Back to Events

CSP — Compak Sporting

Compak Sporting at E.J.Churchill Group Ltd

E.J.Churchill Group Ltd

Friday, 02 January 2026 · CPSA Results →

Weather loading...

Event Rating

Latest Visitor Reviews

No written reviews yet.

Entries

86.1%

Field Average

98.0%

Highest Score

66.0%

Lowest Score

Top 3 Overall

🥈

Michael Hibbert

97/100

97.00%

🥇

Billy Greenwood

98/100

98.00%

🥉 =3

Phil Easeman

Phil Smith

Stuart Lodge

96/100

96.00%

Event Difficulty

86.1% This Event

vs. E.J.Churchill Group Ltd historical average (Compak Sporting)

— About average difficulty

Ground avg: 86.3%

Class Winners

A 15 entered

98/100 — 98.00%

Billy Greenwood

2: Michael Hibbert — 97.00%

B 22 entered

94/100 — 94.00%

Chris Morgan

2=: Adrian Pope — 92.00%

C 17 entered

94/100 — 94.00%

Daniel Meggison

2=: John Smith — 89.00%

D 10 entered

93/100 — 93.00%

Daniel Laddiman

2: Andrew Thurgood — 83.00%

Field Shape

86.1%

Field avg

Compak Sporting at E.J.Churchill Group Ltd had a 32.0 point scoring spread across 64 entries.

Spread 32.0 pts

Front 98.0%

Largest class B

A compact read of how the field performed: average, spread and where most shooters sat.

Score Distribution

90–100%

21 32.8%

80–89%

33 51.6%

70–79%

7 10.9%

60–69%

3 4.7%

50–59%

0 0.0%

<50%

0 0.0%

Field Achievement

% of competitors reaching each score threshold

90%+

32.8%

21 / 64

80%+

84.4%

54 / 64

70%+

95.3%

61 / 64

60%+

100.0%

64 / 64

50%+

100.0%

64 / 64

Unlock the full event analysis

Register free for historical ground trends, class averages and spread, score charts, class composition and a detailed classification breakdown.

Historical Trends at E.J.Churchill Group Ltd

Compak Sporting performance across events held at this ground.

Last 12 months

Overall Average Trend

Classification Trend Comparison

Classification Deep Dive

4 active classifications

—

Member insight

Typical —

Best —

Lowest —

Middle 50% score range

vs Ground Avg (12m)—

—

Member insight

Typical —

Best —

Lowest —

Middle 50% score range

vs Ground Avg (12m)—

—

Member insight

Typical —

Best —

Lowest —

Middle 50% score range

vs Ground Avg (12m)—

—

Member insight

Typical —

Best —

Lowest —

Middle 50% score range

vs Ground Avg (12m)—

Event Performance Analysis

Registered insight

Average by Class

Class averages make it easier to see where the event played hardest across the field.

Field Spread by Class

84.0-98.0%

72.0-94.0%

75.0-94.0%

66.0-93.0%

Boxes show the middle 50% of each class. Orange line is the median.

Top 10 Score Lollipop

A quick visual read of how far the front of the field separated itself.

Score Histogram

High gun: 98.0%. The high-gun band is outlined.

Class Breakdown

Rotate your device to see High/Low scores and the class winner

Class	Count	Average	High	Low	Winner
A	15	93.5%	98.0%	84.0%	Billy Greenwood
B	22	87.2%	94.0%	72.0%	Chris Morgan
C	17	83.5%	94.0%	75.0%	Daniel Meggison
D	10	76.8%	93.0%	66.0%	Daniel Laddiman

Class Composition

15 23.4%

22 34.4%

17 26.6%

10 15.6%

Largest class: B — 22 competitors (34.4%)

Full Results — 64 entries

🔒 The Class Rank and vs Class Avg columns are hidden — register free to unlock both insights.

Class A

Score 98/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class A

Score 97/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class A

Score 96/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class A

Score 96/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class A

Score 96/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class A

Score 95/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class A

Score 95/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class A

Score 94/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 94/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class C

Score 94/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class A

Score 94/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class A

Score 94/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class A

Score 93/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class D

Score 93/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 92/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class A

Score 92/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 92/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 92/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 90/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 90/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 90/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class C

Score 89/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 89/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 89/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class A

Score 89/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class C

Score 89/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class A

Score 89/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class C

Score 89/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class C

Score 88/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 88/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 88/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 88/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 87/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 87/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 87/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 86/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 86/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class C

Score 85/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 85/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class C

Score 84/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class A

Score 84/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class D

Score 83/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 83/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class C

Score 83/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class C

Score 83/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 82/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class C

