Back to Events

Last Updated: 19 Jun 2026, 16:01

CSP — Compak Sporting

Compak Sporting at Eaton Hall Shooting Ground

Eaton Hall Shooting Ground

Sunday, 31 July 2016 · CPSA Results →

Weather loading...

Event Rating

Latest Visitor Reviews

No written reviews yet.

Entries

87.1%

Field Average

96.5%

Highest Score

47.0%

Lowest Score

Top 3 Overall

🥇 =1

Cheryl •••••

Henry •••••

Timothy •••••

193/200

96.50%

Event Difficulty

87.1% This Event

vs. Eaton Hall Shooting Ground historical average (Compak Sporting)

↑ +0.9% easier than usual

Ground avg: 86.2%

Class Winners

A 16 entered

193/200 — 96.50%

Cheryl •••••(tied) Henry •••••(tied)

3=: Martin ••••• — 94.50%

B 25 entered

193/200 — 96.50%

Timothy •••••

2: Brett ••••• — 95.50%

C 18 entered

180/200 — 90.00%

Kelly •••••

2: Jeremy ••••• — 89.50%

D 11 entered

176/200 — 88.00%

David •••••

2: Adam ••••• — 86.00%

Other 6 entered

185/200 — 92.50%

Andrew •••••

2: Thomas ••••• — 89.50%

Field Shape

87.1%

Field avg

Compak Sporting at Eaton Hall Shooting Ground had a 49.5 point scoring spread across 76 entries.

Spread 49.5 pts

Front 96.5%

Largest class B

A compact read of how the field performed: average, spread and where most shooters sat.

Score Distribution

90–100%

29 38.2%

80–89%

39 51.3%

70–79%

7 9.2%

60–69%

0 0.0%

50–59%

0 0.0%

<50%

1 1.3%

Field Achievement

% of competitors reaching each score threshold

90%+

38.2%

29 / 76

80%+

89.5%

68 / 76

70%+

98.7%

75 / 76

60%+

98.7%

75 / 76

50%+

98.7%

75 / 76

Unlock the full event analysis

Register free for historical ground trends, class averages and spread, score charts, class composition and a detailed classification breakdown.

Historical Trends at Eaton Hall Shooting Ground

Compak Sporting performance across events held at this ground.

Last 12 months

Overall Average Trend

Classification Trend Comparison

Classification Deep Dive

4 active classifications

—

Member insight

Typical —

Best —

Lowest —

Middle 50% score range

vs Ground Avg (12m)—

—

Member insight

Typical —

Best —

Lowest —

Middle 50% score range

vs Ground Avg (12m)—

—

Member insight

Typical —

Best —

Lowest —

Middle 50% score range

vs Ground Avg (12m)—

—

Member insight

Typical —

Best —

Lowest —

Middle 50% score range

vs Ground Avg (12m)—

Event Performance Analysis

Registered insight

Average by Class

Class averages make it easier to see where the event played hardest across the field.

Field Spread by Class

86.5-96.5%

47.0-96.5%

77.5-90.0%

74.0-88.0%

Other

79.5-92.5%

Boxes show the middle 50% of each class. Orange line is the median.

Top 10 Score Lollipop

A quick visual read of how far the front of the field separated itself.

Score Histogram

High gun: 96.5%. The high-gun band is outlined.

Class Breakdown

Rotate your device to see High/Low scores and the class winner

Class	Count	Average	High	Low	Winner
A	16	92.6%	96.5%	86.5%	Cheryl •••••
B	25	88.3%	96.5%	47.0%	Timothy •••••
C	18	84.4%	90.0%	77.5%	Kelly •••••
D	11	81.2%	88.0%	74.0%	David •••••
Other	6	85.8%	92.5%	79.5%	Andrew •••••

Class Composition

16 21.1%

25 32.9%

18 23.7%

11 14.5%

Other

6 7.9%

Largest class: B — 25 competitors (32.9%)

Full Results — 76 entries

🔒 The Class Rank and vs Class Avg columns are hidden — register free to unlock both insights.

Rotate your device to see the full results table: score, class placing, class average and delta.

