Back to Events

CSP — Compak Sporting

Compak Sporting at Eaton Hall Shooting Ground

Eaton Hall Shooting Ground

Friday, 31 October 2025 · CPSA Results →

Weather loading...

Event Rating

Latest Visitor Reviews

No written reviews yet.

Entries

80.7%

Field Average

97.0%

Highest Score

58.0%

Lowest Score

Top 3 Overall

🥈

Brett Winstanley

96/100

96.00%

🥇

Paul Foster

97/100

97.00%

🥉

Daniel Whittall

95/100

95.00%

Event Difficulty

80.7% This Event

vs. Eaton Hall Shooting Ground historical average (Compak Sporting)

↓ -5.9% harder than usual

Ground avg: 86.6%

Class Winners

A 13 entered

97/100 — 97.00%

Paul Foster

2: Brett Winstanley — 96.00%

B 7 entered

89/100 — 89.00%

Martin Myers

2: Jeffrey Dix — 88.00%

C 10 entered

90/100 — 90.00%

Keith Roe(tied) Maxwell Drelincourt(tied)

3: Stewart Owen — 86.00%

D 27 entered

82/100 — 82.00%

John Edmunds(tied) Peter Lloyd(tied)

3=: Mark Byng — 81.00%

Field Shape

80.7%

Field avg

Compak Sporting at Eaton Hall Shooting Ground had a 39.0 point scoring spread across 57 entries.

Spread 39.0 pts

Front 97.0%

Largest class D

A compact read of how the field performed: average, spread and where most shooters sat.

Score Distribution

90–100%

13 22.8%

80–89%

18 31.6%

70–79%

21 36.8%

60–69%

4 7.0%

50–59%

1 1.8%

<50%

0 0.0%

Field Achievement

% of competitors reaching each score threshold

90%+

22.8%

13 / 57

80%+

54.4%

31 / 57

70%+

91.2%

52 / 57

60%+

98.2%

56 / 57

50%+

100.0%

57 / 57

Unlock the full event analysis

Register free for historical ground trends, class averages and spread, score charts, class composition and a detailed classification breakdown.

Historical Trends at Eaton Hall Shooting Ground

Compak Sporting performance across events held at this ground.

Last 12 months

Overall Average Trend

Classification Trend Comparison

Classification Deep Dive

4 active classifications

—

Member insight

Typical —

Best —

Lowest —

Middle 50% score range

vs Ground Avg (12m)—

—

Member insight

Typical —

Best —

Lowest —

Middle 50% score range

vs Ground Avg (12m)—

—

Member insight

Typical —

Best —

Lowest —

Middle 50% score range

vs Ground Avg (12m)—

—

Member insight

Typical —

Best —

Lowest —

Middle 50% score range

vs Ground Avg (12m)—

Event Performance Analysis

Registered insight

Average by Class

Class averages make it easier to see where the event played hardest across the field.

Field Spread by Class

82.0-97.0%

76.0-89.0%

71.0-90.0%

58.0-82.0%

Boxes show the middle 50% of each class. Orange line is the median.

Top 10 Score Lollipop

A quick visual read of how far the front of the field separated itself.

Score Histogram

High gun: 97.0%. The high-gun band is outlined.

Class Breakdown

Rotate your device to see High/Low scores and the class winner

Class	Count	Average	High	Low	Winner
A	13	91.5%	97.0%	82.0%	Paul Foster
B	7	82.9%	89.0%	76.0%	Martin Myers
C	10	81.7%	90.0%	71.0%	Keith Roe
D	27	74.5%	82.0%	58.0%	John Edmunds

Class Composition

13 22.8%

7 12.3%

10 17.5%

27 47.4%

Largest class: D — 27 competitors (47.4%)

Full Results — 57 entries

🔒 The Class Rank and vs Class Avg columns are hidden — register free to unlock both insights.