Score 82/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class C

Score 82/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class C

Score 82/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class D

Score 82/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class C

Score 81/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 81/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class D

Score 80/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class C

Score 80/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class D

Score 79/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class C

Score 78/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class C

Score 76/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class D

Score 76/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class D

Score 75/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class C

Score 75/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 72/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class D

Score 67/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class D

Score 67/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class D

Score 66/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

#	Name	Class	Score	Score %	Class Rank 🔒	vs Class Avg
1	Billy Greenwood	A	98/100	98.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
2	Michael Hibbert	A	97/100	97.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
3=	Phil Easeman	A	96/100	96.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
3=	Phil Smith	A	96/100	96.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
3=	Stuart Lodge	A	96/100	96.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
6=	Craig Boddice	A	95/100	95.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
6=	Paul Batchelor	A	95/100	95.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
8=	Amy Easeman	A	94/100	94.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
8=	Chris Morgan	B	94/100	94.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
8=	Daniel Meggison	C	94/100	94.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
8=	Tom Webb	A	94/100	94.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
8=	Wayne Parker	A	94/100	94.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
13=	Aaron Christie	A	93/100	93.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
13=	Daniel Laddiman	D	93/100	93.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
15=	Adrian Pope	B	92/100	92.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
15=	Brian Hartland	A	92/100	92.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
15=	Danny Smith	B	92/100	92.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
15=	Kenneth Bennett	B	92/100	92.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
19=	Andrew Seirlis	B	90/100	90.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
19=	Michael Perman	B	90/100	90.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
19=	Toni Dixon	B	90/100	90.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
22=	John Smith	C	89/100	89.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
22=	Lawrence Bobin	B	89/100	89.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
22=	Martin Nobbs	B	89/100	89.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
22=	Matt Martin	A	89/100	89.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
22=	Nigel Gilder	C	89/100	89.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
22=	Paul Poulter	A	89/100	89.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
22=	Stephen Smith	C	89/100	89.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
29=	Alex Higgs	C	88/100	88.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
29=	Brendan O'Brien	B	88/100	88.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
29=	Natasha Vadasz	B	88/100	88.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
29=	Neil Cousins	B	88/100	88.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
33=	Liam Hall	B	87/100	87.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
33=	Nigel Tubb	B	87/100	87.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
33=	Tim Evans	B	87/100	87.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
36=	Emma Lacey	B	86/100	86.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
36=	Kevin Wharton	B	86/100	86.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
38=	Alan Ayers	C	85/100	85.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
38=	Kevin Allen	B	85/100	85.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
40=	David Gale	C	84/100	84.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
40=	Max Baxter	A	84/100	84.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
42=	Andrew Thurgood	D	83/100	83.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
42=	Andy Seaman	B	83/100	83.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
42=	Daniel Enoiu	C	83/100	83.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
42=	Neil Peppiatt	C	83/100	83.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
46=	Anthony Hoskins	B	82/100	82.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
46=	Gareth Bromley	C	82/100	82.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
46=	Larry Armitstead	C	82/100	82.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
46=	Sian Hoskins	C	82/100	82.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
46=	Simon Shoreman	D	82/100	82.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
51=	Jeffrey Dix	C	81/100	81.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
51=	Michael Holmes	B	81/100	81.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
53=	Brenton Peppiatt	D	80/100	80.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
53=	Rhys Ferrier	C	80/100	80.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
55	Maxwell Walton	D	79/100	79.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
56	Christopher Dennis	C	78/100	78.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
57=	James Pengilley	C	76/100	76.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
57=	Paul Sawitzki	D	76/100	76.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
59=	Neil McColl	D	75/100	75.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
59=	Nick Oldfield	C	75/100	75.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
61	Keith Smith	B	72/100	72.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
62=	Dean Walker	D	67/100	67.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
62=	Ricky Hartland	D	67/100	67.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
64	Graham Brewster	D	66/100	66.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%

Other CSP Events at E.J.Churchill Group Ltd

⚙ Performance Stats DRAG TO MOVE

0.057s ● FAST

DB 68% · Py 22% · Render 10%

12 queries · avg 3.3ms · max 27.1ms

Render Breakdown

DB Logic (Pre-Render) 0.0391s

Python Logic (Pre-Render) 0.0123s

Full Page Render 0.0060s

QUERY TABLES ▾

⚠ event_review 4× 0.003s

shoot_event 2× 0.003s

shoot_score 2× 0.029s

site_configuration 2× 0.002s

ground 1× 0.001s

admin_menu_item 1× 0.001s

⚠ = queried 3+ times (cache candidate)