Class A

Score 193/200

Class placing 1

Class average 92.6%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class A

Score 193/200

Class placing 1

Class average 92.6%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 193/200

Class placing 1

Class average 88.3%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 191/200

Class placing 1

Class average 88.3%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 190/200

Class placing 1

Class average 88.3%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class A

Score 189/200

Class placing 1

Class average 92.6%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class A

Score 189/200

Class placing 1

Class average 92.6%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 188/200

Class placing 1

Class average 88.3%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class A

Score 188/200

Class placing 1

Class average 92.6%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 188/200

Class placing 1

Class average 88.3%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class A

Score 188/200

Class placing 1

Class average 92.6%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class A

Score 187/200

Class placing 1

Class average 92.6%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 186/200

Class placing 1

Class average 88.3%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class A

Score 186/200

Class placing 1

Class average 92.6%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class A

Score 186/200

Class placing 1

Class average 92.6%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class Unknown

Score 185/200

Class placing 1

Class average 85.8%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 185/200

Class placing 1

Class average 88.3%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class A

Score 185/200

Class placing 1

Class average 92.6%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 185/200

Class placing 1

Class average 88.3%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 184/200

Class placing 1

Class average 88.3%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 184/200

Class placing 1

Class average 88.3%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class A

Score 183/200

Class placing 1

Class average 92.6%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class A

Score 183/200

Class placing 1

Class average 92.6%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 183/200

Class placing 1

Class average 88.3%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class A

Score 182/200

Class placing 1

Class average 92.6%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 182/200

Class placing 1

Class average 88.3%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class A

Score 181/200

Class placing 1

Class average 92.6%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 180/200

Class placing 1

Class average 88.3%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class C

Score 180/200

Class placing 1

Class average 84.4%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 179/200

Class placing 1

Class average 88.3%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class C

Score 179/200

Class placing 1

Class average 84.4%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class Unknown

Score 179/200

Class placing 1

Class average 85.8%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class C

Score 178/200

Class placing 1

Class average 84.4%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class A

Score 178/200

Class placing 1

Class average 92.6%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 177/200

Class placing 1

Class average 88.3%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class Unknown

Score 177/200

Class placing 1

Class average 85.8%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class C

Score 177/200

Class placing 1

Class average 84.4%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class C

Score 177/200

Class placing 1

Class average 84.4%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 177/200

Class placing 1

Class average 88.3%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class D

Score 176/200

Class placing 1

Class average 81.2%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 176/200

Class placing 1

Class average 88.3%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class C

Score 176/200

Class placing 1

Class average 84.4%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 176/200

Class placing 1

Class average 88.3%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class C

Score 175/200

Class placing 1

Class average 84.4%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 175/200

Class placing 1

Class average 88.3%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 173/200

Class placing 1

Class average 88.3%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class A

Score 173/200

Class placing 1

Class average 92.6%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class D

Score 172/200

Class placing 1

Class average 81.2%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class C

Score 172/200

Class placing 1

Class average 84.4%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 172/200

Class placing 1

Class average 88.3%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 172/200

Class placing 1

Class average 88.3%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class D

Score 171/200

Class placing 1

Class average 81.2%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class D

Score 170/200

Class placing 1

Class average 81.2%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class C

Score 168/200

Class placing 1

Class average 84.4%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class D

Score 167/200

Class placing 1

Class average 81.2%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class Unknown

Score 167/200

Class placing 1

Class average 85.8%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class C

Score 166/200

Class placing 1

Class average 84.4%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class C

Score 166/200

Class placing 1

Class average 84.4%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 165/200

Class placing 1

Class average 88.3%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class C

Score 165/200

Class placing 1

Class average 84.4%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class C

Score 164/200

Class placing 1

Class average 84.4%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class C

Score 164/200

Class placing 1

Class average 84.4%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class Unknown

Score 162/200

Class placing 1

Class average 85.8%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class D

Score 162/200

Class placing 1

Class average 81.2%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 161/200

Class placing 1

Class average 88.3%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class C

Score 161/200

Class placing 1

Class average 84.4%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class D

Score 160/200

Class placing 1

Class average 81.2%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class C

Score 160/200

Class placing 1

Class average 84.4%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class D

Score 159/200

Class placing 1

Class average 81.2%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class Unknown

