Back to Events

Last Updated: 15 Jun 2026, 15:09

CSP — Compak Sporting

Compak Sporting at E.J.Churchill Group Ltd

E.J.Churchill Group Ltd

Wednesday, 13 July 2022 · CPSA Results →

Weather loading...

Event Rating

Latest Visitor Reviews

No written reviews yet.

Entries

83.5%

Field Average

99.0%

Highest Score

64.0%

Lowest Score

Top 3 Overall

🥈

Anthony •••••

98/100

98.00%

🥇

Jake •••••

99/100

99.00%

🥉 =3

James •••••

Phil •••••

97/100

97.00%

Event Difficulty

83.5% This Event

vs. E.J.Churchill Group Ltd historical average (Compak Sporting)

↓ -2.8% harder than usual

Ground avg: 86.3%

Class Winners

A 10 entered

99/100 — 99.00%

Jake •••••

2: Anthony ••••• — 98.00%

B 16 entered

93/100 — 93.00%

Stephen •••••

2: Gwyn ••••• — 91.00%

C 7 entered

84/100 — 84.00%

Stephen •••••

2: Neil ••••• — 82.00%

D 6 entered

76/100 — 76.00%

Massimo •••••

2=: Elliot ••••• — 73.00%

Other 1 entered

75/100 — 75.00%

Brenton •••••

Field Shape

83.5%

Field avg

Compak Sporting at E.J.Churchill Group Ltd had a 35.0 point scoring spread across 40 entries.

Spread 35.0 pts

Front 99.0%

Largest class B

A compact read of how the field performed: average, spread and where most shooters sat.

Score Distribution

90–100%

14 35.0%

80–89%

12 30.0%

70–79%

11 27.5%

60–69%

3 7.5%

50–59%

0 0.0%

<50%

0 0.0%

Field Achievement

% of competitors reaching each score threshold

90%+

35.0%

14 / 40

80%+

65.0%

26 / 40

70%+

92.5%

37 / 40

60%+

100.0%

40 / 40

50%+

100.0%

40 / 40

Unlock the full event analysis

Register free for historical ground trends, class averages and spread, score charts, class composition and a detailed classification breakdown.

Historical Trends at E.J.Churchill Group Ltd

Compak Sporting performance across events held at this ground.

Last 12 months

Overall Average Trend

Classification Trend Comparison

Classification Deep Dive

4 active classifications

—

Member insight

Typical —

Best —

Lowest —

Middle 50% score range

vs Ground Avg (12m)—

—

Member insight

Typical —

Best —

Lowest —

Middle 50% score range

vs Ground Avg (12m)—

—

Member insight

Typical —

Best —

Lowest —

Middle 50% score range

vs Ground Avg (12m)—

—

Member insight

Typical —

Best —

Lowest —

Middle 50% score range

vs Ground Avg (12m)—

Event Performance Analysis

Registered insight

Average by Class

Class averages make it easier to see where the event played hardest across the field.

Field Spread by Class

88.0-99.0%

75.0-93.0%

64.0-84.0%

64.0-76.0%

Other

75.0-75.0%

Boxes show the middle 50% of each class. Orange line is the median.

Top 10 Score Lollipop

A quick visual read of how far the front of the field separated itself.

Score Histogram

High gun: 99.0%. The high-gun band is outlined.

Class Breakdown

Rotate your device to see High/Low scores and the class winner

Class	Count	Average	High	Low	Winner
A	10	94.3%	99.0%	88.0%	Jake •••••
B	16	85.5%	93.0%	75.0%	Stephen •••••
C	7	75.7%	84.0%	64.0%	Stephen •••••
D	6	70.3%	76.0%	64.0%	Massimo •••••
Other	1	75.0%	75.0%	75.0%	Brenton •••••

Class Composition

10 25.0%

16 40.0%

7 17.5%

6 15.0%

Other

1 2.5%

Largest class: B — 16 competitors (40.0%)

Full Results — 40 entries

🔒 The Class Rank and vs Class Avg columns are hidden — register free to unlock both insights.

