Back to Events

UTR — Universal Trench

Universal Trench at Fauxdegla Shooting Ground

Fauxdegla Shooting Ground

Saturday, 28 June 2025 · CPSA Results →

Weather loading...

Event Rating

Latest Visitor Reviews

No written reviews yet.

Entries

78.8%

Field Average

94.0%

Highest Score

45.0%

Lowest Score

Top 3 Overall

🥈 =2

Adam Gutteridge

David Sipling

93/100

93.00%

🥇

Mark Shaw

94/100

94.00%

Event Difficulty

78.8% This Event

vs. Fauxdegla Shooting Ground historical average (Universal Trench)

↓ -1.0% harder than usual

Ground avg: 79.8%

Class Winners

A 16 entered

94/100 — 94.00%

Mark Shaw

2=: Adam Gutteridge — 93.00%

B 18 entered

91/100 — 91.00%

Leah Southall

2: Christopher Dean — 90.00%

C 9 entered

80/100 — 80.00%

Michael Faux

2=: James Ward — 79.00%

D 14 entered

88/100 — 88.00%

Cory Doble

2: Paul Culverwell — 79.00%

Field Shape

78.8%

Field avg

Universal Trench at Fauxdegla Shooting Ground had a 49.0 point scoring spread across 57 entries.

Spread 49.0 pts

Front 94.0%

Largest class B

A compact read of how the field performed: average, spread and where most shooters sat.

Score Distribution

90–100%

8 14.0%

80–89%

20 35.1%

70–79%

20 35.1%

60–69%

7 12.3%

50–59%

1 1.8%

<50%

1 1.8%

Field Achievement

% of competitors reaching each score threshold

90%+

14.0%

8 / 57

80%+

49.1%

28 / 57

70%+

84.2%

48 / 57

60%+

96.5%

55 / 57

50%+

98.2%

56 / 57

Unlock the full event analysis

Register free for historical ground trends, class averages and spread, score charts, class composition and a detailed classification breakdown.

Historical Trends at Fauxdegla Shooting Ground

Universal Trench performance across events held at this ground.

Last 12 months

Overall Average Trend

Classification Trend Comparison

Classification Deep Dive

4 active classifications

—

Member insight

Typical —

Best —

Lowest —

Middle 50% score range

vs Ground Avg (12m)—

—

Member insight

Typical —

Best —

Lowest —

Middle 50% score range

vs Ground Avg (12m)—

—

Member insight

Typical —

Best —

Lowest —

Middle 50% score range

vs Ground Avg (12m)—

—

Member insight

Typical —

Best —

Lowest —

Middle 50% score range

vs Ground Avg (12m)—

Event Performance Analysis

Registered insight

Average by Class

Class averages make it easier to see where the event played hardest across the field.

Field Spread by Class

74.0-94.0%

68.0-91.0%

71.0-80.0%

45.0-88.0%

Boxes show the middle 50% of each class. Orange line is the median.

Top 10 Score Lollipop

A quick visual read of how far the front of the field separated itself.

Score Histogram

High gun: 94.0%. The high-gun band is outlined.

Class Breakdown

Rotate your device to see High/Low scores and the class winner

Class	Count	Average	High	Low	Winner
A	16	86.0%	94.0%	74.0%	Mark Shaw
B	18	81.6%	91.0%	68.0%	Leah Southall
C	9	76.2%	80.0%	71.0%	Michael Faux
D	14	68.4%	88.0%	45.0%	Cory Doble

Class Composition

16 28.1%

18 31.6%

9 15.8%

14 24.6%

Largest class: B — 18 competitors (31.6%)

Full Results — 57 entries

🔒 The Class Rank and vs Class Avg columns are hidden — register free to unlock both insights.

Class A

Score 94/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class A

Score 93/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class A

Score 93/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class A

Score 92/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class A

Score 91/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 91/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class A

Score 91/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 90/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class D

Score 88/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class A

Score 87/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 87/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class A

Score 86/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class A

Score 86/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 85/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class A

Score 85/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class A

Score 84/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 84/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class A

Score 84/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 84/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 83/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 83/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 83/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 83/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class A

Score 82/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 82/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 81/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 81/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class C

Score 80/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class C

Score 79/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 79/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class D

Score 79/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class C

Score 79/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class A

Score 79/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class C

Score 79/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class C

Score 78/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 77/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 77/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class D