Score 159/200

Class placing 1

Class average 85.8%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class C

Score 157/200

Class placing 1

Class average 84.4%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class C

Score 155/200

Class placing 1

Class average 84.4%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class D

Score 151/200

Class placing 1

Class average 81.2%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class D

Score 151/200

Class placing 1

Class average 81.2%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class D

Score 148/200

Class placing 1

Class average 81.2%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 94/200

Class placing 1

Class average 88.3%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

#	Name	Class	Score	Score %	Class Rank 🔒	Class Avg	vs Class Avg
1=	Cheryl •••••	A	193/200	96.50%	🔒 1	92.60%	🔒 +0.0%
1=	Henry •••••	A	193/200	96.50%	🔒 1	92.60%	🔒 +0.0%
1=	Timothy •••••	B	193/200	96.50%	🔒 1	88.30%	🔒 +0.0%
4	Brett •••••	B	191/200	95.50%	🔒 1	88.30%	🔒 +0.0%
5	Glenn •••••	B	190/200	95.00%	🔒 1	88.30%	🔒 +0.0%
6=	Martin •••••	A	189/200	94.50%	🔒 1	92.60%	🔒 +0.0%
6=	Paul •••••	A	189/200	94.50%	🔒 1	92.60%	🔒 +0.0%
8=	Anthony •••••	B	188/200	94.00%	🔒 1	88.30%	🔒 +0.0%
8=	Chris •••••	A	188/200	94.00%	🔒 1	92.60%	🔒 +0.0%
8=	Joe •••••	B	188/200	94.00%	🔒 1	88.30%	🔒 +0.0%
8=	Ricky •••••	A	188/200	94.00%	🔒 1	92.60%	🔒 +0.0%
12	Brody •••••	A	187/200	93.50%	🔒 1	92.60%	🔒 +0.0%
13=	Adrian •••••	B	186/200	93.00%	🔒 1	88.30%	🔒 +0.0%
13=	Jamie •••••	A	186/200	93.00%	🔒 1	92.60%	🔒 +0.0%
13=	Nathan •••••	A	186/200	93.00%	🔒 1	92.60%	🔒 +0.0%
16=	Andrew •••••	Unknown	185/200	92.50%	🔒 1	85.80%	🔒 +0.0%
16=	Joshua •••••	B	185/200	92.50%	🔒 1	88.30%	🔒 +0.0%
16=	Pietro •••••	A	185/200	92.50%	🔒 1	92.60%	🔒 +0.0%
16=	Stephen •••••	B	185/200	92.50%	🔒 1	88.30%	🔒 +0.0%
20=	Martin •••••	B	184/200	92.00%	🔒 1	88.30%	🔒 +0.0%
20=	Taylor •••••	B	184/200	92.00%	🔒 1	88.30%	🔒 +0.0%
22=	Adam •••••	A	183/200	91.50%	🔒 1	92.60%	🔒 +0.0%
22=	Nigel •••••	A	183/200	91.50%	🔒 1	92.60%	🔒 +0.0%
22=	Phil •••••	B	183/200	91.50%	🔒 1	88.30%	🔒 +0.0%
25=	Jonathan •••••	A	182/200	91.00%	🔒 1	92.60%	🔒 +0.0%
25=	Peter •••••	B	182/200	91.00%	🔒 1	88.30%	🔒 +0.0%
27	Edward •••••	A	181/200	90.50%	🔒 1	92.60%	🔒 +0.0%
28=	Adrian •••••	B	180/200	90.00%	🔒 1	88.30%	🔒 +0.0%
28=	Kelly •••••	C	180/200	90.00%	🔒 1	84.40%	🔒 +0.0%
30=	Chris •••••	B	179/200	89.50%	🔒 1	88.30%	🔒 +0.0%
