Back to Events

Last Updated: 23 Aug 2026, 16:05

DTL — Down The Line

Down The Line at National Clay Shooting Centre

National Clay Shooting Centre

Saturday, 15 August 2026 · CPSA Results →

Weather loading...

Event Rating

Latest Visitor Reviews

No written reviews yet.

Entries

88.3%

Field Average

98.2%

Highest Score

63.8%

Lowest Score

Top 3 Overall

🥈

Steven •••••

588/600

98.00%

🥇

Phillip •••••

589/600

98.17%

🥉

Andy •••••

578/600

96.33%

Event Difficulty

88.3% This Event

vs. National Clay Shooting Centre historical average (Down The Line)

↑ +0.7% easier than usual

Ground avg: 87.6%

Class Winners

AA 6 entered

589/600 — 98.17%

Phillip •••••

2: Steven ••••• — 98.00%

A 15 entered

571/600 — 95.17%

Lee •••••

2=: Paul ••••• — 94.33%

B 18 entered

578/600 — 96.33%

Andy •••••

2: Tim ••••• — 95.00%

C 18 entered

538/600 — 89.67%

Lindell •••••

2=: Michael ••••• — 88.17%

Field Shape

88.3%

Field avg

Down The Line at National Clay Shooting Centre had a 34.4 point scoring spread across 57 entries.

Spread 34.4 pts

Front 98.2%

Largest class B

A compact read of how the field performed: average, spread and where most shooters sat.

Score Distribution

90–100%

29 50.9%

80–89%

20 35.1%

70–79%

6 10.5%

60–69%

2 3.5%

50–59%

0 0.0%

<50%

0 0.0%

Field Achievement

% of competitors reaching each score threshold

90%+

50.9%

29 / 57

80%+

86.0%

49 / 57

70%+

96.5%

55 / 57

60%+

100.0%

57 / 57

50%+

100.0%

57 / 57

Unlock the full event analysis

Register free for historical ground trends, class averages and spread, score charts, class composition and a detailed classification breakdown.

Historical Trends at National Clay Shooting Centre

Down The Line performance across events held at this ground.

Last 12 months

Overall Average Trend

Classification Trend Comparison

Classification Deep Dive

4 active classifications

—

Member insight

Typical —

Best —

Lowest —

Middle 50% score range

vs Ground Avg (12m)—

—

Member insight

Typical —

Best —

Lowest —

Middle 50% score range

vs Ground Avg (12m)—

—

Member insight

Typical —

Best —

Lowest —

Middle 50% score range

vs Ground Avg (12m)—

—

Member insight

Typical —

Best —

Lowest —

Middle 50% score range

vs Ground Avg (12m)—

Event Performance Analysis

Registered insight

Average by Class

Class averages make it easier to see where the event played hardest across the field.

Field Spread by Class

94.3-98.2%

88.0-95.2%

82.3-96.3%

63.8-89.7%

Boxes show the middle 50% of each class. Orange line is the median.

Top 10 Score Lollipop

A quick visual read of how far the front of the field separated itself.

Score Histogram

High gun: 98.2%. The high-gun band is outlined.

Class Breakdown

Rotate your device to see High/Low scores and the class winner

Class	Count	Average	High	Low	Winner
AA	6	96.2%	98.2%	94.3%	Phillip •••••
A	15	91.9%	95.2%	88.0%	Lee •••••
B	18	90.1%	96.3%	82.3%	Andy •••••
C	18	80.9%	89.7%	63.8%	Lindell •••••

Class Composition

6 10.5%

15 26.3%

18 31.6%

Largest class: B — 18 competitors (31.6%)

Full Results — 57 entries

🔒 The Class Rank and vs Class Avg columns are hidden — register free to unlock both insights.

Rotate your device to see the full results table: score, class placing, class average and delta.