SQL QUERIES (12) — click to expand

#1 [00:23:00.518] 1.6ms

shoot_event

SELECT shoot_event.id AS shoot_event_id, shoot_event.cpsa_fixture_id AS shoot_event_cpsa_fixture_id, shoot_event.name AS shoot_event_name, shoot_event.date AS shoot_event_date, shoot_event.discipline AS shoot_event_discipline, shoot_event.ground AS shoot_event_ground, shoot_event.url AS shoot_event_…

#2 [00:23:00.547] 27.1ms

shoot_score

SELECT shoot_score.id AS shoot_score_id, shoot_score.targets AS shoot_score_targets, shoot_score.hits AS shoot_score_hits, shoot_score.points AS shoot_score_points, shoot_score.percentage AS shoot_score_percentage, shoot_score.shooter_id AS shoot_score_shooter_id, shoot_score.event_id AS shoot_score…

#3 [00:23:00.552] 2.4ms

shoot_score

SELECT avg(shoot_score.percentage) AS avg_1 
FROM shoot_score JOIN shoot_event ON shoot_score.event_id = shoot_event.id 
WHERE shoot_event.ground = %(ground_1)s AND shoot_event.discipline = %(discipline_1)s AND shoot_event.is_scraped = true AND shoot_event.admin_hidden != true AND shoot_event.id != …

#4 [00:23:00.554] 1.2ms

shoot_event

SELECT shoot_event.id AS shoot_event_id, shoot_event.cpsa_fixture_id AS shoot_event_cpsa_fixture_id, shoot_event.name AS shoot_event_name, shoot_event.date AS shoot_event_date, shoot_event.discipline AS shoot_event_discipline, shoot_event.ground AS shoot_event_ground, shoot_event.url AS shoot_event_…

#5 [00:23:00.556] 0.9ms

event_review

SELECT avg(event_review.rating) AS avg_1, count(event_review.id) AS count_1 
FROM event_review 
WHERE event_review.event_id = %(event_id_1)s

#6 [00:23:00.557] 0.9ms

event_review

SELECT count(*) AS count_1 
FROM (SELECT event_review.id AS event_review_id, event_review.event_id AS event_review_event_id, event_review.rating AS event_review_rating, event_review.review_text AS event_review_review_text, event_review.reviewer_name AS event_review_reviewer_name, event_review.review…

#7 [00:23:00.559] 0.8ms

event_review

SELECT event_review.id AS event_review_id, event_review.event_id AS event_review_event_id, event_review.rating AS event_review_rating, event_review.review_text AS event_review_review_text, event_review.reviewer_name AS event_review_reviewer_name, event_review.reviewer_hash AS event_review_reviewer_h…

#8 [00:23:00.560] 0.8ms

event_review

SELECT event_review.id AS event_review_id, event_review.event_id AS event_review_event_id, event_review.rating AS event_review_rating, event_review.review_text AS event_review_review_text, event_review.reviewer_name AS event_review_reviewer_name, event_review.reviewer_hash AS event_review_reviewer_h…

#9 [00:23:00.561] 0.9ms

ground

SELECT ground.id AS ground_id, ground.name AS ground_name, ground.url AS ground_url, ground.postcode AS ground_postcode, ground.what3words AS ground_what3words, ground.email AS ground_email, ground.website AS ground_website, ground.num_events_cpsa AS ground_num_events_cpsa, ground.num_events_cpsa_la…

#10 [00:23:00.563] 0.9ms

site_configuration

SELECT site_configuration.id AS site_configuration_id, site_configuration.key AS site_configuration_key, site_configuration.value AS site_configuration_value 
FROM site_configuration 
WHERE site_configuration.key LIKE %(key_1)s OR site_configuration.key LIKE %(key_2)s

#11 [00:23:00.564] 0.9ms

site_configuration

SELECT site_configuration.id AS site_configuration_id, site_configuration.key AS site_configuration_key, site_configuration.value AS site_configuration_value 
FROM site_configuration 
WHERE site_configuration.key IN (%(key_1_1)s, %(key_1_2)s, %(key_1_3)s, %(key_1_4)s)

#12 [00:23:00.566] 0.8ms

admin_menu_item

SELECT DISTINCT admin_menu_item.active_tab AS admin_menu_item_active_tab 
FROM admin_menu_item

LIVE REQUESTS (0) — click to expand

Compak Sporting at E.J.Churchill Group Ltd

Unlock the full event analysis

Historical Trends at E.J.Churchill Group Ltd

Classification Deep Dive

Event Performance Analysis

Analyzing Data...

Refresh Complete

Already Up to Date?

Analyzing Data...

Refresh Complete

Already Up to Date?