30=	Jeremy •••••	C	179/200	89.50%	🔒 1	84.40%	🔒 +0.0%
30=	Thomas •••••	Unknown	179/200	89.50%	🔒 1	85.80%	🔒 +0.0%
33=	Keith •••••	C	178/200	89.00%	🔒 1	84.40%	🔒 +0.0%
33=	Nicholas •••••	A	178/200	89.00%	🔒 1	92.60%	🔒 +0.0%
35=	James •••••	B	177/200	88.50%	🔒 1	88.30%	🔒 +0.0%
35=	John •••••	Unknown	177/200	88.50%	🔒 1	85.80%	🔒 +0.0%
35=	Linda •••••	C	177/200	88.50%	🔒 1	84.40%	🔒 +0.0%
35=	Matt •••••	C	177/200	88.50%	🔒 1	84.40%	🔒 +0.0%
35=	Ron •••••	B	177/200	88.50%	🔒 1	88.30%	🔒 +0.0%
40=	David •••••	D	176/200	88.00%	🔒 1	81.20%	🔒 +0.0%
40=	Oliver •••••	B	176/200	88.00%	🔒 1	88.30%	🔒 +0.0%
40=	Stuart •••••	C	176/200	88.00%	🔒 1	84.40%	🔒 +0.0%
40=	Will •••••	B	176/200	88.00%	🔒 1	88.30%	🔒 +0.0%
44=	Dennis •••••	C	175/200	87.50%	🔒 1	84.40%	🔒 +0.0%
44=	Frank •••••	B	175/200	87.50%	🔒 1	88.30%	🔒 +0.0%
46=	Andrew •••••	B	173/200	86.50%	🔒 1	88.30%	🔒 +0.0%
46=	Nicholas •••••	A	173/200	86.50%	🔒 1	92.60%	🔒 +0.0%
48=	Adam •••••	D	172/200	86.00%	🔒 1	81.20%	🔒 +0.0%
48=	Christopher •••••	C	172/200	86.00%	🔒 1	84.40%	🔒 +0.0%
48=	Mark •••••	B	172/200	86.00%	🔒 1	88.30%	🔒 +0.0%
48=	Peter •••••	B	172/200	86.00%	🔒 1	88.30%	🔒 +0.0%
52	Keith •••••	D	171/200	85.50%	🔒 1	81.20%	🔒 +0.0%
53	Paul •••••	D	170/200	85.00%	🔒 1	81.20%	🔒 +0.0%
54	Mark •••••	C	168/200	84.00%	🔒 1	84.40%	🔒 +0.0%
55=	David •••••	D	167/200	83.50%	🔒 1	81.20%	🔒 +0.0%
55=	Gordon •••••	Unknown	167/200	83.50%	🔒 1	85.80%	🔒 +0.0%
57=	George •••••	C	166/200	83.00%	🔒 1	84.40%	🔒 +0.0%
57=	Nicholas •••••	C	166/200	83.00%	🔒 1	84.40%	🔒 +0.0%
59=	Amy •••••	B	165/200	82.50%	🔒 1	88.30%	🔒 +0.0%
59=	Jennie •••••	C	165/200	82.50%	🔒 1	84.40%	🔒 +0.0%
61=	Emma •••••	C	164/200	82.00%	🔒 1	84.40%	🔒 +0.0%
61=	Pet •••••	C	164/200	82.00%	🔒 1	84.40%	🔒 +0.0%
63=	Andrew •••••	Unknown	162/200	81.00%	🔒 1	85.80%	🔒 +0.0%
63=	Louise •••••	D	162/200	81.00%	🔒 1	81.20%	🔒 +0.0%
65=	Andrew •••••	B	161/200	80.50%	🔒 1	88.30%	🔒 +0.0%
65=	Nick •••••	C	161/200	80.50%	🔒 1	84.40%	🔒 +0.0%
67=	Darren •••••	D	160/200	80.00%	🔒 1	81.20%	🔒 +0.0%
67=	John •••••	C	160/200	80.00%	🔒 1	84.40%	🔒 +0.0%
69=	Christine •••••	D	159/200	79.50%	🔒 1	81.20%	🔒 +0.0%
69=	Mr •••••	Unknown	159/200	79.50%	🔒 1	85.80%	🔒 +0.0%
71	Alan •••••	C	157/200	78.50%	🔒 1	84.40%	🔒 +0.0%
72	Nicola •••••	C	155/200	77.50%	🔒 1	84.40%	🔒 +0.0%
73=	Christopher •••••	D	151/200	75.50%	🔒 1	81.20%	🔒 +0.0%
73=	Pam •••••	D	151/200	75.50%	🔒 1	81.20%	🔒 +0.0%
75	SR •••••	D	148/200	74.00%	🔒 1	81.20%	🔒 +0.0%
76	Adrian •••••	B	94/200	47.00%	🔒 1	88.30%	🔒 +0.0%

