Back to Events

Last Updated: 21 Jun 2026, 12:00

DTL — Down The Line

Down The Line at National Clay Shooting Centre

National Clay Shooting Centre

Sunday, 21 June 2026 · CPSA Results →

Weather loading...

Event Rating

Latest Visitor Reviews

View all 1 review →

Anonymous · 5/5 · 21 Jun 2026

One of the best for DTL

Entries

89.5%

Field Average

98.0%

Highest Score

71.7%

Lowest Score

Top 3 Overall

🥈

Jo •••••

293/300

97.67%

🥇

Stuart •••••

294/300

98.00%

🥉 =3

John •••••

Neil •••••

292/300

97.33%

Event Difficulty

89.5% This Event

vs. National Clay Shooting Centre historical average (Down The Line)

↑ +1.9% easier than usual

Ground avg: 87.6%

Class Winners

AA 3 entered

294/300 — 98.00%

Stuart •••••

2: Nicky ••••• — 96.67%

A 8 entered

292/300 — 97.33%

John •••••(tied) Neil •••••(tied)

3: Charles ••••• — 96.67%

B 14 entered

293/300 — 97.67%

Jo •••••

2: Colin ••••• — 96.67%

C 18 entered

288/300 — 96.00%

Jamie •••••

2: Ka ••••• — 92.67%

Field Shape

89.5%

Field avg

Down The Line at National Clay Shooting Centre had a 26.3 point scoring spread across 43 entries.

Spread 26.3 pts

Front 98.0%

Largest class C

A compact read of how the field performed: average, spread and where most shooters sat.

Score Distribution

90–100%

23 53.5%

80–89%

17 39.5%

70–79%

3 7.0%

60–69%

0 0.0%

50–59%

0 0.0%

<50%

0 0.0%

Field Achievement

% of competitors reaching each score threshold

90%+

53.5%

23 / 43

80%+

93.0%

40 / 43

70%+

100.0%

43 / 43

60%+

100.0%

43 / 43

50%+

100.0%

43 / 43

Unlock the full event analysis

Register free for historical ground trends, class averages and spread, score charts, class composition and a detailed classification breakdown.

Historical Trends at National Clay Shooting Centre

Down The Line performance across events held at this ground.

Last 12 months

Overall Average Trend

Classification Trend Comparison

Classification Deep Dive

4 active classifications

—

Member insight

Typical —

Best —

Lowest —

Middle 50% score range

vs Ground Avg (12m)—

—

Member insight

Typical —

Best —

Lowest —

Middle 50% score range

vs Ground Avg (12m)—

—

Member insight

Typical —

Best —

Lowest —

Middle 50% score range

vs Ground Avg (12m)—

—

Member insight

Typical —

Best —

Lowest —

Middle 50% score range

vs Ground Avg (12m)—

Event Performance Analysis

Registered insight

Average by Class

Class averages make it easier to see where the event played hardest across the field.

Field Spread by Class

89.0-98.0%

92.3-97.3%

86.0-97.7%

71.7-96.0%

Boxes show the middle 50% of each class. Orange line is the median.

Top 10 Score Lollipop

A quick visual read of how far the front of the field separated itself.

Score Histogram

High gun: 98.0%. The high-gun band is outlined.

Class Breakdown

Rotate your device to see High/Low scores and the class winner

Class	Count	Average	High	Low	Winner
AA	3	94.6%	98.0%	89.0%	Stuart •••••
A	8	95.6%	97.3%	92.3%	John •••••
B	14	92.1%	97.7%	86.0%	Jo •••••
C	18	83.9%	96.0%	71.7%	Jamie •••••

Class Composition

3 7.0%

8 18.6%

14 32.6%

18 41.9%

Largest class: C — 18 competitors (41.9%)

Full Results — 43 entries

🔒 The Class Rank and vs Class Avg columns are hidden — register free to unlock both insights.

Rotate your device to see the full results table: score, class placing, class average and delta.

