Back to Events

CSP — Compak Sporting

Compak Sporting at E.J.Churchill Group Ltd

E.J.Churchill Group Ltd

Friday, 31 January 2025 · CPSA Results →

Weather loading...

Event Rating

Latest Visitor Reviews

No written reviews yet.

Entries

86.8%

Field Average

99.0%

Highest Score

54.0%

Lowest Score

Top 3 Overall

🥉 =3

Jamie Brightman

Paul Gillett

98/100

98.00%

🥇 =1

Michael Hibbert

Richard Faulds

99/100

99.00%

Event Difficulty

86.8% This Event

vs. E.J.Churchill Group Ltd historical average (Compak Sporting)

— About average difficulty

Ground avg: 86.3%

Class Winners

A 12 entered

99/100 — 99.00%

Michael Hibbert(tied) Richard Faulds(tied)

3=: Jamie Brightman — 98.00%

B 24 entered

97/100 — 97.00%

Phil Easeman

2=: Aaron Christie — 94.00%

C 16 entered

94/100 — 94.00%

Matt Watling

2: Alex Higgs — 90.00%

D 8 entered

86/100 — 86.00%

Nick Floyd

2: Larry Armitstead — 85.00%

Field Shape

86.8%

Field avg

Compak Sporting at E.J.Churchill Group Ltd had a 45.0 point scoring spread across 60 entries.

Spread 45.0 pts

Front 99.0%

Largest class B

A compact read of how the field performed: average, spread and where most shooters sat.

Score Distribution

90–100%

26 43.3%

80–89%

21 35.0%

70–79%

12 20.0%

60–69%

0 0.0%

50–59%

1 1.7%

<50%

0 0.0%

Field Achievement

% of competitors reaching each score threshold

90%+

43.3%

26 / 60

80%+

78.3%

47 / 60

70%+

98.3%

59 / 60

60%+

98.3%

59 / 60

50%+

100.0%

60 / 60

Unlock the full event analysis

Register free for historical ground trends, class averages and spread, score charts, class composition and a detailed classification breakdown.

Historical Trends at E.J.Churchill Group Ltd

Compak Sporting performance across events held at this ground.

Last 12 months

Overall Average Trend

Classification Trend Comparison

Classification Deep Dive

4 active classifications

—

Member insight

Typical —

Best —

Lowest —

Middle 50% score range

vs Ground Avg (12m)—

—

Member insight

Typical —

Best —

Lowest —

Middle 50% score range

vs Ground Avg (12m)—

—

Member insight

Typical —

Best —

Lowest —

Middle 50% score range

vs Ground Avg (12m)—

—

Member insight

Typical —

Best —

Lowest —

Middle 50% score range

vs Ground Avg (12m)—

Event Performance Analysis

Registered insight

Average by Class

Class averages make it easier to see where the event played hardest across the field.

Field Spread by Class

91.0-99.0%

78.0-97.0%

74.0-94.0%

54.0-86.0%

Boxes show the middle 50% of each class. Orange line is the median.

Top 10 Score Lollipop

A quick visual read of how far the front of the field separated itself.

Score Histogram

High gun: 99.0%. The high-gun band is outlined.

Class Breakdown

Rotate your device to see High/Low scores and the class winner

Class	Count	Average	High	Low	Winner
A	12	96.1%	99.0%	91.0%	Michael Hibbert
B	24	88.2%	97.0%	78.0%	Phil Easeman
C	16	83.3%	94.0%	74.0%	Matt Watling
D	8	75.4%	86.0%	54.0%	Nick Floyd

Class Composition

12 20.0%

24 40.0%

16 26.7%

8 13.3%

Largest class: B — 24 competitors (40.0%)

Full Results — 60 entries

🔒 The Class Rank and vs Class Avg columns are hidden — register free to unlock both insights.

Class A

Score 99/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class A

Score 99/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class A

Score 98/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class A

Score 98/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class A

Score 97/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class A

Score 97/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class A

Score 97/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 97/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class A

Score 96/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 94/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class A

Score 94/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class A

Score 94/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class C

Score 94/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 94/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class A

Score 93/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 93/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 93/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 92/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 92/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 92/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class A

Score 91/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 90/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class C

Score 90/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 90/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 90/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 90/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 88/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 88/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 87/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class C

Score 87/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class C

Score 87/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 86/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 86/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 86/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class D

Score 86/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class C

Score 85/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class C

Score 85/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class C

Score 85/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class C

Score 85/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class D

Score 85/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 85/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 84/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class C