Other CSP Events at Eaton Hall Shooting Ground

⚙ Performance Stats DRAG TO MOVE

0.217s ● FAST

DB 79% · Py 8% · Render 13%

12 queries · avg 14.3ms · max 82.8ms

Render Breakdown

DB Logic (Pre-Render) 0.1714s

Full Page Render 0.0285s

Python Logic (Pre-Render) 0.0175s

QUERY TABLES ▾

⚠ event_review 4× 0.088s

shoot_event 2× 0.006s

shoot_score 2× 0.069s

site_configuration 2× 0.004s

ground 1× 0.002s

admin_menu_item 1× 0.001s

⚠ = queried 3+ times (cache candidate)

SQL QUERIES (12) — click to expand

#1 [23:56:57.270] 2.3ms

shoot_event

SELECT shoot_event.id AS shoot_event_id, shoot_event.cpsa_fixture_id AS shoot_event_cpsa_fixture_id, shoot_event.name AS shoot_event_name, shoot_event.date AS shoot_event_date, shoot_event.discipline AS shoot_event_discipline, shoot_event.ground AS shoot_event_ground, shoot_event.url AS shoot_event_…

#2 [23:56:57.273] 2.1ms

shoot_score

SELECT shoot_score.id AS shoot_score_id, shoot_score.targets AS shoot_score_targets, shoot_score.hits AS shoot_score_hits, shoot_score.points AS shoot_score_points, shoot_score.percentage AS shoot_score_percentage, shoot_score.course_breakdown AS shoot_score_course_breakdown, shoot_score.shooter_id …

#3 [23:56:57.343] 66.8ms

shoot_score

SELECT avg(shoot_score.percentage) AS avg_1 
FROM shoot_score JOIN shoot_event ON shoot_score.event_id = shoot_event.id 
WHERE shoot_event.ground = %(ground_1)s AND shoot_event.discipline = %(discipline_1)s AND shoot_event.is_scraped = true AND shoot_event.admin_hidden != true AND shoot_event.id != …

#4 [23:56:57.349] 4.2ms

shoot_event

SELECT shoot_event.id AS shoot_event_id, shoot_event.cpsa_fixture_id AS shoot_event_cpsa_fixture_id, shoot_event.name AS shoot_event_name, shoot_event.date AS shoot_event_date, shoot_event.discipline AS shoot_event_discipline, shoot_event.ground AS shoot_event_ground, shoot_event.url AS shoot_event_…

#5 [23:56:57.354] 1.4ms

event_review

SELECT avg(event_review.rating) AS avg_1, count(event_review.id) AS count_1 
FROM event_review 
WHERE event_review.event_id = %(event_id_1)s

#6 [23:56:57.357] 2.5ms

event_review

SELECT count(*) AS count_1 
FROM (SELECT event_review.id AS event_review_id, event_review.event_id AS event_review_event_id, event_review.rating AS event_review_rating, event_review.review_text AS event_review_review_text, event_review.reviewer_name AS event_review_reviewer_name, event_review.review…

#7 [23:56:57.359] 1.3ms

event_review

SELECT event_review.id AS event_review_id, event_review.event_id AS event_review_event_id, event_review.rating AS event_review_rating, event_review.review_text AS event_review_review_text, event_review.reviewer_name AS event_review_reviewer_name, event_review.reviewer_hash AS event_review_reviewer_h…

#8 [23:56:57.443] 82.8ms

event_review

SELECT event_review.id AS event_review_id, event_review.event_id AS event_review_event_id, event_review.rating AS event_review_rating, event_review.review_text AS event_review_review_text, event_review.reviewer_name AS event_review_reviewer_name, event_review.reviewer_hash AS event_review_reviewer_h…

#9 [23:56:57.446] 2.5ms

ground

SELECT ground.id AS ground_id, ground.name AS ground_name, ground.url AS ground_url, ground.postcode AS ground_postcode, ground.what3words AS ground_what3words, ground.email AS ground_email, ground.website AS ground_website, ground.num_events_cpsa AS ground_num_events_cpsa, ground.num_events_cpsa_la…

#10 [23:56:57.450] 3.0ms

site_configuration

SELECT site_configuration.id AS site_configuration_id, site_configuration.key AS site_configuration_key, site_configuration.value AS site_configuration_value 
FROM site_configuration 
WHERE site_configuration.key LIKE %(key_1)s OR site_configuration.key LIKE %(key_2)s

#11 [23:56:57.452] 1.3ms

site_configuration

SELECT site_configuration.id AS site_configuration_id, site_configuration.key AS site_configuration_key, site_configuration.value AS site_configuration_value 
FROM site_configuration 
WHERE site_configuration.key IN (%(key_1_1)s, %(key_1_2)s, %(key_1_3)s, %(key_1_4)s)

#12 [23:56:57.454] 1.2ms

admin_menu_item

SELECT DISTINCT admin_menu_item.active_tab AS admin_menu_item_active_tab 
FROM admin_menu_item

LIVE REQUESTS (0) — click to expand

Compak Sporting at Eaton Hall Shooting Ground

Unlock the full event analysis

Historical Trends at Eaton Hall Shooting Ground

Classification Deep Dive

Event Performance Analysis

Analyzing Data...

Refresh Complete

Already Up to Date?

Analyzing Data...

Refresh Complete

Already Up to Date?