Class AA

Score 294/300

Class placing 1

Class average 94.6%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 293/300

Class placing 1

Class average 92.1%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class A

Score 292/300

Class placing 1

Class average 95.6%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class A

Score 292/300

Class placing 1

Class average 95.6%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class A

Score 290/300

Class placing 1

Class average 95.6%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 290/300

Class placing 1

Class average 92.1%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class AA

Score 290/300

Class placing 1

Class average 94.6%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 288/300

Class placing 1

Class average 92.1%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class C

Score 288/300

Class placing 1

Class average 83.9%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class A

Score 288/300

Class placing 1

Class average 95.6%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 286/300

Class placing 1

Class average 92.1%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class A

Score 286/300

Class placing 1

Class average 95.6%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class A

Score 286/300

Class placing 1

Class average 95.6%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class A

Score 283/300

Class placing 1

Class average 95.6%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 279/300

Class placing 1

Class average 92.1%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class C

Score 278/300

Class placing 1

Class average 83.9%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 278/300

Class placing 1

Class average 92.1%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 277/300

Class placing 1

Class average 92.1%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class A

Score 277/300

Class placing 1

Class average 95.6%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 274/300

Class placing 1

Class average 92.1%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 274/300

Class placing 1

Class average 92.1%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 273/300

Class placing 1

Class average 92.1%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 272/300

Class placing 1

Class average 92.1%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class AA

Score 267/300

Class placing 1

Class average 94.6%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 264/300

Class placing 1

Class average 92.1%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class C

Score 264/300

Class placing 1

Class average 83.9%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class C

Score 263/300

Class placing 1

Class average 83.9%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 261/300

Class placing 1

Class average 92.1%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class C

Score 261/300

Class placing 1

Class average 83.9%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 258/300

Class placing 1

Class average 92.1%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class C

Score 256/300

Class placing 1

Class average 83.9%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class C

Score 256/300

Class placing 1

Class average 83.9%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class C

Score 255/300

Class placing 1

Class average 83.9%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class C

Score 254/300

Class placing 1

Class average 83.9%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class C

Score 254/300

Class placing 1

Class average 83.9%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class C

Score 252/300

Class placing 1

Class average 83.9%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class C

Score 244/300