Class AA

Score 589/600

Class placing 1

Class average 96.2%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class AA

Score 588/600

Class placing 1

Class average 96.2%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 578/600

Class placing 1

Class average 90.1%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class AA

Score 577/600

Class placing 1

Class average 96.2%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class AA

Score 574/600

Class placing 1

Class average 96.2%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class A

Score 571/600

Class placing 1

Class average 91.9%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class AA

Score 570/600

Class placing 1

Class average 96.2%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 570/600

Class placing 1

Class average 90.1%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class AA

Score 566/600

Class placing 1

Class average 96.2%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class A

Score 566/600

Class placing 1

Class average 91.9%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class A

Score 566/600

Class placing 1

Class average 91.9%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class A

Score 565/600

Class placing 1

Class average 91.9%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 563/600

Class placing 1

Class average 90.1%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 562/600

Class placing 1

Class average 90.1%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 559/600

Class placing 1

Class average 90.1%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class A

Score 557/600

Class placing 1

Class average 91.9%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class A

Score 556/600

Class placing 1

Class average 91.9%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 555/600

Class placing 1

Class average 90.1%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class A

Score 554/600

Class placing 1

Class average 91.9%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 554/600

Class placing 1

Class average 90.1%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class A

Score 553/600

Class placing 1

Class average 91.9%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 548/600

Class placing 1

Class average 90.1%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class A

Score 547/600

Class placing 1

Class average 91.9%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class A

Score 545/600

Class placing 1

Class average 91.9%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 545/600

Class placing 1

Class average 90.1%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 544/600

Class placing 1

Class average 90.1%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 543/600

Class placing 1

Class average 90.1%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class A

Score 542/600

Class placing 1

Class average 91.9%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class A

Score 538/600

Class placing 1

Class average 91.9%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class C

Score 538/600

Class placing 1

Class average 80.9%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 531/600

Class placing 1

Class average 90.1%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class A

Score 531/600

Class placing 1

Class average 91.9%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class C

Score 529/600

Class placing 1

Class average 80.9%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class C

Score 529/600

Class placing 1

Class average 80.9%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 528/600

Class placing 1

Class average 90.1%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class A

Score 528/600

Class placing 1

Class average 91.9%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class C

Score 527/600

Class placing 1

Class average 80.9%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 524/600

Class placing 1

Class average 90.1%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class C

Score 523/600

Class placing 1

Class average 80.9%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 519/600

Class placing 1

Class average 90.1%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 518/600

Class placing 1

Class average 90.1%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class C

Score 514/600

Class placing 1

Class average 80.9%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class C

Score 513/600

Class placing 1

Class average 80.9%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class C

Score 510/600

Class placing 1

Class average 80.9%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class C

Score 505/600

Class placing 1

Class average 80.9%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class C