Rotate your device to see the full results table: score, class placing, class average and delta.

Class A

Score 99/100

Class placing 1

Class average 94.3%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class A

Score 98/100

Class placing 1

Class average 94.3%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class A

Score 97/100

Class placing 1

Class average 94.3%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class A

Score 97/100

Class placing 1

Class average 94.3%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class A

Score 96/100

Class placing 1

Class average 94.3%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class A

Score 94/100

Class placing 1

Class average 94.3%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class A

Score 93/100

Class placing 1

Class average 94.3%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 93/100

Class placing 1

Class average 85.5%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 91/100

Class placing 1

Class average 85.5%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class A

Score 91/100

Class placing 1

Class average 94.3%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 90/100

Class placing 1

Class average 85.5%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class A

Score 90/100

Class placing 1

Class average 94.3%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 90/100

Class placing 1

Class average 85.5%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 90/100

Class placing 1

Class average 85.5%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 88/100

Class placing 1

Class average 85.5%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class A

Score 88/100

Class placing 1

Class average 94.3%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 86/100

Class placing 1

Class average 85.5%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 86/100

Class placing 1

Class average 85.5%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 86/100

Class placing 1

Class average 85.5%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 85/100

Class placing 1

Class average 85.5%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 85/100

Class placing 1

Class average 85.5%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class C

Score 84/100

Class placing 1

Class average 75.7%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 82/100

Class placing 1

Class average 85.5%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 82/100

Class placing 1

Class average 85.5%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class C

Score 82/100

Class placing 1

Class average 75.7%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 81/100

Class placing 1

Class average 85.5%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class C

Score 79/100

Class placing 1

Class average 75.7%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 78/100

Class placing 1

Class average 85.5%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class C

Score 78/100

Class placing 1

Class average 75.7%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class D

Score 76/100

Class placing 1

Class average 70.3%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class Unknown