Class A

Score 97/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class A

Score 96/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class A

Score 95/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class A

Score 93/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class A

Score 93/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class A

Score 92/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class A

Score 92/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class A

Score 91/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class A

Score 90/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class C

Score 90/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class C

Score 90/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class A

Score 90/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class A

Score 90/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class A

Score 89/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 89/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 88/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class C

Score 86/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class C

Score 85/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 84/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 83/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class C

Score 83/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class C

Score 82/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 82/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class D

Score 82/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class D

Score 82/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class A

Score 82/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class D

Score 81/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class D

Score 81/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class D

Score 81/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class D

Score 80/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class D

Score 80/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class C

Score 79/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class D

Score 78/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 78/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class D

Score 78/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class D

Score 78/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class D

Score 77/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class D

Score 77/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 76/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class D

Score 76/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class D

Score 76/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class D

Score 76/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class C

Score 76/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class D

Score 75/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class C

Score 75/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class D

Score 75/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class D

Score 75/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class D

Score 73/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class D

Score 72/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class D

Score 71/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class C

Score 71/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class D

Score 70/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class D

Score 69/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class D

Score 66/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class D

Score 65/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class D

Score 60/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class D

Score 58/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

#	Name	Class	Score	Score %	Class Rank 🔒	vs Class Avg
1	Paul Foster	A	97/100	97.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
2	Brett Winstanley	A	96/100	96.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
3	Daniel Whittall	A	95/100	95.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
4=	Matt Hance	A	93/100	93.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
4=	Samuel Ward	A	93/100	93.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
6=	David Kempley	A	92/100	92.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
6=	Tom Miller	A	92/100	92.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
8	Aaron Christie	A	91/100	91.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
9=	Anthony Dean	A	90/100	90.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
9=	Keith Roe	C	90/100	90.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
9=	Maxwell Drelincourt	C	90/100	90.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
9=	Paul Gillett	A	90/100	90.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
9=	Troy Thornell	A	90/100	90.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
14=	Charlie Faulds	A	89/100	89.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
14=	Martin Myers	B	89/100	89.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
16	Jeffrey Dix	B	88/100	88.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
17	Stewart Owen	C	86/100	86.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
18	Alan Ayers	C	85/100	85.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
19	Michael Pennington	B	84/100	84.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
20=	Andrew Harvison	B	83/100	83.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
20=	Daniel Laddiman	C	83/100	83.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
22=	Brian Eccles	C	82/100	82.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
22=	Guy Robinson	B	82/100	82.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
22=	John Edmunds	D	82/100	82.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
22=	Peter Lloyd	D	82/100	82.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
22=	Steve Whitelock	A	82/100	82.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
27=	Mark Byng	D	81/100	81.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
27=	Mike Cashmore	D	81/100	81.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
27=	Russell Marshall	D	81/100	81.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
30=	Karen Shoreman	D	80/100	80.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
30=	Robert Green	D	80/100	80.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
32	Jonathan Dennis	C	79/100	79.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
33=	Ash Dar	D	78/100	78.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
33=	Guy Watson	B	78/100	78.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
33=	Pana Brenner	D	78/100	78.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
33=	Peter Cantrill	D	78/100	78.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
37=	Finley Jacques	D	77/100	77.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
37=	Nigel Lane	D	77/100	77.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
39=	Andrew Jones	B	76/100	76.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
39=	Daniel Rimmer	D	76/100	76.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
39=	David Smith	D	76/100	76.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
39=	John Rogers	D	76/100	76.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
39=	Roger Grimshaw	C	76/100	76.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
44=	Dale Cross	D	75/100	75.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
44=	Nick Woodward	C	75/100	75.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
44=	Peter Bridger	D	75/100	75.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
44=	Simon Shoreman	D	75/100	75.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
48	Mark Davenport	D	73/100	73.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
49	Andrew Hales	D	72/100	72.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
50=	Philip Moran	D	71/100	71.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
50=	William Pennington	C	71/100	71.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
52	Dave Harley	D	70/100	70.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
53	Donna Moran	D	69/100	69.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
54	Stephen Trow	D	66/100	66.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
55	Mike Pattison	D	65/100	65.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
56	Dave Pattison	D	60/100	60.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
57	Timothy Duffield	D	58/100	58.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%

Other CSP Events at Eaton Hall Shooting Ground

⚙ Performance Stats DRAG TO MOVE

0.032s ● FAST

DB 40% · Py 40% · Render 19%

12 queries · avg 1.1ms · max 1.6ms

Render Breakdown

Python Logic (Pre-Render) 0.0128s

DB Logic (Pre-Render) 0.0128s

Full Page Render 0.0062s

QUERY TABLES ▾

⚠ event_review 4× 0.004s

shoot_event 2× 0.003s

shoot_score 2× 0.003s

site_configuration 2× 0.002s

ground 1× 0.001s

admin_menu_item 1× 0.001s

⚠ = queried 3+ times (cache candidate)