Score 84/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class C

Score 84/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class C

Score 83/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 82/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 81/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class C

Score 79/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 79/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class D

Score 79/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class C

Score 79/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 78/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class D

Score 78/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class D

Score 77/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class C

Score 77/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class C

Score 75/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class C

Score 74/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class D

Score 74/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class D

Score 70/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class D

Score 54/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

#	Name	Class	Score	Score %	Class Rank 🔒	vs Class Avg
1=	Michael Hibbert	A	99/100	99.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
1=	Richard Faulds	A	99/100	99.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
3=	Jamie Brightman	A	98/100	98.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
3=	Paul Gillett	A	98/100	98.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
5=	Henry Arnold	A	97/100	97.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
5=	Lee Fisher	A	97/100	97.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
5=	Paul Poulter	A	97/100	97.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
5=	Phil Easeman	B	97/100	97.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
9	Nathan Hales	A	96/100	96.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
10=	Aaron Christie	B	94/100	94.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
10=	Charlie Faulds	A	94/100	94.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
10=	John Younger	A	94/100	94.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
10=	Matt Watling	C	94/100	94.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
10=	Oliver Baylis	B	94/100	94.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
15=	Charles Milne	A	93/100	93.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
15=	Kevin Allen	B	93/100	93.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
15=	Michael Smith	B	93/100	93.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
18=	Neil Cousins	B	92/100	92.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
18=	Nick Moss	B	92/100	92.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
18=	Wayne Parker	B	92/100	92.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
21	Stuart Lodge	A	91/100	91.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
22=	Alan Meager	B	90/100	90.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
22=	Alex Higgs	C	90/100	90.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
22=	Andy Seaman	B	90/100	90.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
22=	Charlotte Kerwood	B	90/100	90.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
22=	Emma Lowrison	B	90/100	90.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
27=	Danny Smith	B	88/100	88.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
27=	Nadine Gilder	B	88/100	88.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
29=	Mark Kettel	B	87/100	87.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
29=	Philip Moran	C	87/100	87.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
29=	Timothy Carter	C	87/100	87.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
32=	Brendan O'Brien	B	86/100	86.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
32=	Jeff Bone	B	86/100	86.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
32=	Kevin Wharton	B	86/100	86.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
32=	Nick Floyd	D	86/100	86.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
36=	Ellie Jones	C	85/100	85.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
36=	Jes Simmons	C	85/100	85.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
36=	John Robbins	C	85/100	85.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
36=	John Smith	C	85/100	85.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
36=	Larry Armitstead	D	85/100	85.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
36=	Michael Perman	B	85/100	85.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
42=	Adam Kemp	B	84/100	84.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
42=	Andrew Seirlis	C	84/100	84.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
42=	Steve Richards	C	84/100	84.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
45	Philip Barnes	C	83/100	83.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
46	Donna Moran	B	82/100	82.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
47	Nigel Gilder	B	81/100	81.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
48=	David Gale	C	79/100	79.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
48=	Jemma Paul	B	79/100	79.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
48=	Paul Sawitzki	D	79/100	79.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
48=	Stephen Crowley	C	79/100	79.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
52=	Jeffrey Dix	B	78/100	78.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
52=	William McNeill	D	78/100	78.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
54=	Andrew Thurgood	D	77/100	77.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
54=	Richard Brown	C	77/100	77.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
56	James Pengilley	C	75/100	75.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
57=	Graham Brewster	C	74/100	74.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
57=	William Barry	D	74/100	74.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
59	Alan Pearse	D	70/100	70.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
60	Pam Tibbatts	D	54/100	54.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%

Other CSP Events at E.J.Churchill Group Ltd

⚙ Performance Stats DRAG TO MOVE

0.061s ● FAST

DB 61% · Py 25% · Render 15%

12 queries · avg 3.1ms · max 24.5ms

Render Breakdown

DB Logic (Pre-Render) 0.0373s

Python Logic (Pre-Render) 0.0151s

Full Page Render 0.0090s

QUERY TABLES ▾

⚠ event_review 4× 0.004s

shoot_event 2× 0.003s

shoot_score 2× 0.004s

site_configuration 2× 0.002s

ground 1× 0.025s

admin_menu_item 1× 0.001s

⚠ = queried 3+ times (cache candidate)