Score 499/600

Class placing 1

Class average 80.9%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 494/600

Class placing 1

Class average 90.1%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 494/600

Class placing 1

Class average 90.1%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class C

Score 477/600

Class placing 1

Class average 80.9%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class C

Score 476/600

Class placing 1

Class average 80.9%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class C

Score 464/600

Class placing 1

Class average 80.9%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class C

Score 462/600

Class placing 1

Class average 80.9%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class C

Score 459/600

Class placing 1

Class average 80.9%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class C

Score 436/600

Class placing 1

Class average 80.9%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class C

Score 383/600

Class placing 1

Class average 80.9%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class A

Score 274/300

Class placing 1

Class average 91.9%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class C

Score 194/300

Class placing 1

Class average 80.9%

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

#	Name	Class	Score	Score %	Class Rank 🔒	Class Avg	vs Class Avg
1	Phillip •••••	AA	589/600	98.17%	🔒 1	96.20%	🔒 +0.0%
2	Steven •••••	AA	588/600	98.00%	🔒 1	96.20%	🔒 +0.0%
3	Andy •••••	B	578/600	96.33%	🔒 1	90.10%	🔒 +0.0%
4	Robert •••••	AA	577/600	96.17%	🔒 1	96.20%	🔒 +0.0%
5	Stuart •••••	AA	574/600	95.67%	🔒 1	96.20%	🔒 +0.0%
6	Lee •••••	A	571/600	95.17%	🔒 1	91.90%	🔒 +0.0%
7=	George •••••	AA	570/600	95.00%	🔒 1	96.20%	🔒 +0.0%
7=	Tim •••••	B	570/600	95.00%	🔒 1	90.10%	🔒 +0.0%
9=	Joanna •••••	AA	566/600	94.33%	🔒 1	96.20%	🔒 +0.0%
9=	Paul •••••	A	566/600	94.33%	🔒 1	91.90%	🔒 +0.0%
9=	Paul •••••	A	566/600	94.33%	🔒 1	91.90%	🔒 +0.0%
12	Richard •••••	A	565/600	94.17%	🔒 1	91.90%	🔒 +0.0%
13	Philip •••••	B	563/600	93.83%	🔒 1	90.10%	🔒 +0.0%
14	Jeremy •••••	B	562/600	93.67%	🔒 1	90.10%	🔒 +0.0%
15	John •••••	B	559/600	93.17%	🔒 1	90.10%	🔒 +0.0%
16	Charles •••••	A	557/600	92.83%	🔒 1	91.90%	🔒 +0.0%
17	Ian •••••	A	556/600	92.67%	🔒 1	91.90%	🔒 +0.0%
18	Jo •••••	B	555/600	92.50%	🔒 1	90.10%	🔒 +0.0%
19=	Allan •••••	A	554/600	92.33%	🔒 1	91.90%	🔒 +0.0%
19=	Stephen •••••	B	554/600	92.33%	🔒 1	90.10%	🔒 +0.0%
21	Richard •••••	A	553/600	92.17%	🔒 1	91.90%	🔒 +0.0%
22	Colin •••••	B	548/600	91.33%	🔒 1	90.10%	🔒 +0.0%
23	Martin •••••	A	547/600	91.17%	🔒 1	91.90%	🔒 +0.0%
24=	Julian •••••	A	545/600	90.83%	🔒 1	91.90%	🔒 +0.0%
24=	Lorrie •••••	B	545/600	90.83%	🔒 1	90.10%	🔒 +0.0%
26	Janine •••••	B	544/600	90.67%	🔒 1	90.10%	🔒 +0.0%
27	Paul •••••	B	543/600	90.50%	🔒 1	90.10%	🔒 +0.0%
28	Anthony •••••	A	542/600	90.33%	🔒 1	91.90%	🔒 +0.0%
29=	Carl •••••	A	538/600	89.67%	🔒 1	91.90%	🔒 +0.0%
29=	Lindell •••••	C	538/600	89.67%	🔒 1	80.90%	🔒 +0.0%
31=	Brian •••••	B	531/600	88.50%	🔒 1	90.10%	🔒 +0.0%
31=	Neil •••••	A	531/600	88.50%	🔒 1	91.90%	🔒 +0.0%
33=	Michael •••••	C	529/600	88.17%	🔒 1	80.90%	🔒 +0.0%
33=	Richard •••••	C	529/600	88.17%	🔒 1	80.90%	🔒 +0.0%
35=	Gordon •••••	B	528/600	88.00%	🔒 1	90.10%	🔒 +0.0%
35=	Stephen •••••	A	528/600	88.00%	🔒 1	91.90%	🔒 +0.0%
37	Nicola •••••	C	527/600	87.83%	🔒 1	80.90%	🔒 +0.0%
38	Teresa •••••	B	524/600	87.33%	🔒 1	90.10%	🔒 +0.0%
39	Andrew •••••	C	523/600	87.17%	🔒 1	80.90%	🔒 +0.0%
40	Alexander •••••	B	519/600	86.50%	🔒 1	90.10%	🔒 +0.0%
41	David •••••	B	518/600	86.33%	🔒 1	90.10%	🔒 +0.0%
42	Ka •••••	C	514/600	85.67%	🔒 1	80.90%	🔒 +0.0%
43	David •••••	C	513/600	85.50%	🔒 1	80.90%	🔒 +0.0%
44	Ken •••••	C	510/600	85.00%	🔒 1	80.90%	🔒 +0.0%
45	Zouheir •••••	C	505/600	84.17%	🔒 1	80.90%	🔒 +0.0%
46	Shaun •••••	C	499/600	83.17%	🔒 1	80.90%	🔒 +0.0%
47=	Keith •••••	B	494/600	82.33%	🔒 1	90.10%	🔒 +0.0%
47=	Lloyd •••••	B	494/600	82.33%	🔒 1	90.10%	🔒 +0.0%
49	Chun •••••	C	477/600	79.50%	🔒 1	80.90%	🔒 +0.0%
50	Jade •••••	C	476/600	79.33%	🔒 1	80.90%	🔒 +0.0%
51	Neil •••••	C	464/600	77.33%	🔒 1	80.90%	🔒 +0.0%
52	Brian •••••	C	462/600	77.00%	🔒 1	80.90%	🔒 +0.0%
53	Maxwell •••••	C	459/600	76.50%	🔒 1	80.90%	🔒 +0.0%
54	Terry •••••	C	436/600	72.67%	🔒 1	80.90%	🔒 +0.0%
55	Oscar •••••	C	383/600	63.83%	🔒 1	80.90%	🔒 +0.0%
56	Joshua •••••	A	274/300	91.33%	🔒 1	91.90%	🔒 +0.0%
57	Guy •••••	C	194/300	64.67%	🔒 1	80.90%	🔒 +0.0%

Other DTL Events at National Clay Shooting Centre

⚙ Performance Stats DRAG TO MOVE

0.063s ● FAST

DB 54% · Py 21% · Render 25%

12 queries · avg 2.9ms · max 7.8ms

Render Breakdown

DB Logic (Pre-Render) 0.0343s

Full Page Render 0.0159s

Python Logic (Pre-Render) 0.0131s

QUERY TABLES ▾

⚠ event_review 4× 0.014s

shoot_event 2× 0.005s

shoot_score 2× 0.006s

site_configuration 2× 0.003s

ground 1× 0.003s

admin_menu_item 1× 0.003s

⚠ = queried 3+ times (cache candidate)