Score 77/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class D

Score 76/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class A

Score 75/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class C

Score 75/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class A

Score 74/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class C

Score 73/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class D

Score 73/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class C

Score 72/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class D

Score 71/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class C

Score 71/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 71/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class D

Score 68/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class B

Score 68/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class D

Score 67/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class D

Score 67/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class D

Score 64/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class D

Score 63/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class D

Score 62/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class D

Score 58/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

Class D

Score 45/100

vs Class Avg +0.0%

Profile Open →

#	Name	Class	Score	Score %	Class Rank 🔒	vs Class Avg
1	Mark Shaw	A	94/100	94.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
2=	Adam Gutteridge	A	93/100	93.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
2=	David Sipling	A	93/100	93.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
4	Matthew Panter	A	92/100	92.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
5=	Ian Woodhead	A	91/100	91.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
5=	Leah Southall	B	91/100	91.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
5=	Stephen Corner	A	91/100	91.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
8	Christopher Dean	B	90/100	90.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
9	Cory Doble	D	88/100	88.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
10=	Abbey Ling	A	87/100	87.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
10=	Andrew Pownall	B	87/100	87.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
12=	Ray Sutton	A	86/100	86.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
12=	Robert Bright	A	86/100	86.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
14=	John Reilly	B	85/100	85.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
14=	Michael Wensley	A	85/100	85.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
16=	Daniel Hudson	A	84/100	84.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
16=	Darren Burtenshaw	B	84/100	84.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
16=	Lucas Hyde	A	84/100	84.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
16=	Neil Leeming	B	84/100	84.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
20=	Graham Evans	B	83/100	83.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
20=	Ian Shaw	B	83/100	83.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
20=	Philip Sanders	B	83/100	83.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
20=	Ted Philipson	B	83/100	83.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
24=	Charlotte Kerwood	A	82/100	82.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
24=	Jay Pope	B	82/100	82.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
26=	Alexander Williams	B	81/100	81.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
26=	David O'Donnell	B	81/100	81.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
28	Michael Faux	C	80/100	80.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
29=	James Ward	C	79/100	79.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
29=	Nicholas Harris	B	79/100	79.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
29=	Paul Culverwell	D	79/100	79.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
29=	Robert Gallagher	C	79/100	79.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
29=	Russ Hufton	A	79/100	79.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
29=	Tony Robbins	C	79/100	79.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
35	Michael Barker	C	78/100	78.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
36=	Christopher McReynolds	B	77/100	77.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
36=	Paul Lilly	B	77/100	77.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
36=	Rhys Dixon	D	77/100	77.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
39	Carl Weller	D	76/100	76.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
40=	David Wright	A	75/100	75.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
40=	Graham Carter	C	75/100	75.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
42	Kath Bright	A	74/100	74.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
43=	Abbie Coutanche	C	73/100	73.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
43=	Ian Cunliffe	D	73/100	73.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
45	Anne Phillips	C	72/100	72.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
46=	Gareth Roberts	D	71/100	71.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
46=	Howard Beaumont	C	71/100	71.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
46=	Nicholas Dewe	B	71/100	71.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
49=	Ivan Reid	D	68/100	68.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
49=	Julian Fairburn	B	68/100	68.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
51=	Amanda Gallagher	D	67/100	67.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
51=	Shirley Pope	D	67/100	67.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
53	Cheryl Gizzi	D	64/100	64.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
54	Hazel Denney-Cunliffe	D	63/100	63.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
55	Keith Foote	D	62/100	62.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
56	Michael Sargeson	D	58/100	58.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%
57	Jane Robbins	D	45/100	45.00%	🔒 1	🔒 +0.0%

Other UTR Events at Fauxdegla Shooting Ground

⚙ Performance Stats DRAG TO MOVE

0.212s ● FAST

DB 80% · Py 16% · Render 3%

12 queries · avg 14.2ms · max 87.2ms

Render Breakdown

DB Logic (Pre-Render) 0.1705s

Python Logic (Pre-Render) 0.0350s

Full Page Render 0.0069s

QUERY TABLES ▾

⚠ event_review 4× 0.070s

shoot_event 2× 0.003s

shoot_score 2× 0.004s

site_configuration 2× 0.088s

ground 1× 0.004s

admin_menu_item 1× 0.001s

⚠ = queried 3+ times (cache candidate)