SQL QUERIES (12) — click to expand

#1 [00:37:22.205] 1.7ms

shoot_event

SELECT shoot_event.id AS shoot_event_id, shoot_event.cpsa_fixture_id AS shoot_event_cpsa_fixture_id, shoot_event.name AS shoot_event_name, shoot_event.date AS shoot_event_date, shoot_event.discipline AS shoot_event_discipline, shoot_event.ground AS shoot_event_ground, shoot_event.url AS shoot_event_…

#2 [00:37:22.208] 1.5ms

shoot_score

SELECT shoot_score.id AS shoot_score_id, shoot_score.targets AS shoot_score_targets, shoot_score.hits AS shoot_score_hits, shoot_score.points AS shoot_score_points, shoot_score.percentage AS shoot_score_percentage, shoot_score.shooter_id AS shoot_score_shooter_id, shoot_score.event_id AS shoot_score…

#3 [00:37:22.213] 2.2ms

shoot_score

SELECT avg(shoot_score.percentage) AS avg_1 
FROM shoot_score JOIN shoot_event ON shoot_score.event_id = shoot_event.id 
WHERE shoot_event.ground = %(ground_1)s AND shoot_event.discipline = %(discipline_1)s AND shoot_event.is_scraped = true AND shoot_event.admin_hidden != true AND shoot_event.id != …

#4 [00:37:22.216] 1.1ms

shoot_event

SELECT shoot_event.id AS shoot_event_id, shoot_event.cpsa_fixture_id AS shoot_event_cpsa_fixture_id, shoot_event.name AS shoot_event_name, shoot_event.date AS shoot_event_date, shoot_event.discipline AS shoot_event_discipline, shoot_event.ground AS shoot_event_ground, shoot_event.url AS shoot_event_…

#5 [00:37:22.218] 0.9ms

event_review

SELECT avg(event_review.rating) AS avg_1, count(event_review.id) AS count_1 
FROM event_review 
WHERE event_review.event_id = %(event_id_1)s

#6 [00:37:22.219] 0.9ms

event_review

SELECT count(*) AS count_1 
FROM (SELECT event_review.id AS event_review_id, event_review.event_id AS event_review_event_id, event_review.rating AS event_review_rating, event_review.review_text AS event_review_review_text, event_review.reviewer_name AS event_review_reviewer_name, event_review.review…

#7 [00:37:22.221] 0.9ms

event_review

SELECT event_review.id AS event_review_id, event_review.event_id AS event_review_event_id, event_review.rating AS event_review_rating, event_review.review_text AS event_review_review_text, event_review.reviewer_name AS event_review_reviewer_name, event_review.reviewer_hash AS event_review_reviewer_h…

#8 [00:37:22.223] 0.9ms

event_review

SELECT event_review.id AS event_review_id, event_review.event_id AS event_review_event_id, event_review.rating AS event_review_rating, event_review.review_text AS event_review_review_text, event_review.reviewer_name AS event_review_reviewer_name, event_review.reviewer_hash AS event_review_reviewer_h…

#9 [00:37:22.248] 24.5ms

ground

SELECT ground.id AS ground_id, ground.name AS ground_name, ground.url AS ground_url, ground.postcode AS ground_postcode, ground.what3words AS ground_what3words, ground.email AS ground_email, ground.website AS ground_website, ground.num_events_cpsa AS ground_num_events_cpsa, ground.num_events_cpsa_la…

#10 [00:37:22.250] 0.9ms

site_configuration

SELECT site_configuration.id AS site_configuration_id, site_configuration.key AS site_configuration_key, site_configuration.value AS site_configuration_value 
FROM site_configuration 
WHERE site_configuration.key LIKE %(key_1)s OR site_configuration.key LIKE %(key_2)s

#11 [00:37:22.251] 0.8ms

site_configuration

SELECT site_configuration.id AS site_configuration_id, site_configuration.key AS site_configuration_key, site_configuration.value AS site_configuration_value 
FROM site_configuration 
WHERE site_configuration.key IN (%(key_1_1)s, %(key_1_2)s, %(key_1_3)s, %(key_1_4)s)

#12 [00:37:22.253] 0.9ms

admin_menu_item

SELECT DISTINCT admin_menu_item.active_tab AS admin_menu_item_active_tab 
FROM admin_menu_item

LIVE REQUESTS (0) — click to expand

Compak Sporting at E.J.Churchill Group Ltd

Unlock the full event analysis

Historical Trends at E.J.Churchill Group Ltd

Classification Deep Dive

Event Performance Analysis

Analyzing Data...

Refresh Complete

Already Up to Date?

Analyzing Data...

Refresh Complete

Already Up to Date?