SQL QUERIES (12) — click to expand

#1 [21:46:47.513] 2.6ms

shoot_event

SELECT shoot_event.id AS shoot_event_id, shoot_event.cpsa_fixture_id AS shoot_event_cpsa_fixture_id, shoot_event.name AS shoot_event_name, shoot_event.date AS shoot_event_date, shoot_event.discipline AS shoot_event_discipline, shoot_event.ground AS shoot_event_ground, shoot_event.url AS shoot_event_…

#2 [21:46:47.517] 3.6ms

shoot_score

SELECT shoot_score.id AS shoot_score_id, shoot_score.targets AS shoot_score_targets, shoot_score.hits AS shoot_score_hits, shoot_score.points AS shoot_score_points, shoot_score.percentage AS shoot_score_percentage, shoot_score.course_breakdown AS shoot_score_course_breakdown, shoot_score.shooter_id …

#3 [21:46:47.522] 2.1ms

shoot_score

SELECT avg(shoot_score.percentage) AS avg_1 
FROM shoot_score JOIN shoot_event ON shoot_score.event_id = shoot_event.id 
WHERE shoot_event.ground = %(ground_1)s AND shoot_event.discipline = %(discipline_1)s AND shoot_event.is_scraped = true AND shoot_event.admin_hidden != true AND shoot_event.id != …

#4 [21:46:47.526] 2.8ms

shoot_event

SELECT shoot_event.id AS shoot_event_id, shoot_event.cpsa_fixture_id AS shoot_event_cpsa_fixture_id, shoot_event.name AS shoot_event_name, shoot_event.date AS shoot_event_date, shoot_event.discipline AS shoot_event_discipline, shoot_event.ground AS shoot_event_ground, shoot_event.url AS shoot_event_…

#5 [21:46:47.530] 2.8ms

event_review

SELECT avg(event_review.rating) AS avg_1, count(event_review.id) AS count_1 
FROM event_review 
WHERE event_review.event_id = %(event_id_1)s

#6 [21:46:47.532] 1.4ms

event_review

SELECT count(*) AS count_1 
FROM (SELECT event_review.id AS event_review_id, event_review.event_id AS event_review_event_id, event_review.rating AS event_review_rating, event_review.review_text AS event_review_review_text, event_review.reviewer_name AS event_review_reviewer_name, event_review.review…

#7 [21:46:47.541] 7.8ms

event_review

SELECT event_review.id AS event_review_id, event_review.event_id AS event_review_event_id, event_review.rating AS event_review_rating, event_review.review_text AS event_review_review_text, event_review.reviewer_name AS event_review_reviewer_name, event_review.reviewer_hash AS event_review_reviewer_h…

#8 [21:46:47.543] 1.6ms

event_review

SELECT event_review.id AS event_review_id, event_review.event_id AS event_review_event_id, event_review.rating AS event_review_rating, event_review.review_text AS event_review_review_text, event_review.reviewer_name AS event_review_reviewer_name, event_review.reviewer_hash AS event_review_reviewer_h…

#9 [21:46:47.547] 3.4ms

ground

SELECT ground.id AS ground_id, ground.name AS ground_name, ground.url AS ground_url, ground.postcode AS ground_postcode, ground.what3words AS ground_what3words, ground.email AS ground_email, ground.website AS ground_website, ground.num_events_cpsa AS ground_num_events_cpsa, ground.num_events_cpsa_la…

#10 [21:46:47.549] 1.3ms

site_configuration

SELECT site_configuration.id AS site_configuration_id, site_configuration.key AS site_configuration_key, site_configuration.value AS site_configuration_value 
FROM site_configuration 
WHERE site_configuration.key LIKE %(key_1)s OR site_configuration.key LIKE %(key_2)s

#11 [21:46:47.551] 2.2ms

site_configuration

SELECT site_configuration.id AS site_configuration_id, site_configuration.key AS site_configuration_key, site_configuration.value AS site_configuration_value 
FROM site_configuration 
WHERE site_configuration.key IN (%(key_1_1)s, %(key_1_2)s, %(key_1_3)s, %(key_1_4)s)

#12 [21:46:47.554] 2.6ms

admin_menu_item

SELECT DISTINCT admin_menu_item.active_tab AS admin_menu_item_active_tab 
FROM admin_menu_item

LIVE REQUESTS (0) — click to expand

Down The Line at National Clay Shooting Centre

Unlock the full event analysis

Historical Trends at National Clay Shooting Centre

Classification Deep Dive

Event Performance Analysis

Analyzing Data...

Refresh Complete

Already Up to Date?

Analyzing Data...

Refresh Complete

Already Up to Date?