot_score.hits AS shoot_score_hits, shoot_score.points AS shoot_score_points, shoot_score.percentage AS shoot_score_percentage, shoot_score.shooter_id AS shoot_score_shooter_id, shoot_score.event_id AS shoot_score…

#3 [02:33:17.653] 1.4ms

shoot_score

SELECT avg(shoot_score.percentage) AS avg_1 
FROM shoot_score JOIN shoot_event ON shoot_score.event_id = shoot_event.id 
WHERE shoot_event.ground = %(ground_1)s AND shoot_event.discipline = %(discipline_1)s AND shoot_event.is_scraped = true AND shoot_event.admin_hidden != true AND shoot_event.id != …

#4 [02:33:17.655] 1.1ms

shoot_event

SELECT shoot_event.id AS shoot_event_id, shoot_event.cpsa_fixture_id AS shoot_event_cpsa_fixture_id, shoot_event.name AS shoot_event_name, shoot_event.date AS shoot_event_date, shoot_event.discipline AS shoot_event_discipline, shoot_event.ground AS shoot_event_ground, shoot_event.url AS shoot_event_…

#5 [02:33:17.656] 0.8ms

event_review

SELECT avg(event_review.rating) AS avg_1, count(event_review.id) AS count_1 
FROM event_review 
WHERE event_review.event_id = %(event_id_1)s

#6 [02:33:17.658] 0.9ms

event_review

SELECT count(*) AS count_1 
FROM (SELECT event_review.id AS event_review_id, event_review.event_id AS event_review_event_id, event_review.rating AS event_review_rating, event_review.review_text AS event_review_review_text, event_review.reviewer_name AS event_review_reviewer_name, event_review.review…

#7 [02:33:17.659] 0.8ms

event_review

SELECT event_review.id AS event_review_id, event_review.event_id AS event_review_event_id, event_review.rating AS event_review_rating, event_review.review_text AS event_review_review_text, event_review.reviewer_name AS event_review_reviewer_name, event_review.reviewer_hash AS event_review_reviewer_h…

#8 [02:33:17.661] 0.8ms

event_review

SELECT event_review.id AS event_review_id, event_review.event_id AS event_review_event_id, event_review.rating AS event_review_rating, event_review.review_text AS event_review_review_text, event_review.reviewer_name AS event_review_reviewer_name, event_review.reviewer_hash AS event_review_reviewer_h…

#9 [02:33:17.662] 0.9ms

ground

SELECT ground.id AS ground_id, ground.name AS ground_name, ground.url AS ground_url, ground.postcode AS ground_postcode, ground.what3words AS ground_what3words, ground.email AS ground_email, ground.website AS ground_website, ground.num_events_cpsa AS ground_num_events_cpsa, ground.num_events_cpsa_la…

#10 [02:33:17.664] 0.9ms

site_configuration

SELECT site_configuration.id AS site_configuration_id, site_configuration.key AS site_configuration_key, site_configuration.value AS site_configuration_value 
FROM site_configuration 
WHERE site_configuration.key LIKE %(key_1)s OR site_configuration.key LIKE %(key_2)s

#11 [02:33:17.665] 0.8ms

site_configuration

SELECT site_configuration.id AS site_configuration_id, site_configuration.key AS site_configuration_key, site_configuration.value AS site_configuration_value 
FROM site_configuration 
WHERE site_configuration.key IN (%(key_1_1)s, %(key_1_2)s, %(key_1_3)s, %(key_1_4)s)

#12 [02:33:17.667] 0.8ms

admin_menu_item

SELECT DISTINCT admin_menu_item.active_tab AS admin_menu_item_active_tab 
FROM admin_menu_item

LIVE REQUESTS (0) — click to expand

Compak Sporting at Eaton Hall Shooting Ground

Unlock the full event analysis

Historical Trends at Eaton Hall Shooting Ground

Classification Deep Dive

Event Performance Analysis

Analyzing Data...

Refresh Complete

Already Up to Date?

Analyzing Data...

Refresh Complete

Already Up to Date?