Score 75/100

Class placing 1

Class average 75.0%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 75/100

Class placing 1

Class average 85.5%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class D

Score 73/100

Class placing 1

Class average 70.3%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class D

Score 73/100

Class placing 1

Class average 70.3%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class C

Score 72/100

Class placing 1

Class average 75.7%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class C

Score 71/100

Class placing 1

Class average 75.7%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class D

Score 70/100

Class placing 1

Class average 70.3%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class D

Score 66/100

Class placing 1

Class average 70.3%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class C

Score 64/100

Class placing 1

Class average 75.7%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class D

Score 64/100

Class placing 1

Class average 70.3%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

#	Name	Class	Score	Score %	Class Rank 🔒	Class Avg	vs Class Avg
1	Jake •••••	A	99/100	99.00%	🔒 1	94.30%	🔒 +0.0%
2	Anthony •••••	A	98/100	98.00%	🔒 1	94.30%	🔒 +0.0%
3=	James •••••	A	97/100	97.00%	🔒 1	94.30%	🔒 +0.0%
3=	Phil •••••	A	97/100	97.00%	🔒 1	94.30%	🔒 +0.0%
5	Andy •••••	A	96/100	96.00%	🔒 1	94.30%	🔒 +0.0%
6	Ricky •••••	A	94/100	94.00%	🔒 1	94.30%	🔒 +0.0%
7=	Argun •••••	A	93/100	93.00%	🔒 1	94.30%	🔒 +0.0%
7=	Stephen •••••	B	93/100	93.00%	🔒 1	85.50%	🔒 +0.0%
9=	Gwyn •••••	B	91/100	91.00%	🔒 1	85.50%	🔒 +0.0%
9=	Kjetil •••••	A	91/100	91.00%	🔒 1	94.30%	🔒 +0.0%
11=	Danny •••••	B	90/100	90.00%	🔒 1	85.50%	🔒 +0.0%
11=	Jamie •••••	A	90/100	90.00%	🔒 1	94.30%	🔒 +0.0%
11=	Mark •••••	B	90/100	90.00%	🔒 1	85.50%	🔒 +0.0%
11=	Martin •••••	B	90/100	90.00%	🔒 1	85.50%	🔒 +0.0%
15=	Ceyla •••••	B	88/100	88.00%	🔒 1	85.50%	🔒 +0.0%
15=	Robert •••••	A	88/100	88.00%	🔒 1	94.30%	🔒 +0.0%
17=	Brian •••••	B	86/100	86.00%	🔒 1	85.50%	🔒 +0.0%
17=	Jeffrey •••••	B	86/100	86.00%	🔒 1	85.50%	🔒 +0.0%
17=	Nigel •••••	B	86/100	86.00%	🔒 1	85.50%	🔒 +0.0%
20=	Christopher •••••	B	85/100	85.00%	🔒 1	85.50%	🔒 +0.0%
20=	William •••••	B	85/100	85.00%	🔒 1	85.50%	🔒 +0.0%
22	Stephen •••••	C	84/100	84.00%	🔒 1	75.70%	🔒 +0.0%
23=	Jes •••••	B	82/100	82.00%	🔒 1	85.50%	🔒 +0.0%
23=	Keith •••••	B	82/100	82.00%	🔒 1	85.50%	🔒 +0.0%
23=	Neil •••••	C	82/100	82.00%	🔒 1	75.70%	🔒 +0.0%
26	Nick •••••	B	81/100	81.00%	🔒 1	85.50%	🔒 +0.0%
27	Paul •••••	C	79/100	79.00%	🔒 1	75.70%	🔒 +0.0%
28=	Alan •••••	B	78/100	78.00%	🔒 1	85.50%	🔒 +0.0%
28=	Michael •••••	C	78/100	78.00%	🔒 1	75.70%	🔒 +0.0%
30	Massimo •••••	D	76/100	76.00%	🔒 1	70.30%	🔒 +0.0%
31=	Brenton •••••	Unknown	75/100	75.00%	🔒 1	75.00%	🔒 +0.0%
31=	John •••••	B	75/100	75.00%	🔒 1	85.50%	🔒 +0.0%
33=	Elliot •••••	D	73/100	73.00%	🔒 1	70.30%	🔒 +0.0%
33=	John •••••	D	73/100	73.00%	🔒 1	70.30%	🔒 +0.0%
35	Stephen •••••	C	72/100	72.00%	🔒 1	75.70%	🔒 +0.0%
36	Kevin •••••	C	71/100	71.00%	🔒 1	75.70%	🔒 +0.0%
37	Aaron •••••	D	70/100	70.00%	🔒 1	70.30%	🔒 +0.0%
38	Anthony •••••	D	66/100	66.00%	🔒 1	70.30%	🔒 +0.0%
39=	John •••••	C	64/100	64.00%	🔒 1	75.70%	🔒 +0.0%
39=	Pam •••••	D	64/100	64.00%	🔒 1	70.30%	🔒 +0.0%

Other CSP Events at E.J.Churchill Group Ltd

⚙ Performance Stats DRAG TO MOVE

0.047s ● FAST

DB 51% · Py 26% · Render 23%

12 queries · avg 2.0ms · max 4.9ms

Render Breakdown

DB Logic (Pre-Render) 0.0238s

Python Logic (Pre-Render) 0.0122s

Full Page Render 0.0107s

QUERY TABLES ▾

⚠ event_review 4× 0.005s

shoot_event 2× 0.007s

shoot_score 2× 0.006s

site_configuration 2× 0.003s

ground 1× 0.001s

admin_menu_item 1× 0.002s

⚠ = queried 3+ times (cache candidate)

SQL QUERIES (12) — click to expand

#1 [21:43:30.437] 4.9ms

shoot_event

SELECT shoot_event.id AS shoot_event_id, shoot_event.cpsa_fixture_id AS shoot_event_cpsa_fixture_id, shoot_event.name AS shoot_event_name, shoot_event.date AS shoot_event_date, shoot_event.discipline AS shoot_event_discipline, shoot_event.ground AS shoot_event_ground, shoot_event.url AS shoot_event_…