Class placing 1

Class average 83.9%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class C

Score 243/300

Class placing 1

Class average 83.9%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class C

Score 243/300

Class placing 1

Class average 83.9%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class C

Score 241/300

Class placing 1

Class average 83.9%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class C

Score 235/300

Class placing 1

Class average 83.9%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class C

Score 231/300

Class placing 1

Class average 83.9%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class C

Score 215/300

Class placing 1

Class average 83.9%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

#	Name	Class	Score	Score %	Class Rank 🔒	Class Avg	vs Class Avg
1	Stuart •••••	AA	294/300	98.00%	🔒 1	94.60%	🔒 +0.0%
2	Jo •••••	B	293/300	97.67%	🔒 1	92.10%	🔒 +0.0%
3=	John •••••	A	292/300	97.33%	🔒 1	95.60%	🔒 +0.0%
3=	Neil •••••	A	292/300	97.33%	🔒 1	95.60%	🔒 +0.0%
5=	Charles •••••	A	290/300	96.67%	🔒 1	95.60%	🔒 +0.0%
5=	Colin •••••	B	290/300	96.67%	🔒 1	92.10%	🔒 +0.0%
5=	Nicky •••••	AA	290/300	96.67%	🔒 1	94.60%	🔒 +0.0%
8=	Craig •••••	B	288/300	96.00%	🔒 1	92.10%	🔒 +0.0%
8=	Jamie •••••	C	288/300	96.00%	🔒 1	83.90%	🔒 +0.0%
8=	Stephen •••••	A	288/300	96.00%	🔒 1	95.60%	🔒 +0.0%
11=	Ian •••••	B	286/300	95.33%	🔒 1	92.10%	🔒 +0.0%
11=	Julian •••••	A	286/300	95.33%	🔒 1	95.60%	🔒 +0.0%
11=	Victor •••••	A	286/300	95.33%	🔒 1	95.60%	🔒 +0.0%
14	Richard •••••	A	283/300	94.33%	🔒 1	95.60%	🔒 +0.0%
15	Richard •••••	B	279/300	93.00%	🔒 1	92.10%	🔒 +0.0%
16=	Ka •••••	C	278/300	92.67%	🔒 1	83.90%	🔒 +0.0%
16=	Mick •••••	B	278/300	92.67%	🔒 1	92.10%	🔒 +0.0%
18=	Lloyd •••••	B	277/300	92.33%	🔒 1	92.10%	🔒 +0.0%
18=	Paul •••••	A	277/300	92.33%	🔒 1	95.60%	🔒 +0.0%
20=	Michael •••••	B	274/300	91.33%	🔒 1	92.10%	🔒 +0.0%
20=	Philip •••••	B	274/300	91.33%	🔒 1	92.10%	🔒 +0.0%
22	Mhairi-Ann •••••	B	273/300	91.00%	🔒 1	92.10%	🔒 +0.0%
23	Janine •••••	B	272/300	90.67%	🔒 1	92.10%	🔒 +0.0%
24	Paul •••••	AA	267/300	89.00%	🔒 1	94.60%	🔒 +0.0%
25=	Frankie •••••	B	264/300	88.00%	🔒 1	92.10%	🔒 +0.0%
25=	George •••••	C	264/300	88.00%	🔒 1	83.90%	🔒 +0.0%
27	Peter •••••	C	263/300	87.67%	🔒 1	83.90%	🔒 +0.0%
28=	Alexander •••••	B	261/300	87.00%	🔒 1	92.10%	🔒 +0.0%
28=	Stuart •••••	C	261/300	87.00%	🔒 1	83.90%	🔒 +0.0%
30	Lee •••••	B	258/300	86.00%	🔒 1	92.10%	🔒 +0.0%
31=	David •••••	C	256/300	85.33%	🔒 1	83.90%	🔒 +0.0%
31=	Ken •••••	C	256/300	85.33%	🔒 1	83.90%	🔒 +0.0%
33	Jade •••••	C	255/300	85.00%	🔒 1	83.90%	🔒 +0.0%
34=	Jon •••••	C	254/300	84.67%	🔒 1	83.90%	🔒 +0.0%
34=	Reginald •••••	C	254/300	84.67%	🔒 1	83.90%	🔒 +0.0%
36	Nicola •••••	C	252/300	84.00%	🔒 1	83.90%	🔒 +0.0%
37	Kurt •••••	C	244/300	81.33%	🔒 1	83.90%	🔒 +0.0%
38=	Paul •••••	C	243/300	81.00%	🔒 1	83.90%	🔒 +0.0%
38=	Steven •••••	C	243/300	81.00%	🔒 1	83.90%	🔒 +0.0%
40	Terry •••••	C	241/300	80.33%	🔒 1	83.90%	🔒 +0.0%
41	Guy •••••	C	235/300	78.33%	🔒 1	83.90%	🔒 +0.0%
42	Dylan •••••	C	231/300	77.00%	🔒 1	83.90%	🔒 +0.0%
43	Zouheir •••••	C	215/300	71.67%	🔒 1	83.90%	🔒 +0.0%

Other DTL Events at National Clay Shooting Centre

⚙ Performance Stats DRAG TO MOVE

0.078s ● FAST

DB 44% · Py 33% · Render 23%

12 queries · avg 2.9ms · max 11.7ms

Render Breakdown

DB Logic (Pre-Render) 0.0343s

Python Logic (Pre-Render) 0.0260s

Full Page Render 0.0176s

QUERY TABLES ▾

⚠ event_review 4× 0.006s

shoot_event 2× 0.006s

shoot_score 2× 0.004s

site_configuration 2× 0.013s

ground 1× 0.001s

admin_menu_item 1× 0.004s

⚠ = queried 3+ times (cache candidate)

SQL QUERIES (12) — click to expand

#1 [20:40:40.778] 2.3ms

shoot_event

SELECT shoot_event.id AS shoot_event_id, shoot_event.cpsa_fixture_id AS shoot_event_cpsa_fixture_id, shoot_event.name AS shoot_event_name, shoot_event.date AS shoot_event_date, shoot_event.discipline AS shoot_event_discipline, shoot_event.ground AS shoot_event_ground, shoot_event.url AS shoot_event_…