SQL QUERIES (12) — click to expand

#1 [02:15:31.123] 2.3ms

shoot_event

SELECT shoot_event.id AS shoot_event_id, shoot_event.cpsa_fixture_id AS shoot_event_cpsa_fixture_id, shoot_event.name AS shoot_event_name, shoot_event.date AS shoot_event_date, shoot_event.discipline AS shoot_event_discipline, shoot_event.ground AS shoot_event_ground, shoot_event.url AS shoot_event_…

#2 [02:15:31.127] 1.7ms

shoot_score

SELECT shoot_score.id AS shoot_score_id, shoot_score.targets AS shoot_score_targets, shoot_score.hits AS shoot_score_hits, shoot_score.points AS shoot_score_points, shoot_score.percentage AS shoot_score_percentage, shoot_score.shooter_id AS shoot_score_shooter_id, shoot_score.event_id AS shoot_score…

#3 [02:15:31.150] 2.0ms

shoot_score

SELECT avg(shoot_score.percentage) AS avg_1 
FROM shoot_score JOIN shoot_event ON shoot_score.event_id = shoot_event.id 
WHERE shoot_event.ground = %(ground_1)s AND shoot_event.discipline = %(discipline_1)s AND shoot_event.is_scraped = true AND shoot_event.admin_hidden != true AND shoot_event.id != …

#4 [02:15:31.153] 1.2ms

shoot_event

SELECT shoot_event.id AS shoot_event_id, shoot_event.cpsa_fixture_id AS shoot_event_cpsa_fixture_id, shoot_event.name AS shoot_event_name, shoot_event.date AS shoot_event_date, shoot_event.discipline AS shoot_event_discipline, shoot_event.ground AS shoot_event_ground, shoot_event.url AS shoot_event_…

#5 [02:15:31.155] 0.9ms

event_review

SELECT avg(event_review.rating) AS avg_1, count(event_review.id) AS count_1 
FROM event_review 
WHERE event_review.event_id = %(event_id_1)s

#6 [02:15:31.222] 66.8ms

event_review

SELECT count(*) AS count_1 
FROM (SELECT event_review.id AS event_review_id, event_review.event_id AS event_review_event_id, event_review.rating AS event_review_rating, event_review.review_text AS event_review_review_text, event_review.reviewer_name AS event_review_reviewer_name, event_review.review…

#7 [02:15:31.225] 1.1ms

event_review

SELECT event_review.id AS event_review_id, event_review.event_id AS event_review_event_id, event_review.rating AS event_review_rating, event_review.review_text AS event_review_review_text, event_review.reviewer_name AS event_review_reviewer_name, event_review.reviewer_hash AS event_review_reviewer_h…

#8 [02:15:31.226] 1.0ms

event_review

SELECT event_review.id AS event_review_id, event_review.event_id AS event_review_event_id, event_review.rating AS event_review_rating, event_review.review_text AS event_review_review_text, event_review.reviewer_name AS event_review_reviewer_name, event_review.reviewer_hash AS event_review_reviewer_h…

#9 [02:15:31.232] 4.4ms

ground

SELECT ground.id AS ground_id, ground.name AS ground_name, ground.url AS ground_url, ground.postcode AS ground_postcode, ground.what3words AS ground_what3words, ground.email AS ground_email, ground.website AS ground_website, ground.num_events_cpsa AS ground_num_events_cpsa, ground.num_events_cpsa_la…

#10 [02:15:31.234] 1.0ms

site_configuration

SELECT site_configuration.id AS site_configuration_id, site_configuration.key AS site_configuration_key, site_configuration.value AS site_configuration_value 
FROM site_configuration 
WHERE site_configuration.key LIKE %(key_1)s OR site_configuration.key LIKE %(key_2)s

#11 [02:15:31.322] 87.2ms

site_configuration

SELECT site_configuration.id AS site_configuration_id, site_configuration.key AS site_configuration_key, site_configuration.value AS site_configuration_value 
FROM site_configuration 
WHERE site_configuration.key IN (%(key_1_1)s, %(key_1_2)s, %(key_1_3)s, %(key_1_4)s)

#12 [02:15:31.324] 1.0ms

admin_menu_item

SELECT DISTINCT admin_menu_item.active_tab AS admin_menu_item_active_tab 
FROM admin_menu_item

LIVE REQUESTS (0) — click to expand

Universal Trench at Fauxdegla Shooting Ground

Unlock the full event analysis

Historical Trends at Fauxdegla Shooting Ground

Classification Deep Dive

Event Performance Analysis

Analyzing Data...

Refresh Complete

Already Up to Date?

Analyzing Data...

Refresh Complete

Already Up to Date?