#2 [21:43:30.440] 2.4ms

shoot_score

SELECT shoot_score.id AS shoot_score_id, shoot_score.targets AS shoot_score_targets, shoot_score.hits AS shoot_score_hits, shoot_score.points AS shoot_score_points, shoot_score.percentage AS shoot_score_percentage, shoot_score.course_breakdown AS shoot_score_course_breakdown, shoot_score.shooter_id …

#3 [21:43:30.446] 3.5ms

shoot_score

SELECT avg(shoot_score.percentage) AS avg_1 
FROM shoot_score JOIN shoot_event ON shoot_score.event_id = shoot_event.id 
WHERE shoot_event.ground = %(ground_1)s AND shoot_event.discipline = %(discipline_1)s AND shoot_event.is_scraped = true AND shoot_event.admin_hidden != true AND shoot_event.id != …

#4 [21:43:30.449] 2.1ms

shoot_event

SELECT shoot_event.id AS shoot_event_id, shoot_event.cpsa_fixture_id AS shoot_event_cpsa_fixture_id, shoot_event.name AS shoot_event_name, shoot_event.date AS shoot_event_date, shoot_event.discipline AS shoot_event_discipline, shoot_event.ground AS shoot_event_ground, shoot_event.url AS shoot_event_…

#5 [21:43:30.451] 1.2ms

event_review

SELECT avg(event_review.rating) AS avg_1, count(event_review.id) AS count_1 
FROM event_review 
WHERE event_review.event_id = %(event_id_1)s

#6 [21:43:30.453] 1.3ms

event_review

SELECT count(*) AS count_1 
FROM (SELECT event_review.id AS event_review_id, event_review.event_id AS event_review_event_id, event_review.rating AS event_review_rating, event_review.review_text AS event_review_review_text, event_review.reviewer_name AS event_review_reviewer_name, event_review.review…

#7 [21:43:30.455] 1.4ms

event_review

SELECT event_review.id AS event_review_id, event_review.event_id AS event_review_event_id, event_review.rating AS event_review_rating, event_review.review_text AS event_review_review_text, event_review.reviewer_name AS event_review_reviewer_name, event_review.reviewer_hash AS event_review_reviewer_h…

#8 [21:43:30.457] 1.4ms

event_review

SELECT event_review.id AS event_review_id, event_review.event_id AS event_review_event_id, event_review.rating AS event_review_rating, event_review.review_text AS event_review_review_text, event_review.reviewer_name AS event_review_reviewer_name, event_review.reviewer_hash AS event_review_reviewer_h…

#9 [21:43:30.459] 1.3ms

ground

SELECT ground.id AS ground_id, ground.name AS ground_name, ground.url AS ground_url, ground.postcode AS ground_postcode, ground.what3words AS ground_what3words, ground.email AS ground_email, ground.website AS ground_website, ground.num_events_cpsa AS ground_num_events_cpsa, ground.num_events_cpsa_la…

#10 [21:43:30.461] 1.3ms

site_configuration

SELECT site_configuration.id AS site_configuration_id, site_configuration.key AS site_configuration_key, site_configuration.value AS site_configuration_value 
FROM site_configuration 
WHERE site_configuration.key LIKE %(key_1)s OR site_configuration.key LIKE %(key_2)s

#11 [21:43:30.463] 1.6ms

site_configuration

SELECT site_configuration.id AS site_configuration_id, site_configuration.key AS site_configuration_key, site_configuration.value AS site_configuration_value 
FROM site_configuration 
WHERE site_configuration.key IN (%(key_1_1)s, %(key_1_2)s, %(key_1_3)s, %(key_1_4)s)

#12 [21:43:30.465] 1.5ms

admin_menu_item

SELECT DISTINCT admin_menu_item.active_tab AS admin_menu_item_active_tab 
FROM admin_menu_item

LIVE REQUESTS (0) — click to expand

Compak Sporting at E.J.Churchill Group Ltd

Unlock the full event analysis

Historical Trends at E.J.Churchill Group Ltd

Classification Deep Dive

Event Performance Analysis

Analyzing Data...

Refresh Complete

Already Up to Date?

Analyzing Data...

Refresh Complete

Already Up to Date?