#2 [20:40:40.781] 1.7ms

shoot_score

SELECT shoot_score.id AS shoot_score_id, shoot_score.targets AS shoot_score_targets, shoot_score.hits AS shoot_score_hits, shoot_score.points AS shoot_score_points, shoot_score.percentage AS shoot_score_percentage, shoot_score.course_breakdown AS shoot_score_course_breakdown, shoot_score.shooter_id …

#3 [20:40:40.787] 2.0ms

shoot_score

SELECT avg(shoot_score.percentage) AS avg_1 
FROM shoot_score JOIN shoot_event ON shoot_score.event_id = shoot_event.id 
WHERE shoot_event.ground = %(ground_1)s AND shoot_event.discipline = %(discipline_1)s AND shoot_event.is_scraped = true AND shoot_event.admin_hidden != true AND shoot_event.id != …

#4 [20:40:40.792] 3.8ms

shoot_event

SELECT shoot_event.id AS shoot_event_id, shoot_event.cpsa_fixture_id AS shoot_event_cpsa_fixture_id, shoot_event.name AS shoot_event_name, shoot_event.date AS shoot_event_date, shoot_event.discipline AS shoot_event_discipline, shoot_event.ground AS shoot_event_ground, shoot_event.url AS shoot_event_…

#5 [20:40:40.794] 1.2ms

event_review

SELECT avg(event_review.rating) AS avg_1, count(event_review.id) AS count_1 
FROM event_review 
WHERE event_review.event_id = %(event_id_1)s

#6 [20:40:40.797] 2.0ms

event_review

SELECT count(*) AS count_1 
FROM (SELECT event_review.id AS event_review_id, event_review.event_id AS event_review_event_id, event_review.rating AS event_review_rating, event_review.review_text AS event_review_review_text, event_review.reviewer_name AS event_review_reviewer_name, event_review.review…

#7 [20:40:40.800] 1.8ms

event_review

SELECT event_review.id AS event_review_id, event_review.event_id AS event_review_event_id, event_review.rating AS event_review_rating, event_review.review_text AS event_review_review_text, event_review.reviewer_name AS event_review_reviewer_name, event_review.reviewer_hash AS event_review_reviewer_h…

#8 [20:40:40.801] 1.2ms

event_review

SELECT event_review.id AS event_review_id, event_review.event_id AS event_review_event_id, event_review.rating AS event_review_rating, event_review.review_text AS event_review_review_text, event_review.reviewer_name AS event_review_reviewer_name, event_review.reviewer_hash AS event_review_reviewer_h…

#9 [20:40:40.803] 1.2ms

ground

SELECT ground.id AS ground_id, ground.name AS ground_name, ground.url AS ground_url, ground.postcode AS ground_postcode, ground.what3words AS ground_what3words, ground.email AS ground_email, ground.website AS ground_website, ground.num_events_cpsa AS ground_num_events_cpsa, ground.num_events_cpsa_la…

#10 [20:40:40.805] 1.2ms

site_configuration

SELECT site_configuration.id AS site_configuration_id, site_configuration.key AS site_configuration_key, site_configuration.value AS site_configuration_value 
FROM site_configuration 
WHERE site_configuration.key LIKE %(key_1)s OR site_configuration.key LIKE %(key_2)s

#11 [20:40:40.828] 11.7ms

site_configuration

SELECT site_configuration.id AS site_configuration_id, site_configuration.key AS site_configuration_key, site_configuration.value AS site_configuration_value 
FROM site_configuration 
WHERE site_configuration.key IN (%(key_1_1)s, %(key_1_2)s, %(key_1_3)s, %(key_1_4)s)

#12 [20:40:40.833] 4.2ms

admin_menu_item

SELECT DISTINCT admin_menu_item.active_tab AS admin_menu_item_active_tab 
FROM admin_menu_item

LIVE REQUESTS (0) — click to expand

Down The Line at National Clay Shooting Centre

Unlock the full event analysis

Historical Trends at National Clay Shooting Centre

Classification Deep Dive

Event Performance Analysis

Analyzing Data...

Refresh Complete

Already Up to Date?

Analyzing Data...

Refresh Complete

Already Up to Date?