SQL QUERIES (12) — click to expand

#1 [02:33:55.484] 1.6ms

shoot_event

SELECT shoot_event.id AS shoot_event_id, shoot_event.cpsa_fixture_id AS shoot_event_cpsa_fixture_id, shoot_event.name AS shoot_event_name, shoot_event.date AS shoot_event_date, shoot_event.discipline AS shoot_event_discipline, shoot_event.ground AS shoot_event_ground, shoot_event.url AS shoot_event_…

#2 [02:33:55.487] 1.4ms

shoot_score

SELECT shoot_score.id AS shoot_score_id, shoot_score.targets AS shoot_score_targets, shoot_score.hits AS shoot_score_hits, shoot_score.points AS shoot_score_points, shoot_score.percentage AS shoot_score_percentage, shoot_score.shooter_id AS shoot_score_shooter_id, shoot_score.event_id AS shoot_score…

#3 [02:33:55.491] 1.6ms

shoot_score

SELECT avg(shoot_score.percentage) AS avg_1 
FROM shoot_score JOIN shoot_event ON shoot_score.event_id = shoot_event.id 
WHERE shoot_event.ground = %(ground_1)s AND shoot_event.discipline = %(discipline_1)s AND shoot_event.is_scraped = true AND shoot_event.admin_hidden != true AND shoot_event.id != …

#4 [02:33:55.493] 1.1ms

shoot_event

SELECT shoot_event.id AS shoot_event_id, shoot_event.cpsa_fixture_id AS shoot_event_cpsa_fixture_id, shoot_event.name AS shoot_event_name, shoot_event.date AS shoot_event_date, shoot_event.discipline AS shoot_event_discipline, shoot_event.ground AS shoot_event_ground, shoot_event.url AS shoot_event_…

#5 [02:33:55.495] 0.9ms

event_review

SELECT avg(event_review.rating) AS avg_1, count(event_review.id) AS count_1 
FROM event_review 
WHERE event_review.event_id = %(event_id_1)s

#6 [02:33:55.497] 0.9ms

event_review

SELECT count(*) AS count_1 
FROM (SELECT event_review.id AS event_review_id, event_review.event_id AS event_review_event_id, event_review.rating AS event_review_rating, event_review.review_text AS event_review_review_text, event_review.reviewer_name AS event_review_reviewer_name, event_review.review…

#7 [02:33:55.498] 0.9ms

event_review

SELECT event_review.id AS event_review_id, event_review.event_id AS event_review_event_id, event_review.rating AS event_review_rating, event_review.review_text AS event_review_review_text, event_review.reviewer_name AS event_review_reviewer_name, event_review.reviewer_hash AS event_review_reviewer_h…

#8 [02:33:55.500] 0.9ms

event_review

SELECT event_review.id AS event_review_id, event_review.event_id AS event_review_event_id, event_review.rating AS event_review_rating, event_review.review_text AS event_review_review_text, event_review.reviewer_name AS event_review_reviewer_name, event_review.reviewer_hash AS event_review_reviewer_h…

#9 [02:33:55.501] 1.0ms

ground

SELECT ground.id AS ground_id, ground.name AS ground_name, ground.url AS ground_url, ground.postcode AS ground_postcode, ground.what3words AS ground_what3words, ground.email AS ground_email, ground.website AS ground_website, ground.num_events_cpsa AS ground_num_events_cpsa, ground.num_events_cpsa_la…

#10 [02:33:55.503] 0.9ms

site_configuration

SELECT site_configuration.id AS site_configuration_id, site_configuration.key AS site_configuration_key, site_configuration.value AS site_configuration_value 
FROM site_configuration 
WHERE site_configuration.key LIKE %(key_1)s OR site_configuration.key LIKE %(key_2)s

#11 [02:33:55.504] 0.8ms

site_configuration

SELECT site_configuration.id AS site_configuration_id, site_configuration.key AS site_configuration_key, site_configuration.value AS site_configuration_value 
FROM site_configuration 
WHERE site_configuration.key IN (%(key_1_1)s, %(key_1_2)s, %(key_1_3)s, %(key_1_4)s)

#12 [02:33:55.506] 0.8ms

admin_menu_item

SELECT DISTINCT admin_menu_item.active_tab AS admin_menu_item_active_tab 
FROM admin_menu_item

LIVE REQUESTS (0) — click to expand

Compak Sporting at Eaton Hall Shooting Ground

Unlock the full event analysis

Historical Trends at Eaton Hall Shooting Ground

Classification Deep Dive

Event Performance Analysis

Analyzing Data...

Refresh Complete

Already Up to Date?

Analyzing Data...

Refresh Complete

Already Up to Date?